THE FEAR AND LOATHING OF MARS
This article was spotted and shared by our friend B.G., and it's an interesting topic on an interesting subject: the fear and loathing of Mars. I'm not talking about the attitudes towards Mars, however, but of its two little moons, Phobos (Fear), and Deimos (Loathing, or sometimes, Trembling). There's more than their fair share of high strangeness surrounding these two little moons of the red planet, but we'll get back to that.
For now I want to spotlight the article that B.G. sent along, because for all of you Mars-watchers, this story will sound vaguely familiar:
A Space Probe Brushed Past a Martian Moon to Take a Peek Inside
Now there's so much that's disturbing about this article I don't know where to begin, so let's quote as much as possible, then I'll relate why I'm "more than suspicious":
The long-standing mystery about the origin of the Martian moons could be a step closer to being solved.
A space probe has come within dozens of kilometers of the larger of the two satellite siblings to capture data about what lies beneath its scored and cratered surface."Whether Mars's two small moons are captured asteroids or made of material ripped from Mars during a collision is an open question," says astronomer Colin Wilson of the European Space Agency (ESA). "Their appearance suggests they were asteroids, but the way they orbit Mars arguably suggests otherwise."
Phobos, named for the ancient Greek deity of fear and panic, is the larger of the two moons at 22.2 kilometers (13.8 miles) across, and orbits Mars at an average distance from the surface of around 6,000 kilometers.
Deimos, after the Greek god of dread and terror, is just 12.6 kilometers (7.8 miles) across, and has a much greater average orbital distance of around 20,000 kilometers from Mars.
Now let's stop right there. In my book Covert Wars and the Clash of Civilizations, I pointed out one of those "inconvenient facts" that the Russians were wont to point out during the Cold War, when our own NASA (Never A Straight Answer, a.k.a., Not A Space Agency) scientismists were assuring us that there's "nothing to see here...move along."
"Not so fast!" was the Russian reply. A Soviet astronomer and friend of Carl Sagan published a book in Russian (which Sagan promptly translated into English, apparently without the Russian's knowledge) that pointed out that the discovery of the Fear and Loathing of Mars occurred rather late in the 19th century. The problem the astronomer had (and that some who are honest still have) is why it took so long for the two little moons to be found, after all, people had been staring at Mars for a long time through their telescopes, and by the late 18th century if not slightly earlier, the technology, magnification, and resolution of telescopes should have been able to see the tiny moons...
...if they were there at all. And that, really, was the Russian's point if one read between the lines of his book: someone had parked the moons there. According to the bothersome Russian astronomer who was badly mangling the "nothing to see here" narrative, there was yet another problem, and that was that the English satirist, Jonathan Swift, had also apparently predicted that Mars would have two satellites, and that they'd be more or less in the orbits they were discovered to be in... a century later... (See my book, Covert Wars and the Clash of Civilizations, pp. 27-62.) If there's anyone have doubts about all this, the Russian's name whose book Sagan published was I.S. Shklovskii, and the book's title was Intelligent Life in the Universe. And to give credit where credit is due, it was well-known Mars anomalies researcher Richard C. Hoagland who drew attention to this whole set of inconvenient facts.
If there are such things as Out Of Place Artifacts (OOPARTS), then the Fear and Loathing of Mars would certainly seem to qualify as gigantic examples.
Meanwhile, the article plunges on:
It's also unclear where they came from. Multiple compelling lines of evidence suggest that our Moon broke off from Earth in a giant collision, but Mars and its moons, millions of kilometers away, aren't as easy to study.
This is so laughable it's not even funny... if the Moon is up there doing what it's doing, then explain what possible physics of a collision led to it doing that. So finally we come to this:
One way to look for answers is to peer under the hood, so to speak – to find out what's lurking under the surface of the moons. So ESA sent their Mars Express orbiter for a Phobos flyby, skimming within 83 kilometers (about 51 miles) of the potato-like satellite. For context, the Karman line that separates Earth atmosphere from interplanetary space lies at about 100 kilometers altitude. A flyby at just 83 kilometers is close.
The flyby itself took place towards the end of September. The aim: to use an instrument called the Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionosphere Sounding (MARSIS) to probe below the surface of Phobos.
"We are still at an early stage in our analysis," says astronomer Andrea Cicchetti of the National Institute for Astrophysics in Italy, which operates MARSIS. "But we have already seen possible signs of previously unknown features below the moon's surface. We are excited to see the role that MARSIS might play in finally solving the mystery surrounding Phobos's origin."
