There was a strange moment during President Trump's inauguration speech, and that strange moment seems to be catching the attention of a few people and making a few rounds of discussion, and I have (as one might suspect) my own suspicions and high octane speculations, and they don't seem to be entirely unique to me. And while I normally don't comment much about US domestic politics here, other then to say the Clintons, Bushes, and Obamas have left it a shambles, this one caught my eye: as Mr. Trump began his inaugural address, a group of soldiers and sailors came up behind the new President, flanked him, and stood for a few seconds until another military man came up, said something, and the soldiers and sailors turn and exit.

Did soldiers accidentally crash Trump's inaugural speech? Bizarre moment servicemen in uniform flank the new president - and walk away after a few seconds

Now, The Daily Mail is spinning this all as a "moment of confusion"; this was all accident, a mistake. And indeed, I suspect it was made at least to appear to be "a moment of confusion," and an accident and a mistake.

One person emailed me and asked if I had caught it, and stated that for that moment, he felt like "this is it, this is the moment they assassinate him, and return power to the neo-con neo-liberal Clinton-Bush-Obama-roids." Or words to that effect (he was a bit more "colorful" in his language).

But in my high octane speculation of the day, I am going to suggest this was no "moment of confusion" nor even an "accident", but rather, a very clear symbolic message. Whether that message is a disturbing one is up to the individual reader to determine; I merely present my suspicions and speculations. Indeed, that message can be taken in two ways, as we'll see.

Prior to this last election there was a great deal of back and forth on the internet, and there was even talk - promoted primarily by CIA-affiliated Dr. Steve Piezcenik - that Mr Trump was indeed getting powerful backing from segments of the American Deep State that had finally "had it" with the unipolar Neo-con Neo-liberal agenda of the past three administrations, and that it was launching a soft "countercoup."So far as that scenario goes, it mirrors my own speculations, voiced in various interviews, that Mr. Trump did indeed have backing of certain factions in the American deep state, only my scenario did not include that bit about "countercoups." That in itself is an interesting choice of words, for it implies some previous coup, which, interestingly enough, was never specified as to when it began, and who pulled it off. For my part, I've suggested in a couple of interviews that I view the whole recent election fracas from a very long historical arc, dating back at least to (you guessed it) the Kennedy Administration. And if that "countercoup" scenario does have any merit, then the language itself does suggest that some sort of long historical arc is necessary, for the Bush political dynasty was, in effect, launched when Mr. Nixon brought GHW Bush into the White House from the CIA and made him head of the RNC. Mr. Reagan, of course, was forced to accept Mr. Bush as his Vice President, and months later an assassination attempt on his life by Bush family acquaintance John Hinckley left Mr. Reagan in a hospital bed and Mr. Bush effectively running the country. And, if you've been keeping score, the disturbing revelations surrounding Iran-Contra, and the book of intelligence operative Terry Reed (Compromised: Clinton, Bush, and the CIA) exposed a whole network of nasty connections between the two families.

So picture, now, the scene: Mr. Trump delivering his inaugural address. Behind him are seated former Presidents Bill Clinton, George Walker Bush, and Barack Obama(forced to take Darth Hillary as his Secretary of State), with first ladies Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton. The military walks up behind Trump. Message? Do what we tell you to do.

Conversely, the message could be very different: same scene, different interpretation: the military walks up behind Mr. Trump and flanks him, in clear view of the assembled presidential neo-cons and neo-libs: message? We've got his back, don't try anything stupid. And in the context of pre-election campaign chatter of countercoups and so on, it seems to fit more closely.

But either way, the message is a disturbing one, and I'll leave it as a case of "you tell me."

See you on the flip side...

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. papercut on January 25, 2017 at 12:43 am

    Looks like the soldiers are there to hide something.

    who is this little guy behind the soldiers, running back and forth, laying something down? imgur.com/pbNT05m

    – long shot shows the soldiers are about 10 meters back from trump, not right behind him. It looks like they’re right behind him because of the zoom.

    The msm says it’s a mistake, but trump seems to wave them on. the msm says another soldier comes out and tells them to leave. that’s not quite correct. the soldiers come out, line up, and then the leader goes to the back and left of view. then the little guy goes back and forth three times. then the leader comes back out, walks methodically back up saying something at each row he passes, then says a few words to the front guy on the right. then they all methodically leave.

    here’s some different views.

    the whole speech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRBsJNdK1t0&feature=youtu.be

    closeup, just the soldiers and the little guy: http://time.com/4641165/donald-trump-inauguration-rain/

    far view of soldiers. http://www.usatoday.com/videos/embed/96843430/?fullsite=true

    close view of soldiers, and discussion of what was that? https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/01/23/mili-j23.html

    close view of soldiers, were they lost? http://www.tmz.com/2017/01/20/donald-trump-inauguration-soldiers-mistake/

    • Roger on January 25, 2017 at 12:35 pm

      From the video of just that incident it looks like someone indeed brought down two umbrellas and shortly afterwards the soldiers came down and formed a shield between Trump and the umbrellas. Then it looks like someone may have checked to see if the umbrellas were indeed just umbrellas and that nothing else was hiding in or with them. Once everything checked out they retreated back to their posts.

  2. Pellevoisin on January 24, 2017 at 8:42 pm

    A friend tells me that the sudden appearance of the military behind him during his speech was tied to the BBC’s tweet about Trump being shot … which did not happen. But in trying to correlate the timing … I have not been successful.

    Perhaps it was scheduled to coincide with what Trump was saying at the moment to telegraph that the various branches were with Trump on those points. But it seems more likely that someone was expecting Trump to be shot, and they were sent out to whisk him out after being shot. A ballet gone bad … or an assassination averted.

