THE GLYPHOSATE PRESIDENT, OR, IS TRUMP A GMO?
Amid all the "big stories" this past two weeks - the Epstein files, the Guthrie kidnapping, the growing tensions with Iran and the US escalation and military buildup, the Russian fly-bys of Alaska, the Chinese coup and purge, Secretary of State Rubio's speech in Europe, and even the UFO disclosure issue which consumed the first two of this week's blogs - there is a story that fell right off the radar, but it's another significant one, and in my opinion, yet another reason to question the coherence of Mr. Trump's administration. Indeed, as the headline title of this blog indicates, Mr. Trump has positioned himself - via one of his recent executive orders - as the "glyphosate president", and in the context of this week's previous blogs, it is only reasonable to ask the rather humourous question of whether he might himself be a GMO.
Humour aside, however, there really is nothing funny about the following article which was shared by W.G. (for which our thanks):
Note that this executive order not only makes the production of glyphosate a national security issue, it compels its production, and thus extends the blanket of immunity from liability suits to the companies making it, companies like Bayer, which on this website we refer to by a more accurate nickname, I.G. Farbensanto, A.G. After all, Bayer - mentioned in the article - was a component of the notorious I.G. Farben cartel, and Bayer a few years ago gobbled up Mon(ster)santo, a major player in the world of "Big Agra", big agriculture business:
President Donald Trump late Wednesday signed an executive order intended to boost domestic production of glyphosate.
Glyphosate is the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller. Bayer, which acquired Monsanto in June 2018, is facing tens of thousands of lawsuits from people alleging Roundup caused them to develop cancer.
Trump’s order also grants legal immunity to domestic manufacturers of products containing glyphosate when manufacturers are ordered, under the Defense Production Act of 1950, to produce the products.
The Defense Production Act is used in national emergencies to compel the production of materials or supplies necessary for national security.
And if one is in doubts about the immunity issue, there's this:
The executive order states that it “confers all immunity provided for in section 707 of the Act (50 U.S.C. 4557).” The act itself says “no person shall be held liable” for “any act” resulting from compliance with an order issued under that law, Gillam wrote for The New Lede.
Brett Hartl is director of Government Affairs for the Center for Biological Diversity, which has filed multiple lawsuits challenging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s approval of glyphosate. Hartl told The New York Times that Trump’s order is “alarming because it’s clearly designed to offer a broad immunity.”
Now here's the kicker: this article, it will have been observed, is coming from the Childrens' Health Defense website, the very website associated with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Mr. Trump's Secretary of Health and Human Services. But wait, there's more:
U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has publicly criticized glyphosate for years. As an attorney, in 2018, he helped to win a landmark $289 million jury verdict against Monsanto for plaintiffs who said that Roundup caused their cancer.
As a presidential candidate in 2024, Kennedy said in a post on X that glyphosate is “one nof the likely culprits in America’s chronic disease epidemic.”
However, in a statement reported by the Times, Kennedy said he supported the president’s decision.
“Donald Trump’s executive order puts America first where it matters most — our defense readiness and our food supply,” Kennedy said. “We must safeguard America’s national security first, because all of our priorities depend on it.”
Since taking office, Kennedy has argued that banning glyphosate would put farmers out of business and that instead it should be phased out.
So, more double talk from the political class, because it's difficult to see how a problematical product like glyphosate can be "phased out" when it's now been decreed - without any debate or supporting argumentation - that it is now crucial for the national defense...
...unless, of course, the fact that Israel has been dumping it by the planeload on nearby Lebanon:
So one wonders, again, who really is in charge of this administation, because politics does, indeed, make strange bedfellows: Israel and Bayer, a component of I.G. Farben! Strange bedfellows indeed. But one thing clearly emerges, in no case is this about the good, or health, of the people. It's about profits, and now, glyphosate is revealed to be a "national security issue", like most weapons are...
See you on the flip side...
(If you enjoyed today's blog, please share it with your friends.)
5 Comments
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
Curiosity made me recall some devilish Pentagon contractors were part and parcel of the rise of corporations like Monsanto and Bayer. A little bit of research would reveal they made Agent Orange for the Vietnam War. Then, they brought some of the same toxins into the food supply through genetically engineered crops in various countries. Now, they’re ushering in an era of a synthetic substance they call Franken foods. So true to Bayer’s and the Nazi’s goals. But of course no one will go looking for those connections.
What give here are our elites out to turn Earth into a dead planet? What will they gain from that?
Not a dead planet but one that conforms to their ideology. Bow the knee and conform is the primary objective.
Israel uses glyphosate in Lebanon as a form of land theft-scorched earth policy to deprive the Lebanese of their land. A form of salting the earth. Spraying the same territory with Zyklon B would be too on the nose. So why does an authoritarian ruler suddenly declare increased production of this plant killing, cancer causing chemical a matter of national security for the US? A ruler who supports Putin taking Ukrainian land, Bibi taking Lebanese and Palestinian land? Does Trump plan on spraying Cuba? Canada? Or Red States should they elect Democrats in the midterms? Dumping it in the water supply of Blue States – and blaming it on Immigrants? Or China? How do you trace the source of glyphosate to Trump controlled sources? Want a health crisis? A national emergency you can use to cancel midterms? Then toss in a couple fake assassination attempts on the VP, SM, CN, etc., and you’ve got a Reichstag Fire to justify suspending civil liberties and taking longed-for ruthless action. The midterms are coming and they don’t bode well for this White House. Glyphosate is a weapon that can be deployed against Americans to push or punish. Is an executive order mandating Dioxin production in the works, too?
Magic Mushrooms galore!
Presently, I spike my camomile, peppermint and nettle regime, with some ‘Chinese Love Dream’, a very mysterious concoction, from the local tea club, for herbal enthusiasts.
There is always a herbal remedy, for everything, and, that, which is known, as Yin-Yang, in China, is, originally, Yahweh-Elohim [the basic quantum pair], that became Scythian export, to Asia.
Point is, that Taoism [a shamanistic superposition] was brought to Asia, by the Scythians, who were the original ‘ten tribes’ of Samaria, and, thus known, as the ‘Kingdom of Israel’, and later, as the ‘Aesir of Asgard’, in the sci-fi Stargate.
Traditional Chinese Medicine:
https://youtu.be/dpOv9gr8MP8