I have to say that this website's article contributors are some of the sharpest people on the planet, so much so that occasionally they send along articles with their own cursory analyses which I find to be so compelling that I simply put a bit of spit and polish on them, and write the blog. Such is the case today with this article and "scenario analysis" by an individual who prefers to remain so anonymous that he (ahhh.... the benefits of the traditional masculine pars pro toto usage of the English language!) doesn't even want his initials used as a means of thanking him for the article and observations!

So today's high octane speculation is really not my own.

With that, here's the article:

XIV BRICS Summit Beijing Declaration

The declaration for the most part is, as one can tell from reading it, the usual and most-self-congratulatory boilerplate that such declarations coming out of international conferences tend to be. There are, however, a couple of intriguing "linguistic ambiguities" that make one wonder. The first of these (not pointed out by our anonymous article contributor) is the unusual language concerning the United Nations organization:

5. We reiterate our commitment to multilateralism through upholding  international law, including the purposes and principles enshrined in  the Charter of the United Nations as its indispensable cornerstone, and  to the central role of the United Nations in an international system in  which sovereign states cooperate to maintain peace and security, advance  sustainable development, ensure the promotion and protection of  democracy, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, and promoting  cooperation based on the spirit of mutual respect, justice and equality.

6. Recalling the BRICS Joint Statement on Strengthening and Reforming the Multilateral System adopted by our Foreign Ministers in 2021 and the  principles outlined therein, we agree that the task of strengthening and  reforming multilateral system encompasses the following:

  • Making instruments of global governance more inclusive, representative and  participatory to facilitate greater and more meaningful participation of  developing and least developed countries, especially in Africa, in global decision-making processes and structures and make it better attuned to contemporary realities;

Translation: no way in hell we're going to allow the United Nations organization to transmute into a global government and give up our national sovereignty, and any view of using it to impose the old Western imperialism on Africa in a new guise is not acceptable.  This is hightlighted by the later statement that the BRICS nations agree that the UN Security Council has the sole authority to level sanctions... take that, USA...

Beyond the usual double-talk of such boilerplate, however, there are a number of very peculiar parts of this document that relate to space. Consider the following paragraphs (and I have reversed the order of their appearance):

58. We  welcome the establishment of the BRICS Joint Committee on Space  Cooperation in line with the Agreement on Cooperation on BRICS Remote  Sensing Satellite Constellation and the convening of the first joint  committee meeting. We are satisfied with the formulation of working  procedures for data exchange and joint observation of the BRICS Remote  Sensing Satellite Constellation and appreciate the commissioning of data  sharing and exchange of the constellation. We encourage BRICS space  authorities to continue to effectively utilize the capacity of the  Constellation, and to widely promote application with data of the  Constellation, aimed at facilitating the sustainable development of  BRICS countries.

29. We call for  strengthening the system of arms control, disarmament and  non-proliferation, including the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological)  and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction (BTWC) and the Convention on  the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of  Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction (CWC), and for preserving  their integrity and effectiveness to maintain global stability and  international peace and security. We underline the need to comply with  and strengthen the BTWC, including by adopting a legally binding  Protocol to the Convention that provides for, inter alia, an efficient  verification mechanism. We reassert our support for ensuring the  long-term sustainability of outer space activities and prevention of an  arms race in outer space (PAROS) and of its weaponization, including  through negotiations to adopt a relevant legally binding multilateral  instrument. We recognize the value of the updated Draft Treaty on the  Prevention of the Placement of Weapons in Outer Space, the Threat or Use  of Force against Outer Space Objects (PPWT) submitted to the Conference  on Disarmament in 2014. We stress that practical Transparency and  Confidence-Building Measures (TCBMs), may also contribute to PAROS. (Emphasis added)

Now, as our anonymous contributor put it in the email accompanying the article, notice the reference to the use of force against "Outer Space Objects" and that the Brics nations are against this.  As our anonymous contributor noted, one does not use force against certain types of objects, like sand, or water, or forests, or even, to use another example from the context of the declaration itself, "remote sensing satellite constellations", which could certainly qualify as "objects" against which one might under certain circumstances use force, which, again, the BRICS nations in this declaration are against.

So let's extend our anonymous contributor's high octane speculations: why even mention such a thing? One answer is that, in 2022 when this declaration was made, the USA had already begun its strange media campaign of releasing its films and videos of "objects" in space, films very obviously - if not doctored or made up in a Disney studio - the result of military aircraft  gun camera footage. That idea alone implies military responses - "force" - perhaps being used against these things - or "objects".  A further context to this potential "war in space against 'objects'" is the strange remarks of President Ronald Reagan that Mr. Gorbachev subsequently revealed that Mr. Reagan had made to him. Basically Mr. Reagan's question was, "If ET attacks us, will you help us?" to which Mr. Gorbachev informed us that he had responded to Mr. Reagan's strange inquiry with a resolute affirmative.