  3. henry on January 24, 2017 at 6:00 pm


    “While countries like China and Germany continue to make progress in their transition away from the dirty energy of the past, this action will roll back the progress we have made,” Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) said in a statement. “Encouraging the production of this oil, which includes Canadian tar sands – one of the dirtiest fuels in the world — is a huge step backward.”

    “Earlier last year, Russian President Vladimir Putin has also criticised the way the US-backed Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, saying the “clandestine talks” do not promote stability in Asia Pacific.

    Putin has backed China on both the FTAAP and the China-led RCEP trade talks.

    RCEP groups the 10 members of the Association of South East Asian Nations plus China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia and New Zealand, but not the United States.”

    “China and Russia have repeatedly voiced opposition to the deployment of THAAD, arguing that its real aim was to deter the strategic weapon systems not only in the Korean peninsula’s North, but primarily in China’s hinterlands and Russia’s Far East regions.”

    “Mikhailov said Russia would look to increase involvement in the South China Sea, where islands and shoals are subject to competing claims from China, the Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam and Brunei.

    But Mikailov said Russia could be involved in joint military exercises that involved not only the Philippines, but also China and Malaysia, according to the Sputnik report.”

    “This includes former colonial powers. It is not for them to lecture countries they once exploited on how to conduct their own internal affairs today,” the Malaysian leader wrote. “Malaysia and China are united in agreeing on the need to defend the sovereignty of the nation state and in the belief that the individual histories, values and governance systems of different countries must be respected.”

  4. henry on January 24, 2017 at 1:06 pm

    Speaking of a “strange moment” during Donald Trump’s inauguration

    let’s not forget there were more than 60 Democrats that did not attend his inauguration,
    and you know whats the last occassion about roughly same number of Democrats also boycotted?

    It was quite “inappropriate” and “unusual” to have a Republican House speaker, John Boehner to invite the leader of a foreign country to address to a joint session of Congress.

    “Prime Minister Netanyahu is a great friend of our country, and this invitation carries with it our unwavering commitment to the security and well-being of his people” Boehner said in a statement on Wednesday.
    “In this time of challenge, I am asking the prime minister to address Congress on the grave threats radical Islam and Iran pose to our security and way of life. Americans and Israelis have always stood together in shared cause and common ideals, and now we must rise to the moment again.”

    not only it was a “snub” to Barack Obama, but it was a clear attempt to stop his governmet from signing the Iranian nuclear deal.

    “Netanyahu used the Tuesday speech to frame Iran as a major terrorist threat to the U.S and Israel, framing it in the same vein as ISIS and North Korea. And he argued that the deal currently in the works to prevent the nation from gaining nuclear weapons would in fact “guarantee” that it secures them — “lots of them.”

    among the 58 democrats who boycotted that “special treatment” of Israeli prime minister Netanyahu, demonstrating a “special relationship” between the U.S. and Israel, in the form of a rare joint session of Congress speech, was Tim Kaine, deeming it as “inappropriate” .

    The man was Clinton’s pick for vice-president in the 2016 U.S. presidental election, but he was also, in the eyes of right-wing Israeli like Netanyahu’s Likud party, a “frontman” for J-Street,

    the “anti-Israel” liberal-Jewish organization’s worldview are often at odds with Netanyahu’s right-wing policy, on key issues like,
    – diplomatic flexibility with Iran
    – a tougher US line against Israel’s settlement activity

    “Ben-Ami believes that the rise of Kaine, who has long leaned toward J Street’s positions, is becoming the norm among congressional Democrats, who sought cover in the organization’s tent during a bruising battle over Iran last year between the White House and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.”

    and Donald Trump’s son in law, Jared Kushner, who serves as the liaison for AIPAC, now Trump’s White House “special advisor”,
    now, is anyone surprised to see one of the first things that the 45th president of the U.S. eager to do is speaking with Netanyahu on the phone and inviting him to visit the U.S.? and the “hot topic” in their conversation, you guessed it, the “Iran nuclear threat”.

    But here is the thing, the “anti-Israel” J-street also received donation from George Soros since 2008… although this could be the case of Israel’s long time strategy of infiltrating any “anti-Israel” groups, but it could also be a “third party actor” trying to manipulate both sides.
    The organization’s motto is “pro-Israel, pro-peace”, yet it has been described as being neither pro-Israel nor pro- peace. One of its founders, Daniel Levy has been quoted as saying “the creation of Israel in 1948 was wrong”, it certain endorses “the right of the Palestinians to a sovereign state of their own”, i.e. the creation of a Palestinian state.

    To add another confusion to this mess, is the fact the Russians are actually the ones that’s been helping the Iranians to acquire nuclear power

    that could be problematic for Trump’s administration since evidently it has a “pro-Israel” and “anti-Iran” agenda.
    One the surface level it shows certain divide between the powers in Washington and Moscow, but beneath it, there could be “third party actors” in play, like the Jewish/Russian mafia, which has ties to all the parties involved, Netanyahu, Putin and Donald Trump,etc
    but these, are only “human actors”, lurking behind them, are something far more calculating and intelligent, everything and everyone seems to be its “chess piece”, and for some reason, it has been manipulating both sides of the conflict of interests, and the design is ultimately geared towards a “nuclear confrontational senario” on this planet.

    And, guess who was also invited by House speaker John Boehner to address a “joint session of Congress” back in 2015?
    meet the real “masters” in Tel Aviv and Rome, or are they mere “servants” of something else?

  5. TRM on January 23, 2017 at 9:34 pm


    Maybe handing out umbrellas and a message at the same time?

