JUST EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED IN ACAPULCO?
This story is an unusual one, because virtually nothing, and I mean nothing is being said about it. There was, of course, the usual flurry of news in the media, and then the story seems to fade from front-and-center as our attention is made to lurch from one crisis to another: the Ukraine, Maui, Israel and Hamas... somewhere in that chain there was a tropical storm called "Otis" and its sudden and dramatic surge into a hurricane, and it plowed into the popular Mexican resort city of Acapulco... then, not a peep. I received the following story of D.J. and there is something - in fact, a things - that caught my eye and that, if true, argue that "something" is going on and it's not good:
It's that top statement on this website that disturbs:
On October 25th, at 1am, Acapulco was hit by a massive hurricane that erupted into a Category 5 from a tropical storm in a matter of hours and hit Acapulco with a population of nearly 1 million people in the middle of the night with no warning from the media.
National Public Radio seems to confirm that the hurricane dramatically intensified as it drew near the city from a category 3 to a category 5 storm, as noted by CNN:
Hurricane Otis unleashes massive flooding in Acapulco and triggers landslides
Hurricane Otis’ Category 5 ‘nightmare scenario’ knocks out all communications in Acapulco, Mexico
In the CNN version we're being given the usual "thermal" explanation for such an intensification of the storm: it picked up energy from the warm waters of the ocean. Interestingly enough, in the CNN version, the storm was predicted to intensify, but even here the article relates that the reality exceeded the predictions:
Otis was not forecast to become a hurricane until early Tuesday morning, a little more than 24 hours before it would make its unprecedented Category 5 landfall.
A hurricane watch was issued Monday afternoon for Acapulco and surrounding parts of the coast. The forecast was on the “high side of pretty much all the intensity guidance” that forecasters get from computer models, Michael Brennan, director of the National Hurricane Center, told CNN.
But the storm was still severely underestimated. Brennan said the satellite data and hurricane models were underplaying its current intensity and how strong it could potentially get.
Disruptive high-level winds were expected to keep a lid on Otis’ strength. But it was a small storm, which made it much more prone to big changes in intensity. As Tuesday progressed, and the storm began to move over incredibly warm water near the coast, it became clear environmental conditions weren’t playing out as forecasters expected and Otis was not going to be held back.
So the bottom line here is that the models, and the reality, varied immensely, and as the article goes on to relate (after the usual bow to the "this-all-happened-because-of-climate-change" narrative) that weather tracking aircraft flown into the storm showed that it was intensifying much more rapidly and strongly than the models predicted. The article then gives the following timeline of how rapid that intensification was:
3 a.m. – 65 mph tropical storm: The NHC first forecasts a hurricane and says there is “about 1 in 4 chance of rapid strengthening during the next 24 hours.”
9 a.m. – 70 mph tropical storm: The NHC ups its intensity forecast slightly and notes some forecast models show “a greater than normal probability” of rapid intensification and “further upward adjustments to the intensity forecast are possible later today.”
Noon – 80 mph Category 1 hurricane: The hurricane tracks into very warm water off the Mexico coast and begins rapidly intensifying, aided by moist air and favorable high level winds, two ingredients that allow cyclones to grow stronger. “Further strengthening [is] likely until landfall,” the hurricane center warns.
1 to 2 p.m. – Hurricane Hunters fly through the eye of Otis, discovering it was much stronger than satellites had estimated.
3 p.m. – 125 mph Category 3 hurricane: The NHC dramatically alters its intensity forecast and calls for an “extremely dangerous” Category 4 hurricane with sustained winds of 140 mph shortly before landfall.
6 p.m. – 145 mph Category 4 hurricane: The NHC warns “…there are no signs of this explosive intensification stopping,” and forecasts Otis to reach Category 5 for the first time.
9 p.m. – 160 mph Category 5 hurricane: The hurricane center warns “a nightmare scenario is unfolding for southern Mexico this evening with rapidly intensifying Otis approaching the coastline.”
12:25 a.m. Wednesday - Otis makes landfall as a 165 mph, Category 5 hurricane.
And after this we get more of the climate change narrative nonsense:
The storm’s rapid intensification is a symptom of the human-caused climate crisis, scientists say – and one that is becoming more frequent.
And after this comes the "thermal model" explanation: too much heat in the ocean contributed to the storm's intensification:
Scientists have defined rapid intensification as a wind speed increase of at least 35 mph in 24 hours or less, generally requiring significant ocean heat.
More than 90% of warming around the globe over the past 50 years has taken place in the oceans, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. In addition, El Niño is growing in the Pacific this year, driving ocean temperatures even higher.