Again, for anyone who has been following the Mars anomaly researcher Richard C. Hoagland, the fact that the ESA is now admitting that it has finally "see possible signs of previously unknown features below the moon's surface" will merit a hearty belly-laugh, for here is Hoagland's paper on the whole subject, from at least a decade ago:
For the World is Hollow and I have touched the sky Part 1
For the World is Hollow and I have touched the sky Part 2
My point with all of this is simply to draw attention to the fact that the basic data about the Fear and Loathing of Mars has been known for a rather long time, decades if one goes back to Shklovskii, and centuries, if one goes back to Jonathan Swift. Hoagland, at least, was willing to consider the obvious conclusions from the whole affair.
What's intriguing to contemplate is why is the whole story being raised in a more or less "mainstream" source, and raised now?
My guess? It is becoming increasingly difficult for mainstream scientism to ignore the inconvenient Out of Place Artifacts, and the Martian moons, like our own, are two large and completely baffling examples. Don't expect them to change the narrative. They won't. They will simply put out their data, and allow the interpretations to fall where they may, until the obvious becomes impossible to ignore any longer. Again, they were a little late to the party, but at least they're hovering on the patio now...
See you on the flip side...
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
Strange “ancient history” posts online from persons with no backgrounds in history, rather a degree in AI.
“Who Built The Moon” writ by consumer marketing psychs.
Gobbledygook and bullshit, piled high and deep. Lotsa digging for the possible pearl, then again, might be only bs
It is possible that the Ancient Greeks could have known about the two moons of Mars. There is credible evidence from Greek pottery that the Ancient Greeks had telescopes.
The best book and a superb read that covers the subject of crystal lenses and telescopes in antiquity is that by Robert Temple – The Crystal Sun.
The Russians did, and still do, have a knack for pointing out details often missed or simply ignored. The Russians are no slouch on the couch when it comes to scientific details to aid their presence on planet. Probably where the idea of how the Earth’s Moon seems to have been parked where it presently is orbiting Earth and does what it uniquely does with Earth & the Sol star, came from..
Babylonian star gazers or mappers (astronomer / astrologers) called the planet Mars, Nergal, a few millennia ago for their god of death and pestilence. Only fitting that its presumed offspring would be similarly named in context.
There are several features on Mars, those prominent Mon’s, for instance, that almost fit the characteristics of isosceles and right triangles with an imposed bisector if one were to use geometry relationships with their arrangement near the (almost on) Mars equatorial grid line. There are several other unusual characteristics that seem to have Earth bound markers, too, like that coordinate 19.5 degrees on Earth in relation to the Moon, but on Mars. The mons line up as well. You’d think that they were part of something constructed or put there as [hand-me-downs-for-posterity] or possibly left-overs of an earlier period or something.
Just like those chain of craters or holes or impact sites. One can note something of that reckoning on Earth, too, like that Peruvian band of holes. Thousands of them, nearly 7000 holes that meander across the Cajamarquilla Plain along the border near the Pisco Valley of Peru, South America. Theories about how and why vary. Usually, anthropomorphic in nature to suggest a practical utility or water use. There’s a ‘Band of Peace’ in Egypt, also, that suggests a relationship with water along the Nile River. Long after the Nile River changed from emptying into the Atlantic Ocean in the west of Africa into the present Mediterranean Sea. The planet was very different back then, it seems, according to satellite imaging and Edgar Cayce.
A wild ride in translating that particular one & a few others, too, from being mere coincidences that just seem to pop out at the viewer through large magnifying glasses. After all, Mars & Earth share the same celestial sky within the purported same billion-year accumulation period. A long time that seems to escape modern Archæology. Likewise, the other planets of the Solar system. Even the remaining inner and outer system rocky rings.
In one’s view, there might have been something big, very BIG, attached to those, what are now called volcano positions of the Martian Mons’ of Olympus, Arsia (contrasting part of Tharsis Montes), Pavonis (Latin for Peacock), and Ascraeus, to include the rest of the Tharsis Ridge on Mars. Essentially, a volcanic highland near the Martian equator that includes the largest known volcano in the Solar system, Olympus Mons. That region stands out like it was stamped into the surface as shown by the colorized Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) relief map. You could almost circumscribe a tetrahedral triangle that includes all those pock marked volcanoes point by point. As if they’re out-of-place, but in place for a purpose.
In the end, attrition has its way.
It’s interesting that you’ve mentioned Hoagland because just recently I’ve noticed that all videos by him or featuring him were removed from YT as well as all serious videos by other authors about face and what appears to be pyramidal structures on Mars. Or at least YT search didn’t yield any results. At least some of them can still be found on Rumble.