  6. Robert Barricklow on January 23, 2017 at 5:07 pm

    Following up on my post today in latest News & Views
    about India’s U.S. backed cashless society move:

    The Indian Demonetization Disaster Explained.
    [approx. 37 minute video]
    B[Brazil under US political coup]
    I[India under US financial coup]

    • henry on January 23, 2017 at 8:11 pm

      its really a sad thing to see India and China pitch against each other, given these two ancient civilizations have been co-existed peacefully as neibours for over 2,000 years, that one of the greatest cultural exchanges along the ancient Silk Road, was the transmission of Buddhism from ancient Indian to ancient China which forever bonded the two cultures together.


      yet, the relationship between the two is more than mere “history”, more than some cultural exchange of the past,

      the fact that they have existed “side by side” on this planet, is ofcourse not a coincidence,

      that relationship is “eternal”, and thats their “destiny”, they are just still under the spell of modern “nationalism” which has its roots in modern colonialism, but remember this, nobody is burning witches today, there will be a day the two realized its time to move on,

      or to use “The Law of One” anology, they are still, like the rest of cultures on this planet, “density 3 civilization”, yet, their destiny is the “Heavens”,

      they are just still asleep, still unaware of the wonders they would achieve together millions of years from now into the future and space,

      but also a relationship that existed since time immemorial, perhaps it can be traced back to at least 200 million years ago, in a galaxy far far away…

      a comment from an Indian Youtuber,

      “Cried many times during this great movie… xuan zang was the greatest Buddhist master … his life and journey to india is inspirational… lots of love to Chinese people from Indian people.”

      i very much share his emotion,

      let me just say, thank you India for preserve the great traditions of “the peoples of Light”, the wisdoms of Atlantis and Lemuria, which through the transmission of Buddhism, not only enriched us culturally, but forever reminded us, who we really are, and where we came from,

      on this earth and beyond…

      Long Live India!

      • henry on January 23, 2017 at 11:20 pm

        @”or to use “The Law of One” anology, they are still, like the rest of cultures on this planet, “density 3 civilization”, yet, their destiny is the “Heavens”,”

        i give president Trump 5% probability of doing what Obama failed to do, namely “disclosure”, although my estimate is that its highly unlikely he would do it,

        but if he can pull it off, he will become one of the greatest American president ever, and it will have great transformational effect on the man himself as well, and for the betterment of the U.S, and for the betterment of the world, i hope that 5% can win through.

        However, im very realistic about the situation, and the moment this “pro-Israel” candidate becomes the U.S. president, i sensed that there is a very good chance that innocent lives could be lost due to the negative nature of this love affair with “Zionist Israel”,

        On 19 January 2017, just a day before Donald Trump’s inauguration, the iconic landmark 17-story high-rise building in Tehran, the Plasco Building mysteriously caught fire and collapsed, killing dozens of people (mostly firefighters), the building was built by a prominent businessman Habib Elghanian, who was an Iranian Jewish businessman who served as the president of the Tehran Jewish Society, and a symbolic head of the Iranian Jewish community in the 1970s.

        now, lets revisit the remarks made by Netanyahu after the U.N. Resolution 2334 was adopted last December

        “The decision taken at the UN yesterday was part of the swan song of the old world biased against Israel,” Mr Netanyahu said.
        “We are entering a new era and as the President-elect Trump said yesterday, this is going to happen much quicker than people think. In this new era there is a high price for those trying to harm Israel.”

        now, tell me this, is it just merely a coincidence, that the deadly Plasco Building,
        a – happened in Tehran, and to Israel’s “arch-enemy”, Iran
        b- happened just a day before Donald Trump become the U.S. president, which according to Netanyahu, will be, “In this new era there is a high price for those trying to harm Israel.”
        C- the building itself was built by a “Jewish” person

        not to mention, the scene looked like a “mini 911” event…

        and as someone who has clearly stated his goal is to “eliminate terrorism from the face of the earth”,
        this opens the door for two possibilities,
        1- more radicalized Muslims fighting the imperialist American invaders of their “holy land”.
        2- false flag events like 911 “terrorist attack” to justify pro-longed military presence in the Islamic world.

        but if he can grab(instead of grabbing pussy…) that 5% probability chance, this is what he will be dealing with as the president of the U.S.

        (start @ 1:05)

        that is a “density 5 civilization”, the Pleiadians are at this evolutional stage, and they will be the one making “First Contact” with earth.

      • Robert Barricklow on January 24, 2017 at 6:42 pm

        the people of both countries are good people.
        The PTB have incorporated their power infrastructures to counter to forces that good people deserve for their own selfish sinister desires/power.
        I feel that religions are the opiate of the masses; given as an antidote to the unforgivable power structures which these living spirits are being subjected to. Buddhism is one of the least offensive of these opiates. I don’t subscribe to any of them; but do take from the many aspects which I find match my own beliefs. And those beliefs are continually being challenged as I journey on through life.
        Israel has got to be as close to the devil as they come. Despicable is as close as I can get to describing them w/o being moderated.

  7. Robert Barricklow on January 23, 2017 at 3:54 pm

    A cautionary tale/video on Trump’s promise:


    Short, but to the point.
    [A Leopard can’t change its spots.]
    Of course, I hope he’s wrong, and the infrastructure benefits small businesses/people; instead of the usual suspects, absentee owners & the 1% ers
    Hope is a poor tactic, at best.

