Transhumanist

NANOTECH BIOEXPLOSIVE ENGINEERING IN FRANCE

In case you think that bizarre materials engineering projects are the sole and exclusive brief of American or Chinese black projects, this one is being reported from France:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-11-explosive-composite-based-nanoparticles-dna.html

Let's speculate a bit here. Ever since the appearance of Eric Drexler's Engines of Creation, outlining the perils and promise of nanotechnology, materials engineering on a molecule-by-molecule, and even an atom-by-atom level, was at first the plaything of theorists, but is now, as the article illustrates, the stuff of reality.

The idea that nanoengineers are designing explosives with their new toy should give us pause. Imagine the possibilities, speculate, let the mind roam free, pretend you're a research scientist for DARPA reading this article...

... Imagine the ability to engineer a material with enough explosive brissance to initiate thermonuclear explosion, i.e., a hydrogen bomb. Indeed, as I've detailed in various books, but especially The Philosophers' Stone, this was indeed a sought-after goal both of the American and Soviet thermonuclear programs of the late 1950s, namely, a hydrogen bomb that wouldn't require one of those nasty, dirty atomic bombs to set it off, whence cometh all that nasty dirty fallout. One could have a clean hydrogen bomb, a clean big bang.

Enter nano-technology and engineering on the molecular scale. Of course, there are all sorts of nasty reasons that such a material could never be engineered, and we needn't go into them here. What is interesting is that the USA and USSR pursued such a project anyway, notwithstanding those "nasty reasons" when the prospects for success were even less, and the techniques and materials engineering technologies much less than they are now.

Imagine nano-engineering a super-dense material at cryogenic temperatures, and then suddenly subjecting it to a sudden increase of heat...and...well, bang. Indeed, such an idea was patented, as I point out in my various books on Nazi technology, in 1938, by the physicist Nowak.

The French have doubtless more up their classified sleeve than what is revealed in the phys.org article, and I strongly suspect that imaginations are already running wild in the black laboratories of the world on the possibilities...

39 thoughts on “NANOTECH BIOEXPLOSIVE ENGINEERING IN FRANCE”

  1. Hmmm….. just add a couple of nanobombs to the coming medical nanobots that will circulate in your bloodstream and…. kaboom! …. “boy, he blowed up real good”

  2. Paul, you probably understand me better than
    you are assuming. Don’t underestimate yourself.
    I know just how complicated I am.

    If I elaborated at this time, you would not understand at all !!
    All things happen in the time it is due, or in due time
    BECAUSE
    they have already happened, not yet happened and the only
    ‘now’ there is, is the timelessness between time quanta.
    Yes the idea is already being researched.

    The odd thing that really gets my goat is that shortly after
    I come up with a working ‘theory’ and share it not much above a whisper,
    it seems to go “out there” and becomes a thing to seriously research.

    Am I as good a transmitter as I am a receiver (?)
    I have often wondered about that as I shortly hear
    my own ideas from the mouths of others.
    Still perplexed on that one.

  3. My fear is that Dr. Farrell will spend too much time responding to emails and comments and not enough time working on his books.

      1. It might just be a web-site mal-function HAL? I don’t think he has beau-cou bucks to fix it.

        If not === he’s the owner of this site (I am assuming he is) He can do what he pleases with HIS SITE. I don’t think he’s an anarchist? He sometimes gives CHAOS its due but he really has a strong-sense of ORDER? ( I presume he likes order or structure. I do most of the time while I sometimes surf the WAVE of INSECURITY like Alan Watts once put it.)

        He’s LAX ( probably a softy at heart? ) or tries to be. (am I out of line with this previous sentence. Then forgive me my thoughts or even my projections. No my viewer FEEDBACK OK?)

        One thing about the PUBLIC——YOU CANT PLEASE EVERYBODY JUST AS i DON’T BELIEVE SOMEBODY IN HERE (is)SOME REINCARNATED NAZI SCIENTIST JUST BECAUSE THEY VISITED A PSYCHIC! ! ! I let people have their own BELIEFS UNTIL THEY BEGIN TO INFRINGE ON MINE!

        ( ConspiracistS tend to be like MORRIS THE CAT = VERY FINICKEY!)

