WOE CANADA! BABIES TO BE ALLOWED EUTHANASIA
As if you needed any more proof that the regime of Justin Turdeau in Canada is completely anti-human and anti-God, and that as a sign of the decline of the West and its institutions in general Canada cannot be bested, then there is this story shared by one of our Canadian readers, R.P., and a cautionary note: it is not for the light-hearted:
Canada expands assisted suicide laws to allow for killing of INFANTS for profit
We are where the pro-life movement said we'd be, decades ago when the United States' Supreme Court decision on Roe vs. Wade was handed down: that full-term abortion on demand for any reason whatsoever would eventually lead to infanticide, and that, in turn, would lead us to other kinds of state-sanctioned killings having nothing to do with capital punishments of crimes. It is the end result of that vile change within so many business of their departments of personnel to departments of human "resources", the reduction of the human being, at all stages of life, to a mere bundle of chemicals and resources to be harvested and sold when "convenient":
Canadian Dr. Louis Roy is leading the charge to allow toddlers and infants in Canada to be killed through euthanasia.
Boasting the world's laxest assisted suicide laws, Canada is now a safe haven for young children to be euthanized for profit under the expansive Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program.
From now on, infants deemed too sickly to live can be signed up for assisted suicide in Canada, even though critics argue that a young child is not old enough to make this kind of decision without coaxing.
Fulfilling what many worried would eventually become the case, MAiD appears to be a program for expanding infanticide rather than assisted suicide, also known as "death with dignity."
But there's a "catch" in this article, a "hang-up" as it were, and it's at the center of all such debates. The article hems and haws, tacks and comes about again, but in the end, still sails into a head wind. Consider the following passages:
As you will see and hear, Dr. Roy believes that in cases where a child is born with "severe malformations," it is not out of the question for that child to want to die rather than have to live an entire life with such problems. (Emphasis added)
Wait a minute. Who said? The Quebec College of Physicians? How do they know what such a child does or does not want?
At the same time, a child under one year of age cannot possibly consent to die, no matter how much he is spoon-fed the words by parents or a doctor. At what point does society draw a line on consent for "assistance in dying?"
"Instead of 'assistance in dying,' infants will be euthanized for the convenience of the parents and doctors who no longer want to deal with problematic babies," one report explains. (Bodlface emphasis added)
Bingo: this is all about "convenience" again, just as the limitless abortion-on-demand was always, and only, about convenience.
The Quebec College of Physicians defends its support for the practice by claiming that some babies are suffering from "unbearable pain" that only assisted suicide can quell.
Unbearable pain... put them down, like a sick kitten or bird. And note carefully that we are never told exactly what constitutes "unbearable pain", because with such people, that goalpost constantly changes. What about the child who wants to bear the pain of that cancer, in order to live? Or is it really about the unbearable pain to the adult not undergoing it?
What is unclear from all the support, though, is how custodial situations work in which a child is handled by two different parents who may not both be in agreement that a child's "pain" warrants assisted suicide.
Adults, the college says, can decide for these babes, this acting as a "safeguard" between the child and attending "physicians" who are ready and waiting to kill babies for profit.
Really? I suspect we already know that will happen if father is opposed to the euthanasia of his offspring, and the mother supports it: she will prevail, because of course the infant was "once a part of her body", a bit of gynecological nonsense that once underwrote all those pleas for abortion on demand: My body my choice, with the fact that the infant body in question had different genetics than, say, the mother's arms or big toes. My body my choice went right out the window once that, too, became inconvenient to the planscamdemic narrative and the "mandates".
Of course, the real goal is simply as has already been stated: the total reduction of a human being at any stage of life to a mere "resource" to be harvested for his or her life, and when that is no longer "profitable" their life can be ended and their organs "harvested" and sold. And the technocrat is really, when all the talk about women's rights or reproduce rights, or age-ism or parental rights or children's rights is said and done, the one who gets to make the decision.