    • Robert Barricklow on January 23, 2017 at 3:57 pm

      error 404
      Just click the home page
      and scroll down past
      “Bill for Change”
      Then click on video

    • henry on January 23, 2017 at 5:24 pm

      @”It looks like Trump is following the Kissinger group, trying to split up Eurasia by backing Russia. I don’t think he has a chance in succeeding in this, because Putin can say, “Look, America changes its policies so much we can’t depend upon you. Obama and Secretary Kerry have broken every agreement that they have made with us. The Clintons have broken every agreement. We can’t trust America anymore. You’ve forced us to rely on China and Iran.” And of course, China also is supporting Iran because of its oil investments there.

      So I think the Trump administration will fail to break up Eurasia – to break up the Shanghai Cooperation Organization of Russia, China and Iran. At that point I think Trump may get angry and go back to the Hillary-type confrontation that looks very dangerous.”

      thats a very good assessment, William Engdahl also think Putin is a smart leader that he would not fall for Kissinger’s tactic.
      Also, Cobra’s newest intel also confirms that Putin is aware of this situation, that he has “advisors” to help him to deal with such situation, and that’s also my own assessment of Putin as well.

      however, i think we should not underestimate this “international criminal mafia” and what they are capable of, remember there was this “mysterious” accident
      from last September involving Russian President’s official black BMW where Putin’s driver was killed in a bizzare car crash on Moscow’s highway.

      now imagine, what kind of effect this kind of “message from somebody” could have on those “traitor Russians” serving in the current Russian hierarchy,
      if even the president of the Russian Federation could be blackmailed like this,

      remember Vladmir Chamov, the Russian ambassador to Libya, who reportedly called Medvedev a “traitor” back in 2011,

      “Based on official versions, Chamov was accused of “inadequately portraying Russian’s interests in the Libyan conflict”. The chairman of the Supervisory Council of the Institute of Demography, Migration and Regional Development- Yuriy Krupnov – during an interview with the “Eurasia” portal’s correspondent, stated :

      “From my point of view we see here some serious disagreements within our hierarchy, and they, as a matter of fact, do not concern Libya as such, but the overall position of Russia in the modern world”. ”

      That in part may explain why the Russians are involved in the 2016 U.S. election, “scapegoat” maybe, but not completely innocent either in my opinion.

      also, know this, unbeknownst to most Russians as well as the Chinese, there exist an “unbreakable bond” between them.

      let’s call that “the Ninth Heaven”

      Victory of the Light ! (as Cobra would say)

      • Robert Barricklow on January 24, 2017 at 6:53 pm

        Both Trump & Putin despise the press that is The Mafia mouthpiece. Both want to replace them with a real press that speaks truth to power; rather bend at his knees and do as power desires. At least they appear to and so far as actins go. Time will tell. Yet, both have enemies within their camps.
        That Trump has sided with Israel so strongly is a very bad omen in my mind’s eye

  8. henry on January 23, 2017 at 3:47 pm

    Trump is being trolled over misspellings in his tweets, like misspelling “unprecedented” as “unpresidented”, and “honored” as “honered”, perhaps they are just “misspellings”, but in case they are somthing else, here goes my theory,

    it should be read as “honored” in American English and there is no such word as “unpresidented”, now, talking about “hidden messages”,

    the letter “O” was “misspelled” as letter “E” in the word “honor”

    Donald Trump has just replaced “Obama” as the U.S. president, but in his first “presidential tweet”, the word “honored” was “detracted” by the letter “E”

    the “message”?

    “you have the opportunity to do a honorable thing as the president of the U.S.”

    and that “honorable thing” has something to do with the letter “O”, say what Obama failed to do as the 44th president, but it also has something to do with the letter “E”,

    can one say “Extraterrestrial ”

    as for “unpresidented”, call it a “warning”, in case the man try to push the “red button”, given that he’s keen on things like “Iran nuclear threat” etc,

    i’ve heard that “ETs” are keen on human nuclear programs, and are reportedly been disabling nuclear arsenals on this planet.

    Now, do you think “Independence Day: Resurgence” just happened to be released in the same year the U.S. is choosing its next leader, is merely a coincidence?

    there is so much more to it than one can possibly imagine, and how incredibly relevant to the 2016 election that movie is.

    maybe thats why the “Military Industrial Complex”, the one Eisenhower warned about, was posturing behind the “puppet” president.

    • Robert Barricklow on January 24, 2017 at 6:54 pm

      There is more there than meets the eye.

  9. Kahlypso on January 23, 2017 at 11:57 am

    The Presidential Speech, etc. etc. Has to be the most tense part of the inauguration speech.., Big sitting duck, target painted over his face, and if a message were to be transmitted.. Shooting Donald in the Face.. would certainly send a message. Would a troop of random soldiers…not know where they were going.. and be allowed to simply waltz up behind the new POTUS (whilst he’s on live TV) who would have been surrounded by his new goons and his own private security army. I dont think so..
    President Trump didnt even flinch at the sound of boots frogstepping behind him. If I were becoming p=President and as I were giving my speech, I heard a bunch of military boots stomping toward me… I’d certainly give a quick glance as to what the heck is going on behind me.. He knew that they were there.

    Can someone please tell me.. which regiments were involved.. I think that it’s United States Army Dress uniforms that they are wearing.. But with so many different peaked caps.. I think that they were representatives of each ‘regiment’ behind Donald.. I thought that it was navy blue for army and white for the navy.. But I’m nowhere near knowledgable enough…
    And you can bet your short and curlies that the Clinton/Bush cronies on the front row would have been able to identify each regiment by view, maybe that’s why they turned up behind Trump, as he was saying those exact words…. (Expect maybe George Dubya who is just dumb and stupid… double chromosomes maybe??)

