Many of you sent this extremely intriguing article, and some of you - Ms. K.M. in particular - immediately suggested a high octane speculation that might explain it, though I don't know of any scientist that has made the suggestion that she did, and that we will entertain here.  In any case, here's the article:

Astronomers Find Quasars Are "Aligned" Across Billions Of Light-Years

There's so much meat to chew on here one doesn't know really where to begin, but consider these paragraphs:

"Using the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope in Chile, a team led by Damien Hutsemékers from the University of Liège in Belgium studied 93 quasars known to form huge groupings. We’re seeing them now at a time when the universe was only about a third of its current age. “The first odd thing we noticed was that some of the quasars’ rotation axes were aligned with each other—despite the fact that these quasars are separated by billions of light-years,” Hutsemékers says in a news release.

"So the team wanted to find out if the rotation axes were linked at that time—and not just to each other, but also to the structure of the universe on large scales. When looking at the distribution of galaxies on scales of billions of light-years, astronomers have found that galaxies aren’t evenly distributed: They form a web of filaments and clump around huge galaxy-scarce voids. This arrangement of material is known as the large-scale structure.


"These new findings indicate that the rotation axes of quasars tend to be parallel to the large-scale structures that they inhabit. That means that if the quasars are in a long filament, then the spins of their central black holes will point along the filament. (See the image above.) According their estimates, there’s only a one percent probability that these alignments are simply the result of chance." (emphasis added)

Note that the filamentary structure - breathtakingly illustrated by the last picture in the article - is some 300,000,000 light years across. This in itself is revealing, for the cosmological problem posed by special and general relativity was that the velocity of light was the "upper limit" on electromagnetic energy, and hence, large structures such as we are looking at here had to be bound together in some other way.

Then along came photon entanglement, one of the most peculiar and bizarre phenomenon in all of physics. The essence of this is that is one "entangles" the information in two photons such that they reproduce each other's information exactly, and then shoots them at light speed away from each other, altering the information in one will alter the information in the other, instantly, no matter how far apart they are. One of the key types of information used in such experiments is polarization, or to put it differently, the "spin" information and all that this implies: plane of rotation, axis of rotation, and so on.
Note that what might be happening  - and here comes the high octane speculation of the day, and, remembering that it was Ms. K.M. who suggested it - is a similar sort of phenomenon on a macro or very large scale. Entanglement, in other words, might not be a phenomenon restricted just to the quantum sphere or the physics of the very small, but something operative under certain conditions at the macro level, or the physics of the very large. Entanglement might be a kind of cosmic "analogical principle." When one looks at the stunning photograph at the end of the article, another thought also occurs: with but little modification, one might think one was looking at a photograph of a neuron; in other words, the physics of the very large might be suggesting something like a cosmic or cosmological neural net underlies the phenomenon of such large scale "entanglement." Such high octane speculations, if true, would seem to indicate that the views of some scientists that the universe and all physical fields are ultimately fields of information might just be beginning to come into its own. If so, then such filamentary structures on the very large scale - structures long ago discussed by Swedish plasma cosmologist Hannes Alfven - might be a clue to the fundamental structures of physics, and might ultimately pave the way for "cosmic capabilities" and even a kind of "travel",utilizing the cosmic analogy of entanglement. Time, and the actual hard date of numbers, of course, will tell.

See you on the flip side...


Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. RAJM on November 25, 2014 at 8:30 pm

    Looking at that simulation is indeed similar to a neural net. I wonder just how massive this universe being is that we inhabit. And how tiny those that inhabit us. Reminds me of a line from animal house.

  2. Gaia Mars-hall on November 25, 2014 at 11:36 am

    “As Above, So Below”

  3. Guygrr on November 24, 2014 at 7:12 pm

    Ooh I just noticed adds on the site, good idea Dr Farrell. I hope the added income will help you with things. How does it work? Do you make money off clicks or what? Ill go click em all everyday if you do.

