FORGET ABOUT CHEMSPRAYING, NOW ITS OCEAN-DYEING

There's an old expression that comes from the world of espionage tradecraft called "dyeing the waters," an expression that comes from the practice of studying water currents by injecting colored dye into a body of water, and watching the progress of the dyed water as it moves through the wider body. In the world of espionage, the analogy is used to explain an operation designed to explain the flow of information through a network, i.e., to expose the hidden currents and connections between people as information is passed from one person to another. A piece of information (or often, misinformation) is given to a carefully selected target individual, and that information is then carefully monitored to see where it pops up again, and who refers to it or uses it.

But now there may be an entirely new application of the phenomenon, one having to do with so-called "climate change" and borrowed from the world of chemtrails, the spraying that was once decried as a conspiracy theory until it became so obvious that they don't even bother denying it any more, and are admitting that they want to modify the environment by that means, such as lunatic busybody billionaire Baal Gates' eminently kooky idea of trying to modify the amount of light coming from the sun by such spraying. What could possibly go wrong?  Well, according to this article spotted and shared by W.G., they have embarked on a similar project involving not the world's atmosphere, but the world's oceans:

'Scientists' Dump 65,000 Liters Of Chemicals Into Ocean In Geoengineering Experiment

In case you missed it, here it is:

In a move that’s raising alarm, researchers have poured 65,000 litres of sodium hydroxide into the Gulf of Maine, claiming it’s a step toward combating climate change through geoengineering. 

With unknown effects on marine life, many are worried this experiment reeks of tinkering that could backfire.

The trial, dubbed the LOC-NESS project, took place off the Massachusetts coast last August, with scientists from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution leading the charge.

They argue that boosting ocean alkalinity could suck more CO2 from the atmosphere, turning it into harmless baking soda.

Yet, as globalist agendas push these unproven fixes, freedom-loving skeptics see it as another layer of control over nature without public consent.

Over four days, the team added the alkaline chemical, tagged with red dye for tracking, to waters 50 miles off Boston. “These early results demonstrate that small-scale OAE deployments can be engineered, tracked, and monitored with high precision,” said principal investigator Adam Subhas of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute. “We need independent, transparent research to determine which solutions might work.”

The method, known as Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (OAE), aims to mimic and accelerate the ocean’s natural CO2 absorption.

As the document details, the oceans already trap around 38,000 billion tonnes of CO2 as dissolved sodium bicarbonate. By resetting the pH with sodium hydroxide, the scientists boosted it from 7.95 to 8.3—matching pre-industrial levels—and measured 10 tonnes of carbon entering the water immediately.

In the best-case scenario, they estimate the dump could absorb about 50 tonnes of carbon over a year, equivalent to the yearly emissions of five average citizens. 

But that’s a drop in the bucket compared to industrial outputs, and it doesn’t address the hypocrisy of governments preaching emission cuts while funding these chemical interventions.

Critics aren’t buying the hype. Gareth Cunningham, Direct

It should go without saying that I oppose all these supposed "fixes" to "climate change" (and indeed, I continue to grouse and complain about the ludicrous and tautological nature of the phrase "climate change" itself. Of COURSE the climate changes. It's called weather.) Humor aside, however, all of these "fixes" are, as the article itself rightly observes, are "unproven," but scientismists continue to do them, and retired politicians who have endorsed the whole scam in their tenures in goobernment continue to buy oceanside property that according to some models, should be nearly worthless because it should be underwater in a few years.

But there is something else that concerns me here, beyond the usual criticisms of the whole "climate change" narrative, and that may be simply stated as "the next step."  That "next step" has already been revealed by how "they did it" with the chemtrail spraying operation. Very simply, commercial air flights, passenger and/or cargo, began to be used in this spraying operation as additives were added to airplane fuel when and where "needed", so that the whole operation very quickly assumed a global scale. The denials that any such thing was or is being done continue to this day, but just look up. On some days as one watches the jets streaming back and forth in the skies, no such trails form. On other days in similar weather conditions, the trails of particulate-engendered condensation not only form, but they linger and grow to such an extent that the blue sky is turned into a dusty-milky-white to light gray smear.

I suspect - very strongly - that we will see a similar thing happen in this instance by the careful recruitment of ships into such dumping as they ply the oceans. They might be specially modified to dump additives into the oceans as they travel the sea lanes... over time, just as with the atmosphere, the effects will build, and eventually become obvious. Personally, I think the effect of the spraying on weather has been dramatic, particularly on severe  wind and electrical storms. But when one starts playing around with the oceans, one is playing literally, and directly, with the temperature moderator of the entire planet. And the weather? Play with those ocean currents and you're playing with the weather (and the food chain) in ways we can scarcely imagine.

Why I am so confident that something like this will be done?

The answer, regrettably, is very simple: not only because they can, but because they have that unique hubris and arrogance of the scientismist, that hubris and arrogance that the rest of us call "stupidity, irrationality, insanity, and lunacy." Think of the madman Baal Gates or other billionaire busybodies of that kidney, and you get the idea.

See you on the flip side...

(If you enjoyed today's blog, please share it with your friends.)