    There are soo many mixed signals going on with this guy, its hard to follow.. He fills his cabinet with Goldman Sachs then tells the Clinton’s that they’re great, he gives Hillary a standing ovation and he tells the CIA that he’s 1000 percent behind them (SINCE he’s had Kiss-Of-Death-inger breathing down his neck, sent by Molech himself..)

    However.. on the other hand..
    Unless.. he’s been wearing a wire… I can imagine that certain parts of the Powers That Be are simply just sick of the constat amateurism of Weiner and Podesta and the insanely …..(self edit) …… abundant criminality of the Clintons/Bush/Obama Unholy Trinity…and he’s simply been setting up everyone to fall harder..
    The world might finally emerge from the evil and darkness that the CIA has vomitted over the world with their Yale educations and complete lack of moral fiber and conscience (scrubbed from them at an early age by abuse and education??)
    He’s certainly declared war on the CIA, and certain sources seem to concur that he’s told the CIA to stop the Drugs, Weapons and Child trafficking.. We’ll have to see where he stands on human mind control, pharmaceutical testing, gouvernment toppling (KISSINGER… get rid of Kissinger Mr President, send him to Bohemia Grove attached to a cruise Missile.. then send another 50 missiles and then repeat the excercise when the flames just start dying down..) sorry I digress.

  10. OrigensChild on January 23, 2017 at 9:21 am

    Everyone who has contributed here has brought something interesting to the table. Thank you all for your contributions.

    I looked at this through the lens of what was said in the entire speech. When viewed this way it appears to me they appeared behind him to say they were protecting his back, then were seated behind the previous administrations to suggest we are watching you carefully. But from the angle I saw I could be mistaken since the camera angle I viewed did not capture enough of the field of vision to know for sure.

    What is missing from all commentary thus far are the references to space. I have been listening to Catherine Austin Fitt’s reviews from the Dark Journalist this past election season carefully now many times and found some remarkable symmetries between her analysis and his speech. His comments do appear to indicate a seismic sea-change in policy. That remains to be seen. But he peppered his comments a few times with words like horizon, dawn, sky, and dreams. Then shoved them together in his closing comments by saying:

    “We stand at the birth of a new millennium to unlock the mysteries of space. We intend to end the ravages of diseases and to unlock the industries and technologies of tomorrow.”

    This comment, and everything that follows, is peppered with a military style formula augmented with another curious comment: “No matter whether we are from the inner city or the wind swept plains of Nebraska we all look up at the same sky and dream the same dreams.” If there is a clear statement of Secretary Fitts idea that Trump intends to turn the “red” button “green” in public, this would be it.

    As I said before I don’t know what to think. This is just what I heard and saw from the numerous views of the coverage. He has set forth what some suggest is an impossible agenda–but it’s presented in bold colors because it’s intended to inspire us to dream again as a united people with space as part of the platform. Like any dish served at any fine restaurant, if the taste does not rapture the pallet in greater measure than the grandeur of the presentation, it’s just plain garbage dressed in garnish.

    • OrigensChild on January 23, 2017 at 9:46 am

      There are times when I wish I could edit and polish more than simply shoot from the mouth, but today is not one of those days. Please forgive typographical errors, misspellings and any obvious violations of grammar and style.

    • Guygrr on January 23, 2017 at 2:31 pm

      The part about the mysteries of space, curing diseases, and new energy sources is what interested me the most. The roll out is on the horizon.

  11. unclejed on January 23, 2017 at 7:44 am

    The official story was:
    Q: “Shortly after Trump was sworn in and began giving his speech there was a group of military men that lined up in formation behind him. They stood there for a short time before walking back. What were they doing? Was this a scheduled part of the ceremony, or was it some mixup?”

    A: “They were delivering umbrellas. It began to rain before Trump was sworn in. It worsened as the event continued. In the image, you can see one of them coming down the stairs with an umbrella in each hand.”

    This refers to the first few that come down and later an individual female officer, all of whom are clearly carrying umbrellas down but leaving without them. However the group of 7-8 that come down and line up in 2 rows behind don’t look like they’re delivering umbrellas!

    • Roger on January 23, 2017 at 12:28 pm

      The official story is probably what it was. Just handing out bullet proof umbrellas to important people; like they were ordered to do if it looked like it could start raining lead if anything suspicious was spotted nearby. Everything isn’t a conspiracy.

  12. sagat1 on January 23, 2017 at 5:03 am

    Did anyone pick up on the BBC tweeting the following dduring the inaugeration… “Breaking News: President Trump is injured in arm by gunfire #Inauguration.”


    The Beeb claim their twitter account was hacked, but personally I find it quite odd that a hacker would be so specific as to state he’d been shot in the arm and not simply shot or killed. Memories of old auntie reporting on the collapse of WTC7 prior to it happening come to mind.

    • Guygrr on January 23, 2017 at 1:37 pm

      Say what? That is interesting.

  13. mercuriAl on January 23, 2017 at 4:01 am

    What a bunch you guys are!

    Ya all forgot about the Russian Spetsnaz GRU Operators assigned to the Prez!

  14. zendogbreath on January 23, 2017 at 12:10 am

    the irony of all is that trump et al are now thoroughly labeled right wing, racist,….

    they’re all suspected of bringing genocide and collapse to ussa. which could very well happen. it could make the ussr under gorby, yeltsin et al seem a dance in the park by virtue of what those same banker families are doing to the ussa via trump et al.

    what would happen if instead those clearly racist bigoted folk who now openly run the fed ussa govt got things to be even a slight bit better for every man woman and child in the next 8 years? and it wouldn’t take much effort to make everything for everyone even a little better. there has been and is so much effort to making everything worse, all it takes is a little easing off the choke hold to give everyone enough air to make everyone think, hey this good cop (vs the other bad cops) really is one great guy.