        This doesn’t pertain to the article above but just to your post HAL THE GREEK;

        I once was a fan of Derick Jensen and they had a web-site fostering his ideas in which they pretended Jensen didn’t oversee it or the web-site was his? These people called themselves ANARCHO-PRIMITIVISTS so I take them at their word, GOT IT?

        The MINUTE ONE POSTED ONE TINY SHRED OF CONTRARINESS TO THE THE IDEOLOGY or PARTY-LINE, OR EVEN A ‘HINT’ of opposition or even IF YOU THOUGHT of being different = YOU GOT BOOTED OUT FASTER THAN A SPEEDING BULLET!

        Screwy isn’t it. (I figured out the reason for this. They should call it a site for VICTIMS OF CHILD-abuse BEcause IT WAS A VERY STRONG THEME in there. They said they wanted a get this -SAFE SITE!)

        ITS REALLY WEIRD! ! ! BLOW UP DAMS BUT LETS PLAY ‘NICEY” on this site! TALK ABOUT DUAAAAAAAL PERSONALITY!

        I am not DEFENDING Farrell’s site.(me and my flashlight are just poking around some unmentionABLE thoughts we might occasionally have now and then — if you don’t then I suggest getting a ROBE AND A SHORT HAIRCUT and never TURN OFF the light switch! ! !)

        I am only saying this = see the QUALITY AROUND YOU ON THE NET. THINK you might come to A conclusion about censorship?

        THIS IS NO SLIPPERY SLOPE — PROBABLY MOOT? I THINK FARRELL IS PLANNING TO CLOSE UP SHOP IN THE NEAR FUTURE. I TOOK WHAT HE SAID AS A HINT? (Just intuitively guessing for I SEEN IT BEFORE IN GROUPS)

        He may not like what I just said or wrote but then maybe he might? One can never tell for certain about these things? MAINTAINING a web site practically on your own is tough! Takes a lot out of you!

        I FOUND IN MY EXPERIENCE – the more DEDICATED ONE IS THE MORE CHANCE OF BURNT OUT! (BESIDES Propaganda IS ABOUT GETTING THE WORD OUT! IT wears thin after a while? (Propaganda is really about educating but it deserves its bad name)

        . I wouldn’t be a CONSPIRACIST if I trusted. REMEMBER the CRETAIN (is that right?) liar?

        Being a CONSPIRACIST IS LIKE BEING A FISHERMAN?

        I CAUGHT A FISH so BIG…..I needed a truck to carry it home? Ha, ha!)

        1. THE PHOTOGRAPH ON page 98 in “The COSMIC WAR” along with the sentence—– “Contrary to Alford, the giant remains are obviously not mere metaphors: their existence would thus seem to constitute loose corroboration of the fact that the wars in which giants were repeatedly engaged were not mere metaphors either.”

          Also on page 99 below is written — “French Chart Showing Comparisons of Giants Based on Physical Remains (or in the case of Goliath, biblical testimony).

          HERE IS WHERE I START TRUSTING but I sure wish I could in person “touch” the bones for my self but who has money enough for AIRFARE. ( besides, I don’t appreciate hired hands!)

      2. Hey HAL,

        Why don’t YOU be a nice Christian and take my place tonight?

        I am going to the hospital for a sleep test. Can I VOLUNTEER your head when they poke all those wires on it.

        I DON’T THINK THEY WILL FIND ANYTHING AND BESIDES i AM NOT PAYING FOR IT.

        1. SORRY HAL – I JUST REREAD WHAT i WROTE IN THAT short TExT IN A LITERARY SENSE.

          What I mean is” I don’t think they will find anything IN MY HEAD, HA, HA! ”

          NOt YOURS, HAL!

          You got something going on up there in YOUR Charlie Chaplin FACTORY WHEEL = HEAD of YOURS.

          I am INTERSTED! [[[[[More often than not for what grinds in MY OWN HEAD often comes to a halt and I need the inspiration?]]]]]]

          1. I’ll take that last comment as a compliment, Paul,
            but I can’t volunteer my head.

            As it is, I’m afraid that someone might want it when I die
            and have instructed my daughter to cremate me immediately !!

            The strangness on that uploaded comment that said
            over my comments and in the same frame,
            “Your comment is waiting to be moderated.”

