DELENDA EST NATO? STOLTENBERG NOW WANTS SANCTIONS AGAINST CHINA
Honestly, sometimes I think I've gone to sleep, died, and woke up in a bad dream being run by Looney Tunes cartoon characters, like I'm the guest star in some new version of Who Framed Roger Rabbit? where cartoons and real people mix and mingle in one world, with the corresponding chaos that ensues (like falling ACME safes, elevators in tall buildings that break the sound barrier on the way up or down, with corresponding G forces, and so on). In this case, the insanity was spotted and shared by one of our regular article spotters-and-sharers, V.T., who saw the following priceless example of Everything That Is Wrong And Just Frankly Completely Nuts About The West And Its Criminally Insane "Leadership".:
Beyond NATO's carefully disguised swastika logo(yes, it's there, you just have to think about it), the insanity here is a snapshot of Everything That is Wrong And Just Frankly Completely Nuts &c &c... the opening sentence in this article says it all:
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg proposed sanctioning China over its support for Russia amid the Russia-Ukraine war. Unlike the West, China has not directly provided countless aid packages to Russia, but China has kept trade open and exchanged technology with Moscow. Stoltenberg believes China must face “consequences” for not aligning with NATO.
The West is theoretically not at war with Russia or China. NATO is on the offensive, completely stepping over boundaries and harassing foreign nations to instigate World War III. Then they tell the public and mainstream media to announce that they are merely protecting their own people from our enemies who have done absolutely nothing to earn such a title.
Precisely what, I ask myself, is the business of The North Atlantic Treaty Organization in how Russia and China conduct their trade? I've no love lost for the current Chinese government, but on the other hand, how and with whom it chooses to conduct its trade is its business, not NATO's. And as for Russia, we've been listening to an endless stream of Putinophobia for decades now, and how he is some sort of New Stalin Intent Upon Conquering All Of Europe, and yet, in spite of all of this, and to anyone really paying close attention, he's been exercising remarkable restraint vis a vis his "conquest" of the Ukraine. The bottom line here is that NATO is establishing a very dangerous precedent if, on the pretext of any war it chooses to launch - like the Ukraine - it chooses to sanction any nation based on the fact that that nation refuses to agree with NATO's narrative on the war it has chosen to start.
The insanity is deeper than it looks: presumably, in order to sanction a country - like China - one has to produce things that the sanctionee wants to buy, and you also want to deny it the currency it needs to do so. About the only thing I can thing of that NATO exports to China is automobiles, and the last time I looked, the Chinese seem to like principally German cars - Audis, Mercedes, BMWs - but you don't see very many Saabs, Volvos, Peugots, Citroens, Fiats, Lamborginis, Ferraris, Rolls-Royces, Jaguars, or Minis running around. Other than that, what are you going to sanction them with? Airplanes? Nope. The Chinese make their own. Trains? Nope. The Chinese make their own. Money? Nope. The Chinese make their own. And given their bad habit of copying everything, automobiles are probably not far behind. The bad news is, if China ever wakes up and throws the corruption that is the CCP out of power, and starts dealing with its own corruption problems effectively, watch out. After all, they've successfully landed a lunar probe on the far side of the Moon, while the USSA's Boeing has successfully stranded two astronauts on the space station. China, you'd better be afraid, very afraid. (Frankly, if we could weaponize and bottle this incompetence, and export it to China, then, yes, the Chinese would have reason to be afraid.)
Currency? Well, the Chinese seem to be abandoning dollars as fast as they can, and the recent message of the USA to Saudi Arabia disclosing that country's intelligence participation in the 9/11 attacks does not seem to be producing the needed response in Riyadh, as the Saudis are still not back on the petrodollar. Time will tell what the escalation from that will be.
