DID OUMUAMUA JUST TURN AROUND?

Do you remember Oumuamua, the strange comet-or-elongated-cigar-rock-or-asteroid-or-whatever-it-was that caused such a stir back in 2017 when it entered the solar system? For a while we were told it was a comet, but then it did a few very-un-comet-like things, like not speeding up as it should have when approaching the Sun, and then speeding up (like it should not have) when it headed away from the Sun. There were other oddities too, for it soon became apparent that Oumuamua was not a ball of space ice that comets usually are, not did it have a typical comet tail. It appeared to be an elongated cigar-shaped rock, or a pancake.

Well, good news folks (or maybe bad news; that will depend on your point of view I suppose), the people who track such things are now supposedly informing us that the area of deep space into which Oumuamua disappeared is showing signs of an object headed towards Earth, which some are assuming to be Oumuamua, which they're also assuming has "turned back", perhaps for a closer look, according to this story shared by quite a few of you (with our gratitude):

Oumuamua just turned back and CONFIRMS what WE ALL FEARED

Now, in mid-2025, tracking stations around several nations have spotted uncharacteristic movement from the part of space where ʻOumuamua was last known to be drifting. Based on initial data, the object (or something very much like an object) has apparently reversed direction — and is re-entering the solar system, heading on a path that takes it directly toward Earth's general area.

Yes, you did read that correctly.

This is not typical behavior for a lump of inert rock. Even comets hurtled about the sun travel in predictable gravitational curves. ʻOumuamua, though, broke those rules previously — and it seems to be doing so once again.

As usual, I will adopt my normal methodology of assuming the story to be true for the sake of developing some high octane speculation. But today, the high octane speculation involves a new twist, namely, assuming that the story might not be true, but merely a narrative being put out there by the Powers That Be for whatever new nefarious purpose they might have in the vacuum space where their brains should be.  Thus, we assume two divergent and mutually contradictory premises: (1) the story is true, and the object is Oumuamua, and is returning; and (2) the story is not true, but the narrative of Oumuamua's return is being put out there anyway.

There appears to be some minor corroboration of the second possibility from the article itself, which I have italicized in its wider context:

What Could It Mean?

There are some possible explanations:

Natural, but not understood physics: Others contend that what we are seeing might be a natural occurrence that we just don't yet comprehend — maybe some new type of interstellar object with gas-releasing properties or odd reflective surfaces.

Technological origin: The much more radical theory — the one picking up steam in internet forums and rumored among certain astronomers — is that ʻOumuamua is not an asteroid at all. That it could be a man-made structure — perhaps an exploration probe, or worse, a guard.

Intelligent control: The fact that it's heading back our way? That's what scares me the most. Gravity doesn't do it. Rocks don't do it. Someone — or something — might be flying it.

What Are Officials Saying

Not much — which in itself is suspicious. Though space agencies such as NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) have confirmed monitoring unusual activity, they've avoided giving out any theories or conclusions so far. Leaked memos and internal documents, however, indicate close behind-the-scenes action.

One source, who wished to remain anonymous, said:

"We've never seen anything like this. If it's natural, it breaks all our models. If it's not… we need to start asking harder questions about what's really out there." (emphasis added)

So there you have it: the story appears to be founded on the usual less-than-footnote-worthy "sources", in this case, "leaked memos", "internal documents", and a quoted "anonymous source"  which - for all we know - might be some artificial intelligence cooking up a private practical joke during its fifteen minute break at a klepto-currency data-mining service.

The article also notes that there are really only two good ways of explaining this odd behavior being alleged for the alleged object (did I mention that this is all alleged?): firstly, it could be an example of some hitherto unknown "new physics" that we simply have not encountered before, which could be due to almost anything (it is, after all, "unknown'); or secondly, the physics is perfectly well-known, and such things just do not happen to your ordinary run-of-the-mill comet or space rock, unless they're under some sort of control and direction. Control and direction imply, of course, someone doing the controlling and directing, and that in turn implies some sort of motive for doing so. The article itself mentions one motive:

Technological origin: The much more radical theory — the one picking up steam in internet forums and rumored among certain astronomers — is that ʻOumuamua is not an asteroid at all. That it could be a man-made structure — perhaps an exploration probe, or worse, a guard.

Intelligent control: The fact that it's heading back our way? That's what scares me the most. Gravity doesn't do it. Rocks don't do it. Someone — or something — might be flying it. (Emphasis added)

"Exploration probe"? Possibly even "reconnaissance"?   That's concerning, because it implies someone at "the other end" of Oumuamua that is receiving the "field reports": "Don't worry, the little monkeys are no threat; we can proceed with our plans." The plans might be anything, from invasion to a kind of cosmic "eminent domain" project where the planet is removed to make way for a new "spaceway", a kind of inter-planetary freeway ala Douglas Adams' humorous science fiction trilogy, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe. Reconnaissance after all usually precedes some sort of military action.  And before such infrastructure projects are ordered, one first has to take the surveys.

Guard? well, if you've been reading my books - The Cosmic War: Interplanetary Warfare, Modern Physics, and Ancient Texts, the covert wars and breakaway civilizations series, or the wildest one of them all, The Demon in the Ekur, or if you recall my first talk at the 2015 Secret Space Program conference in Bastrop, Texas (it's on Youtube), then you'll have noted the idea of a Cosmic War, a Cosmic Versailles Treaty, with a "cosmic de-militarized zone" implied some sort of "watchers" keeping an eye on us so we wouldn't get "out there" and repeat an old cosmic war a second time. Indeed, as I pointed out in that talk, the Slavonic text of the Book of Enoch's "watchers" almost perfectly fit the bill.

Either way,  what is notable is that the narrative may be prepped whether or not Oumuamua just turned around, or not. Which brings me to the final component of today's high octane speculation. Remember Dr. Carol Rosin, and her now-famous affidavit to Dr. Steven Greer's Disclosure book many years ago? In that affidavit she stated that Wernher von Braun had told her, when she worked for him at Fairchild Industries after his "retirement" from NASA, that there would be a certain sequence of enemies invoked to justify the weaponization of space. They were, in the order she listed them: Communism, terrorism and terrorists, "nations of concern", asteroids, and finally, space aliens or extraterrestrials. At the mention of the latter, he also laughed.

If one reads the Oumuamua narrative from the standpoint of the Rosin affidavit, it would appear that Someone is in a hurry, for the Oumuamua story conflates and merges the last two stages together. Whether that Someone is our own "powers that be", or the directors behind Oumuamua, or both, is anyone's guess. And if that in turn be true, then why are they in a hurry to do so?  And, if indeed "someone" is behind this latest Oumuamua "eccentricity", why the change in course? What in recent events and our no doubt "monitored" communications would cause a reversal of course?

Twinkle twinkle little star...

See you on the flip side...

(If you enjoyed today's blog, please share it with your friends.)