            I scrolled up and down and it was already perfectly uploaded.
            It stayed on the page as I posted the questions,
            until I clicked it to post.
            When the screen did change, it was gone and everything was
            as it was without that comment just over what I had typed.
            It had been in the same frame and everything else seemed
            at all times just fine with the comment and site.
            It had already posted!

            It was not Joseph or his site.
            Given that everything was normal otherwise and the comment
            was not there with the subsequent “reply” comment;
            I think I know what happened and why, how.

            It may have something to do with a strange (what else)
            experiment I performed long before general internet connection,
            Microsoft and the mouse.

            “Online” was not even a word and the only thing
            that could be accessed in that manner was a basic encyclopedia.

            Given the nature of what I was trying to do and after a couple of
            hours at the terminal in the computer lab at my school, I was
            actually successful and it continued even after the mouse for awhile;
            I don’t think I should reveal more of my strangeness at this time
            and on this particular ‘happening.’

            For Joseph, I repeat, it had NOTHING to do with any error or
            otherwise at this [your] site. NOTHING !!

        2. BTW
          What does being a Christian have to do with this (being nice ?)
          Do you know the history of Christianity?

          The horrors it perpetrated for so many centuries and that
          still go on in that Cristians have the only truth along with
          EVERY OTHER “religion!”

          Killing a bunch of live, grown-up people to make a statement
          to save a fetus to the fanatical extent some do is, in my opinion,
          not very Christian: a case of do what I say, not what I do.
          It seems to harken back to the “Dark Ages,” which did not get its
          name because there was no sun !
          AND
          the Christian church was started by someone who never even
          knew or met the person of his supposed adoration—–Saul / Paul.

          Religions are institutions of man, completre with some
          ridiculous dogma in some cases, for the purposes of
          manipulation and to create war….
          in that it is very successful.

          True spirituality is a different ‘animal’ altogether and very
          personal.

          1. Lets not get into spirituality and religion debate. I am on your side. I was talking about the christians WHO STILL ARE decent people. I am not going to discount them unless….. as you say but I don’t think the Christians I know would do such atrocities!

            Hal this strange experiment. Well the same thing happened to me. Up on board for about a minute then gone. Some times I feel our Unconscious omits our conscious awareness but I cant prove this?

            Anyway YOUR so VAGUE and MYSTERIOUS. I wish you would be a wee bit simpler so I can understand you or know what you are driving at.

            Or as Bud Abbot said to Lou Costello —-Whose on First?

            Now I am off to have my breathing examined while I am Unconscious or out in the land of NOD!

  4. D*mn straight, Quasar.
    Do you do everything on the ‘spur?’
    Charge like a bull and then all kissy-kissy
    after upsetting everyone.
    You seek attention. THAT is obvious !
    I accepted a personal apology from you and
    have no problem with that.

    BUT
    do you have any idea how many authors do a
    daily public blog? Pretty d*mn near zero !
    To avoid the other end of the spectrum of ‘kookery’
    like you.
    I do a lot of reading and have yet to come across
    a book without a single typo, word left out, or errors
    of one sort or the other, from the best publishers.

    Joseph doesn’t make a ton of money, you know?
    That’s not his primary concern or his books would
    not be so relatively inexpensive, put out by
    a small independent press ….. and thank goodness
    there are still some of those left !!!

    He’s a knowledge seeker and as such, most naturally
    wants to share. As someone once said a few years ago,
    “What good is knowing / learning many things if there is
    no one to share it with(?)”

    Now I’ve had my say and no offense is intended, I assure you.
    I am not defending anyone, either. Joseph has shown to be
    quite capable of that himself.
    But I’ve done my share of writing, fiction and non-fiction, and
    remained unknown by choice for several very good reasons;
    but surely one of which would be not to put up with what
    sometimes calls itself, the public.

    [See yesterdays blog for a bit of my own experience.]

    All of you should sit up and pay attention———
    I’m sure, for the most part, he finds his work very gratifying,
    but Joseph hasn’t even been feeling well.
    He doesn’t HAVE to do a public blog.

    Again, no offense to anyone and no need for a reply from anyone.
    I’ve had my say.
    Thank you……………..to whoever deserves it.