    • zendogbreath on January 23, 2017 at 12:13 am

      didn’t germany love the 3rd reich at least for a little while as the banksters poured money to build infrastructure and all after weimar and before ww2?

  15. zendogbreath on January 23, 2017 at 12:04 am

    basta made a good point too. throughout all of this one might ponder we had 46% who didn’t bother to vote. the majority has spoken. and has had enough. granted we’re all more or less strapped in to plato’s cave facing that stupid shadow puppet show on the wall. that doesn’t me we have to watch.

    of course then a few well orchestrated conflicts – lib vs con, race, gender, north vs south, immigration, wall st vs main st, war vs peace,….. abortion, terrism, gun rights,…. the polarizing list is endless. how exactly are we going to get that other 46% to look back at that wall?

    does anyone think the son of a man – who’s empire derived from providing hospitality in the feminine way to early rockefeller employees working mines and wells – is going to ever do anything to damage the rottenchildren rockheaded oligarchies?

    perhaps the neoconlib con job is over and the bush clinton face of the oligarchs is gone. perhaps it is time for some new faces. just cause different colored wolves are circling the sheep, seems hardly a reason to be heartened.

  16. zendogbreath on January 22, 2017 at 11:51 pm

    tj has a point. the ussa military has been sick of neolibcon since 911 at least. their own families got spanked and stabbed at home with their own sword in their own drills. they were all forced to suck it up. then suck up a decade plus the worst assignments, equipment and financing. it’s no longer a matter of a few demoralized grunts. there are more than a few who feel they’re more part of pat tillman’s family than any other. and then they see what can happen to some disgruntled oath keepers via jade helm at waco in 2015.

  17. T.J. on January 22, 2017 at 10:56 pm

    Given that WikiLeaks’ DNC/Podesta emails resulted from a “Leak” not a “Hack” (maybe even by U.S. intel, who were sick of Bush, Clinton & Obama), given Trump’s mafia-savvy background & experience, and given the vague unanimity of FBI & U.S. intel that “Russia did it” (with little proof), a third or fourth hypothesis for an in-your-face inaugural military presence is that the U.S. military was sending a signal BOTH to Trump AND to those who might attempt to ‘take him out.’

    As per the VeteransToday.com article, “Completing the Criminal Takeover of the United States” (a “must read”), the forces that control Trump, Putin & Netanyahu are criminal oligarchs & dual citizens of Russia & Israel (e.g., Fridman & Slater), who also control significant portions of U.S. intel & FBI. Complex stuff — not easy.

    What both VT and GDS readers are missing (IMHO) is the possibility/probability that post-WW2 Nazis & so-called Rothschild mafia types have often worked together — but were split during the 2016 Hillary/Trump election.

    IF so, then Trump’s task now is to consolidate control of Hillary’s post-WW2 Nazi types — without losing control of Trump’s Rothschild mafia types. U.S. military would want to send a signal to both — to back off! ;-).

    • T.J. on January 22, 2017 at 11:07 pm

      The VT article is “Must Read: Completing the Criminal Takeover of the United States (updated)” By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor and Ian Greenhalgh, Managing Editor on January 20, 2017 at http://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/01/20/trumps-bankruptcy-and-the-russian-money-laundering.

      Trump’s super-slim victory was no accident. With help from Bibi/Rothschild intel, Russian intel AND U.S. intel (all oligarchically controlled), Trump’s victory makes perfect sense. However, unless we expose & cut the puppet strings that control Trump (whatever they are), Americans & most others will get screwed — again.

      • Hawkeye Lockhart on January 23, 2017 at 12:40 am

        Duff is no saintly upright do-gooder himself. He is on record on-air saying 40% of what they publish is disinfo “because if I didn’t, I’d be dead” unquote. So you tell me where his loyalties lie. And who’s got him by the short hairs….

        • OrigensChild on January 23, 2017 at 8:33 am

          I agree with you about VT and Gordon Duff. For a long time now I have found many of his comments about important things deliberately obfuscating the trail rather than illuminating it. I seem to get more mileage when I consider him an insider rather than a whistle-blower. Given the death sentence that comes from truth-telling genuine whisle-blowers are hard to find these days.

      • Kahlypso on January 23, 2017 at 1:01 pm

        Hi TJ, thanks for the article, very interesting read.. Have to say… I’ve been looking at what politics has achieved in the western world this last 100 years or so.. Normally I’m based around 5-18 thousand years ago in Mesopotomia.. So It’s interesting to get a reality check… I look up and I see..
        Drug running, child enlevement and slavery, sex trade, arms dealing, massive deployment of chemical pesticides, chemtrails and mind control, possible (very possible) secret space programs with secret technology.. (lazers, mazers, force fields and teleportation with mind controlled UFOs… We have the EM drive now…. They even have a wiki page for the TR-3 series…Even 8 months ago, anyone saying this stuff would have been locked into a mental home..
        Oh and Antarctica’s melting….

        So Yeh, I think that I’d prefer just a plain old fashioned normal criminal in charge.. Who cares if he was bought out of poverty and bankruptcy by the mafia in the 90’s.. At least (it doesnt appear) he hasnt helped put into place human trafficking rings that deliver children into the hands of old perverts. At least he has had absolutly nothing to do with importing crack cocaine into the USA. At least he hasnt actively helped keep rapists on the street.

        Hope it all works out, but I’m pretty sure it’ll ba a case of Animal Farm.

  18. MxFusion on January 22, 2017 at 8:47 pm

    I’m not as sanguine about President Trump as most of the other commentators here. I’m speculating, but it could very well have been a signal that a silent military coup has taken place. A military coup along with a corporate plutocratic coup.

