THINGS THAT MAKE YOU THINK “AS IN THE DAYS OF NOAH…”
This story was noticed and shared by several of you - W.G., D.C., S.D. and a few others, with our thanks - and it's another reminder that the scientismists, technocrats, and so-called "ethicists", running (and ruining) this civilization have little to no humanity or human empathy. In fact, the story reminds me, again, of a certain novel of C.S. Lewis that I've often mentioned in recent blogs, and that I will mention again.
The version of the story that I want to focus on for the purpose of this blog is the version shared by W.G., as it brings together all the elements - soulless "ethicists" and technocrats ensconced in the halls of quackademia asserting their considered scientismistic opinion that "boyoids" will feel no pain - into one miserific transhumanist vision of the bright and endless vista of virtual immortality that will be visited on all who can afford it:
Notice all the propatainment techniques at work just in the headline and subtitle alone: beginning the whole headline with the phrase "ethically sourced", then immnediately following that, the introduction of what is supposedly "ethical", namely the "spare human bodies" and then the supporting "argument" that all of this would reduce the reliance on animal testing, improve the development of new drugs, &c &c blah blah blah. Here they missed a golden opportunity, for they might have mentioned that such "bodyoids" would have eliminated the need for the covert op called the planscamdemic in order to test their potions on human subjects under the guise of government and corporate mandates to get jabbed with the potion or else lose your job. No planscamdemic necessary if only we had a decent supply of bodyoids to test our concoctions on!
Isn't transhumanist technocracy and scientism wonderful? And notice, we're not even past the headline yet. The opening paragraph of the "op-ed" article is - as we say here - a whopper doozie, and is followed by two more paragraphs that are themselves whopper doozies:
Why do we hear about medical breakthroughs in mice, but rarely see them translate into cures for human disease? Why do so few drugs that enter clinical trials receive regulatory approval? And why is the waiting list for organ transplantation so long? These challenges stem in large part from a common root cause: a severe shortage of ethically sourced human bodies.
It may be disturbing to characterize human bodies in such commodifying terms, but the unavoidable reality is that human biological materials are an essential commodity in medicine, and persistent shortages of these materials create a major bottleneck to progress.
This imbalance between supply and demand is the underlying cause of the organ shortage crisis, with more than 100,000 patients currently waiting for a solid organ transplant in the US alone. It also forces us to rely heavily on animals in medical research, a practice that can’t replicate major aspects of human physiology and makes it necessary to inflict harm on sentient creatures. (Emphasis added)
Pay attention to that argument for why we need "bodyoids": we could stop doing harm to sentient creatures, i.e., animals, in pharmaceutical and medical research; we''ll get back to that in a moment. Then comes the argument for "bodyoids":
There might be a way to get out of this moral and scientific deadlock. Recent advances in biotechnology now provide a pathway to producing living human bodies without the neural components that allow us to think, be aware, or feel pain. Many will find this possibility disturbing, but if researchers and policymakers can find a way to pull these technologies together, we may one day be able to create “spare” bodies, both human and nonhuman.
There might be a "catch", however:
Of course, exciting possibilities are not certainties. We do not know whether the embryo models recently created from stem cells could give rise to living people or, thus far, even to living mice. We do not know when, or whether, an effective technique will be found for successfully gestating human bodies entirely outside a person. We cannot be sure whether such bodyoids can survive without ever having developed brains or the parts of brains associated with consciousness, or whether they would still serve as accurate models for living people without those brain functions.
And that, I submit, is the "catch", the big fat ugly moral and physiological problem squatting in the middle of this otherwise thoroughly disgusting proposal. Despite the attempts to appear "reasonable" and "concerned" about human sensibilities about the proposal, I'm not buying it. This is, after all, an American quackademy, and one of the leading quackademic institutes for scientism and technocracy. The piece is not really an op-ed piece; it's a narrative preparation piece. What it is talking about has probably already covertly been done. What it really appears to be trying to do is to reassure everyone that "they" are confident their "bodyoids" can feel and experience no pain.