So the BRICS declaration of 2022 actually poses a huge change on the part of one of those parties to Mr. Reagan's query, and therefore on the part of the BRICS nations of which it is a part: RussiaIf the USA is shooting at someone out there, the BRICS declaration to which Russia is signatory is tantamount to saying "You're on your own..."

So the questions are, what changed, and when did it change, and why? In answer to that question, join me in crawling even further out on the end of the high octane speculation twig, and recall for further potentially relevant context the strange remarks made by Russian leader Dmitri Medvedev a month before the Chelyabinsk meteor incident, calling for an international effort to construct an "asteroid defense system," and his additional statement that if no one joined Russia in the effort, Russia would just have to do so itself. Questioned as to how Russia would defend against asteroids, Mr. Medvedev stated that Russia could perhaps use its many strategic nuclear missiles, and then cryptically mentioned "other means" which were left conveniently unspecified. Or consider Mr. Trump's strange remarks during his administration about needing "another" space force, and his equally strange remarks about other types of weapons beyond nuclear that no one would believe.

In other words, the 2022 BRICS declaration shows us something that, unless you're paying close attention, you might miss: it's showing us a rift among the space powers of the world regarding "objects in space", one side apparently confronting them with force, and the other saying to the first "you're on your own," and kuddos to our anonymous article donor for spotting it. So, again the questions are, what changed, when did it change, and why?

And that, good readers, is not a rhetorical question.  It may, indeed, be the most pressing geopolitical, and perhaps even spatiopolitical, question.

See you on the flip side...

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".

No Comments

  1. paradigmslost369 on August 5, 2023 at 12:16 pm

    Oumuamua has such a striking likeness to human faeces that one wonders whether
    (1)Aliens are giants and
    (2) that they emptied their inflight toilet in our solar system.

  2. Copenhagen on August 1, 2023 at 2:24 pm


  3. Michael UK on July 25, 2023 at 10:10 am

    I suspect that Russia and China know secrets about some meteors / asteroids / space rocks that could be artificial in construction and made by aliens such as Oumuamua and Ryugu.

    Also Russia and China may know more about a possible spaceship that could have crashed on Mars.

    • Michael UK on July 25, 2023 at 10:31 am

      See these images of Ryugu asteroid, looks like an artificial satelllite. It is perfectly symmetrical – just like a spinning top or gyroscope!
      Also it may contain building blocks of alien life.

      • anakephalaiosis on July 26, 2023 at 4:37 am

        The Vatican psywar is pitting one tribe against another, which is the well-known tactical trademark of the Roman Empire, which is called “divide et impera” in Latin.

        The Von Braun/Rosin affidavit depicts a series of scare spins, with a backup plan, where culprit is finally seen hiding behind out-of-reach space rocks, in a “space spin” diversion.

        Having Jews on thrones in Scandinavia, begs the question, what papal plot is at large, and WHAT Jews are doing there, HOW did they get there, and WHY isn’t one being told?

        Hiding behind six million space rocks, ain’t gonna make a difference, in the Scythian revival of the Holy Grail, at the Last Supper.

  4. anakephalaiosis on July 25, 2023 at 2:15 am

    The Von Braun/Rosin affidavit stipulates a series of imaginary scares, that are needed as a precursor, to justify taxpayer money being used, to fund military-industrial complex.

    “Rights vs. Duties” is another angle, on the “Elohim-Yahweh” nexus, and one without the other won’t do, because it makes an unbalanced boilerplate into a mere piece of propaganda.

    In Bronze Age politics, Elohim-Yahweh is a balanced boilerplate, which is the whole point of a moot point, in itself, when striving for balanced thinking.

    BRICS is just a multilateral nexus, at the local powwow. That’s all.

  5. marcos toledo on July 24, 2023 at 7:34 pm

    Translation no Age of Conquest, Exploitation Murder for the West like what has happened on Earth for the last five hundred years shall happen in space if the BRICS CAN STOP IT.

    • anakephalaiosis on July 26, 2023 at 5:01 am

      From Asian perspective, Westerners are thralls under Jewish royalty, that operates secretly with secret agenda.

      Undermining the Minsk agreements, from the get-go, discloses the mind of the thrall, that has no honour, as lickspittle.

      Culturally, BRICS represents a push for bilateral tribal treaties, away from bloc hegemony of imperial design.

      The superstructures of the West are of Vatican design, and Catholic suppression awakens Scythian Protestantism.

  6. Marco Fredriks on July 24, 2023 at 6:26 pm

    My best thoughts are that we need to redefine what space is. I honestly dont believe the NASA version of space.

