SWAPING OUT DARK MATTER FOR A WHOPPER DOOZIE
We began this week's blogs last Monday with a Wile E. Coyote nosedive into the speculation canyon with a blog about that Japanese research that argues the case that some Japanese tits, a species of bird in that country, have a rudimentary grammar and syntax that allows them to communicate. I have top say that stories like that are not really a surprise to me, because I was never much of an adherent to that wonderful 19th century view of the cosmos as a "big machine"; I've always preferred the more ancient "microcosmist" view that the universe is a big organism and, as St. Maximus the Confessor once put it, a "macanthropos", a "large man." In that world, the idea that animals might actually be communicating with an actual grammar underlying all those meows, moos, barks, quacks, and squawks is not surprising. It can only be surprising to certain kinds of philosophers and "theologians" whose output reflects the machine-like cosmology to which they adhere.
Today we encounter a rather different kind of story, once again shared by M.D. (with our gratitude), and this one was - at least for me - a real jaw dropper, particularly a couple of paragraphs which M.D. was good enough to highlight for me to make sure I wouldn't miss them (I wouldn't have, as they are too far into whopper doozie category to be ignored):
A new theory of gravity could explain cosmic acceleration without dark energy
Now, the reader will have noticed that I have filed today's story undert the "UFO" header, and wondered what, exactly, this story about dark matter and something called "Finsler gravity. (Patience, we'll get there.) For now, we'll note the article's own very apt and accurate description on where "dark matter" comes from:
Why Dark Energy Was Added in the First Place
Cosmologists use Einstein's general theory of relativity along with the Friedmann equations to describe how the universe changes over time. However, when these equations are applied to real astronomical observations, they fall short. To match what telescopes see, scientists must manually add an extra "dark energy term" to the equations. This addition is not derived naturally from the theory itself, which has long made it an unsatisfying solution.
In other words, "dark matter" became a purely mathematical formalism to make the theory (Einstein's) fit with observation. This problem has been inherent in General Relativity since its inception, because many people are not aware that the great English astronomer and physicist Arthur Eddington, in his quest to crown and anoint Einstein as the Physicist Par Excellence For All Time, fudged some of the numbers that resulted in the 1921 eclipse experiment so that the observed results would fall within the prediction margins of Einsteins general relativity equations. It's an obscure fact, but true, but also one seldom mentioned in the textbooks one learns in school. The same problem merely resurfaced when extended to cosmic scale, and was no longer confined to a solar eclipse bending light. Please note the rather "Hegelian method" in evidence: when observation conflicts with the equations, then save the equation by introducing a mathematical formalism, which introduces a new "physical" object into the theory. "But Professor Hegel, the facts do not support your theory!" "Then," retorts Hegel, "so much worse for the facts!"
To make a long story short, some scientists are now proposing to throw away that mathematical formalism(and therewith dark energy) altogether, and replace it with something else, and here is where this article's story gets extremely intriguing, launching into whopper doozie category:
Because of this limitation, the team at ZARM and their Romanian collaborators explored an alternative idea. Their results, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, rely on an extension of general relativity (GR) known as Finsler gravity. This approach has been developeded (sic) over recent years and uses a broader description of spacetime geometry.
Unlike the standard formulation of GRT, Finsler gravity can describe the gravitational behavior of gases more precisely. This difference turns out to be crucial when modeling the large-scale behavior of the universe.
Accelerated Expansion Without Dark Energy
When the researchers applied Finsler gravity to the Friedmann equations, they uncovered a striking result. The modified equations, known as the Finsler-Friedmann equations, naturally predict an accelerating universe even in empty space. No extra assumptions are required, and no additional "dark energy" term needs to be added by hand.
"This is an exciting indication that we may be able to explain the accelerated expansion of the universe, at least in parts, without dark energy, on the basis of a generalized spacetime geometry," says Christian Pfeifer, ZARM physicist and member of the research team.