In other words, the article and all its premises are based upon the implicit assumption that "they" have figured out consciousness, and that its root and basis exists in the brain and the nervous system. Remove these, and one can have "non-person" bodyoids that can be bought and sold as a commodity. These two implicit assumptions undergird the whole nauseating article and proposal.
Call me old fashioned, a Luddite, a curmudgeon, a dogmatist, a relic from the by-gone age of faith, a traditionalist, call me whatever epithet or name you wish. But the bottom line is: the mystery of human consciousness has not ever been adequately fastened down. Remember the case in France of a man lacking almost 97% of the mass of a normal brain. He experienced pain, functioned, had emotions, and so on. We all know of the cases of coma victims with no brain function, waking up and telling everyone that they heard and saw them, when scientism said such things were impossible. And then, on top of all of this, to turn life into a commodity.
So, not only "no" but a firm and unequivocal NO! I do not want to be the guinea pig in your experiments: I do not want your potions, concoctions , philtres, tinctures, and elixirs, made from the harvested body parts of humans, whether grown in "bodyoids" or not. I do not want a transplanted organ from some luckless individual grown in a vat at MIT, which assures me it experienced no pain or suffering to supply whatever "replacement part" I might need. Trust these people to stop there?
Ausgeschlossen!
It is worth reminding ourselves what sorts of people they are: in the name of science they will commit all sorts of atrocities; think only of the camp "doctors" in Nazi Germany. Think only of Dr. Fausti, torturing beagles in Tunisia. And now they want to grow monsters in a vat without brains or nerves and reassure us that it is a new path forward.
Not only NO, but HELL NO, because that is indeed what they are advocating: Hell, the Hell of C.S. Lewis' That Hideous Strength, that promises "immortality" by an endless supply of replaceable body parts, beginning with the severed head of a guillotined French murderer.
See you on the flip side...
(If you enjoyed today's blog, please share with your friends.)
No Comments
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
Dr. Farrell:
Please enjoy this excellent write-up on the history of brain and head transplants.
https://scitales.com/the-living-head-a-gruesome-curiosity/
Humble question: why is my „comment awaiting moderation“?
Truly horrifying, could the fires of Heaven be far off now?
The “spare” in the heading of the article reminded me of that book by Prince Harry who claims that as the 2nd boy, he was conceived as a “spare” for for the chosen eldest brother. I didn’t read the book but understood that he made references to his body parts also being part of the “spare parts” deal of his life as a royal.
Harry princeling is a whistleblower, whose overseas residence is a modern trend, that places royal spares, in the New World – just in case, that the Jew royals – as special guardians of safe zones, for persecuted globetrotters – would face a guillotine backlash, in Europe. Harry ‘the snippy-zapped’ Potter says, in his autobiography:
“Ethically sourced human bodies.” We already have them. We call them human beings. These human bodies without nervous systems or brains? So – less than 100% people? Like the 3/5s people also known as slaves in the American South. Remember the 3/5 Compromise where slaves were counted as 3/5 of a person for the purpose of deciding how many representatives a state could send to the House in Congress? Those were “ethically sourced human bodies.” Bought and sold. Are these Heinrich Himmlers of science really trying to go there? Or is it Southern Heritage all over again? How do we turn human bodies into commodities? The goal of capitalism where the bottom line justifies any and all behavior. Does Bill Gates want to go from growing dinner meat in a petri dish to human bodies in a petri dish? Because the easier way to accomplish this will be to create bodies with nerves and brains and then pith them, so to speak. Destroy the nerve tissue “so they can’t feel anything.” Do it before they are conscious. Achieve their goal in a reverse manner because it’s more cost effective. Because that’s what the bottom line, and profits and shareholders, demand. That’s the ethics of capitalism – whatever serves the bottom line. This agenda of “ethically sourced human bodies” is a dark piece of mind control on the road to Hell.
