DR. CHARLES LIEBER SENTENCED

You may or may not remember Dr. Charles Lieber, the Harvard chemistry and nanotechnology professor that was arrested during the height of the covid planscamdemic for allegedly not disclosing his financial ties to the Wuhan Chinese laboratory which  (according to the narradigm at that time) was also not responsible for the planscamdemic outbreak (the other part of the narradigm being, of course, that the injections were real vaccines even though they had to change the definition of vaccines in various dictionaries, and that they were entirely safe and effective, even th0ugh they required a seemingly endless set of "boosters", and even though people started manifesting various strange symptoms or, alternatively, just dropping dead  after getting them. "Death by medical coincidence" entered the vocabulary.)

But I digress. Back to Dr. Lieber. As it turned out and as the alternative media quickly discovered, he was not only an expert in vaccines, viruses, and so on, but also in nanotechnology, and had been apparently working in areas on delivering nano-scale sensors via injections to perpetually monitor a patient's health, and also to deliver medicine itself via a kind of built-in injector system. If that sounds rather similar to Baal Gates' plan to deliver nano-sensors into the human body via injections, that's because it is. Then came the stories of people who, having been injected by the quackcines which had, as it turns out, a variety of "secret Ingredients" that Big Pharma was unwilling to disclose - raising the distinct possibility that various different "recipes" were being tried out in different batch numbers on the public that had been transformed into human lab rats - started dying, and their autopsies (or funeral directors) discovered their blood vessels were literally clogged with long, stringy, rubbery clots. No one was asking the question, but it's an obvious one: was this the unintended (or worse, intended) consequence of the nano-technology element of the injections?

I rehearse all of this because they are the questions lying in back of the following article on Lieber's sentencing, shared by G.:

Charles Lieber Sentenced For Role In CCP-Backed Espionage Operation

Note the following:

In 2019, I was able to make a life-long dream of mine come true by willing myself onto InfoWars as a guest during Alex Jones' Christmas special on Jeffrey Epstein. I was involved in the feature for an investigation I did uncovering a network of shell companies operated by Mark Esptein, Jeffrey's brother, and Nadia Marcinko, his former pilot. In the days following the release of the report, Alex and I looked forward to another endeavor between the two of us. This was all of course in the now seemingly alternate reality preceding the madness that became the COVID-19 pandemic. At the time, people's concern over the virus was a diametrically opposed to the hysteria that would soon envelop them as it was still only localized to China. Despite that, Alex and I honed in on a particularly concerning story which raised our suspicions on the origins of the virus and its potential as a bioweapon meant to be unleashed upon the world: the arrest of Harvard scientist and NIH research fellow Charles Lieber.

Since his arrest, Lieber has become the prototypical supervillain of sorts for any aspiring screen writer. The life of this Faucian mad scientist mired in an espionage saga is the embodiment of the truth being stranger than fiction. Despite the drama surrounding the former DARPA-backed Harvard faculty member, his downfall would aptly be described as anti-climactic. Having been convicted by a jury in 2021 for following his arrest for concealing his affiliation with the Wuhan Institute of Technology in the months preceding the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, the sentence Lieber received can be categorized as a slap on the wrist at best. On April 26th, the former Chair of Harvard University’s Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department was sentenced to time served along with 2 years of supervised release including 6 months of house arrest as well as paying a fine of $50,000 and $33,600 in restitution to the IRS for his crimes. Lieber had only served two days in prison.

Given that fact that Lieber had received in excess of $15 million of grant funding from the National Institutes of Health and Department of Defense, Lieber had been repeatedly interviewed by the FBI as a person of interest regarding the communist-led espionage operation. Following Zheng's arrest, statements made by Lieber to federal law enforcement beforehand had been proven to be false, resulting in Lieber's arrest for two counts of making false statements to federal authorities, charges that were accompanied with two additional counts of income tax return fraud, and two others for failing to file reports of involvement with foreign banks with the IRS.

The sentence passed by the judge presiding over Lieber's case fell far below what federal prosecutors recommended. Yet, even what those prosecutors sought seemed lenient considering the gravity of his crimes. Their initial initial recommendation was for 90 days in prison, 1 year of supervised release including 3 months of house arrest, along with an increased fine of $150,000 combined with the same $33,600 in restitution due to the IRS.

Which leads to the unanswered questions:

While the ultimate penalty that Lieber faces for his crimes could be described as an injustice in and of itself, another component of his sentencing is the litany of unanswered questions that remain from his involvement with the CCP-backed espionage operation. Lieber's arrest came just a couple of months before a positive coronavirus case was first registered in the United States. The hysteria that followed cloaked the possibility that Lieber himself was a component of the research that was being done at the Wuhan Institute of Virology into genetically engineering a novel coronavirus. At the time, the premise that the virus had a lab origin was relegated to the realm of being a conspiracy theory. Presently, that theory has become an all but incontrovertible fact.

While the NIH's role in cultivating the virus behind what they have repeatedly categorized as the worst pandemic in a generation has somewhat come to light, the intricacies and scale of the program they were complicit in has yet to, if it ever even will be. Given the involvement Lieber had with the NIH and DARPA, his collusion with the CCP gives more credence to the idea that COVID-19 was developed as part of a biological weapons program that incorporated gain-of-function research. However, the soft sentencing handed down to Lieber suffices as a limited hangout of sorts, capping any further inquiries that could reveal the extent that the NIH knowingly cooperated in the development and theoretical deployment of COVID-19.

(italicized Emphasis added)

What the article does not say or indicate is whether or not Dr. Lieber received such light treatment in return for a pledge of cooperation in uncovering the extent of gain-of-function research by the National Institute of Health or the Wuhan laboratory itself. Hopefully the Federal Investigation Bureau (FIB) has not become so corrupt and weaponized that it neglected to solicit this element of cooperation from Lieber in return for a light sentence, but the way things have been going (downhill) for the past few misadministrations of the twenty-worst century, I'm not holding my breath.

On the face of it,  then, a possible actor or accomplice in some of the most heinous human experimentation in history has received a slap on the wrist, and the major questions have been closed down without further inquiry.  That, perhaps, was the objective all along.

What's the lesson here? If there is any, I suppose it is this: our quackademic institutions, our public health institutions, a few malcontents in the medical profession, and some big names in the pharmaceutical industry, would all seem to be so corrupt and power-hungry that they are willing to turn the entire global population into lab rats, first in releasing a "designer pathogen", and then in the release of a dubious and inadequately tested "cure", from which they reaped huge profits while exempting themselves from civil legal repercussions should anything go wrong, while the victims of this Mengele-on-steroids experiment continue to suffer and die of a bizarre and almost incomprehensible list of "adverse reactions" and "death by coincidence". At Nuremberg after the Second World War, such people were hung for crimes against humanity, and genocide. Now, they simply retire, and collect fat pension checks.

My proposal is therefore a mild one: the name of the Hippocratic Oath should be changed to the Hypocritical Oath....

See you on the flip side...