The article raises the following telling point:
Should NATO also punish India, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, and others for continuing to trade with Russia? NATO has absolutely no authority to demand that other nations shun Russia from the global economy. They know that these proposed sanctions would not deter China from conducting business with Russia. Instead, these “consequences” will cause China and all other non-NATO nations to back away from trading with the West entirely. Will they do the same to nations who continue to trade with China once they redirect their focus to Taiwan? Will they force “consequences” upon nations who do not support Israel
Precisely. What other nations do or not do vis-a-vis Russia or China is their business, and it's presumption of the highest order that assumes NATO can or should dictate the foreign and/or trading policies of a Brazil or India vis-a-vis Russia or China or the Ukraine. This brings me to today's main point. In the wake of the crack-up of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact, there were those wondering why NATO had to be maintained. You can count me in that column. What possible use could it have? We've seen what its use is to the Globalooneyists and the American Neocons: it's their catspaw, their front, their excuse, to meddle. It's a system of alliances that has outworn its original purpose, thrashing about to find another purpose to justify its continued existence... but that impending neo-Stalinist Invasion of Europe from Russia has failed to materialize. Its worthlessness to Europe and to sane financial policy is evident to all from the insanity of Mr. Stoltenberg's proposals. It is now nothing but an engine for the West's ultimate destruction, as the Armstrong Economics article puts it, and with which I wholeheartedly concur:
NATO has zero reason to back Ukraine on paper as it is not a member. They do not plan to offer Ukraine membership at the upcoming Washington summit, but Stoltenberg said they will place the framework to “build a bridge” to future membership. Stoltenberg congratulated NATO members for contributing more to the alliance this year than ever before. This global force is a danger to civilization itself as it aims to propel us into a global conflict from which there will be no turning back. (emphasis added)
Precisely. This is Mr. Globalooney's economic and geopolitical mess to clean up. Europe has no vested interest in it, and let's hope the recent European Parliament elections are an indicator that Europe is waking up and coming to its senses, because ask yourself: What interest does France, or Germany, or Italy, or the United Kingdom, have in a trade war with China, or a hot war with Russia? Answer: none.
See you on the flip side...
(If you enjoyed this blog, please share with your friends.)
No Comments
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
You do understand that the star of NATO is an ancient symbol for the same sky/sun god the swastika represents. They changed the packaging that’s all.
State Department Announces Forcing Gay Sex on Foreign Countries is a Matter of National Security
https://dailystormer.in/state-department-announces-forcing-gay-sex-on-foreign-countries-is-a-matter-of-national-security/
Andrew Anglin June 28, 2024
Antony Blinken, from the US Department of State website:
https://www.state.gov/secretary-antony-j-blinken-at-a-reception-in-honor-of-pride-month-2/
“Defending, promoting LGBTQI+ rights globally is the right thing to do, but beyond that, it’s the smart and necessary thing to do for our country, for our national security, for our well-being. And why is that? It’s pretty basic. If you look around the world and look at the countries that respect the rights of the LGBTQI+ community, they’re more stable, they’re healthier, they’re more prosperous, they’re more democratic. Those that don’t are not. And that’s a pretty basic thing, because a world of stable, healthy, prosperous, democratic countries is a world that’s good for the United States. A world that features the opposite is not. And there is a direct correlation – a direct correlation – between countries that respect these rights and the health of their societies that we see every day.”
(…)
Asymetrical warfare that doesn’t look like warfare is the only way a wealthy small majority of the population have a chance of defeating 1 billion of their unsuspecting neighbors. But to do it successfuly you got to have enough money to take control of their education through lobbying, own and produce their cultural media narratives and heroes, and buy off their political leaders. People make the mistake that modern wars are no longer about religious objectives and are just about power and wealth. Politicians are afraid to look at it for fear of losing their biggest donors or being politically and financially destroyed. The biggest, most influential alternative media outlets won’t look at it for the same financial concerns. And Media influential Evangelicals won’t point it out because many have been bought off and compromised. I don’t even like pointing it out but that’s where the circumstantial evidence leads anyone who investigates the money trail, main historical actors, and the world’s most secretive religious belief systems.
“But to do it successfuly you got to have enough money to take control of their education”
Bologna, Pisa, Curriculum 21
What have educational reforms to do with cultural hegemony?
https://www.zeit-fragen.ch/en/archives/2016/no-20-23-september-2016/bologna-pisa-curriculum-21
by Dieter Sprock
Zeit-Fragen Cooperative
More and more parents throughout Europe are wondering what is going on in the schools in their countries. Their children no longer learn to properly read, write and count, and parents spend hours after their work, to teach them what would actually be the school’s task. Private learning aids are booming. (…)
The problems are well known. For more than twenty years in many European countries conformist school and university reforms have been following one another where two international organisations act as key players, namely the OECD, responsible for managing the school developments via Pisa, and the EU with the Bologna process at tertiary level.