Underpinning all of this is the idea that the infant is not "self-aware":
"An infant is not self-aware and cannot 'commit suicide,'" one report explains about the lunacy of expanding MAiD to include babies. "Infants want to live, eat and be held by their parents."
The key here is "self-awareness". What, exactly, defines a "person", and how is the "awareness" of that entity manifest and known? Indeed, can personhood ever really be defined, exhaustively and all-inclusively, or can we only aspire to symbolize its infinite depths of utter uniqueness by symbolizing it with the word "person"? Do any of us, ever, ever reach total, all-encompassing "self-awareness"? And even if we do, how do we communicate that to someone else? And must they be entirely self-aware too? And how do we know we are "self-aware" and what is the magic age that that happens, or is that too, an infinite chasm of uniqueness which we can only symbolize? Is the ability to communicate that awareness somehow constitutive of our very "personhood"? Does the fact that I, a grown man of 66 years, still want to live, to eat, and even to be held by my parents, make me an infant, or does it just make me human? In short, who said an infant is not self-aware? and how do "they" know it? The bottom line is that knowledge and self-awareness are pretty poor determinants of what constitutes a "self" and a "person". That is the deepest of all mysteries, and it is the question at the heart of all philosophy and of all science and of all religion and worship. And the best and wisest answer has been to honor that mystery by protection of the youngest and tenderest stages of life, because when that stage is reduced to mere awareness or a mere resource or defined as this or that chemical reaction or materialist paradigm, all other stages are reduced to that as well.
Or to put it in a very different form, the truest and best measure of is what is fully human does not arise at some "age of reason" or when the bishop comes by to slap someone in the face, but is fully present at the outset and ab initio; the acorn is still an oak, and the only seed of the oak is an acorn. It's why, in some churches, infants and children are not packed off to "Sunday school" where they can learn to be "self-aware" in some sort of semi-human-until-'self-awareness'-limbo" awaiting the day of the episcopal slap in the face, but instead enter the communion line with their parents, and are, with them, full members of that great society of the communio sanctorum even in infancy... That life, and that person, are sacred, even and especially, in infancy.
See you on the flip side...
No Comments
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
No! No! These babies know. After all these people claim babies are old enough to decide to switch sexes -or be a nothing at all! It’s time to quit coddling this type of nonsense from these types of people. Turn about is fair play since they seem to know what’s best for US – I think I know what’s best for THEM…
OMG…I`m completely speechless and deeply aggravated…This is simply diabolical!
Guess this is no news spread widley on the TV news, or in mainstream media…
The idea that infants or prenates do not have self-awareness is patently false. There is an entire body of psychology devoted to exploring issues from birth and in utero. Check out the Association for Pre and Perinatal Psychology and Health (APPPAH) [https://birthpsychology.com/]. They specifically look at the birth and prenatal process from the lens of the prenate/infant, providing incredible insight into our children and ourselves. This video helps explain some of the ideas: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7z-BxmXg9_c]
This is insidious. The Trudeau government is like some kind of litmus test for the WEF or NWO. Looking at it he is the ideal candidate.
Thank you Dr Joseph. That was profound.
Infanticide has been with humanity all along. The practice has historically been sanctioned by both religious and secular societies. There have been ebbs and flows of what is acceptable and what is not, legislation notwithstanding. It’s hardly surprising to see society slipping after a period of condemnation of the practice. And it’s not at all shocking that Canada is one of the first western nations to “legislate” that it’s ok to kill babies after they exit the birth canal. Perhaps it’s an admission by the new priest class (the almighty cult of medics) that they can’t actually fix anything. No surprise there either. While the notion of baby-killing sends my limbic system into chaos, i realize no action i can take will alter the crowd’s course. The most meaningful thing i can do is pass to my descendants the concept that life is sacred. That’s done.
Who keeps the Adrenochrome from the euthanized I wonder ?
The street name for Adrenochrome is Ambrosia, which is, what the nectar of the gods was called, in ancient times.
