This one was found by Ms. P.H. and I have to share it. Dig this image from NASA's JPL, and I'll leave it to you to ponder all the implications(look in the upper left corner):


Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. Sandygirl on October 2, 2014 at 6:23 pm

    Take a look at how the shadows fall on the Bocci rack, they don’t fall in the same direction.

  2. jedi on October 2, 2014 at 1:43 pm

    NASA the folks that brought us images of the muppets on red planet

  3. Gaia Mars-hall on October 1, 2014 at 5:02 pm

    That’s my router

  4. Ramura on October 1, 2014 at 12:42 pm

    When I look at it sideways, it seems like the back is flat and there are head sculptures (all facing the same way?) in a row. In fact, it looks like it slipped off the flat surface behind it to the right…

    All very strange…

  5. basta on October 1, 2014 at 11:29 am

    Anyone at all interested in Mars should study this newly published geological map of Mars, just published today by the USGS: http://www.sci-news.com/space/science-geologic-map-mars-02174.html

    You can clearly see that the southern half of the planet was blown away and riddled with craters +/-300 million years ago, and that the vast Hellas Planitia crater-basin in the south corresponds exactly to the vast upwelling of the Mons Olympus protrusions on the exact opposite of the planet.

    Of course, all of this is ignored, and the data obfuscated by dry-as-dust scientific jargon and willful blindness.

  6. ara_alain on October 1, 2014 at 8:44 am

    how come no one is commenting on the smooth surfaced that looks like a part of a road covered in sand?

  7. unclejed on October 1, 2014 at 4:45 am

    That’s One Of Those Illuminating Martian Traffic Regulators?

  8. emlong on September 30, 2014 at 10:03 pm

    Mind you, I am a fan of all the various imaginative theories about the Martian past remote viewed, channeled, whatever; but what most excites me about Mars is the evidence that it is as dead as a doornail. That exemplifies what a choice thing a life planet like Earth is. Mars is probably what most of the universe is – rocks and extreme cold and extreme heat and lonely as hell. We have to jettison our loss of nerve with regard to stewarding planet Earth. Making a new earth somewhere else will take eons, and we do not have eons left before trashing what we have. When I see all those barren Martian photos on the TV I inwardly rejoice because the subliminal message is that Earths are very, very rare things.

  9. FrankyFreedom on September 30, 2014 at 7:18 pm

    I think it looks more like a rack to hold Bocci Balls. I think at one time mars was inhabited by Italian Mars who spent most of their time eating linguini, drinking wine, and playing Bocci Balls. Just a theory of course.

    • Joseph P. Farrell on September 30, 2014 at 7:21 pm

      Lol… now that’s the best one yet! The Venetians made it to Mars secretly! ROF! I love it.

      • unclejed on October 1, 2014 at 4:49 am

        How Do You Drive A Venetian Nuts? …. Put Him In A Round Room And Tell Him There’s An Hermetic Solution In The Corner !

      • eric on October 3, 2014 at 9:15 pm

        I can see the sequel book now “Venetian Martians and the huge anus age”

    • QuietRiot on September 30, 2014 at 8:32 pm

      I think I’ve seen Olive trees in a Van Flandern photo. YOu Italians would have never left Mars… or Italy… for that matter, without their precious Olive Oil.

  10. emlong on September 30, 2014 at 7:16 pm

    Spherical concretions in an American desert:

  11. DownunderET on September 30, 2014 at 1:57 pm

    To quote Richard Hoagland……….

    It may turn out that WE ARE THE MARTIANS !!!!

  12. Luso on September 30, 2014 at 1:31 pm

    My deep admiration for Dr. Farrel (and this assembly) is due (still is) to the daring, methodical and disciplined way of questioning and speculating about the reality sold to us by the “status quo”.
    However, I recently started to notice a trend for the construction of “high brisance” speculations based on other speculations and trying too much to make events and phenomena fit a specific narrative.
    I can also see the start of another “ufo like cult”, with its unquestioning followers.
    This sort of cult does a disservice to Dr. Farrell (as I believe that he needs to be more careful and prudent for his sake in the long run).
    This recent lack of prudence, and the cult´s growing collection of clichés are realing pissing me off, to be honest…

    • sjy1969 on September 30, 2014 at 3:54 pm

      I agree unfortunately.

    • Joseph P. Farrell on September 30, 2014 at 4:54 pm

      I have to agree. It makes me very uncomfortable. Sometimes I wonder how many times I have to remind people that I’m just a hack from South Dakota.

      • TRM on September 30, 2014 at 6:22 pm

        As long as you’re not a hack from North Dakota! That would be intolerable 😉

  13. Frankie Calcutta on September 30, 2014 at 11:39 am

    Not quite as interesting as the recent NASA picture of a Martian pushing a shopping cart, but intriguing none the less.

    • Frankie Calcutta on September 30, 2014 at 11:46 am

      Makes me wonder if the Flintstones tv series was not based on the lives of ancient humans living on Earth, but in fact based on ancient humans living on Mars.

  14. marcos toledo on September 30, 2014 at 11:16 am

    I am familiar with this photo if NASA IS NEVER A STRAIGHT ANSWER what does JPL stand. Any suggestions for what it really stands for just can’t think of any now but I and others on this website will come up with something. That object sure looks artificial wonder who made it and when. NASA and JPL caught with their pants down again.

  15. loisg on September 30, 2014 at 10:31 am

    What is the distance is the camera above the Martian surface, are we looking at massively huge objects? It doesn’t matter really if that object on the upper left is a rock or not, nature doesn’t form objects like that, so if it is a rock, it has been shaped artificially. There are other formations that stick out also, like the 90 degree angles that can be seen all over the place.

    • TRM on September 30, 2014 at 6:23 pm

      Yes what is the scale here? Are we looking at something inches, feet, yards tall?

      • Enlil's a Dog on October 1, 2014 at 12:01 am

        That’s always the problem when we are looking at photos like this. Without knowing what the ‘depth of focus’ ratios are there is no telling whether the subject is 2 cm long, 2 metres long or 20 metres long etc etc.

  16. basta on September 30, 2014 at 8:41 am

    The terminally brainwashed and the paid trolls are all atwitter, furiously copy-pasting “It’s just a rock” on all and sundry forums across the Internet-tubes.

    Looks a bit like the tip of a corner ornament from a Mayan temple, FWIW.

    And it’s always nice to see how NASA tweaks the color and saturation, as if we don’t already know that Mars is called the Red Planet. D’oh.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events