  4. Guygrr on November 24, 2014 at 5:37 pm

    Hmmm the proverbially error in the equations and very sound proposal of what might arise from applying those error free equations. When “we” discuss the unified field theory maybe we aren’t thinking big enough. Maybe we should view antigravity engines and the like with all their vortex spin properties as mini entanglement engines that cohere large scale structures with 4space, ie maybe ufos aren’t moving through space on a vector but rather doing mini jumps through space time. With all their remote viewing and consciousness experiments maybe they were attempting to rediscover the mechanisms of our conscious mind’s entanglement with the aether to then be exploited as an energy source. In essence reversing the schism in the primordial nothing, sort of like how human sacrifice was used to “shock the medium”. Which might just explain the ritual cult sacrifice and abuse that occurs to this day.

    The whole filaments deal though has got me thinking about the ai and chemtrails vid chat. In rappoport’s space conference he talks about how when people leave the gravity well they have out of body experiences, see dead relatives like aunt gert etc, might gravity prohibit us from interacting with this neural network in space so they are trying to recreate one of their own on earth using satellites to manipulate it. If this network has the ability to interact with astronauts surely the network here can, especially if the demons that are supposedly trapped here according to ancient texts can inhabit such a global brain like they can allegedly possess humans. Gives new meaning and better explains the PTB’s penchant for infecting everyone with toxins and heavy metals, possibly giving their network a cozy little home in our bodies. To them it’s like updating their computer with 7 billion extra processors. It’s my opinion that the toxic soup we live in and all the stealth infections significantly effect a person’s spirituality. Through my detox journey I’ve detoxed a large portion of the garbage that inhabits the majority of the populations bodies and a long the way I’ve become extremely spiritually and sensitive to other people’s energy. I can actually feel and interact with my soul again. It’s not too far of a leap, clog up the soul’s vessel and the interface between the two will be altered.

    Ughhh I wrote up a whole big post detailing the specifics of the toxins and infections and how everyone is sick with them but my browser crashed and I lost all of it. I’m too pissed off to re do it now. I apologize for the spelling and grammar mistakes I’m terribly ill with from these toxins and pathogens and have difficulty writing and speaking a lot of the time but I’m not going to throw the whole post away.

    • moxie on November 24, 2014 at 10:17 pm

      It might also be applied to remote viewing, since a particle can exist at two or maybe even multiple locations at a time.

    • Gaia Mars-hall on November 25, 2014 at 12:01 pm

      Your comments are well articulated
      Too bad about losing some of your post, I hate that…

    • RAJM on November 25, 2014 at 8:33 pm

      You could try structured water, it has many properties just being discovered

      This is a fifteen-minute sound clip of an interview with physicist Richard Alan Miller on the informational properties of water. It is very interesting.


      More medical info:


      • Guygrr on November 30, 2014 at 2:26 pm

        Thanks guys. I just saw the replies and will look into the structured water, I’ve actually been looking for a better one at detoxification. Gaia, I’m able to write/think it just takes an immense amount of effort, energy and time so by the end of a few paragraphs I’m burnt out, but thank you all the same.

        • Lost on November 30, 2014 at 3:14 pm


          Patrick Flanagan’s crystal energy is more interesting than most of structured water approaches. Also cheaper.

  5. GizaBrother on November 24, 2014 at 2:48 pm

    Imagine that creation is an infinite boundless state and that this is all there is – nothing is outside of it, because there is nothing else beyond it – only 1 thing exists infinitely forever and nothing else ever will, because there has never existed anything else beyond it and will never exist anything else beyond it and cannot exist anything else beyond it, because there is nothing beyond the infinite. In other words, imagine that creation is one thing – the only thing that will ever exist, the only thing that is infinite, the thing that is reflected in everything forever and ever – a simple truth. Now if that is true, it means that everything is connected and reflects that single thing and that this single thing is the point of origin to everything and is the point of return of everything. Now, from this point of view, finding entanglement between two photons travelling in the opposite direction to each other at an infinite speed makes sense, because they will always remain connected to and reflect a sub-state of their point of origin. Now, you might put a number of definitions onto what this boundless state is. In my understanding, this boundless state is God – total boundless unconditional infinite love – nothing is outside of it, nobody is left outside of it – because it is unconditional love – infinite in every way, all that has ever existed, the only thing that is infinite and all that ever will exist. In human form it is Christ, in human state of being it is Christ Consciousness.