    Look at who’s going to be in the most important Cabinet posts: billionaire CEO’s and retired Generals.

    As for Trump having “testicles of steel,” they could be fortified with the fact he’s going to keep his own private security force along side of the Secret Service.


  19. NorseMythology on January 22, 2017 at 6:29 pm

    Lots of great insight and opinions in here.

    I too noticed this strangeness, not withstanding the fact that I was on the lookout for such things. There was also a moment when IIRC a black female military came down behind him. No big deal it was just odd that any motion would be allowed in the backdrop of an inauguration.

    I also noticed the empty bleachers on his route to the White House. Of course the media latched onto it but i thought to myself, why is yhe bleacher beside it completely full and this one has only 2 people? That sort of behavior is against natural tendencies. Like going into a bathroom and choosing the urinal with people on both sides when there is one with no one around… It doesnt happen. Makes me believe people were not allowed on those if for no other reason than to make it look bad for Trump.

    His speech was very interesting though. His promises for economic prosperity lead me to wonder if he will try to print government issued currency.

    I recommend the documentary The Rothschild Empire to learn about the banking system, particularly since the Rothachild family and more particularly, here in America and the battles and assassination attemps multiple presidents have endured.

    • Kahlypso on January 23, 2017 at 8:15 am

      “Like going into a bathroom and choosing the urinal with people on both sides when there is one with no one around”.. I like the way you think 🙂

  20. Robert Barricklow on January 22, 2017 at 6:00 pm

    Once again my reply is too on the money?
    in short…

    • Robert Barricklow on January 22, 2017 at 6:02 pm

      I even self-censored from
      Sky F**king High!
      Sky High!

      and still moderated.

  21. Robert Barricklow on January 22, 2017 at 5:59 pm

    If you recall it was the most decorated marine in history at the time of his death that said/I spent 33 years and 4 months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street, and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. This was Major General Smedley Butler[highest rank authorized at that time]. He also prevent a fascist coup against FDR.
    This military men are putting their lives on the line[and their family’s well being] for the country; NOT, the oligarchical gangsters. If they have a president that stands against these fascist gangster; than, by God, they stand behind him.
    Although the script has been to maintain the illusion of self governance; perhaps, that is illusion was taken as reality by far too many youngsters going into positions of power. Now they are setting course to blow that illusion Sky High!
    What’s left after the smoke clears?
    Hopefully, as Benjamin Franklin answered just after the founding/close of the Constitutional Convention of the our country [1787] on what form of government we have/

    A Republic, if you can keep it.

    • Robert Barricklow on January 22, 2017 at 6:04 pm

      Time will tell…

  22. basta on January 22, 2017 at 1:45 pm

    Ok, ponder this one: why is the choice always between a cleverly plotted conspiracy and utter incompetence?

    • Freefall on January 22, 2017 at 5:48 pm

      Good point !! .. It reminds me of something one of our members mentioned .. “Why is every ancient machined granite rectangle .. a tomb?” .. Good point !!

    • Hawkeye Lockhart on January 23, 2017 at 12:52 am

      My vote- it was a ‘Freudian slip’ of choreography – with broader metaphorical meaning – for anyone seeing the layers of the playing fields….

  23. Sandygirl on January 22, 2017 at 12:43 pm

    President Trump speech at CIA headquarters, about the 14:30 mark he says; next time I come we need to build a larger room, one built without columns – if you understand what I mean”. I wonder what he was implying? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xlawqm7UZtc

    • justawhoaman on January 22, 2017 at 2:20 pm

      According to an article showing this video on ZeroHedge, it went on to explain that the columns he is referring to is the the Fifth Column, the rogue elements of the CIA. From the article:

      “A fifth column is any group of people who undermine a larger group—such as a nation or a besieged city—from within, usually in favor of an enemy group or nation. The activities of a fifth column can be overt or clandestine. Forces gathered in secret can mobilize openly to assist an external attack. This term is also extended to organized actions by military personnel. Clandestine fifth column activities can involve acts of sabotage, disinformation, or espionage executed within defense lines by secret sympathizers with an external force.”

      Trump continues to illustrate that he has testicles of steel. He will enlarge the CIA but only without the enemies within.


    • Arne Saknussemm on January 22, 2017 at 3:29 pm


    • Guygrr on January 23, 2017 at 1:42 pm

      I.e. No Masonic fifth column(s), if you know what I mean.

  24. TraceElement on January 22, 2017 at 12:20 pm

    It was a warning, in the context of the speech, to the Nefarium’s Lower reaches, that they will not be immune from scrutiny nor retribution.

    • Freefall on January 22, 2017 at 5:37 pm

      Kelly .. Yup!! .. I agree .. It was a message to the “parasites” delivered at point blank range ..

  25. marcos toledo on January 22, 2017 at 12:20 pm

    There was a attempted assassinations Andrew Jackson being one of them. And we have to examine the two between Lincoln and Kennedy they are usually been overlooked. If the control of the printing of the currency might have been behind these assaults it’s four out for four or five if we included Jackson.

  26. Neru on January 22, 2017 at 11:00 am

    Really, people, this one is not difficult.
    Donald often lurks at Gizadeathstar and likes what he sees.
    But…. it’s always about Russia and Putin.
    So Donald came up with a scheme knowing and appreciating the good doctors keen observation skills would work wonders.
    Wait for the other tidbits to come to decode.

