WHY IS SOMEONE TRYING TO KILL RFK, JR.?
A respectful doff of the hat to the good folks at Armstrong Economics for covering a story that the Amairikuhn lamestream propatainment media virtually refuse to cover: various assassination attempts on independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. (article shared by V.T.):
While I have little in common with many of Mr. Kennedy's policies, I do share some of his views (on, for example, border security, or the questionable "science" behind so many vaccines, including the covid injections which I cannot even recognize as vaccines in any classic understanding of the term). On that score, Mr. Kennedy's book The Real Anthony Fauci is a stunner, not only exposing the "science", but the whole fabric of paid-for "results" and the vast minefield of corrupted institutions behind the covid planscamdemic.
Beyond this, I do, however, feel some sort of connection and empathy for him, because I was a boy and youth when his famous uncle and his own father were so cruelly and publicly murdered. It is now apparent to anyone who has bothered to do but a minimum of open-minded research into "The Three Assassinations" (Dr. King being the third, and if you're counting Malcom X, then a fourth), that what we are now calling the Deep State - Continuity of Government, Shadow Government, Secret Team, whatever you wish to call it - was deeply involved and implicated in the planning and cover-ups of those murderous events.
To his great credit, Mr. Kennedy has also courageously gone on record as believing that he does not think that Sirhan Sirhan, convicted for the murder of his father, actually did the deed, and again, on that score, anyone who has studied that assassination will realize there is a great deal of evidence to suggest that Sirhan, like Lee Harvey Oswald or James Earl Ray, was the deep state's designated patsy.
All of this brings us to the central point of today's blog:
Someone is attempting to eliminate the competition. The mainstream media has failed to properly cover the repeated assassination attempts against Robert F. Kennedy Jr., which are a direct threat to our already corrupt election process. RFK Jr. has been pleading with the government to provide him security to no avail. As I said, he knows he is a walking target for exposing nearly every angle of the establishment, and the powers that be want him permanently eliminated.
The question is thus not so much the "who?"... we already know the answer to that question: "the (very corrupt and very evil) powers that be", the Swamp, the Deep State, the COG, the secret team...again, call it what you will. We'll get back to the "who?" as the article itself returns to it. The other question is the "why?" What precise threat does Mr. Kennedy pose that, for example, Donald Trump does not? Why go to all the trouble to get Mr. Trump out of the picture through indictmentgate, and not try similar tactics with Mr. Kennedy? Why, in other words, have "they" gone immediately to the assassination paradigm, do not pass go, do not collect 200 indictments, but go directly to assassination? And in case you didn't know, there have already been attempts on Mr. Kennedy's life, and please note, all of them were by "lone nut" patsies, conforming to the patterns we've come to accept for assassinations of American political leaders since John Wilkes Booth:
First, an armed man attempted to breach RFK JR.’s campaign in September when he was speaking at Wilshire Ebell Theatre in Los Angeles, only two miles from where his dad was murdered in 1968. The attempted assassin was carrying a US Marshal badge and claimed to be part of the security crew. “The man, wearing two shoulder holsters with loaded pistols and spare ammunition magazines was carrying a U.S. Marshal badge on a lanyard and beltclip federal ID. He identified himself as a member of my security detail,” Kennedy posted on X. “Armed GDBA team members moved quickly to isolate and detain the man until LAPD arrived to make the arrest. I’m also grateful to LAPD for its rapid response.”
Then yet another intruder attempted to enter Kennedy’s personal home. The intruder was arrested and quickly released on bail. The restraining order did absolutely nothing as the same man returned to Kennedy’s home on the very day of his arrest and attempted to break in while Kennedy and his wife were home.
And in the case of the second designated patsy, the Deep State "they" were apparently attempting, as they so often do, to "stack functions" and "combine operations" by loosely implicating Donald Trump in the second assassination attempt!:
Interestingly, the home intruder Jonathan Macht, 28, has been described as a smart “book nerd kid” who supported Donald Trump. “I thought he was a Trump supporter,” a business associate said to reporters. “We were just talking about how the economy was doing good when Trump was there. He was like, ‘Hopefully we’ll have another Trump in office.” Macht is a successful real estate broker and does not outwardly present as some crazed lunatic. Yet, Kennedy’s team claims Macht had sent them hundreds of emails and was obsessed with the politician.
Such a move is typical, and smacks of desperation. Indeed, these people are so deeply committed to their own propatainment, that one can even imagine them extending that scenario to encompass The Ukraine, Russia, and Mr. Putin, because after all Mr. Putin helped Mr. Trump get into the White House!
