User Answers

THE DAILY BELL, THAT RETRENCHMENT SCENARIO, AND NORTH AMERICAN UNION

As most regular readers here are aware, I've been skeptical of the doom-and-gloom "the banksters are deliberately going to crash the economy to bring in their global government" scenario for quite some time. Mind you, it's not that I don't think some of them aren't crazy enough  or power-hungry to try such a stunt, nor is it because I think that isn't one of their ultimate goals.  I disagree simply with the timing and analysis of most people in this respect. I have always held the opinion that in the wake of the post-Soviet era "push" by a neo-conservative agenda in America, the agenda driving the 9/11 attacks and response at a certain level, that American unipolar-imperialism's failure in the post-9/11 world has fostered deep internal fissures within the Western world's oligarchy and elite. Old factional, national, and regional geopolitical interests have seen a resurgnce, and as a consequence of this, there has been a deliberate retrenchment by the Anglo-American power elite back intoNorth America. As long ago as 2008 on The Byte Show, I maintained that this power elite could ill-afford to weaken its own base of power - North America - by crashing its economy or further shipping of its remaining manufacture overseas.

More recently, in conjunction with people like Catherine Austin Fitts, I've also been entertaining the speculative scenario that with 3d printing being pushed to heavily, with the dramatic expansion of fracking and the concomitant dramatic rise of American petroleum production, one is looking at a retrenchment.

But there's a third pillar to this scheme, which, while not abandoning the goal of globalism, is going to have to retrench, and revive an old and supposedly defunct idea: the North American Union, the iron-and-clay amalgam of the USA, Canada, Mexico, and smaller Meso-American nations:

North American Union...and So It Begins

My only quibble here with the Daily Bell, and it is a small one, is merely that we are looking at more evidence of the factions within the structure orchestrating what they call "directed history," namely, a faction that wanted to pursue the "globalization quick, and under American hegemony", ala the unipolar imperialism model in the wake of the Soviet collapse, and the other faction, that wanted to do it on a more long term, "region by region" and "continent by continent" basis. The failure of the former has merely empowered the latter, but the ultimate goal remains the same.  And rest assured, those goals, so far as the Anglo-American faction of the Western oligarchy is concerned, remain a "globalism" under that same Anglo-American hegemony.  And that's just not going to play for the Chinese, Japanese, Brazilian, Italian, French,German, Spanish, or Indian elites.

So the Daily Bell is right, the whole ludicrous scheme is doomed from the beginning, and ultimately, the elites behind it are doomed along with it. Or, to put it in the terms of the Shelley epigraph with which they begin the article:

On the pedestal these words appear:
"My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.
See you on the flip side.

7 thoughts on “THE DAILY BELL, THAT RETRENCHMENT SCENARIO, AND NORTH AMERICAN UNION”

  1. War time? It bothers me that there seem to be so many issues right now that could be covered over with a big, old WWII-style conflagration. Four or five years of open warfare with a couple hundred million dead would make the military industrial complexes of many countries lots and lots of money allow a financial “reset” of the debt-based world economy. I pray it doesn’t happen, but I get a bad feeling when I consider how certain pockets of people would probably really welcome a serious blood bath right about now.

  2. Well they haven’t given up on the “global domination corporation” stuff. Look at the TPP. Isolate China. Look at the Ukraine. Isolate Russia.

    You may be right about it being their fallback plan but they haven’t given up on Empire America yet.

  3. You mean the North- Central American Union Joseph minus South America for the time being. With the inclusion of South America it will be the Pan American Union. This might not be bad if what came out of this was something equivalent to the Federation of Star Trek or the Republic of Star Wars. But what we will get is a global protection racket or slave plantation instead.

  4. This is a curiously benign perspective on 2008: Those who predicted that the plan was to crash the economy were absolutely correct, because the economy WAS gutted, the Treasury looted and $trillions of bailouts went to the perpetrators.

    It still makes the head spin, the magnitude of the looting. And what more could have been done? Wasn’t that crash enough?

  5. They’ve lost our trust…and it is then you see they are just a bunch of criminals…..the truth sets you free.

    Too bad, they had a good thing going.

Comments are closed.