How Bologna has changed the university landscape
On 19 June 1999, at the University of Bologna the EU Ministers of Education signed a declaration of intent for the European education area, the so-called “Bologna Declaration”, by means of which European Higher Education was adapted to the American Bachelor/Master system.
Also present was a seven-member Swiss delegation, consisting of representatives of politics and science, headed by State Secretary Charles Kleiber. This one signed the declaration as well – against the advice of the accompanying University Rectors – whereby also in Switzerland the conversion to the Anglo-American system was introduced without prior discussion. Just one week earlier the Plenary Assembly of the Rectors’ Conference of Swiss Universities had declared that the present declaration was unacceptable for Switzerland.2
Via Bologna a uniform European educational area was to be created and the duration of study to be shortened. Uniform criteria and methods of quality control, the European Credit Transfer System (ECTS), were to make the achievements in the various study courses and countries measurable and comparable. Thus, mobility and employability of students were to be improved and the competitiveness of European Universities vis à vis global competition was to be safeguarded.
Nothing was achieved. The result has been a market economy-oriented and bureaucratic monster restricting the freedom of teaching and research and transforming universities into economic businesses and students into customers. Financially strong companies are increasingly pushing research in a direction that promises profit. “More competition, more performance, more efficiency – and above all, more Europe [i.e. EU] these are the slogans”, Matthias Daum writes in Die Zeit.3
In an interview with the Sonntagszeitung, the Zurich sociologist and critic of Bologna, Kurt Imhof, speaks of “bulimia-learning: guzzeling, vomiting, forgetting”. The doctrine was reduced to the mainstream. And the teaching staff was forced to “standardize the knowledge and then to query it via multiple-choice tests.” Knowledge, nowadays, was transmitted through a funnel and checked at the end. “Students no longer think outside the box. Due to a lack of time they are no longer able to deal critically with anything and they are increasingly limited to what is current”, Imhof says.4
How PISA redesigns the “Volksschule” (primary and secondary school) and controls the learning content
The transformation of the “Volksschule” which, through the propagation of individualising learning methods had its beginning in the late sixties, received a new push by PISA. Fueled by the overwhelming media coverage, the publication of the first test results led at the beginning of this century in some European countries to the so-called “PISA shock”. Subsequently and in the spirit of the PISA-makers they began to align their education policies for a better performance in the “international comparison” and to coordinate the learning content with the tests. In this way, the learning content was to be standardised, and made measurable and controllable worldwide. “The supposedly neutral PISA-test”, says didactics lecturer Jochen Krautz in an interview with the “Neue Zürcher Zeitung”, “leads to a completely new concept of education. It is no longer about knowledge, but the ability of ADAPTATION.”5
Closely associated with PISA is the competency orientation. But in the sense of the PISA tests such competence has nothing to do with the notion of competent people whom we all cherish, but leads to an action-oriented trivialisation of the school.
The individualising learning methods do not mean individual support, as some well-meaningly might have believed, but isolation. They are aimed at the abolition of classroom teaching. 5;;;°
Teachers are to be replaced by the computer. 5;;;°
The Seizure of Switzerland and Curriculum 21
In order for this shift of paradigm in Switzerland to be made possible, the elementary schools had to be loosened from their direct-democratic anchoring. The supervision of schools, which until ten years ago was performed by representatives of the municipal and district school care, elected by the people for four years, has been partly transferred to so-called professional “expert bodies for school assessment”, none of which is democratically legitimated.5;;;°
A study carried out by proponents (!) of the reforms in the research field “State in transformation”(!) at the University of Bremen describes in surprise how the reformers succeeded in eliminating the “veto players” in Switzerland and in significantly shaping through clever manipulation the domestic debate on the reforms of the education system.8 (…)
“Why did they go for PISA?”