Hooray! Einstein's basic approach - geometrization - is saved! One can still do physics entirely in one's head using abstruse mathematics! Hooray! Except there's a huge, huge whopper doozie squatting like a big ugly big-consuming bull frog in the middle of this collective circle of huge sighs of relief. Now, I haven't a clue of what Finsler gravity, nor its modified Finsler-Fredmann-Einstein equations look like nor say, but I can get an idea from the short little clue provided in the article about what they might imply: "Finsler gravity can describe the gravitational behavior of gases more precisely." Let that sink in, because it firstly implies that one might be dealing with "space gas", or plasmas, in all their variegated forms, and secondly, that plasmas have gravitational properties peculiar to them. That concept, in turn, suggests a logical extension (which may or may not prove to be empirically true), namely, that different states of matter might modify, or respond to (or both) various gravitational properties. Or to put all this wild high octane speculation very differently, local gravitational effects might depend on the various states of matter in a region; it is not a mere response to the presence of "mass", it is also in some sort of relationship to what kind of mass is present. (In other words, that "M" in "E=Mc^2" might ultimately prove to stand for more than just a mass difference.) That is, of course, so radically different than we have been taught to think of gravity and mass that it leaves one rather breathless to comprehend that gasses might respond to, and affect, gravity in a special way, suggesting that various states of matter might respond to, and affect, it differently, requiring, as the article suggests, a complete overhaul of all the equations. This should not surprise us, because most of what is speculated about black holes, neutron stars, and so on, are about the relation of states of matter to gravity. And again, if this article is really talking about gasses in the form of plasmas, then since plasmas constitute 99% of all the known matter in the universe, and our entire physics as developed until the 20th century is a physics based entirely on the other 1% of matter, then we should expect more, not less, surprises of this nature. And once we say plasmas, we are in the area of "magneto-hydrodynamics" and propulsion, "magneto-hdrodynamic drives" to use the wording of the 1950s Brookings Report.
And once we're in that territory, it should ring a Bell...
See you on the flip side...
(If you enjoyed today's blog, please share it with your friends.)
No Comments
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
At last – now the statements by the late Ben Rich of Lockheed’s Skunk Works make sense!
Ben Rich from 1975 to 1991, was the Director of Lockheed’s Skunk Works, the division responsible for development of several advanced technological aircraft including the U-2, the SR-17 Blackbird, the F-117 Nighthawk stealth bomber, and the F-22 Raptor.
In a presentation about the infamous Skunk Works program, Ben Rich made several unusual comments that had many in the audience scratching their heads.
Jan Harzan, director of Mutual UFO Network (MUFON), attended the March 1993 lecture at the University of California, Los Angeles, with fellow UCLA engineering alumnus and UFO enthusiast Tom Keller.
Jan Harzan reported that:
“He intimated that there was a lot of other stuff going on that he could not talk about. He ended his talk with a black disk zipping out into outer space, and he ended it with these words: ‘We now have the technology to take ET home.’”
Harzan says that after the lecture ended a few people remained behind to ask questions. Some wanted to know more about the technology to “take E.T. home.”
Several in attendance believed that Rich’s final comment inferred that aliens had visited Earth, could possibly still be here, and that we possess the technology to take them across the vast expanses of space.
From there, the conversation got even stranger. As Rich was leaving the stage, an engineer asked him if he thought it was theoretically possible to travel to the stars. Rich responded:
“We found an error in the equations and we now know how to travel to the stars, and it won’t take us a lifetime to do it.”
Another engineer promptly asked, “I have a real interest in the propulsion you are talking about that gets us to the stars. Can you tell me how it works?”
Ben Rich stopped and looked at him, then asked: “Do you know how ESP works?”
The engineer responded: “I don’t know, all points in space and time are connected?”
To which Ben Rich replied, “That’s how it works.”
The ‘Newton-Einstein affair’ is a magical make-believe hoax, for duped Vatican sheep!
The ‘Newton-Einstein affair’ is an attempt, to stem the tide – to prevent the threatening Sci-Fi Ascension – of those Scythian heathens, who are prone, to recognise the ‘candlelight as fire’ – platonically – which leads, to the knowledge, that the ‘meal was cooked a long time ago’.
https://thescifibuddhist.wordpress.com/2014/11/23/cryptic-quotes-and-their-buddhist-roots/
Historically, Elijah is the Scythian Odin, who is the Buddha, in Asia – which, scientifically, is the superposition, in quantum mechanics – and – Odin’s two brothers, Yahweh-Elohim, are the basic Cucuteni-Trypillian quantum pair, the Yin-Yang, that defines Tao, as the superposition.
The out-of-body experience changes the observer, because the normally-pinned-down consciousness becomes liberated, into a consciousness field – which induces epistemic collapse, whereafter Nirvana, as the realm, between realms, becomes the template, for an epistemology, seen, from outside the Matrix [the karma wheel].
