Mr. M.D. shared this story, and in the context of our transhumanist focus today, this one deserves some attention:

First cloned baby "born on 26 December"


Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. Blue Dragon Lord on March 17, 2015 at 1:23 pm

    Well Eve was cloned from Adams rib right and according to the Sumeria clay tablets 240,000 years ago they had worked on that too. So this is a very old story cloning humans and making men from clay that must be why this planet is called Earth as they are Earthlings got it now.

    But seriously i understand the ethics question but scientist never have those do they, Nuclear bombs, GMO, chem trails sad examples but too many others to name as that is way too depressing these stories are all part of the leak out information see what people respond to and here people do and say what is on their mind. Cloning and genetic manipulation whether of people or plants is just people playing at being god such aspirations wonder what comes next now if only these efforts could be brought into focus of what will really be needed then as a race you may not go extinct but these attempts show resigned to failure as this is not the right way at all we can see that.

  2. freewill42 on March 9, 2015 at 7:24 pm

    The story is from 2002. It was never verified.
    Michael Guillen, a former science editor at ABCNEWS, told Good Morning America, that he had selected experts to perform the tests by New Year’s Eve and was “disappointed” when he was not allowed access to the family. After temporarily giving up efforts to oversee tests of the alleged clone, he released a statement saying the claims could be part of “an elaborate hoax.”

  3. James on March 9, 2015 at 6:03 pm

    Embryologists from long ago pioneered this. It is quite remarkable what can be done with micro glass pipettes and microscopy and exceptional delicate technique.

  4. marcos toledo on March 9, 2015 at 12:46 pm

    What are the scientific idiots complaining about. A identical twin is a natural clone so this nothing unnatural to begin with. What is unnatural is taking a cell or cells from a living creature and creating a identical twin separated by many years. Anybody for having the Judeo-Christo-Islamic religious leaders declare any coupe who have identical twins made a pack with Devil.

  5. Robert Barricklow on March 9, 2015 at 8:30 am

    Hello Dolly.
    One of your old favorite sheep from way back when.
    find her an empty stall fellas,
    Dolly’ll never go away.

  6. WalkingDead on March 9, 2015 at 6:16 am

    It may be more appropriate to state that this is the first one anyone has admitted to…
    If it is indeed a clone, it will not, by any means be an exact copy of the individual because it will have its own soul and conscientiousness; it’s personality will not be identical either due to differing life experiences over the course of its development.
    Just because we have the ability to do something, doesn’t mean it’s ethical or even advisable to do it.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events