Unfortunately, as the article also concludes, none of this is going to wash:
This is another example of the Deep State interfering in our elections. We must realize that Kennedy will continue speaking and questioning the government even if he is not elected president. The Deep State wants him silenced. People are waking up are realizing that he is far from a conspiracy theorist. These are clear attempts to murder a potential presidential candidate, and although we are far out from the election, RFK would be dead if not for his personal security team.
Indeed, one wonders if having secret service protection would be such a good idea: it did neither his uncle nor his father any good, and a case can be made, again, that at least in his uncle's instance, there were indications of security stripping at the crucial moment of the motorcade.
But this question remains: why are "they" so intent on denying that protection - in effect, repeating the security stripping - that lead to his uncle's murder? :
Every presidential candidate since the 1970s who has requested Secret Service protection has received it. Candidates may receive Secret Security protection 120 days prior to the election OR earlier in extraordinary cases. Obama received Secret Security detail two years before the election because the government claimed he had “a realistic chance to become president” and faced “unique threats as a black man.” Now, we have three consecutive assassination attempts against Kennedy, and the Biden Administration refuses to provide him with security.
Or again, why have "they" leapt directly to the assassination solution, do not pass go, do not collect 200 indictments, but go directly to assassination? What is the major threat from Kennedy that requires such a "solution" that even Donald Trump does not pose?
Well, I am, as one might expect, going to speculate here: firstly, I think it is abundantly clear that "they" did try the assassination solution on Mr. Trump, multiple times. There were, as you might recall, multiple helicopter attempts woth helicopter problems, even attempted missile launches (if you were paying close attention) in Hawaii during Mr. Trump's flight to meet with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, or missile launches in Puget sound (remember that one?), and Mr. Trump also retained his personal security long after entering the White House (which, you might also recall, he declined to enter immediately after taking office). Secondly, in both cases, we are dealing with men who, whatever their individual policy disputes, have broadly similar views, and both are independently wealthy and not beholden to their individual party elites and their donor lists. But in Mr. Kennedy's case, unlike Mr. Trump, one is dealing with someone who, through his family history alone, probably "knows things", or at least, suspects things about those murders that so impacted his own life and that of his family, that he might be inclined to use presidential power to open up those archives that even Mr. Trump was reluctant to do. Those suspicions probably include the death of his cousin, John F. Kennedy, Jr. Many people who have investigated that "accidental death" have concluded there is enough prima facie evidence there to question the whole accidental death narrative, and I number myself among that group of people. I simply do not believe it, and I do believe there are enough indicators to suggest that JFK Jr. was privately investigating his father's murder. It goes without saying that he, and his cousin RFK Jr., probably had many a private discussion on those subjects. Thirdly, and oddly enough, Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Trump have a connection precisely through JFK, Jr., with whom Mr. Trump was friendly. I am suggesting, in other words, that there is a deep nexus here, and one which is probably a factor in the calculus of the "They" in dealing with both men. When one extends that range of associations to include, in Mr. Trump's case, Roy Cohn, and that nexus becomes even more suggestive, for Roy Cohn, of course, was chief council to Senator Joseph McCarthy, and Senator McCarthy in turn was a close friend of the Kennedy family, and, it should be added, Mr. Kennedy's own father, RFK Sr., was for a short period the assistant council to McCarthy, and therefore, Mr. Cohn's subordinate.
When one contemplates the implications of these associations with the eyes of its opponents - associations which go back far enough in time to the rise of the Kennedy political dynasty, and to the rise of the Trump financial empire - than one clearly has that kind of informal network of associations so feared by those in power and by their own deep states. To draw an analogy between this Kennedy network (and its extended Trump associations), to yet another such network, one is looking at what Joseph Stalin so feared and attempted to eliminate in his infamous show trials of the late 1920s and early 1930s: an independent Trotskyist network that extended to and included Marshal Mikhail Tukhachevski and the "Khabarovsk Lot". It was a network that potentially "knew things" of such a nature as could imperil Stalin and his own deep state apparatchiks. It is that potential knowledge and its own unknown extent of connections and information that is feared. It is also feared because the tacit agreement "not to discuss nor to reveal certain things" can always change if enough components of such informal networks agree that they should.
In short, the indictments against Mr. Trump, and the assassination attempts against Mr. Kennedy, would appear to be of a piece, and part of one operation, for the connections and the animosities underlying those connections were forged during the 1950s. That 1950s connection might explain - and if one is following the research of Diana West, does explain at least in part - why the powers behind Mr. Bai Den Dzhao are so intent on stripping Mr. Kennedy of Secret Service protection, like they did his uncle. Patsies, false flags, security stripping: the pattern has not changed; the fingerprints of the perpetrators are all over both the attempted and the realized crimes...
... See you on the flip side...
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.