Every superposition can be expanded, into an unlimited field, as an a contextualised episteme – which C. S. Lewis explains, as the mirroring Lady-Lake-ponds, that sprout runic ‘river fishes’, in the world between.
BTW, in academia, both religion, and science, are curated narratives, by Jesuit-controlled Freemasonry, on behalf of the Vatican, the imperial mafia, suppressing heathen science.
It is therefore proper, that the ‘Yahweh-Elohim’ be known, as the basic quantum pair – which provides an ‘osmotic trigger point’, between religion and science, that affects both ways.
Thus the proverbial ‘axe is laid, unto the root of the trees’, and, the corrupt Bible Belt [the Salem witch trials], that brings no good fruit, is, thus ‘hewn down, and cast into the fire’.
The Book of Genesis is quantum mechanics, clothed, in bardic metaphors – where the first man is a world tree – a superposition – known, as the Ash Yggdrasil, the Norse ‘arborary axis’.
Quantized Inertia offers a radical alternative that eliminates the need for dark matter
The out-of-body inertia is quantified, indirectly, by Odin’s runes [the 32-point compass template] – because the Scythian runes induce the 33rd central superposition – the ‘eye of the storm’ – which is the Mimir’s ‘well of light’, the ‘exit door’, from Plato’s cave – which is Samadhi, in Ashtanga Yoga.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/pih0162nwhdrpd1/blue-banshee.jpg
Roddenberry fabulates, that his Star Trek’s mind-over-matter ensign encounters an out-of-body inertia, during several warp drive experiments, in the Sci-Fi TV-series – and – likewise, when going native, his ensign apprentice encounters a standstill-outside-time, during extreme distress, when the higher self takes control.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/chrnitld2muxgxd/standstill-in-crossover.jpg
Another lie bites the dust, how many pseudo theories are there, any way of finding what real physics?
I see something similar to their gaseous hypothesis but notably different. Using orderly, logical procession of visual thoughts from the beginning, most basic Universal potentials to how they inevitably form larger more complex organizations many of physic’s mysteries can be glimpsed. Especially when you consider an Aether instead of vacuum. I suspect there are no true vacuums anywhere. Nothing is impossible and is only a mental construct of the potential of a nothing. The three basic potentials found in all vacuum is positive, negative and neutral potentials. It is known that in the quantum realm of vacuum, positron and electron virtual particle pairs constantly pop in and out of existence as their charges separate from a neutral Aether state and then near instantly cancel each other out again back to neutral. So the beginning building blocks of potential are neutral, positive, and negative charges. When a neutral potential center point quantum fluctuates into a positive/positron point it also creates a negative/electron potential point because even with Aether you can’t get something out of nothing. Aether is infinitely divisible into infinite different scales of negative, positive, neutral charge potentials. Other words there is infinitely progressively smaller charge values to Aether as well as infinitely progressively bigger charge values to Aether of all three potential charge phases of Aether. When conditions of mass/energy, rotation direction, and velocity of electron orbit of the positron instead of falling back into it and annihilating each other becomes stable you get a hydrogen atom. Forming stable, positive or denser particle centers of Aether logically creates an extra dimension of space around that particle in Aether. That created space is not empty or a vacuum in Aether, it is just a lower scale of left over potential charge that forms around the particle formed from condensing part of Aether into a central point or nucleus inside the infinite sea of Aether charge that is infinite space. No matter how small in scale you go in Aether there will always be some potential charge there but so small we can’t measure it’s value. There is no true vacuum anywhere, potential charges exist at all observable and unobservable scales of potential. But the more stable mass/matter that gets created the more less dense regions of Aether also gets created. So space is growing/expanding because Aether evidently is producing more new stable particles out of itself than it is consuming at our scale and region within infinite Aether at this moment. The gaseous atom cloud model works so well because the more space that becomes available to a finite amount of gas atoms in a growing in volume vacuum chamber the more spread out each atoms becomes to each other. Thus you would see an expanding Universe.