    If creation is actually a frozen endless state of love/Christ Consciousness within which everything exists, then it must mean that there is an infinite amount of sub-expressions of that state within it, where each such expression is unique, but connected through it, always connected. If you at the core are a reflection point of creation and you are at the same exact state of the state of creation, it would mean you would find yourself being aware of total infinity in everything, feel infinite amount of love constantly, live forever and so on. Now, if you compare this thought to your thought about what you can observe here and now, you will find that the only thing in the way of easily being able to tell that they match, is all the limits you perceive around you that has put you in a sub-sub-sub… state of that original state. In other words, from a limited perspective it’s difficult to see that everything is one – infinite amounts of expressions of the same thing, that everything is connected in an ocean of unconditional endless love. In other words, when we learn to overcome limitations, we start to find that all of our logical explanations of everything slowly start to break down – we are learning the truth – the real truth.

    In other words, this theory is that everything in creation is nested sub-states of one underlying main state and that all of these sub-states are connected and threaded towards the same one underlying main state and that these threads connect to and reflect the infinite source of unconditional love – consciousness is in turn travelling on these threads through parallel universes – each parallel universe is just a particular sub-state, guided by their chain of parent states all the way to God. At each level, through all levels, everywhere, is a connection point to God and this one is the same everywhere. This is what entanglement means to me and I’m not surprised that scientists observe entanglement both at the macro and the micro scale, it is a great scientific discovery for sure. It seems like the deeper you dig into to the truth, the more overwhelming the truth becomes – a miracle of infinite love, infinitely miraculous, always…

  6. kchuray on November 24, 2014 at 10:57 am

    Makes ya wonder – are we looking at neurons in the mind of God?

  7. duncan mckean on November 23, 2014 at 11:15 pm

    a feeling mindful human suffering from dyslexia takes a photo of himself through a mirror.gets inebriated on his own ego then tries to distinguish right from left in the photo??what is reality first?i do not think god would insult the meaning of reason.may give a few clues?IMO

  8. bdw000 on November 23, 2014 at 10:51 pm

    I’m just going to throw out one of the main ideas of the “electric universe” folks: that the entire universe is filled with electrical flows (keep in mind that 99% of the universe is plasma, aka charged particles). There are many pictures of Birkeland currrents, many of them light years long.

    The EU folks theorize that all galaxies are aligned with these large scale current flows, the current flow being in the direction of galactic spin axis. Keep in mind that not all current flow has to glow like lightning: if the current density is too low, you have “dark mode” plasma.

    iirc, the EU folks also theorize that “quasars” are simply regular galaxies, just viewed EXACTLY down it’s spin axis. Many galactic “jets” have been photographed by astronomers, and it only makes sense that if you look directly at the jet, as if down the barrel of a gun, you are going to get a much “brighter” looking object.

    Keep in mind that I am no EU expert (just a “convert”!).

    The key here is that no quantum weirdness is needed to explain what the above article describes: all you need is literally high school level electricity. Anyone ever heard of Occam’s Razor???

    • QuietRiot on November 23, 2014 at 11:34 pm

      Thanks! There are challenges with the electric universe concept. It doesn’t explain entanglement. The theory can’t account for all phenomena, Then by definition it can’t be considered complete. Of course, We see and are surrounded by electrical phenomena, but electric theory does not explain the whole picture.

      If you can dig back and find P A M Dirac’s original work in the 1920s, with his explanation of the relationship between quantum mechanics and relativity, you’ll find an almost infinitely mineable resource of physical insight. Dirac’s papers DO describe reality developing out of matter/antimatter relationships, with positron/ electron pairs doing the work. This theory neatly explains gravity, the strong force, The weak force, and electromagnetism. Dirac’s work was readily suppressed by Heisenberg himself after Hitler came to power. The Nazi scientist suppressed study of negative energy. Dr. Dirac specifically described how it was Benjamin Franklin’s fault that the expression “negative energy” came into being. Heisenberg used that association to crush any research into the true nature of the Dirac sea of negative energy. It was as if the longitudinal qualities of waves could only be described in Hertzian terms; except that this time, It was energy itself that was treated like Hertzian waves, And all we are left with is the zero point… We can measure the amplitude of the waves and zero point Field, but we can’t see how deep the abyss is beneath it.