(…)
The second phase began also with a shock, this time triggered by the disastrous results of the national education report, “A Nation at Risk” by the US itself in the early eighties. As a result and under the threat of its withdrawal the federal government urged the OECD to develop international educational standards. They wanted to enforce control over the educational policies of the US states similar to the cantons in Switzerland and the federal states in Germany. The OECD gave in to the pressure. Thus, it became the most important educational actor and invented PISA.
The third phase is characterised by the definition of a political and economic strategy for the EU member states through the European Council. Triggered by the “post-socialist globalisation process” and shocked by the results of the first PISA test the German-speaking countries, including Switzerland, took over the educational standards developed in the US and propagated by the OECD, although, according to Langer, the US itself had “made far from uniformly positive experiences” with it. (…)
Internationalisation of education policy
A great number of studies now exist that are concerned with the management of education policy by international organisations such as the OECD and the EU. (…)
In their work on “Paradoxien der Neuen Staatsräson. Die Internationalisierung der Bildungspolitik in der EU und der OECD” (“Paradoxes of the New Reason of State. The Internationalisation of Education Policy in the EU and the OECD”)10 the social scientists Kerstin Martens and Klaus Dieter Wolf examine the growing influence of international organisations on the education policy of the nation states and come to the conclusion that, in recent years, both the EU and the OECD have unexpectedly gained in importance in the field of national education reforms. (…) According to the authors, their success is attributable to a “manipulation of the balance of power within the states”, in which both organisations use their influence on the political cadres of the national governments to enforce their interests (…)
If you are willing to take a close look, there can be no doubt about the influence exerted by the two US-dominated organisations, the OECD and the EU, on Europe‘s education policy. And it is incomprehensible that the European countries and, unfortunately, even Switzerland are willing to accept American educational standards, although the US – apart from a few elite schools and universities, which do not teach according to these principles – are known for their poor educational system. (…)
What does all this have to do with cultural hegemony?
Zbigniew Brzezinski, author of “The Grand Chessboard. American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives”14, pays particular attention to America’s “cultural domination”, which, he writes, has “been an underappreciated facet of American global power”. America’s mass culture exercises a magical appeal, especially on young people all over the world. “American television programs and films account for about three-fourths of the global market. (…)
Brzezinski leaves no doubt that America is ready to use these advantages in its favour. American dominance, he writes, “is exercised through a global system of distinctively American design”. To a much greater extent than earlier imperial systems, the American “global system emphasises the technique of co-optation”. Likewise, it relies heavily on the “indirect exercise of influence on dependent foreign elites”. (Brzezinski, p. 25)
(…)
Americans are turning against the Hollywood and Music Label brainwashing and cultural degradation apparatus in increasing droves. Many parents in the USA, the one’s that still pay attention and have an interest in their kid’s future anyway, are unhappy with the new education system as well. The people who have come up with and control all this don’t send their kids to public school however. They have their own schools and way of teaching that is much superior. But their schools have strict religious and cultural segregation measures in place. No wonder they now dominate science, law, and business. It’s kind of like that’s the plan.
1) look at the design of the NATO headquarters from above. Clearly the SS (schutzstaffel) sign. Just googe
2) and we all think Mark Rutte is going to solve this: or are we like me certain that he (the teflon man) will ignite the WW3 spark. He might be younger but has the same brainpower as Biden
Yes, the NATO Headquarters, in Brussels, look like Harry Potter’s scar, in aerial view, bestowed on him, by Vatican Voldemort, the dark lord.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/Brussels_NATO_Headquarters_02.jpg
The original Scythian rune means marriage, which comes after the rune of the skilled worker, and is followed, by the rune of general tribal assembly.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/pnz9jpb73u1gfla/druidry-for-dummies.pdf
NATO intends to do Samson on a planetary scale since Western Europe knows it’s going over the cliff they plan to take the rest of the World with them to HELL.
When getting ready for war, and all ‘sides’ are in, no one is too school to be in school. As are you, and me, and all of us. This is how it looks. Do your champions prevail, is that the theory? Though there is precious little to love about war, when the real one comes, it takes its own course.
Wow, that swastika! Once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
Originally, the swastika is a Scythian symbol, brought to India, in the sixth century, during the Persian invasion, that included both Scythian and Greek mercenaries, of whom the former mastered the Scythian (Parthian) shot, whose training method became known, as Ashtanga Yoga, in India, and, in Scandinavia, as Odin’s Scythian sports.