Mars was always said to have no atmosphere when we were young..Now two moons turn up and lo and behold.. Ice, surface water, blue skies..(until someone fiddled the color contrast on the screen and red skies came back..)
Would it be too far of a supposition to think that Moons hold atmosphere’s in place? Is it why our atmosphere doesnt spin off into outer space as the globe keeps turning..
If this were to be true, then someone, somewhere, has the power and capability to produce moons, or Oumuamua Cigars/Disc/not sure what shape it was, long and thin..
I often thought that interstellar voyages would have to be done inside a hollow moon/Meteorite in order to protect us and equipement from radiation..
I’m reminded of Ringmakers of Saturn, YT videos of globes syphonning plasma off the Sun, I’m reminded of Iapetus and it’s ridge, I’m reminded of Egyptian myths saying that the Moon rose in the wrong side of the sky, I’m reminded of Volcanic Glass being discovered by Harrison Schmitt in Apollo 17.
I remember the moon maps being colorised and evidently ‘artificial’ (I dont know if straight lines can be formed in a vacuum, but I know that nature and the golden section wont allow straight lines to occur… I digress) strutures being noticed. I remember a mega monolith being photograpped on Phobos and some AstroNOt saying we have to get to Phobos.. (before disappearing into Antarctica.. pure evil.. aaaah….)
So yeh… I lean towards the possibility that somewhere exists some’one’ /thing (s) that know how to Slartibartfarst they way into making a plantetoid thats used evidently to terraform potential planets by slowing down orbits, locking in atmosphere through magnetic forces and magnetism the likes of which we are just too puny and small minded to fully understand or are even able to measure to make it quanitifiable… acting as a planet killing asteroid shield.. like a smaller version of Jupiter doing it’s thing by atttracting all that space debris?) The moon gets parked into orbit by Oh Ye Mighty God(s) and they live upon it (Im thinking of Chinese Women in the Moon myths) until such time as to “Come Down from Heaven” and BBQ their follower’s children as sacrifice..in an orderly manner please, we’ll call it religion..
So, yeh… My Tinfoil hat is literally on fire, but if you can do that, that skimming fuel from the sun to jump off to the next system doesnt seem that far out there, and using Oumuamua type harpoons of rock to communicate inbetween systems would probably be necesssary, as galaxies blue and redshift away, into and from each other at varying speeds getting faster, then beaming lasers of communication into the neant seems like literally a shot in the dark… and cost a lot of energy..
C. S. Lewis’ point is, that extraordinary entities, with such terraforming and interstellar capabilities, are not necessarily fully incarnated beings.
When picking apart the Catholic snake oil sale, then what remains is the original, basic distinction, between what is incarnated, and not.
That papal entity seeks to monopolize the spiritual dimension, and pose as sole interpretor of the unknown, to prevent dissidence outside the box.
So-called “God” appears to be Abram’s paradox, between temporal interval (Elohim) and temporal shift (Yahweh) – the Year, basically.
It is a wonder that the ESA probe got that close does anyone remember what happened in 1988 AD Soviet probe was zapped while approaching one of Mars moons. As for Jonathan Swift what did he know about these moons and when did he know it? Hoagland’s title of that paper comes from an episode of the original Star Trek show.
Psilocybin mushrooms, as a cosmic kaleidoscope, are very difficult to control. They take one for a ride, and one can only tag along. Nevertheless, one can raise a question initially, and that affects the outcome.
Seven days a week are a reminiscence of seven musical spheres, and they are obviously connected to Elohim. Therefore, one traditionally goes mushrooming in Elohim, and toasts fermented brew in Yahweh, to acquire hidden knowledge.
These are so-called “allies”, to use Carlos Castaneda’s terminology, and, at some point, one doesn’t need those stimulating agents, to acquire their effects, as don Juan points out. Then one has become natural high, permanently.
These vegetative traditions are of course deemed pure witchcraft, by the papal busybody, and his inquisitorial spooks.
Now we know why so many Mars probes were deliberately destroyed now there is the question of who our overlords serve and are willing to offer us up as a sacrificial offering to retain power or what is their real covenant or pack and what will be the payoff to our elites.
The late Claude Raines was in a movie variant of the Star Trek episode The World Is Hollow For I Have Touch The Sky. But in that film, the colony ship had become a tomb.
Good episode as it dealt with the Earth as something of a traveling celestial colony. If memory serves, there were mind manipulations apparent in that show, too. Of a verboten type to climb a certain height.
