“QUANTUM FINANCIAL SYSTEM”, OR JUST ANOTHER ...

Last Wednesday I blogged about how the following paper, shared by J.R. tended to confirm (and then some!) my warnings about bullion depositories and electronic transfer systems that make the claim to be "backed" by hard assets:

QUANTUM FINANCIAL SYSTEM “QFS”

I explained that the presence of the mystifying word "quantum" in the description of this system is not accidental, but is there with the intention to indicate that asset backed currencies are dealing with such minute amounts of hard assets that any single unit of currency's "backing", no matter what the currency is, is so small that physical convertibility is impractical, and therefore, one must rely on computers to perform the calculations of what that "backing" amounts to. Only the very super rich will be able to command amounts of tokenized assets that can be practically and physically convertible.

From this conclusion, three things follow:

(1) All physical assets of every individual will enter this asset pool (and thus, you will own nothing, and be "happy"); but your assets vis-a-vis the total pool are so miniscule that, again, your "backed" tokenized currency can only be calculated on a computer, and real convertibility of assets is only possible for the super-rich; and,

(2) Thus the whole scheme is an asset seizure scheme, and thus

(3) The two-tired financial system that I have been writing about for some time - that of an open or public system and a hidden and secret one - is thus being taken "public" and rendered into a permanent state of financial affairs, all of which is balanced precariously and non-redundantly on a single point of failure: the whole thing will work on the basis of electronic transfer systems of those "tokenized" assets.

But as I averred in last Wednesday's blog, there's an even deeper and far more sinister layer lurking beneath all of this. One may think of it as the hidden assumptions lying behind all of the slides of the presentation of the "quantum financial system". Those assumptions I alluded to in that blog when I pointed out that the "reconciliation" process being described in the slides was similar to and evocative of the "renormalization" process that often occurs in quantum mechanics, namely, that when the equations return infinities, one "renormalizes" the results, and simply ignores the resulting infinities, thus rendering the results "normal", and hence the term "renormalization". But what happens if, rather than descent into infinite debt, one is instead confronted with the possibility of infinite production, or fecundity?  It is this metaphysical problem that lies at the heart of all systems of finance, since time immemorial. An infinite fecundity cancels an infinite debt; it "zeros" the books. In fact, if one wishes to be metaphysical about it, one could make a very good case that it actually not only cancels or zeros the books, but leaves them with an incalculable surplus, which only the super rich and powerful can draw upon. (Hmmm.... sounds vaguely familiar, if you've been paying attention...)

Thus far, we've managed to avoid such problems precisely by basing our financial systems on closed systems of energy, i.e., on "non-renewable" sources of energy, such as oil(and note the massive assumptions thus being made about petroleum in the process. It's a "fossil" fuel... or is it really?)  Enter quantum mechanics, and more specifically, the Dirac sea and the zero point energy, for in both of those concepts one is dealing with virtually infinite processes of limitless and endless energy. No scarcity needed; In fact, cosmologically, it's impossible. Nature does not always follow the "simplest" path, for if that were the case, there would be no nature in the first place with all its multifaceted nuance and complexity. Mastery of such processes would not only give nearly limitless energy, but also the ability to fashion any hard assets as well.  Heck, forget about Dirac Seas and Zero Point Energy. Controlled fusion alone would provide nearly limitless energy.

And all of them would threaten the financial system, and the power it gives to a very narrow (and mentally silly) group of people. So as we are on the cusp of these possibilities, and because - as I have warned many times - the weaponization of things like zero point energy would make a hydrogen bomb look like a firecracker, and because these possibilities in turn present a proliferation nightmare (see, for example, my book Babylon's Banksters), the powers that be must contrive either a system of surveillance to prevent people from developing these capabilities on their own or in groups of voluntary association, or devise a system of control to keep them from doing so, or both...

... and that, I submit, is what this "quantum financial system" is really all about.  Perhaps some will argue that "they" intend it only as a temporary stopgap to be maintained just long enough until they can get themselves and like-minded conspirators and thieves off this planet to somewhere else, where they can run their technocracies unencumbered by having to worry about a planet of billions of people, before we blow ourselves up...

...what they're not telling people is that they are the ones who also have the tendencies to start wars, and blow things up...

See you on the flip side...

(If you enjoyed today's blog, please share it with your friends.)