A swastika is basically a proto-Scythian Olam, that marks four peaks of a time cycle, which either refers, to the year’s four seasons, or, to the four tides of the day – as the four compass directions. Basically, the swastika is a navigator’s tool, that is first referred to, in the Book of Genesis, as the four rivers, defining the four major compass directions.
The Vatican political branch has hijacked the swastika – along with the runes – for nefarious purposes, in an attempt, to subdue the Scythian descent in Europe, which is exposed, by simply deciphering the runes, whose content renders the Vatican as proven fraud, because the runes are just an IQ-test, that determines rightful tribal leadership.
The Vatican’s political branch, the Nazis, and its armed offshoot, NATO, don’t have a clue, about the real function of their stolen feathers, because identity theft doesn’t produce a real McCoy.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/pnz9jpb73u1gfla/druidry-for-dummies.pdf
With one sleepy eye, opened and perusing the transition from mass formation to the mass deformation of reality, one truly feels like, turning over, pulling the blankets around one and returning to the arms of Morpheus.
If/when the USSA goes to war with China, we have to consider that there are over 250,000 Chinese “students” here in the USSA, not to mention those that have crossed the former borders of the USSA. I’m sure that they’re all good boys and girls though!
Today, Texas is a city in Russia, and, it will become more evident in time, when a major bulk dissidence rides off the reservation, into the setting sun.
It seems that there are fanatical Evangelicals in NATO, US, Europe and the UK plus some Jews who are praying for Armageddon and to achieve this outcome they are stoking conflicts in the Ukraine and Gaza. Igniting WW3 is their aim and they will not stop.
This documentary gives a good overview of what is happening in the US.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m001z96s/storyville-praying-for-armageddon
Yep… their Messiahs continues to be a no-show though. The only sure thing, in my opinion, is a repeat of what the Babylonians and Romans did to Jerusalem. Every group or individual that has predicted the “end” of the world (and it’s accompanying events) has been WRONG.
About the problems Boeing is experiencing with its plane parts, if you look into it a bit, it kind of looks like Boeing may be suffering from industrial sabotage. The parts manufacturing part of Boeing was split off awhile back and was bought by a big investment fund manager. Appears these big hedge funds have been quitely buying up and running huge profitable industries for a while now. And ever since then a lot of potential shenanigans seem to have become common, most notably cutting corners to maximize profits. The same company that makes Boeing’s questionable parts also makes the same version of parts for Europe’s Airbus which is a major competitor of Boeing. Airbus doesn’t seem to be plagued with the same issue however. When you look at Spirit (and who runs the troubled parts manufacturer) that split from Boeing but was recently bought pack by Boeing to fix this problem things get a little interesting. It appears the airline industry is looking to phase out big jets and move to smaller business class jets that are cheaper to run, maintain, and build. They also put out less pollution and in the near future travel may become a lot more restrictive as well so jumbo jets may not be as necessary. Anyways there is a third major commercial aero space industry that already mainly just makes business class jets and that is state owned. The state that owns them brags to be the real Second Eye of the clandestine world as well. This is where the past CEO of the people who bought Spirit from Boeing and his background and identity gets a little interesting. Perhaps Boeing whistle blowers were not silenced for blowing the whistle but to cover who put them up to the whistle blowing in the first place and why. Just speculation, not claiming this is indeed the case. What’s happening to Boeing may just be another part of the shadow war between opposing factions of the world’s so called elite.
I like the association of NATO with Carthage. NATO is by definition a sea power and relies heavily on soldiers of fortune. It is also run by a family. Barkas rhymes to Bush as well as to Biden.
Regarding your comment that the Chinese will soon be making their own copied versions of German automobiles, It gets closer every day. The Chinese make a copy of the popular Porsche Macan that is VERY close to the original, the Zotye T700.
The Chinese actually do like Lamborghinis and Bentleys now that they make SUVs ( a lot of their roads require an SUV and don’t work well for sports cars) But… Bentley and Lamborghini and Audi are all part of the German owned Volkswagen group.
Keep up the good work Dr. Farrell!