Bloodsucking vampires aim for the highest position, in any society, to secure their supplies, by pomp and circumstance.
To keep the gaslight going, they claim divine right to rule, in the pantheon, and hire autists, as religious bureaucracy.
When the Scythian SEAL Team of the Holy Grail arrives, then the vampires vapourise, because of industrial skull cup production, by Buffy the Vampire Slayer.
Greetings from the Benighted White North!
A Modest Proposal. Where’s Swift when you need him?
Anyway, it looks as if Roy is the stooge put up to float this trial balloon. I’ll bet the remuneration is good–probably better than the per-jab fee doctors got for administering injections.
The one angle that wasnt explored here is that Canada has a government funded healthcare system. With the Turdeau regime trying to destroy Canada’s fundamental economic advantages (e.g. oil & gas, agriculture), it will continue to become increasingly hard to pay for health care, especially until all the baby boomers die off (which Turdeau wasnt successful in doing during the planscandemic).
During the Roe vs Wade debate I posted on social media that my actual birth date was the night my parents conceived me, and the day I left my mother’s body is actually better termed as Mothers Day. My Mother agrees with this concept, but there were some haters to my social media post.
1. Assyrian loyalists were a distinct group, that replaced the deported proto-Scythians, and took over their wine farms.
2. The Assyrian loyalists were of course loyal, to the Assyrian empire, otherwise they wouldn’t have been offered such spoils of war.
3. These Assyrian loyalists were never driven out of the territory, and when the Romans wanted a ruthless tax collector, they chose Herod.
4. Herod was an Assyrian loyalist, with an eugenic agenda, hostile to the proto-Scythian descent, resulting in genocide, by a Roman mandate.
5. This resulted in an exodus to Britain, under a reconstructed tribal leadership, with a Scythian mandate, in defiance of the Roman Empire.
6. The Romans had no interest in the Assyrian loyalists, because theft of wine farms, and leeches on thrones, don’t build taxable societies.
7. These Assyrian loyalists, driven out by the Romans, have been falsely posing, as proto-Scythian descent, ever since.
8. When Assyrian loyalists become exposed, as having a stolen identity, then they will be judged as fraud, and sentenced as unwanted.
9. To prevent exposure, the Assyrian loyalists need to have the proto-Scythian descent conquered, weakened, and unknown to itself.
10. Today, the Assyrian loyalists have an eugenic agenda, to prevent proto-Scythian descent, from ever claiming rightful heritage.
Cain wants to mass murder Abel, by any means, which is contrary, to being spawned in tea cosy.
I guess World War II is far enough in the past for eugenics to come out in the open again. I never thought I’d live to see the day, yet here we are . . .
Eugenics isn’t fixed on the timeline, and history books reflect only, what is allowed to say. There are many types of systemic murders ongoing, at any given time, that are racially motivated, by means of slow poisoning, and soft assassinations.
The original concept of paradise was the control of territory, by the scales of law, represented by a cultural trope, known as Elohim-Yahweh. To ban clan members, who sought to breed outside the ingroup, was a necessary precaution, to prevent a hostile takeover.
My bardic bloodline is amongst the ancient creators of Scandinavia, which is why I am targeted, from day I crawled out of the crib, by Herods on thrones, who are systematically, and preemptively, uprooting traits, that could potentially rise and defy pretenders.
Abel doesn’t do magic anymore, because Abel has ten Cains, watching his every move, ready with a Jesuit knife. Abel can only survive, as a wild animal, and therefore he has no use for overseas moralists.
*fixated on the timeline…
Who’s Next old people there is an episode of Star Trek the Next Generation where on this planet when you turned sixty you had to snuff yourself. My guess is since there hasn’t been a major planetary war in the last eighty years our masters are tearing their hair trying to come up with an excuse to perform human sacrifice to the gods they truly worship.