The real, undiluted, hard-core message, from the biblical narrative, is the Bronze Age man’s resistance – against being herded, like mindless cattle, into an imperial control system, a Tower of Babel, where he is enslaved, and culled, by lunatic elitists, who are ancient parasites.
Because of the brave resistance, of the Scythian horse archer, then (1) the Assyrian empire fell, whereafter, it was briefly revived, as (2) the Neo-Babylonian empire, that was then overthrown, by (3) the Persian empire, which, in turn, was conquered, by (4) Greek imperialism, to be overtaken, by (5) the Roman Empire, that fell, and morphed, into the Vatican imperial idolatry, the hidden empire of (6) the Roman Catholic Church – the present day’s mafia octopus incarnation.
The final piece of the jigsaw puzzle is realising, that the Scythian war trophy – the skull cup – from the 7th century BC, became revived, in the 1st century AD – as the ceremonial toast, at the Last Supper – which is de facto a Scythian declaration of war, against the Roman Empire.
When Scythian Odin sets war court, in Scandinavia, in the 1st century AD, then he is the Scythian Pendragon, who defeats the Roman Empire.
I have never read C.S. Lewis, but what came to mind was a movie I have not seen but know of: The Island, in which clones live until they are needed for their body parts. And these are the people who put down science fiction, fantasy, mythology, and folk tales, proving that they are arrogant, stupid idiots.
The Gremlins’ imperial theme park:
H. G. Wells’ “The Island of Doctor Moreau” (1896) is about a dystopian Britain, being flooded, into an imperial melting pot.
C. S. Lewis’ “The Magician’s Nephew” (1955) cracks the Catholic melting pot, by the means of a vibrant incantation, from a bardic lion.
The Jew royals, as evil double agents on thrones, are Freemasonic heads of Catholic melting pots, in the Vatican’s imperial provinces.
Those men, who resist being experimented on, are the perpetual, nonconformist Protestants, who, in their hard-core version, are Scythian bards.
Steven Spielberg’s parody:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/scl/fi/451kqn4oprh2ul0xx4pij/steven-spielberg-parody.jpg?rlkey=njjk54olr83shn53fcs753pou
Check out the movie “Never Let Me Go” – it explores the clone consciousness issues in an interesting manner.
A main problem our science has in understanding the living human being is that it keeps using the wrong model. Science takes a dead human being, and then pumps it with fluids to make it not decay. Then science cuts the cadaver into many parts, and names them all. Supposedly, this gives us an accurate map to overlay on the living human. But this is akin to going to the lumber yard, getting a 2×4 stick of wood, and thinking you understand a living tree. How ridiculous! You might understand something about wood, its hardness, its ability to be modified and shaped, its utility in building structures – we’ve created entire cities with just this understanding of wood. But this doesn’t lead to an understanding of a tree – a 2×4 will never reveal the secret of photosynthesis, or the oxygen/carbon dioxide exchange through the leaves. We can’t understand the fluids moving though the trunk and branches, nor the way soil nutrients feed the roots. And we can’t imagine the connection of a single tree to the other trees in the forest, or to other plant species.
But this is the standard confusion of science, as it forces the map of a cadaver onto a living human being. They will never understand the truth of human, or get an accurate perspective on consciousness, breath or even the simplest concepts of health. Of course their perspective will lead to clones, as they already think of humans as “parts” and machines. But they will never get this right, as we are much more than parts. We are physical, psycho-emotional, energetic, spirit entities – and what is happening on one “layer” is simultaneously happening on all “layers.” And consciousness pervades it all.
This sounds awfully like the 2010 movie “Never Let Me Go,” based upon the book of the same title. Well worth a watch or a read for anyone on the fence about this issue.
