WEATHER DERIVATIVES STRIKE AGAIN

While you're contemplating the Maui fires and the possibility that they were desired, if not deliberately set, remember that there are now "weather derivatives". As I've mentioned before, weather derivatives are handy things to have around if you also have access to a technology that can manipulate the weather, and even more so if you're pushing the narrative of climate change. Since most people are completely unaware of these weather manipulation technologies, you can hire Angry Little Swedish Girls to scream about cow farts and agriculture and how we've got to get rid of CO2 (which plants breathe and exhale - as their waste gases - oxygen, which animals breathe.  Gee, almost as if it was designed that way. But I digress from the climate change lunacy of the Angry Little Swedish Girl, of Baal Gates, der Hochklaus Freiherr von Blohschwab und Bloviation, and John Ketchup I'll-continue-to-fly-on-my-private-airplane-if-I-want-to-because-I'm-a-big-hypocrit-like-everyone-else-in-the-Davos-set Kerry).

M.D. spotted these three articles about weather derivatives and shared them (with our thanks), and I find it extremely odd that they should appear in the same time frame as the Maui fires:

Chicago Mercantile Exchange starts offering rainfall futures and options

A blockchain-based platform for trading weather derivatives

Now, why am I bothering you about the obscure area of weather derivatives trading and options? Beyond the obvious implication of the collateralization of weather effects themselves (imagine: rainfall on your "balance sheet" and you get the horrifying idea), there is a connection to natural disasters that it is time that people start considering seriously: weather derivatives and weather manipulation technologies are the ultimate way for insider trading, for the very obvious reason that most people are unaware of such technologies, nor their enormous potential to capitalize (literally) on weather windfalls and things like "fire sales".

Many years ago, Catherine Austin Fitts mentioned her astonishment one year at the sudden - and inexplicable - sell-off of Indonesian bonds. But then everything became clear after the sell-off when the Indonesian tsunami of 2004 occurred. The sell-off occurred before the tsunami, indicating that the sellers had the ability to predict the tsunami, and what better way to predict a tsunami than to create one?

So with that in mind, one wonders: what were the weather futures and trades for Hawaii this month? for June and July? Who traded them? Who made money from weather derivatives involving Hawaii during this period?  The same questions not only might be asked of the Maui fire, but also of the Canadian, Australian, and California fires; and these questions not only might be asked of them, but they must be asked.

Will there be a pattern that emerges once one does ask these questions?

I simply don't know.

What I do know is that, if there is a pattern of consistent winners and losers in such fires that is exhibited in weather derivatives, then it is all but certain the events themselves were deliberately coordinated.

I'll go further: we need, from now forward, to query every natural disaster - floods, tornadoes, derechos, draughts, earthquakes - in this fashion: who were the pre- and post-disaster winners and losers? What were the weather derivatives trading? This will goa long way to determine if we are dealing merely with exploited crises of opportunity, or deliberately engineered ones.

See you on the flip side...