    1. It was my distinct pleasure this past weekend to have attended the conference and been able to meet and hear the very informative presentation Dr. Farrell made at the alchemy event in LA. Not only was the presentation exceptional, as we’ve come to expect, but meeting the doctor in person, I found him to be exactly as kind and humble as he comes across in his video and radio interviews. Open, honest, thoughtful and without guile. We have a treasure and for those of us who’ve spent decades trying to make sense of what might be the real history of mankind, one that has never been revealed; to have a man who’s so knowledgeable in so many varied disciplines and who can sort and pull it all together into a clear and logical presentation is indeed a rare gift that we should appreciate with awe and admiration and not criticism. The doctor deserves all our support for his life’s work and the effort he’s pouring into it. In the years ahead the synthesis that he’s building, the picture of the real history kept from our eyes will one day be appreciated in its fullness and scope.

      We should try to support and uplift this man in every way we can. After all, if we love truth, knowledge and integrity, we have to band together to help anyone swimming against the tides that have covered up the past and keep us living in darkness and lies.

      Let’s stop being picky and petty. There aren’t any points given out for being nasty or for winning imaginary arguments. There’s a time for many things and it’s time to put away the bickering and get down to acting like grown ups and treating each other and Doctor Farrell with the respect each of us deserves and owe to one another.

    2. HAL838 your words are my words, as well. I know that many authors tend to pay more attention to the one or two negative comments about their work than the overwhelming positive comments. This can be unfortunate because it can distract and discourage the author. My son is an author of computer books, and I have had to rescue him from such distractions in the past. Dr Farrell should not concern hisself with nit-picking critics as this would side-track truely valuable analysis we all appreciate.

      1. Thanks for the input, romanmel.

        My own sound-off and the point is that Dr Farrell
        REPLIES at all.
        How unusual is that?

  5. Robert Barricklow

    In Michael Crichton’s book Prey, he gets into a runnaway nanobot; there is also the biological scenario, and now this.
    So many sciences converging on fabulous treasures to benefit all/
    or towards an ‘eve of destruction’.

  6. Off topic but does anyone want to take a stab at this email that I sent Dr. Farrell? He won’t answer it.

    Dr. Joseph P. Farrell;
    Joseph,

    I am in the process of reading your books. So far I have read Babylon’s Banksters, The Cosmic War, Reich of the Black Sun, and The Giza Death Star.

    I am presently reading The Giza Death Star Deployed. There is a mistake in this book, a printing mistake. On the bottom of page 66 is this paragraph:

    “Entering the Pyramid and beginning his descent down the Descending Passage, he was assailed by a blizzard of bats “so ugly and so large, exceeding a foot in length” that he decided to scare the bats away by firing his pistol. To his surprise, “the explosion reverberated like cannon shots in the restricted passage of the Pyramid.”

    Page 67 is entirely a picture of a close-up of Mars Viking Frame 35A72.

    Page 68 begins thus:

    “of the Greatest Pyramid as taken by Mr. John Greaves, the ancient Cubit of Memphis is determined.” (Italics in original.)

    Googling “Cubit of Memphis” in quotes, took me here:

    http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/view/texts/normalized/THEM00276

    Scanning this article, at the end of paragraph 6 I found this:

    “…and the cubit of Memphis will be equal to 1 & 732/1000 of the English Foot.”

    While this article explains the cubit of Memphis in considerable detail as deduced by Sir Isaac Newton, I am curious what the missing text in your book is. If you will supply me with this information then I will greatly appreciate it.

    (I am unaware how many publishers publish this book. The copy I have is from Adventures Unlimited Press and it appears to be the first printing as no others are listed.)

    Respectfully,

    ;
    —Dan

    1. Hi, Citizen Q.
      I found that same problem too several months ago.
      I wrote to the publishers, Adventures Unlimited, and I got a friendly reply that it was a mistake that was corrected in a subsequent printing. I asked if they could xerox the corrected pages and send them to me, but the kind lady at AU sent me a whole new copy! I suggest you contact them. 🙂

      1. Thanks, Craig. I will do that.

        It is only a missing sentence or so, I surmise a paragraph at most. I am curious as to what it says and I thought that if I contacted the author that the author might supply me with the missing lines, at least in some type of form letter, but the author is obviously not going to and apparently couldn’t care less.

        I find this insulting. So I will read the rest of his books checking them out from libraries. He will not get another penny from me.