Now, don't get me wrong nor misunderstand me: I am not saying that such storms have no thermal component. They obviously do. What I'm wondering, however, is exactly what human activity specifically contributed to the 31 degree Celsius patch of water off the coast of Mexico that was in the path of the storm? It certainly wasn't massive cattle-ranching and underwater bovine flatulence? If the warm was was somehow the result of the growing vulcanism in the Pacific "ring of fire" I can believe that, but how then are humans responsible for that? In short, the CNN article is advancing the usual narrative that accompanies such events, and doing so with no explanation nor connective process of reason. It simply utters statements as dogmatic pronouncements, which one must simply accept: dogma one: the models were unable to predict the rapid intensification of the storm; dogma two: it's all because of "human action" (left unspecified and undefined). Unstated problem: if the predictive models of the storm were so off in a weather event of a few hours, what does this say about the predictive models of "climate change"?
Woops. Don't go there. That's a "Shameful Question" you're not allowed to ask. Shut up, and accept the narrative.
In fact, while we're asking Shameful Questions, where are the studies and data correlating oceanic water temperatures with tropical storm intensity? I'm quite confident that there are such things, but they're completely absent from the article that confidently utters the dogmas of the narrative. What not mention them?
Might it be because such data does not incline to support such a rapid intensification of the storm? Is it because such data might indicate there is something anomalous about Otis and its energy? Might that data indicate that there had to be another source of energy for the storm than simply the "thermal explanation"?
As regular readers of this website probably already have guessed, I strongly suspect that this may be the case, because as I've been suggesting and arguing for many years, a purely thermal model of such vorticular storms does not seem sufficient to explain all the phenomena associated with them as, in this case, rapid intensification lying outside the predictive parameters of models. I've also been stating and arguing for a number of years that there is a truth contained in the standard climate change narrative that such things are due to human activity; it's just that the "human activity" that is being referred to is the actual development and deployment of weather modification and steering technologies and their use for disaster capitalism profit. Want to pick up some land in Canada, California, or Australia on the cheap? Have a fire, and then a "fire sale". In other words, there is a human activity, but that activity is being cloaked by the ridiculous narrative put out by idiots like the hysterical Swedish girl, Ketchup Kerry, and the like, that it's all due to over-farming, too much carbon, too many flatulating cows and pigs, and so on. As for that "extra source" of energy for rapid intensification (and steerage), try the electromagnetic manipulation of the ionosphere, and so much the better if you have a patch of warm water nearby to add a little extra "oomph" to the picure...
...See you on the flip side...
No Comments
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
Official; “Sir any device, should it exist would not be connected with this incident … or that incident … or the other incident. This does not mean we are aware of any such device … should it exist. Also please be aware of the faulty brakes in your car which is totally not related nor do we have knowledge of.”
I’ve lived on the Gulf coast of Florida for almost my whole life. I first heard about this event from Jeff Berwick, The Dollar Vivalante, and then from Max Igan (The Crowhouse), an Australian who has been residing in Acapulco for the last couple years. Max just happened to be traveling in the United States when the storm hit. Jeff who owns a home in Acapulco was at his home near Mexico City when the hurricane hit Acapulco. According to Jeff, there was no rain with this “hurricane”. Just wind and storm surge. And it came up so fast, there was almost no warning. Being a Floridian who has been through numerous tropical storms and hurricanes, nothing about this event rings true as being a natural weather event. There is always plenty of time to alert the population to evacuate, and there is always rain. This was a direct hit on a major city. Also where the Anarchopulco event is held every year. I believem2024 is the 10th year. Jeff Berwick is one of the main organizers, and Max Igan a featured speaker. The area is devastated. Jeff Berwick has organized a relief effort, if anyone cares to donate: hurricaneotisrecovery.com
This really is a strange one. So glad you highlighted it. I remain very interested in local and anomalous ocean warming. An extreme hot spot could cause unexpected weather.
Still, I’m leaning toward High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program. Here’s a cask-streangth speculation for the mix. The Mexican Govt has signaled interest in joining BRICS. If the storm was driven by human hand, perhaps this serves as motive.
As noted in other comments, it’s fascinating that the AGW narrative is proving useful for disaster capitalism, if not a one world government (and/or, either or?).
eddyminimum – based on your comment about Mexico’s interest to join BRICS, in today’s vidchat, I speculated that the “hurricane” was some sort of payback for the our President’s invitation to Russia to participate in the INDEPENDENCE DAY parade. Even some of the President’s advisors, not to mention, the suppossed “center-right” opposition parties critiqued this. So, the BRICS situation and the direct defiance of U.S. current hostile police towards Russia, by inviting the russian military to the parade, I’m sure have something to do with the utilization of some sort of high energy technoloy to turn a tropical storm into a massive category 5 hurricane. I’m not defending the president, who is a crypto-mason and has clear intention to further destroy the roman catholic culture that was a great cultural and social strength in Mexico.