This line of reasoning got me thinking of gravity and why it isn’t effected by electro-magnetic radiation or positive and negative charges. Why it doesn’t seem to interact with either at all. Logically it can be reasoned that it might be because it is a neutral phase phenomenon. If neutral space/Aether expands but becomes less neutrally charged around centers of greater masses of electrons and positrons making up masses of physical matter of atoms then this lighter neutral charge density would be less the closer to the center of mass of the object formed in that region. In other words gravity/less dense neutral charge Aether’s effects would be felt more strongly the larger the center of mass occupy a region in the infinite sea of Aether was. This is also why the force of a massive object’s gravity falls sharply the further you are from it’s center of manifestation. Like charges positive and negative repel but neutral charges don’t. Neutral charged gravity wells may be seen as less neutrally dense regions of space compared to the greater surrounding neutral charged regions of infinite space away from the centers of large masses. So to make an anti-gravity device you would need to artificially create an even lesser denser region of space in the direction you wish to fall towards but in order to do that you would have to create a denser neutral field some where else. Most useful would be in the floor of your craft in outer space no stronger than the force of gravity on planet Earth so you won’t get the ill health effects of too little or too great a gravity. But even this amount of gravitational force condensed to such a small location in infinite neutral Aether would propell you at tremendous speeds in the direction you wish to travel relatively comfortably. But good luck using electro-magnetic field manipulations to achieve this. But if you could somehow take this medium phase of Aether in front of you and condense it somewhere into a similar body of something with the characteristics of a miniature neutron star at the bottom of your space craft you would get both thrust and artificial gravity from it at the same time. Convert the mass of the Earth into energy output and you would get very fast acceleration if you craft was small. Seems to me mastering neutral charge density and manipulation is the secret sauce of manipulating both gravity and faster than light speed travel.
The ‘Newton-Einstein affair’ is a monkey, in the Buddha’s hand!
The ‘velocity of light’ is NOT a Newtonian constant, in support of Einsteinian relativity.
In quantum mechanics, a superposition is a field, which means a contextualised episteme.
In Doctor Who, time itself disappears, because of River Song [the Echoing cascade].
Narcissus drowns, in his own Echo, for eternity!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wedding_of_River_Song
River Song [the Echoing cascade]:
https://youtu.be/ymJrIgceiF0
BTW, the USA theory is, that, because of the USA’s continental nationhood, the USA’s massive mass can bend light.
Irish pub music shenanigans are putting that theory, to the test, by sending Granny:
https://youtu.be/pvl4ija2wvs
Today this line of speculation reminded me that if people can create fusion and fission reactions in labs and in nuclear bombs then it obviously doesn’t take super massive stars to do the same thing. This likely happens naturally under many yet to be discovered processes in nature, stars, and in the core of planets. I also suspect the most elementary atoms of hydrogen may not only get consumed and converted into heavier elements by stars like our Sun but are likely somehow produced by Stars as well. I suspect stars may somehow convert the Aether’s virtual positron and electron pairs into primordial one electron to one proton hydrogen atoms via the violent fluctuating magnetic interactions that happen on Stars such as during Sun spot activity with some of these virtual particle pairs. Might be why super massive, magnetic black holes at the center of galaxies have so much material around them. All the gravitational forces of stars and galactic black hole magnetic current sheets interactions together are converting Aether into stable particles and atoms. Now if stable particles and atoms are created then the yin should also have a yang where stable particles get converted back into Aether as well in some sort of cosmic balance. And we do, they are called black holes. Hawking radiation is likely particles slowly converting back into the Aether medium or the source medium as I see it. So black holes, stars, and likely even planets are all responsible for creating more stable particles and elementary atomic building blocks to all physical matter. And likely it is fluctuating and crossing magnetic fields and streams that is helping creating the conditions for some virtual positron ad electron pairs to be come stable atoms such as hydrogen. And deuterium(hydrogen atoms with a neutron) also gets formed by strong gravities in conjunction with strong magnetic fields working together. And deuterium fusion can build all the other heavier atoms eventually. We know unstable isotopes of atoms eventually naturally fission down to lighter elements until the elements created are stable isotope versions. Likely there never was a single Big Bang and multiple sources of yin/yang cycles are responsible for everything. The theory of relativity should be theory of scale in my opinion. From a certain perspective and scale of view a single Universe can appear appear and disappear like virtual particles. If my hypothesis has any partial truths to it then Aether has infinite repeating scales of manifestations to it. Whole Universes are created and destroyed in every virtual particle pair creation and every virtual particle pair creation is a creation of another potential new Universe. There may be countless Universes in Aether that get created at many different scales of observation/frequencies. Aether may be infinitely divisible and have infinite repeating scales of observation. Size and position are relative to which scale you are born into in which Universe.
I always thought dark matter was a crutch, and proceeded to ignore anything based off of dark matter.