        1. Citizen, I do not recall seeing your comment regarding the misprint in the book. I get many comments as you know, so do not have time to read or respond to every one. I do not know where your constant hostility to me is coming from. I struggle to survive, and try to answer as many comments as I can. Comments get overlooked, emails get overlooked. I forget many things and forget even who I have responded to or what I have said. But this isn’t the first time you’ve leaped to conclusions about me and judged my behavior “insulting.” Obviously, as an author, once a manuscript is out of my hands, it is out of my hands, and in the hands of my publishers. Apologies.

        2. You’re very welcome, Citizen Q, but in light of your subsequent posting, I feel the need to clarify my initial statement.

          When I wrote, “I found that same problem too” I was referring to my discovering that gap in the text. I did NOT mean that I had asked Dr. Farrell and he didn’t answer. Given the truly amazing volume of high quality work he has produced — in book form, in interviews, and on this website — a body of work which has given me, and I’m sure many others, an entirely new Weltanschauung far, far closer to the truth, it never struck me to waste his time with such a question.

          You shouldn’t be insulted. You should just give a good, overworked man a break.
          And be the first in line to buy his next book. They are treasures beyond price. As is he.

        3. Citizen,
          You’ve given us ample examples of the knowledge and information you’ve acquired over the years. Have you ever considered the possibility of assembling all of them in book form so we can all have access to your thoughts and so we don’t have to search out the numerous comments you’ve left us with on this page alone?
          May I offer encouragement for you to consider this as an option so your valuable insights and contributions can have a much wider audience and get the attention that they’re so deserving of. It seems you have much to say.

          1. Vinnie:

            I have run a number of blogs but I find it burdensome. I have been told by several authors, one of them Robert Groden, that I should write a book myself. One of these days I will.

          2. Vinnie,
            You must be at least half kidding……….
            Quasar (and his mind) is too scattered for that;
            not the necessary organization and focus to write
            a BOOK ! Been there, done that.

            I’m sure he is very smart; in fact, I know he is.

            [I mean that, Quasar, because THAT shows through, too;
            but you don’t have the temperment to write a book. No
            one knows unless they have at least tried it.]

            Play nice, children.

    2. Dan, I finally found this comment which you say you emailed to me. I have no doubt you emailed, but I do not recall reading it. I get hundreds of emails per day to sort and look through, so apparently yours was one I didn’t look at, and as I was also at a conference this last weekend, I had a pile of emails waiting for me on my return, which I am only just now catching up with. That said, I still haven’t encountered your email. I years ago brought this printing error to the attention of my publisher, and they assured me an erratum sheet would be attached to copies of the book when it was sent out, but apparently they did not do that in your instance. I do not have a copy of the missing page to send, nor can I type it easily, since it has a footnote citation from Tompkins’ book. I do not know what else to do to rectify the situation, as it is out of my hands. I could type the missing page for you as a word attachment., That is the best I can do.

      1. Dr. Farrell: OK.

        I owe you an apology and I offer it. I am truly sorry for my outburst. It was inaccurate and uncalled for.

        By way of explanation I say:

        At times I do have difficulty controlling my emotions. This is why I was given the nickname “Quasar.” (The “Citizen” part of my internet moniker is used for distinction, only because there were already quite a few Quasars on the net and I didn’t want to use something like Quasar123456789.)

        I suppose you could call me “bi-polar” or say that I have “PTSD” and sometimes this manifests itself when I am sitting at my computer and I am only thinking out loud at my desk and yet I am talking to the whole world, typing things that are permanently out there, by my hand and in my name. This has caused me considerable difficulty, once even bringing an FBI S.W.A.T. team to my door.

        TMI:

        I have a physically damaged brain from an automobile accident. I know this because I have seen MRIs of my brain. My corpus callosum is also considerably lopsided though I am told this doesn’t matter.

        I know you get a lot of emails and that you are a struggling busy man. I had intended to wait a week for a response and to send you a second email then. I had hoped to begin an email dialog and that seemed to be a good way to start one. But the firestorm in my brain confused me and caused me to lose my patience and sound off improperly. I am now ashamed of myself and mildly grief-stricken and I offer my apology again.

        I will continue to buy your books and to read them. if I can ever afford it then i will send you a donation. I hope that you are feeling better and that you do well at the upcoming conference.

        I hope that I have covered my “misbehavior” adequately. I really don’t care who knows these things about me because they help to explain constant “misunderstandings” that arise; me usually being the one who misunderstood something.