Honestly, at times, I think I’ve woken up in a parallel universe.
I even posed such a question; with supporting “evidence”, in a recent vid-chat.
Such bizarre “strangeness” just didn’t happen, in the universe – I was born into.
LOL! Clever NATO swastika design[plus the Chase Bank one, you also recognized] !
[write a book/webinar on the Nazi infiltrations vs McCarthy books on communists infiltrations.]
Of course, “they’ve” been FUBAR’d ever since North Korea lined-up with Russia.
Indeed, Russia has been exercising remarkable restraint in The Ukraine War[West vs Russia]; as Paul Craig Roberts continually harps about in his daily blogs.
It is, as if the Nazis won the war; so what’s so strange about the NATO Nazi policies, aligning with their brother Nazis in DC?
It is, as if; the “West” has a game changing weapon it wishes to launch upon the globe.
But so do other players, have such game changing technologies.
Which means, the intelligences of the West are more about gaming the system[s] with bogus intelligence. To what ends?
Is there a Cosmic interest in making the current conflict go beyond control.
And, over into the realm; of Cosmic control?
Much about this parallel universe is the slow & sure transformation into another realm; where digital control is being manifested across all arenas, colosseums, and social mediums.
Cosmic control across a galactic digital bridge/medium.
Where AI is a major cog unplugging analogue connections?
Pinocchio Stoltenblooper explains Ukranus bankruptcy, as China tea, in the Russian sam-o-war. The panda did it!
NATO is the armed forces of the Vatican, created, specifically, to spread systemic Catholicism, globally, which is, why NATO doesn’t make sense, politically.
The Vatican filioque, and its revolutionary derivatives, don’t fare well, with the so-called heathens, which is, why Jesuit missionaries had to be deprogrammed in Japan.
Russia is an ideological threat, to the Vatican, because fallen Samaria rose in Crimea, and gave birth to the Scythians, who poured into Europe, as hell-bent heathens.
China is betting, on the Scythian horse of Odin, who became the eight-legged Buddha wheel, in martial arts – known – as horcruxes in Potterverse.
The origin of Buddha wheel:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/pih0162nwhdrpd1/blue-banshee.jpg
A letter from Harry Potter:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/scl/fi/3cvesey7nnwjfcowll55g/letter-from-harry-potter.pdf?rlkey=7pyf08vjkuxlmqffhfdpzt936
BTW, it is a geopolitical paradox, that both Russian sam-o’-war, and British man-o’-war, are fuelled by China tea, which leads to the conclusion, that the panda did it, and not the butler…
The Chinese have always had lofty expectations, and it is apparent they ‘believe’ they are intent on fulfilling their prime objective, i.e. WW-3, or perhaps a more salient term, a 5th Dimensional war. What is the ‘face’ of China? It is the harmless, yet inscrutable PANDA BEAR, which always wears a ‘smile’ on its face. China has already ensnared America, think here about China Joe Biden-ese, the perpetually ‘dumbed-down’ ruler of America. However, there are 2 other worthy opponents to be added into the mix in this conflict. Those dastardly Ruskies have been ‘courting’ the North Koreans for several years, and their relationship has never, ever been more cordial, and friendly. Throw into the witches brew how Japan is changing their monetary system, and who can fathom why the Russians have been wooing India for several years? Lots more could be written here, but if a Person wanted to ‘bottom-line’ the highly important events it would be that the BRICS alliance in not too far away from its abandonment of the USA’s Dollar, and the downfall of its status as the World’s reserve currency.
USA course is full force against China international role in commerce or dare I say geopolitics, since first Trump and is being continued presently.
Hence these words by Stoltenberg are actually warnings against EU countries not China. Unless USA opens up their markets and technological know-how wide (similarly to the period afer WWII), than good luck with trying to keep everybody in line.
President of Poland, A. Duda must have not heard the memo, and went to China with 4 day state visit. And why wouldn’t he, Intel just scraped $5bln investments in Poland.
https://english.www.gov.cn/news/202406/25/content_WS6679fce6c6d0868f4e8e87d5.html
Too true Nidster.
As if “they” want to destroy what remains of the USA.
The USSA is already doing a damn good job of that.