Whatever. This whole Dark Matter thing is the elephant in the room when we talk about the nature of our world, the universe of matter to which our physical bodies are attuned. We can’t quite explain what’s going on so Dark Matter is theorized to explain what goes bump in our equations intended to explain what is behind the workings of our world. It’s the monster under the bed or in the closet. So let’s go to the beach, where we see foam riding on the water as it surges ashore. Foam and water, related, part of the same universe, different states, the foam rides atop the water and its movement us affected by the water underneath that is driven by forces of wind, close to the foam, and currents (farther from the foam), and tides linked to the moon, distant from the foam existence. If the world is multidimensional, like an onion, and we live on the outer layer, the foam world, then the unseen layers underneath are the Dark Matter, supporting and connected with the foam world, affecting its behavior and manifestation. Richard Hoagland talks about hyperdimensional physics and points to Mauna Loa, Mons Olympus, and the hexagons on the poles of Saturn. Where do we go when we travel out of body? Or when we die? If our world exists in a multidimensional universe, why do we think our math is going to explain the workings of our dimension unless it can also express the way our dimension relates to the neighboring dimensions that affect ours? These math glitches are telling us we need a better model of the universe. And when UFOs appear and instantly disappear, the reappear in seconds in another part of the sky, that too should suggest the possibility of a shift into and back out of a neighboring dimension. The point being, the groups using alien technology probably have a very different model of the universe and a physics that goes along with that model, as opposed to what we are led to believe is our cutting edge science where we scratch away at cave walls, working by torchlight, theorizing about Dark Matter, a new concept of gravity, and fudging equations.
The angelic magnificence of Chalcolithic Cucuteni-Trypillia:
The Cucuteni-Trypillian Yin-Yang [Yahweh-Elohim] is a counter-rotating principle, that induces a superposition, that is a Buddha field, that contextualises an episteme:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/sh6ld8kvmxggv4t/flammarion-engraving-crystalline-veil.jpg
The draconic sectarianism of the Fertile Crescent:
The Goa’uld snakeheads are Sci-Fi parasites, whose survival depends on deception, whilst keeping the duped Jaffas enslaved, in a cult of personality, worshipping false gods:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/scl/fi/451kqn4oprh2ul0xx4pij/steven-spielberg-parody.jpg?rlkey=njjk54olr83shn53fcs753pou
Today, the Goa’uld Vatican is threatened, by Elijah’s Scythio-Christianity, because the latter is a Cucuteni-Trypillian derivative – which reveals the original quantum mechanics, that caused Roddenberry’s mind-over-matter ensign, to disembark in protest, from the Star Trek Enterprise, where Jesuits play Mozart in space.
Both Einsteinism, and Epsteinism, are Goa’uld islands, where Prospero’s autistic sectarianism flourishes, amongst technocratic Calibans and Ariels.
The giants in the playground!
The Babylon 5’s proposition is, that there are two kind of technologies, at play – which is, that of the Vorlons, and of the Shadows – and, those are the ‘giants in the playground’.
The Shadow technology is an echoing derivative, of a derivative, of a derivative etc., whereas Vorlon technology is the Buddha superposition, in quantum mechanics.
The Shadows are the ‘draconic sectarianism of the Fertile Crescent’ – whereas the Vorlons are the ‘Chalcolithic Cucuteni-Trypillian quantum mechanics’.
The Fringe TV-series induces the ‘Buddha on the road’ – which is the Stargate Ascension, in Sci-Fi, that rises, above the Goa’ulds, and the Replicators.
STARGATE PI TRILITHON
When Narcissus gazed into puddle,
his flesh tent transformed idle,
expanding cosmic soul
through wormhole,
engaging dragons in battle.
When Narcissus echoed soundless,
he uploaded consciousness,
into mirror reflection
of self ascension,
in higher existing emptiness.
When Narcissus went high octane,
transcending pyramid arcane,
he spun time cyclical,
hyperdimensional,
rendering ancient Runes plain.
The Megalithic Trilithon is the ‘High, Just-as-High, and Third’ – which is the mathematical symbol of pi – which, in quantum mechanics, connects diametrical opposites, by the diameter, that goes through the centre – which defines the superposition.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/bgsuow5w7ynrqvg/stargate.jpg
The Stargate pi-episode, with the talkative Asgard-shrooms:
https://stargate.fandom.com/wiki/Thor%27s_Chariot