        Besides, if you ever locate that email, I signed it with my full name which, if you Google it in quotes you will come up with 18 pages of my internet sins.

        Respectfully,
        —Dan (Quasar)

        That should cover everything.

      2. Dr.Farrell,
        You wrote:

        “I years ago brought this printing error to the attention of my publisher, and they assured me an erratum sheet would be attached to copies of the book when it was sent out….”

        Sir, they did fix it. I have a copy in hand to compare with the erroneous copy. In the corrected copy there is no erratum sheet but an entire page of text, page 67, replaces the photograph of Martian pyramids, and meaningfully connects page 66 and 68. And the only footnote on the missing page is “ 11 ibid., p. 31,” referring to Peter Tompkins’ Secrets of the Great Pyramid. In fact, Tompkins is the only source cited on pages 66, 67, and 68 for footnotes 9-13. Here’s the missing material in the Adventures Unlimited pagination:

        Page 66 ends:

        …To his surprise, “the explosions reverberated like cannon shots in the restricted passage of the Pyramid.” (footnote 10, Ibid., p. 25)

        Page 67, the missing page, begins:

        Greaves’ data, when published, caught the attention of a physicist working on a new theory of the most fundamental force of nature. The force was gravity, and the physicist was Sir Isaac Newton. From Greaves’ carefully compiled mathematical data of the Great Pyramid, Newton deduced that it had been constructed using two different basic units of measurement, one a “profane” cubit, and the other a “sacred” cubit. “From Greaves’s and Burattini’s measurements of the King’s Chamber, Newton computed that a cubit of 20.63 British inches produced a room with an even length of cubits: 20 x 10.”(footnote 11, Ibid., p. 31). The importance of Newton’s discovery cannot be overstated, for it contains two implications:

        The British system of measurement appeared remarkably close to a very ancient standard of measure; but,
        If the ancient system were used, most dimensions of the Pyramid could be expressed as whole numbers.

        The last point assumes great significance with respect to the Pyramid’s possible “analog computer” function as well as with respect to “dimensional analysis”, a technique theoretical physicists use to check the mathematical modeling of their theories. As was also noted in The Giza Death Star, it appears that some similar whole numbers existed as an approximation of Planck’s constant and the other “Planck units” in ancient times.

        In any case, Newton derived the longer, or “sacred” cubit from a comment made in the Jewish historian Josephus regarding the circumference of the pillars in the Jerusalem Temple. Estimating this cubit to be somewhere between 24.8 to 25.02 British inches, he published these results in an extremely rare paper bearing the somewhat lengthy title A Dissertation upon the Sacred Cubit of the Jews and the Cubits of several Nations: in which from the Dimensions

        Page 68 begins:

        of the Greatest Pyramid, as taken by Mr. John Greaves, the ancient Cubit of Memphis is determined. (footnote 12, Ibid.)

        But why should a scientist of Newton’s stature….

        Please note that there was no page number for footnote 12 given in either of the copies I have.

        I received an email from Lori Brandner of AU on July 7, 2011 in prompt response to my enquiry. If you would like, I can send you a copy of the email. They treated me very well and I am a very satisfied customer, so you have no complaints from this neck of the woods about your publisher.

        I hope this is of some service and enables you to get some rest so you can write more amazing things. Thank you.

          1. As if I haven’t already made a big enough fool out of myself, I am obviously busted again. I confess, i bought a second-hand copy of “The Giza Death Star Deployed,” hence one with the original uncorrected error in it. I was at a thrift store and so I quickly scanned the used books and there it was, the Farrell book I was intending to read next. So I bought it.

      3. Sorry I wound up ahead of you, Joseph.
        No comment needed.

        You know something, Quasar;
        maybe you SHOULD make a stab at it.
        Yes, indeed; maybe you should.

  7. Dr Farrell…I havent read all your Nazi books yet but I was reading somewhere who mentioned something about Nazi’s had the nuke prior to us, they tested one in a certain named area and there is a DoD white paper of some sort that is @ the pentagon that most even in the military don’t know about.

    It was further stated the reason they tried to assinate Hitler is because he refused to use the bomb @ Normandy for fear of jacking up the Aryan DNA. So they tried to take him out…

    Just a thought you might be interested in…

    Peace

Comments are closed.