May 19, 2015 By Joseph P. Farrell

Mr. V.T, and Ms. B.H. shared this article, and I am both so saddened, nauseated, and outraged by it, that I simply had to share it. I think, when you read it, that you will see why I had such an emotional response, and why I had to share it:

Depopulation test run? 75% of children who received vaccines in Mexican town now dead or hospitalized

The article is eye-opening enough concerning the unmitigated crap that the big pharma companies put into their vaccines and the unmitigated crap with which they assure their "safety" to the public in the American media:

"Just recently, in fact, the UK government agreed to pay $90 million to victims of the swine flu vaccine. That vaccine caused permanent brain damage to over 800 children across Europe. The truth is that vaccines regularly harm and even kill innocent children, most likely because of the toxic chemical adjuvants and preservatives they still contain. As the CDC openly admits, vaccines are still intentionally formulated with mercury, aluminum, MSG and formaldehyde. Some vaccines even use ingredients derived from aborted human fetal tissue. Last year, a CDC scientist blew the whistle on the CDC committing scientific fraud to cover up links between vaccines and autism in young African-American males."

But there's something disturbing here, and it prompts some questions:

"Despite the insidious attempts of the corporate-controlled U.S. media to censor the stories about the deadly side effects of vaccines, the truth keeps surfacing. The latest vaccine tragedy to strike has killed two babies in La Pimienta, Mexico and sent 37 more to the hospital with serious reactions to toxic vaccine additives.

'...14 children are in serious condition, 22 are stable and one is in critical condition," the Chiapas Health Secretariat said in a statement via

"What's especially alarming is that only 52 children were vaccinated in all, meaning that 75% of those receiving the vaccines are now either dead or hospitalized."

One notices here the implicit "scientism" of which I wrote earlier this week: the use of "declarations" by this committee or that committee to assure the public that what has been announced, or proposed, is scientific. If challenged, the priesthood usually resorts to the tactic of producing a blizzard of incomprehensible equations in order to convince the public it can't "possibly understand" and simply must take their word for it.

Nonsense. Degrees and equations are no substitute for truth, for responsible and transparent authority, and for independent critical thinking. This is what modern scientism cannot accept, for if its narratives and their philosophical assumptions - whether about evolution or the standard model of quantum mechanics or the dogma of the safety of all vaccines - are challenged, the power structures erected upon them come tumbling down. One wonders, for example, how one can call the smallpox vaccine and the modern syringe full of mercury and fetal tissue and God knows what else a "vaccine" in the same breath or use the term so univocally. I, quite frankly, have my doubts.
But beyond the philosophical issues, there are some bothersome questions here. Why was this town chosen. What were the "vaccines" for? Who authorized the test? and most importantly, who is the corporation behind it, and who are its major shareholders?
For those questions, you see, highlight the sociological problem of modern "science", or rather, scientism, for we are not dealing with Galileo, or Jenner, or Pasteur, or Mendel, or Maxwell, or Darwin, or Einstein. We're dealing with Mon(ster)santo, BASF (Bloated Assinine Synthetic Foodlikesubstances), or Muck Pharmaceuticals. We're dealing, not with science, but scientism cartels, knowledge cartels, and that's why those questions are important.
And for those Mexican families who have seen their children die or suffer, our hearts and prayers go with you.
See you on the flip side...