As one who lived through hurricanes Irene and Maria which struck Puerto Rico a week apart and left the island four months without power, this looks like an upgrade on directed storms
In an attempt to ‘control the weather’ scientists experimented on de-intensifying tropical storms in the Gulf of Mexico. Clouds were “seeded” using silver iodide with the ‘hope’ it would weaken the storm system. They had limited success, and we were told the project was abandoned by 1983. In August 2005, Hurricane Katrina a Category 5 Atlantic hurricane moved into the Gulf of Mexico which caused 1,836 fatalities and damage estimated between $97.4 billion to $145.5 billion. New Orleans was almost fully devastated. At the time, it was the costliest tropical cyclone on record, later tied by Hurricane Harvey of 2017. Are nuclear weapons testing to blame, or is it due to our Sun going into its solar maximus? Who knows, but hurricanes, cyclones, droughts and other devastating weather events have been a part of Earth’s cycle for as long as anyone can remember.
Project Stormfury, an attempt to control the weather. https://spectrumlocalnews.com/nc/charlotte/weather/2021/11/23/project-stormfury
In one’s view, Otis probably had a little help from El Nino and Solar energy inputs. The satellite imagery showed a ‘bullseye’ like direct hit on the city as it spin up to a Cat-5.
. . . “the “thermal model” explanation: too much heat in the ocean contributed to the storm’s intensification: . . . ” is where one trends toward for some extra late minute heat exchanging. But there’s also Solar activity, a whopping big player in weather phenomena, that seems to be neglected or forgotten about. Nasty omission. One would suggest that that direction is a mistake, and that the Sol star is VERY much involved with global weather extremes as is the weakening magnetosphere (a VERY big factor neglected). Sol is still increasing towards Solar max while also getting ready to shift polarity. The Earth’s magnetosphere is shifting and that recorded data of any past occurrences is having some folks question current causality.
Meteorological science, science in general, is lagging for what is taking place. What’s been recorded in the rocks and Solar system has yet to be fathomed, too, without toes of ignorant academia getting stepped on.
As for this upright simian type taking ALL the credit for weather & climactic inducement, . . . Well, . . . more of a wild boast on behave of the elitists WHO think they know better, but don’t know what. Supercomputing & AI modeling may be fun and a great tool to use but garbage-in is still garbage-out.
BC flooding, is to Chinese winter Olympic cloud seeding, as Acapulco destruction is to _______________.
….”and when we act, we create our own reality. And while your studying that reality-judicially as you will-we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out.”. – Mr. Warmth, Dick Cheney
The good news is that tax your dollars paid for the technology to reign terror down from the Gods upon the people; a people who have trusted in governance systems-long ago overthrown-acting in their own, narrow sighted and godless interests.
The people are supposed to have become dumbed down[B.S. media narratives galore] and passive through both electromagnetic technologies and chemical warfare[chemtrails, ionic heaters, mRNA injections, and a compromised food system, etc., etc.].
So, where’s the next real estate bonanza going to be?
You know, the other new real estate realities being created?
See any tell-tale 9/11puts recently?
Or, Indian Ocean beach front properties?
Somebody wanted to smoke out the pervasive drug cartels, that took a stronghold of Acapulco for years now. That’s all. Did they got too independent from their masters (read Langley boys)?
I watch the satellite imagery each day to manage my farm in SoCal. The imagery presented on wunderground.com displays the entire region. I saw the tropical storm off the coast and felt relieved that it was not heading north. But then a strange series of events unfolded over the following days. The storm became larger, made landfall, and then completely disappeared. That’s what got my attention. How does such a large storm evaporate so quickly after landfall? The news reports of the disaster followed. Disaster capitalism.
A similar thing happened with Katrina which made landfall at Hallandale Beach in Florida before moving out over the warm waters of the Gulf of Mexico and ramping up quickly into a Category 5, moving very eratically, like a pinball wizard, and then eventually hitting southeast Louisiana and Mississippi as a Category 3.
It has been argued by some scientists that the human cause of Earth’s warming climate since the 1940s has been nuclear weapons testing – atomic bombs and hydrogen bombs which have trashed and greatly disrupted the Earth’s troposphere, ionosphere and magnetosphere. Unfortunately the tests are classifed top secret, so we will never know the truth. That is the reason why intelligence agencies, John Ketchup etc have pushed the human fossil fuel generated CO2 narrative. They would not want the public to rally and mass demonstrate against nuclear weapons like they have done with fossil fuels and big oil (Greta know it all, Extinction Rebelllion etc).
Yes that sounds logical to me, and the climate change narrative was convenient for other purposes. A win-win situation for the bullies.
The weather god is very angry, and plebs must confess their sins, and make amends, by paying tribute, to Pope Nero-Caligula’s new palace construction.
Catholic kumbaya, and rosary, will save you, from the angry weather god, because Pope Nero-Caligula is your supreme weather Jesuit in office.
You must believe everything he says, because the supreme weather Jesuit is infallible, and he is your only protection, against heathen Odin, who drinks beer at the pub.
Be a good Catholic, and remember, that Pope Nero-Caligula is your friend.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/g1y6f9ds6u01tdu/jesuit-jew.jpg