RARE PREDICTION OF MIDDLE EAST STORMS

Now, if you're still in doubt about the possibility of weather manipulation technologies and weather warfare, you're in for a shock.  Indeed, this is such a shocker that when I opened the email from friend Catherine Austin Fitts and found this article in it, I knew that this would definitely be a part of this week's blogs:

Dubai Weather: Rare Storm To Hit Middle East Amid Iran War; Severe Flood And Tornado Risk UAE, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar

Yes, you read that headline in the link correctly: flood and tornado risks in the United Arab Emirates, Oman, Bahrain, and Qatar:

A powerful and highly unusual storm system is heading toward the Middle East, threatening to bring severe weather to a region already strained by ongoing conflict. Parts of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Dubai, Qatar, Bahrain, and Oman are expected to be hit by strong thunderstorms, heavy rain, hail, and even a rare risk of tornadoes on Thursday, March 24, 2026.

Meteorologists say this kind of setup is almost unheard of for the region. A developing system over the Mediterranean, along with a strengthening low-pressure area near Baghdad, is pulling large amounts of moisture into the desert. This will create the right conditions for intense storms, some of which could rotate and produce tornadoes or waterspouts.

Now, while March 24th has already come and gone, the mere fact that such a storm was even mentioned as a possibility in a region where they are incredibly rare does raise my suspicion meter into the red zone, and since it's already in the red zone, I might as well go ahead and take a running leap off the end of the twig of the speculation tree and do my usual nosedive into Speculation Canyon below:

Over the years of blogging about the subject of weather modification technologies, I have evolved a few ways that I believe are prima facie indicators that such a technology is in use. Note that I say "prima facie indicators" and not "proof". "Proof" would constitute actual access not only to the technologies themselves, but to when specifically they were used, for what effect, and to what result. Obviously, neither I nor anyone else who has talked about weather modification technologies has that kind of access. We must argue circumstantial and therefore prima facie cases.  So what are my criteria for  concluding that some weather system might be the product of technology? I have essentially (1) the storm exhibits anomalous behavior that is not typical of natural storms, and (2) the system occurs in a time and place where other political and/or financial events are occurring. For example, in the first category, I have long argued that hurricane Katrina was anomalous because of its very odd track and behavior, moving first east to west through the Gulf of Mexico (not the Gulf of "Murika", thank you very much Mr. Trump), its brief pause due south of New Orleans, and then its 90 degree turn north to plow into New Orleans and southern Louisiana. In the second category, I have argued that the earthquake and tidal wave that led to the Fukushima disaster occurred in a convenient geopolitical context in Japan as to suggest that they were also geoengineered.

With these storms, we have a rare situation where both factors are present, for their occurrence during Operation Epstein's Epic Fury not only provides a clear geopolitical context and therefore potential motivation, but also the mere presence of such potential rainfall amounts, not to mention tornadoes in the Middle East is in itself anomalous. Add to this the fact that Iran has been suffering a long drought and that its water reservoirs are almost dry raises the stakes significantly that Iran's drought might itself be an engineered phenomenon. This raises the possibility that the Middle East storms talked about in the article might themselves have been an attempt at weather manipulation to restore that water supply in Iran; in other words, an attempt by a foreign power with the technology to help Iran, or to impede its Gulf enemies.  Of course, both Russia and China have both been long and strongly suspected to have such abilities; indeed, they themselves have occasionally boasted about their possession of such capabilities.

Whether the storms occurred as predicted or not is, in my opinion, beside the point, for the point is that the prediction itself was made by those watching weather conditions. Given the timing, place, and circumstances, what the article indicates is that there is much more going on with Operation Epstein's Epic Fury than meets the eye, and most certainly much more than we're being told.

See you on the flip side...

(IF you enjoyed today's blog, please share it with your friends.)