      Entanglement reveals a deeper structure, one that can’t be explained by Dirac’s theory as far as I understand it. I’m working through his papers now and I will let you know if entanglement is explainable with the theory. I don’t think that the electric universe will ever explain the deep formatic patterns that to give rise to all that we can experience and measure. What I mean is that deeper forms, including consciousness network systems and informatics/consciousness go beyond the electric universe.

      If we could get a look at James Clark Maxwell’s original paper in the 1860s, we might find some additional insights there. But the paper has been deeply suppressed. His was a masterwork with 26 equations and 20 unknowns reduced to a paper with four equations with two unknowns…

      I have this sense, Although I can’t point to a specific instance or theory, that entanglement is the most important concept in human thought. We are literally at the point where we can program quantum packages that are capable of creating entanglement in systems that have never been apparently entangled. We are at the point where we can read all of the properties of the local quantum system, and have that exact thing reappear in another system 80 km away. I don’t believe that we have even begun to scratch the surface of the ultimate meaning of entanglement. Another word to use for it would be “association”. It readily suggests an analogical basis, an inherent relatedness, a non-locality, which Joseph has been working with and thinking about for many years; not to mention the work of Leibnitz, Bell, and Gödel. Make no mistake that those with the largest stake in any outcome have also been paying attention to it, quietly.

      • Joseph P. Farrell on November 24, 2014 at 1:28 am

        Interesting comments Quiet Riot. It has been many MANY years since I’ve read Dirac, and am not even sure I understood him then nor would now. My own intuition is that if one models things in quaternions, and if(here is another long string of if’s!) such scalars are themselves the result of zero vector sums, then they might be themselves definable as sets comprised of those scalars, and equated with a common surface. A set of six translation vectors summing to zero translation would be six scalars, four vectors summing to a zero vector would be four scalars, etc. Defining scalars combinatorially might be a direction. I simply don’t know.

      • bdw000 on November 24, 2014 at 7:44 am

        “The theory can’t account for all phenomena, Then by definition it can’t be considered complete. Of course, We see and are surrounded by electrical phenomena, but electric theory does not explain the whole picture.”

        They are not trying to explain “everything”!!

        Since when is it a requirement of any theory that it explain EVERYTHING????????

        They are using known physics (electrical) ideas to explain common astronomical observations. What more can you ask for?

        • bdw000 on November 24, 2014 at 7:46 am

          This is a reply to QuietRiot.

      • moxie on November 24, 2014 at 9:06 am

        Well, Ben Rich et al. Have figured it out (entanglement phenomenon) a long time ago.. maybe, like in the brain, there are also some kind of cosmic dendrites and axons interconnecting

        • Lost on November 29, 2014 at 1:45 pm


          All those Maxwell equations are readily available, in a Dover (US) reprint of Maxwell’s “Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, vol 2”, page 267.

          You’ll have do a good deal of reading and experiment to get at what Maxwell was talking about, except that yes of course he certainly believed in a material ether.

          This suppression thing is a myth. Now someone could have done experiments with that knowledge at Maxwell’s time and perhaps those things have been suppressed. Maxwell was not an experimental type.

          • Churchless Mouse on November 29, 2014 at 2:58 pm

            Thanks for your message. As a matter, The evidence for the suppression of Maxwell’s work, is well shown. In fact, Richard C Hoagland received an award from a European government, sweden I think, for his recovery of the original paper. I have the Dover version, and I can tell you that it is not Maxwell’s original paper. It is an edited paper updated quote unquote by later scientist, which is a pattern in these
            things. It was the first evidence that we were entering a significant period of scientific repression.

          • Lost on November 29, 2014 at 3:28 pm


            I’m glad you have the Dover book, and the equations are definitely in there.

            Unfortunately Hoagland has made that claim, and as far as I know not shared the paper.

            Do you know the name of the paper, the place of publication and the journal? I’m happy enough to be wrong, except about the equations being in the Dover ed. And would certainly like to see the paper.

          • Lost on November 29, 2014 at 3:29 pm

            Sorry, Churcless:

          • Lost on November 30, 2014 at 1:10 pm

            Churchless Mouse:

            Same Dover edition: I highly recommend a glance at the bottom of page 257, a whole list of scalar functions.

            And then Maxwell spends some effort explaining what he means. Sure looks like stress in a medium. Here remember that Maxwell would likely have read Hamiltion’s 900 page “Lectures on Quaternions”, which differs significantly from quaternions as only being used for rotations–though the rotational thing is in there too.