This new Canadian infant euthanasia policy sounds exactly like Aktion T4, the Nazi law that allowed for the forced euthanasia of disabled children and adults.
https://allthatsinteresting.com/aktion-t4-program
T4 established the legal groundwork that made the holocaust possible through Nazi law. In addition to turning humans into mere products, this new Canadian euthanasia policy could be setting the stage for mass forced euthanasia (state sanctioned mass murder).
If it wasn’t already abundantly clear that Canada is going balls-out Nazi, it should be clear now.
Hitler was a Jew, and Himmler a Jesuit, which makes Nazi an extension of the Vatican, a controlled opposition, and a Catholic crusade against heathens.
The founders of the USA were Jesuit-controlled Freemasonry, which makes the USA likewise a Vatican creation, exterminating heathens in Europe and elsewhere.
Judeo-Christianity is a Catholic deception, and those, wailing at the wall, claim false identity, and seek to rule over those, to whom the identity truly belongs.
Two can’t share the same identity, and one will have to go.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/rtq5r7pkcbxowfi/original-settlement.jpg
Yep its the T4 program all over again. Hitler initiated it in 1939. We have Baal.Gates ‘final solution’ running at the same time. There’s nothing new under the sun. The Nazi mindset is in full swing. If another third of the population starts waking up we might save civilisation-if not whoops here we go again.
As a character in one of my fiction books relates, It isn’t what they’ve done that disturbs her. What disturbs, her is that she’s not crying anymore. She’s become partially desensitized.
That looks to be part of the goal in these inhuman acts being splashed in ink across the globe; both in those participating and those knowing about it.
RAGE is what I feel.
The story brings to mind Shakespeare’s Macbeth…,
“Life is a tale/Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury”.
Once again, I’m running late..
Will finish post later…
White Rabbit
A “hang-up” is.., your still breathing.
That’s where it’s all headed to, at the pass; still living, w/the wrong ideology.
One world. One ideology.
Your with us; or, your on the death list.
Your digital footprint will be continually processed by an AI, to see where you stand.
Not a social credit score per se; more of a – life or death score.
1. Religious bureaucracy always ends up sacrificing man, by casting lot, to decide, who is going to be cannibalised, and, those, who have no advocate, are less likely to present a complaint.
2. Empires are built on religious bureaucracy, where those enslaved keep other enslaved, which is the crusading Catholicism, whose worldview needs to abort Protestants as heathens.
3. Secular Elohim-Yahweh – as the balance of the scales – doesn’t allow bureaucrats any supernatural hideouts, because there aren’t any shadows to hide in, at the centre of revealing light.
4. Only Elijah’s template of Odin, which is Scythio-Christianity, can oppose the Colosseum of Judeo-Christianity, that the Assyrian loyalists propose, by papal decree.
5. There isn’t any valid position in Catholicism, because Catholicism is, by definition, a slippery slope, towards aborting heathens, and, whatever is heathen, pope Nero-Caligula decides, on a whim.
6. To maintain cost effective provinces, the most ruthless tax collector is appointed, to increase Roman tax income, which brings Herod to power, who feeds infants to Moloch.
7. To culturally uproot the balance at the scales, Herod bans Yahweh, the annual jubilee at solstice gathering, and, to secure compliance, the youngest are targeted as blasphemous.
8. Today, Christmas is likewise targeted, by the Scrooges, who are moneylenders in a Christmas carol, hunted by their past actions, which was where the Scythian hunt claimed skulls.
9. Those bureaucrats, who are Vatican agents, live in dreaded fear of the Scythian drinking culture, whose Protestantism toasted bureaucrats to hell, in their own skull cups, by ancestral tradition.
10. The Last Supper revived a seven centuries old tradition, and, like Nineveh fell, so did Rome, four centuries later, because every toast, to Odin, was a praise to downfall of religious bureaucracy.
PROTESTANTISM
Odin, with his eye in a well,
did, what pub tales tell,
toast Vatican flop
by skull cup,
on highway to hell.