Along this line of speculation is Greg Bear’s excellent novel, “Eon,” in which the asteroid Juno had been hollowed out to create a “natural” spaceship. There’s also the strange population of diamond-shaped asteroids/moons, of which Deimos is one. It is noteworthy that many of the missions to asteroids have chosen the diamonds or cubes. Phobos is a fun topic to ponder. In addition to the monolith, there’s Stickney crater that could be a docking port of exhaust port; there’s what appears to be deck plating on the surface; there are strange lines radiating away from the large crater. In any case, there would be an astonishing amount of living space, artificial gravity if spun on its long axis, and natural protection from radiation and impacts. If I were Elon…
Assuming, that a great fall took place in high antiquity, then declaring the sublunar region, as a quarantine zone, makes sense, with observation posts in nearby orbit, at safe distance.
Assuming, that the cosmic fall in the heavens was caused, by tampering with the genome, producing orcs, then the transhumanist agenda is an ancient problem on repeat.
Assuming, that an ancient hybrid is in control, a biological robot of some sort – that doesn’t express quality of soul – then it has a hellbent agenda, to transform the planetary habitat, into its own devilish likings.
Thus the silent planet, as C. S. Lewis coins the phrase, is in fact a prison camp, ruled by Sauron’s papal gang.
Delightful! Rumour is the Mars Express also obtained full colour narrow angle camera images of the “Monolith” that sits on the surface of Phobos. Arthur C Clarke will be elated and proven correct!
When will ESA share the images with the public? Or will they pretend the narrow angle camera malfunctioned during transit?
ESA has nowhere to hide now!
Arthur C. Clarke’s black monolith is a blank Hollywood wide-screen, turned 90°, triggering military-industrial complex amongst primitive monkey goyim.
HAL “crazy daisy” 9000 is a secret agent AI computer, on a secret mission, and astronaut David Bowman heralds the birth of a New World Order.
That is sci-fi Hollywoodism on steroids, with 3D glasses, and a wide eye shut, featuring monkey goyim, being elevated into transhumanism.
Fabian eugenicists are meddling busybodies, lobbying for a better seat a the table, to rise in the ranks of food chain, by gaslighting.
As our Moon looks to have suddenly appeared[according to some].
Although, madness wasn’t discovered in conjunction w/the Moon’s appearance.
Jonathan Swift no less, who predicted the two moons of Mars.
I think the inner social circles Swift visited w/in; gave him an inkling or two about our celestial brother[s]. It’s interesting to note what “they” chose to reveal in print[so-to-speak], and what they did not(because I for one; don’t think they spilled all the Mexican strawberries[Lonesome Dove’s Gus McCrae’s word for “beans”]).
Their “esplaining” the Earth’s, Moons’, and solar system’s anomalies are going to be of mainstream cartoon quality; as “they” try to maintain the two systems stay separate and apart.
That is: the Breakaway[s] w/ all the real science, hidden from the rest of society; as opposed to the Horse & Buggy Science, w/all its cartoon esplaining away – any common sense solutions
That’s because “they” want to carry these two opposing systems; in the words of an appropriate cartoon character. “To infinity and beyond!”.
Star rover Ransom, with two culprits at gunpoint, observes two Malacandrian moons, when leaving scene of crime.
C. S. Lewis, Out of the Silent Planet:
“When he returned to the dark side, the world they were leaving hung in the star-strewn sky not much bigger than our earthly moon. Its colours were still visible – a reddish-yellow disk blotched with greenish blue and capped with white at the poles. He saw the two tiny Malacandrian moons – their movement quite perceptible – and reflected that they were among the thousand things he had not noticed during his sojourn there. He slept, and woke, and saw the disk still hanging in the sky. It was smaller than the Moon now. Its colours were gone except for a faint, uniform tinge of redness in its light; even the light was not now incomparably stronger than that of the countless stars which surrounded it. It had ceased to be Malacandra; it was only Mars.”
BTW, ancient Israelites were also into planets, and they were all up there, talking about kingdom of heaven etc.
Whereas King James’ bulk translation of Hebrew terms is a political compromise, and a scientific disaster, so that Pope Satan can have himself an idol, and sell his snake oil cantarella.
A cluster nexus in ancient Hebrew:
1. Yah is a temporal loop (year).
2. Yahweh is a temporal shift (annual jubilee).
3. Elohim is a temporal interval (planetary week).
4. Olam is a temporal circumscription (lifespan, OE werald [man’s age] as world).
Abram & Co heeded highest call,
while playing heaven balls,
and hailing year woe
in wine flow,
was drinking sport above all.
Elohim = heaven balls.
Yahweh = year woe.
The Runic Reformation comes out of Abram’s nose, as snot called Odin/Adon/Adonai.