            How and why a scalar potential would transform into a vector is the mystery.

            It would seem to me that by the end of the 19th century given the well established existence of a material ether that those few pages of Maxwell coupled with an understanding of Hamilton that there’s more than enough room to build a whole new science.

    • jedi on November 24, 2014 at 9:24 am

      Bdw, you are an expert. The convergent point is where a star is born. I suspect the missing formulae is a fourth frequency wave. Sin cos tan waves….the earth use to be a star…we are literally made up of star matter…is light. I suspect the earth is a twin star and the pyramids interfered with its alternate, buying them time.

  9. caz on November 23, 2014 at 9:05 pm

    As above, so below…

  10. EVERMORE on November 23, 2014 at 6:32 pm

    Reminds me of an old movie…

    The Incredible Shrinking Man (1957) Closing Monologue


    And the ancient maxim,
    “As above, so below”

  11. DownunderET on November 23, 2014 at 1:36 pm

    Scientists haven’t a clue about the Universe, they don’t know how it began or where it’s going, it’s all theatre and information for the masses. Newton and Libnitz knew, and so did Schwaller de Lubitz, so all the quackademics can speculate on quasars and black holes and pulsars and all you end up with is this, drum roll please………….”A NOTHING”.

    • jedi on November 23, 2014 at 2:29 pm

      yup…all a bunch of bs….all this stuff was known in ancient times…greatest coverup of all time..at least we have the pyramids as a eternal record…and nature as proof of his creation.

  12. emlong on November 23, 2014 at 1:00 pm

    We are rapidly and inexorably heading toward the realm of the superluminal. Once broached, anything goes. Our ET brothers must be tickled.

  13. moxie on November 23, 2014 at 10:56 am

    It might really be a conscious universe..
    the physical form that can be observed, is through which the overmind operates..

  14. marcos toledo on November 23, 2014 at 10:11 am

    Could the reports of faster than light particles from the Hadron Collider have some connection to this article? It just that the whole dark matter, big bang, string theory might be joining the Ptolemaic cosmology in the waste basket of history. Which brings up the point of how interconnected is religion, politics, science, philosophy is in our society.

  15. nines on November 23, 2014 at 9:25 am

    Indra’s Net….

  16. Lost on November 23, 2014 at 8:47 am

    Didn’t Paul LaViolette mention either aligned quasars or quasars which pulse in sync?

  17. Frankie Calcutta on November 23, 2014 at 7:05 am

    This will all be explained in my forthcoming book: “Quasar Entanglement.” (It originally started off as a screenplay but once it got over a thousand pages, I decided to turn it into a book.)

    Accessing this cosmic neural net can be done by bypassing the brain or, as I label it in my book: the space-time modulator. (right brain=space, left brain=time). This can be done through mediation but this can take many lifetimes of practice, or by holding one’s breath for at least seven minutes. There are other methods to bypassing the brain, such as watching lots of tv or going to public school or taking meds, but none of these methods will give you access to the cosmic neural net and the treasure trove of information you will uncover there. Unfortunately, once you gain access to this infinite wisdom, you become a danger to the powers that be and your ISIS threat level increases dramatically and you have to go into hiding.

    To demonstrate how powerful this ability is: I am watching Stephen Hawkings right now begin his new book on his discovery of quasar entanglement which came to him the other day in a dream.

    • jedi on November 23, 2014 at 9:55 am

      ROOM No. 237 ….

  18. RedPlanetRefugee on November 23, 2014 at 5:57 am

    Dr Farrell,

    Could scale-invariance be a fundamental and unifying aspect of reality?
    Could it be expressed in the ‘metaphor’ as a sub-set permeating all other subsets back to the ‘primary schism’?
    Could it be the essence of analogy for all things? Or put another way is analogy expressed as scale-invariance in physical reality?

    [Please excuse me if my questions are asinine. I haven’t read all your books yet and had to read the appendix to chapter 9 in ‘Giza Death Star Destroyed’ several times to begin to (barely) get my head around it].

    • DanaThomas on November 24, 2014 at 2:57 am

      As for Chapter 9, same here: it would be nice if Joseph could expand on it, in writing or maybe in a video talk!

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events