    • george on January 22, 2017 at 1:17 pm


    • LSM on January 23, 2017 at 11:05 am

      please print probable truth (links) that ‘Donald’ every once in awhile lurks around Gizadeathstar- would interest me (I’m sure all of us) greatly-

      Larry in Germany

  27. basta on January 22, 2017 at 10:44 am

    That was no accident — though I highly suspect only a very few members of the incoming administration knew that it would occur. The message quite obviously was, “we stand behind him.”

    And wow, give the Donald credit, he is fearless. He might as well have walked over and slapped them all in the face with a week-old herring., then tossed them over the railing.

    And so it begins…

  28. LSM on January 22, 2017 at 10:21 am

    hasn’t anyone not yet noticed in the 1st 18 seconds of Trumps’s speech soldiers/sailors are mouthing Trump’s words in sychronicity?!- not yet realized this?- then look at the video very critically and especially at the military man initially directly behind him- it’s all so very subtle…

    Larry in Germany

    • LGL on January 22, 2017 at 10:47 am

      Do you have a link ?

      • LSM on January 22, 2017 at 6:43 pm

        link was provided by Dr. Farrell on this website article

  29. Beckysue on January 22, 2017 at 10:18 am

    I think they wanted to say they had his back. Remember the remarks of the high brass before the election? Asking the military to control itself and wait for orders in case HRC got in? They did not want a willy-nilly military coup. (I think the brass had an orderly one ready anyway.) I think Trump knows what’s REALLY going on and the military is behind him.

  30. LGL on January 22, 2017 at 8:05 am

    One will notice that the military arranged themselves behind him as he was speaking the following words:

    Today’s ceremony, however, has very special meaning. Because today we are not merely transferring power from one Administration to another, or from one party to another – but we are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the American People.
    For too long, a small group in our nation’s Capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost.


    • WalkingDead on January 22, 2017 at 9:06 am

      The timing of the maneuver would seem to indicate they have his back. However, I don’t believe for a minute they intend to hand the power back to the people who, at this point, are little more than sheep for the most part. The next three months or so will be a good indication of what really may be going on.

    • Sherry on January 22, 2017 at 1:48 pm

      Yes, I just watched it again. It was clearly planned. Who was the first man who came down the stairs and appeared to set something down behind Mr. Trump? Then they pan over to Obama, and when they pan back the military is already standing behind him (in the C-SPAN clip). This is very interesting. I would like to know who planned it and its exact meaning from the perspective of the military.

  31. Vomito Blanco on January 22, 2017 at 6:02 am

    How about the third option– a bunch of horrendously educated nitwits with barely a few brain cells to stitch together after years of video games, text messaging, and millions of hours of tv, join the US military because that or working at a dollar store is the only career path open to them upon graduating high school. Because they excel at shining their shoes good, they get tasked with serving at Trump’s inauguration as an honor guard representing the various branches of the military. During the speech, one of them takes a wrong turn (because he doesn’t know left from right yet) and like lemmings, his cohorts follow him until they wind up center stage behind President Trump. Not knowing where to go or what to do and incapable of any kind of independent thought, they stand in place until they are given new orders. After the inauguration they are oblivious to what happen and are totally unaware that they mildly interrupted the inauguration and were on camera for millions to see. Instead of being reprimanded for being brainless imbeciles, they were then loaded into a jeep and taken to McDonald’s where they all got happy meals with little toys to play with for the bus ride home back to the base later that day.

    • Joseph P. Farrell on January 22, 2017 at 6:03 am

      Lol! I definitely like it!!

    • Gary on January 22, 2017 at 3:12 pm

      After looking at this part of the speech again I’m really perplexed at what the soldiers were doing there. My initial impression when I first saw this was that the soldiers were there to protect Trump from a possible perceived threat on his life as though security got wind of a threat and protected Trump with their bodies. Then after a few seconds an officer comes and tells them to scatter, half went to the right where Obama and the other ex-presidents were seated and the other half went to the left where Trump’s family was seated. Maybe the threat was a hoax and the protection was called off. Which leads me to some further questions.

      1. If there was a perceived attempt on Trump’s life why would the soldiers have come and not the secret service. Does Trump not trust the secret service (CIA influenced) and must rely on the military.
      2. If the military was sending some type of message why did half of them go to Obama’s side of the aisle and the other half go to Trump’s side after they scattered.

      Maybe we’re just making too much of this with Vomito Blanco being correct that it’s just a screw up. It does give the impression of a keystone cop scene.

      But was that to agree with Vomito Blanco that it was a screw up. It had a feeling of a keystone cop scene. However if it was deliberate then I believe it was to show that the military has Trump’s back.

      • Gary on January 22, 2017 at 3:15 pm

        After looking at this part of the speech again I’m really perplexed at what the soldiers were doing there. My initial impression when I first saw this was that the soldiers were there to protect Trump from a possible perceived threat on his life as though security got wind of a threat and protected Trump with their bodies. Then after a few seconds an officer comes and tells them to scatter, half went to the right where Obama and the other ex-presidents were seated and the other half went to the left where Trump’s family was seated. Maybe the threat was a hoax and the protection was called off. Which leads me to some further questions.

        1. If there was a perceived attempt on Trump’s life why would the soldiers have come and not the secret service. Does Trump not trust the secret service (CIA influenced) and must rely on the military.
        2. If the military was sending some type of message why did half of them go to Obama’s side of the aisle and the other half go to Trump’s side after they scattered.

        Maybe we’re just making too much of this with Vomito Blanco being correct that it’s just a screw up. It does give the impression of a keystone cop scene.

        (I forgot to edit out the last paragraph on my earlier comment).

    • Freefall on January 22, 2017 at 5:51 pm

      LMAO … love it !!

      • Freefall on January 22, 2017 at 5:52 pm

        and that was meant for Vomitos comments

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events