CONCERNED ABOUT CERN? YOU MIGHT HAVE GOOD REASON TO BE

Today we leap from dams-with-underwater-bombs in Alabama across the Great Pond to Europe, and to CERN'S Large Hadron Collider buried under the ground near Geneva, Switzerland. Regular readers of this website, or of my book The Third Way, will know that I have harbored suspicions and conCERNs - sorry, I just can't help myself - about that underground particle collider for a long time.  If you've read that book or listened to the various interviews I've done on the topic of the CERN collider(s), you'll know that I'm not entirely buying the "particle physics" explanation as being all that they're up to with the facility.  Before the thing was ever "turned on", some aspects of the design of the machine suggested strongly to me that this was about more than particle physics, though that was certainly a component. The fact that there are two circular accelerators, a smaller one above the large circular track (which larger track is the large hadron collider that spins particles in opposite directions before smashing them together). The smaller one is the final accelerator in a series of three previous accelerators, all linked, that accelerate the particle stream before its final injection into the hadron collider. This smaller accelerator sits above the larger circular track, and is canted off of center, so that if looking at the two circular colliders from above, the smaller one would sit atop the circular path of the larger one beneath it, thus providing the two circular tracks with two different axes of rotation. That fact, plus the extremely strong local magnetic fields of the two circular tracks, suggested to me that one would get magnetic precessional "wobbles" and torsion effects when the device was turned on, and that this, along with the particle physics, was one of the secret investigative agendas of the whole project. (I have posited other secretive agendas and aspects of the project as well, but this is not the place to review them. Readers interested in those may consult my book The Third Way.) I have also offered the very speculative hypothesis that the strong magnetic fields of the machine, several times stronger than the local magnetic fields of the planet, would also produce magnetic resonance effects not only within the planet, but possibly in the Sun itself, given the coupling of magnetic fields between the two celestial bodies. These effects would, I also suggested, be magnified by the piezo-electric effects of the matrix in which the underground facilities were placed.

In short, there were several scientific agendas, and particle physics was only the most obvious, and hence, the "cover story" or narrative for the project.

In that context, S.D. and M.C. shared the following two stories, respectively (and with our gratitude):

Scientists Intentionally Trigger 8,000 Earthquakes Deep Beneath Swiss Alps

Unusual electromagnetic effects in the skies over Geneva.... as the Hadron Collider is operating

Now, I've seen the video before, and indeed commented on it, but I post it again here to point out that if the video be true, and if the assertion of its sharer is true that the collider was indeed operating when this effect was observed and recorded, it is a strong circumstantial argument that the hadron collider is a machine producing effects far beyond "particle physics".  It is altering the planetary environment, exactly as some of my speculations had been maintaining.

Which leaves the first article about earthquakes, which contains statements that are "intriguing", to say the least:

Scientists at ETH Zurich university in Switzerland have deliberately induced around 8,000 seismic events deep underground in the Swiss Alps as part of an experiment called Fault Activation and Earthquake Rupture (FEAR-2).

The team injected 750,000 litres of water into the ground via two boreholes over approximately 50 hours at the BedrettoLab facility. The quakes were too small to be felt at the surface or cause damage, with magnitudes ranging from -5 to -0.14.

The researcher explained “While some seismic events occurred on the target fault zone, a large number of events took place on neighbouring geological structures activated by the fluid injection.”

In other words, the water injections will not produce any noticeable seismic events nor any damage to structures, for the seismicity is too small to be noticed except by very sensitive equipment. We'll get back to that, and CERN, in a moment.

Then there's this odd statement:

Professor Domenico Giardini, one of the lead researchers, stated: “If we master how to produce quakes of a certain size, then we know how not to produce them.”

And this:

Researchers say that the experiment, conducted at the end of April, builds on efforts to better understand earthquake generation processes.

And the article does us the service of "going there" all on its own, by coupling all this earth systems modification to weaponization of the planet and its systems itself via electromagnetic machinery, in this case, the High Altitude Auroral Research Project (or HAARP) in Gakona, Alaska:

The Swiss experiment has prompted renewed discussion around long-standing theories that earthquakes could be deliberately triggered for strategic purposes.

Proponents point to technologies like the U.S. High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) in Alaska, which studies the ionosphere but has faced persistent claims of dual-use capabilities for seismic or weather influence.

The article also mentions other earth-systems modification projects, such as the projects to dump chemicals into the oceans, and projects to dim the sun.

But what has all this to do with CERN and its machine? Answer: almost everything. From the outset, one of the agendas that I have publicly speculated has been operating in CERN'S case are what I call "data correlations monitoring". CERN's access to, and use of, the internet is overwhelming. Most people do not know, so it is worth repeating, that CERN is the internet's single largest use "customer". The sheer amount of data it shares with its scientific teams around the world guarantees that status for it. But it also enables a covert project of data correlation, which I have argued that forms one very secretive component of its research. What, for example, might be the correlations between CERN's hadron collider activity (i.e., when it is turned on), and weather systems around the planet? Are there any disCERNible patterns? (Sorry, again I couldn't resist.) Are there correlations to local seismic activity? Human behavior? Is there are correlation between its operation and the behavior of the sun? and on and on we could go.  Studying the micro-seismic effects of water injection, in other words, might be, at least in part, a cover story for monitoring micro-seismic effects of the collider's operation. It would be natural to do so because, as I pointed out above, the strong local magnetic fields of the machine exist within a rock matrix that may have unique piezo-electric properties that rocks under stress - like earthquakes - produce.  The connection between weather modification, earthquakes, and such electro-magnetic technologies in HAARP's case is not merely guess work, for these capabilities and possibilities were mentioned as potential uses in the initial patent filings for HAARP.

Earthquakes? You betcha.

Are they related to magnetic and piezo-electric stresses? You betcha.

Unusual electrical displays? Lightning over Geneva when the collider is on? And might those even be piezo-electric in nature, on a grand scale?

Let's just say I would not be surprised at all.

And let's not forget what the machine looked like after it was first turned on, and then just as quickly turned back off. We were told it was an electrical short, a leak in the helium cooling mechanism, and so on.

To me, it looked much more like a torsion effect:

The damage that derailed the Large Hadron Collider

So let me end this blog with another Wile E. Coyote nosedive into High Octane Speculation Canyon. What if those earthquake experiments are part of the CERN story, part of the "hidden agendas science" I believe is going on? I'll go further, and even suggest that all those proposed experiments to "dim the Sun" might have something to do with tweaking the magnetic resonance effects and coupling between this planet and its parent star, a resonance that could be further "tickled" by extremely strong local magnetic fields acting upon the rock matrix of the planet.

Or to put it country simple: they're "playing" with planetary- and stellar-sized systems, folks.

Sleep well, and I'll see you on the flip side...

(If you enjoyed today's blog, please share it with your friends.)