  7. Paolo on July 24, 2023 at 11:50 am

    Hum….could it be NAZIS in space that they are talking about?

  8. Robert Barricklow on July 24, 2023 at 11:18 am

    “They”, like the “U.N” speak and write in a reverse projective context. What the U.N. describes as the enemy; is – in reality – the best description of the U.N. itself. What they describe themselves as; is – as a friend of mine often says after giving directions – nowhere’s near it. It’s all Orwellian doublespeak – that’s “their” media in a nutshell. A nutshell, being a perfect metaphor for “them”.
    Reading the U.N’s description w/all the “democracy” and “sovereignty” is just the opposite of what number “5” describes. So full of B.S., it makes one blush, as the audacity – and to think someone may actually be swallowing their numerous baited hooks.

    The U.N. may have already swallowed an “other” hook and are mimicking an “other[s]” policies?

  9. InfiniteRUs on July 24, 2023 at 10:46 am

    Perhaps the BRICS hope to become the BRICSA by being alien inclusive rather than violently racist towards extraterrestrials.

    • anakephalaiosis on July 25, 2023 at 2:27 am

      The endgame isn’t a bloc another bloc, only bilateral security in fair trade. One bully ain’t gonna hold the “ring to rule them all”, when hobbits have a say.

      • anakephalaiosis on July 25, 2023 at 2:34 am

        *bloc against another bloc

  10. Eddie Worthington on July 24, 2023 at 9:00 am

    Let us not forget that Donald Trump is connected to the legacy of Nikola Tesla via Dr. John Brown of MIT, the expert called upon by the US Federal Government to catalog and explain the treasure trove of technology left behind by Tesla. Creation of the space force by POTUS Trump makes sense when viewed from this angle. I would wager that Trump knows plenty of what happens in space and how to prepare for it.

  11. Sophia on July 24, 2023 at 7:14 am

    Dr. Farrell,

    I’m not sure if this is related or not, but the US Army’s 4th PSYOP Group recently released another short video (1 minute long, this time). Some suspect this unit is used to “send messages” or something of the sort:

    4th PSYOP Group YouTube channel:

    Fly Me To The Moon
    Frank Sinatra

    Fly me to the moon
    Let me play among the stars
    Let me see what spring is like
    On a-Jupiter and Mars
    In other words, hold my hand
    In other words, baby, kiss me

    Fill my heart with song
    And let me sing for ever more
    You are all I long for
    All I worship and adore
    In other words, please be true
    In other words, I love you

    Fill my heart with song
    Let me sing for ever more
    You are all I long for
    All I worship and adore
    In other words, please be true
    In other words, in other words
    I love… you

    No coincidences?

    • anakephalaiosis on July 25, 2023 at 3:12 am

      The Vatican psywar is called divide and conquer, and Jesuits are trained assassins, who specialise in creating fake nationhoods, which are colour revolutions.

      Ideologically, Lao Tzu and Sun Tzu are one and the same. They both stand in Tao, which is outside the matrix of the crystal veil, in the in Flammarion engraving.

      In the clash between East and West, the Scythian narrative is decisive to victory, deprogramming the Roman Catholic Church, by calling out the papal scam.

      Scythian Odin is the key, to unlock the Caucasian door, in the Darial Gorge.

      • anakephalaiosis on July 25, 2023 at 3:32 am

        BTW, the population is socially conditioned, not to see the American Revolution, as a colour revolution. When the spell eventually wears off, it is systemically reinvigorated, by shocking the medium, into a collective trauma, by 9/11 etc., and by staging theatrical presidential assassinations, and spiriting Jesuit agents out of office, into retirement behind fake gravestones. Catholics can never be trusted, as they are papal toe kissers.

  12. Mark Sean de Cantual on July 24, 2023 at 6:14 am

    If the decision point actually arises or has arisen, we can only hope and pray, that our space brothers have the wherewithal and motivation to study, understand and effect discretion in their treatment of any part of humanity using “force” against any of their “objects”. Or indeed that some channel of communication, providing those details regarding the nuances of human realpolitik, space miltary technology and verification of owneship, is in place or in play prior to any such action decision point.

  13. Bizantura on July 24, 2023 at 5:55 am

    Current crop of Western leaders promote the constant “shocking of the Medium”. For themselves and or their evil masters. because they live of the energy that shocking produces? Gives dark forces constant acces to the human realm? Why would you support such a thing!

    • Brendan on July 25, 2023 at 10:15 pm

      @Bizantura – well if you pray to a dark deity like these sociopathic lot may likely do one would expect the energy would come from somewhere.

      • Brendan on July 25, 2023 at 10:16 pm

        Like Mr Burns’ birthday on the Simpsons, the newspaper headline says “Credits long life to Satan.”

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events