Re:
Science fiction films
What’s next? Bodyoids providing life energy for self-proclaimed Homo Superior individuals, whilst they subtly manipulate the rest to consume, conform and obey? And when you lose hope, use the chance to have a nice death and be turned into a green cookie to feed the hungry masses.
Typical day. Had to reboot.
Must be “improving” service.
Your headline reminded me of Ralph Nader’s,
“Did they teach you to believe?
Or, did they teach you to think?”.
Ironically, when it comes to “them”;
I’m reminded of the old classic sci-fi film “Them”
Giant ANTS!
Not man,
A highly socialized “HIVE – mindset”.
To the post – with haste.
And there it is.
Again, reminded of the many sci-fi films, novels, and nonfiction:
Clones.
Like Star Wars: The Clone Wars.
Just another of “THEM” roads to hell;
paved with faux-narratives, of media’s good intentions.
Unfortunately; many will follow the Hive-Mindset, as designed.
Just another brick in the wall.
No excuses for the suffering “THEM” breeds.
No heart beats for THEM.
Anyone caught with a heart; is terminated; posthaste.
And, remember, in this “op-ed”; THEM is admitting to…
these Frankenstein bodyoids.
What aren’t THEM admitting to?
And that’s the rub.
These wannabe gods, have no pulse on the “real” mind/consciousness.
It’s so like THEM tp pretend to have hearts and/or minds.
But, scrath deeply , and you’ll find only “copies”.
Nothing “real”.
They can only manage “facsimiles”.
Scratch even deeper, and you’ll find you’ll find.
Re-Branded Slave Traders.
All Traitors, to: a man.
sorry, still working on my first coffee
Lindzen is his name
I highly recommend. “Climate: The Movie”. Excellent remake of “The Great Global Warming Swindle”
I canceled my subscriptioni to MIT’s Tech Review for this reason, over 20 years ago
Tech Review is eaten up with propaganda and modern scientific claptrap
If MIT would spend half as much time on legitimate research as it does on brainwashing and social engineering, the world’s problems would have been solved 50 years ago
MIT is fully on board with Man-Made Global Warming although they have a meterology department headed by a majorly respected meteorologist who says the theory is just crap
I canceled my subscriptioni to MIT’s Tech Review for this reason, over 20 years ago
Tech Review is eaten up with propaganda and modern scientific claptrap
If MIT would spend half as much time on legitimate research as it does on brainwashing and social engineering, the world’s problems would have been solved 50 years ago
Jew royals keep duped subjects, whom they call cattle-goys.
A golem is their bodyoid automaton, which is a puppet slave.
Karma is a millstone, hung around their neck, to be drowned, in the depths of the sea. Matthew 18:6.
The Prisoner [1967] – I’m not a number, I’m a free man!
https://youtu.be/nW-bFGzNMXw
BTW, those criminals, who – today – falsely call themselves Jews, are the descendants of the marauding carpetbaggers, whom the Assyrian empire brought into the area, as tactical replacement population, when the ten northern tribes were deported, north, into the Median territory.
In the first century BC, the marauding carpetbaggers falsely claimed the Judahite identity, on behalf of the Julio-Claudian imperial dynasty, to uproot Yahweh: the concept of annual tribal gathering, because, that very concept had spurred the birth of the Roman Republic, in the late sixth century BC.
During two millennia, while headed, by the Vatican papal hoax, the marauding carpetbaggers have clung onto a stolen identity, to be able to infiltrate, and replace all leadership, in Europe, and, today, this hoax has become visible, and, the Jew royals are now running, in the Ukraine, in fear of their lives.
Raven-Odin – as the necromanced raven-Elijah – is the Scythian head of head-choppers, and, he is the one-eyed troll slayer – the celebrated skull toast of escalating anti-Semitism.
Mad King George & Co:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/scl/fi/xp6kyjuvcqtjdy1zbs1yf/looney-tunes8.jpg?rlkey=tjcb4ezgdi63qgipav8kvuzvm