THAT WIKILEAKS THING...

THAT WIKILEAKS THING…

Most readers of this website know that I seldom rely on Wikileaks as a source nor comment on any of its major leaks. Indeed, the organization reached a new high - or, depending on one's lights, low - during the last American presidential election cycle when leaks began to emerge during the last days of the campaign that were particularly damaging to Darth Hillary. Granted, she didn't need much help, for the stink of corruption and "suspicious deaths" have followed the Clintons since the Arkancides of the 1970s and 80s' up to and including the weird "suicide" of Clinton aide Vince Foster and the strange details around the bloody massacre of the Branch Davidians at Waco, the weirdness around the Oklahoma City bombing, the dubious financial activities in Haiti, and so on.  These matters have been covered by other researchers in depth, so there was no need here to comment on them.

But Wikileaks itself has not been much of a subject here, either, though most regular readers here probably suspect that to gain access to the information contained in its "leaks," it had by the nature of the case to have "inside help," as it were. This, at least, has been my own suspicion, which is why when I saw the following article shared by Mr. S.D., and read a certain passage within it, that I had to pass it along, together with my daily dose of high octane speculation. The article in question is by Professor Michel Chossudovsky and appears at the website Global Research; the article, you will note, was dated December 13, 2010:

Who is Behind Wikileaks?

The pattern of backers here is intriguing, for one has the usual suspects; Professor Chossudovsky writes:

Wikileaks had also entered into negotiations with several corporate foundations with a view to securing funding. (Wikileaks Leak email exchanges, January 2007):

The linchpin of WikiLeaks’s financial network is Germany’s Wau Holland Foundation. … “We’re registered as a library in Australia, we’re registered as a foundation in France, we’re registered as a newspaper in Sweden,” Mr. Assange said. WikiLeaks has two tax-exempt charitable organizations in the U.S., known as 501C3s, that “act as a front” for the website, he said. He declined to give their names, saying they could “lose some of their grant money because of political sensitivities.”

Mr. Assange said WikiLeaks gets about half its money from modest donations processed by its website, and the other half from “personal contacts,” including “people with some millions who approach us….” (WikiLeaks Keeps Funding Secret, WSJ.com, August 23, 2010)

Acquiring covert funding from intelligence agencies was, according to the email exchanges, also contemplated. (See Wikileaks Leak email exchanges, January 2007)

At the outset in early 2007, Wikileaks acknowledged that the project had been

founded by Chinese dissidents, mathematicians and startup company technologists, from the US, Taiwan, Europe, Australia and South Africa…. [Its advisory board]  includes representatives from expat Russian and Tibetan refugee communities, reporters, a former US intelligence analyst and cryptographers.” (Wikileaks Leak email exchanges, January 2007).  (Emphasis added)

Note that the backers, by Wikileaks' own admission, includes:

1) Chinese dissidents, mathematicians, and start up company technologies;

2) from the USA, Taiwan, Europe, Australia and South Africa;

3) Expat Russian and Tibetan refugees;

4) Reporters;

5) A former US intelligence analyst;

6) Cryptographers; and

7) "people with some millions who approach us."

Chossudovsky then notes:

From the outset, Wikileaks’ geopolitical focus on “oppressive regimes” in Eurasia and the Middle East was “appealing” to America’s elites, i.e. it seemingly matched stated US foreign policy objectives. Moreover, the composition of the Wikileaks team (which included Chinese dissidents), not to mention the methodology of “exposing secrets” of foreign governments, were in tune with the practices of US covert operations geared towards triggering “regime change” and fostering “color revolutions” in different parts of the World.

In addition, further on in the article, Chossudovsky notes the ties of Wikileaks to The Economist and to the Rothschild interests:

Wikileaks and The Economist have also entered into what seems to be a contradictory relationship. Wikileaks founder and editor Julian Assange was granted in 2008 The Economist’s New Media Award.

The Economist has a close relationship to Britain’s financial elites. It is an establishment news outlet, which has, on balance, supported Britain’s involvement in the Iraq war. The Economist’s Editor-in-Chief, John Micklethwait was a participant in the June 2010 Bilderberg conference.

The Economist also bears the stamp of the Rothschild family. Sir Evelyn Robert Adrian de Rothschild was chairman of The Economist from 1972 to 1989. His wife Lynn Forester de Rothschild currently sits on The Economist’s board. The Rothschild family also has a sizeable shareholder interest in The Economist. Former Editor of The Economist (1974-86), Andrew Stephen Bower Knight is currently Chairman of the J. Rothschild Capital Management Fund. He is also reported to have been member of the Steering Group (1986) of the Bilderberg.

The broader question is why would Julian Assange receive the support from Britain’s foremost establishment news outfit which has consistently been involved in media disinformation?

Are we not dealing with a case of “manufactured dissent”, whereby the process of supporting and rewarding Wikileaks for its endeavors, becomes a means of controlling and manipulating the Wikileaks project, while at the same time embedding it into the mainstream media.

It is also worth mentioning another important link. Julian Assange’s lawyer Mark Stephens of Finers Stephens Innocent (FSI), a major London elite law firm, happens to be the legal adviser to the Rothschild Waddesdon Trust. While this in itself does prove anything, it should nonetheless be examined in the broader context of Wikileaks’ social and corporate entourage: the NYT, the CFR, The Economist, Time Magazine, Forbes, Finers Stephens Innocent (FSI), etc.

What caught my eye in all of this was the strangeness of these combinations of interests: Western financiers and members of the "oligrachy", expatriates from Russia and Tibet, Chinese dissidents (including, presumably Taiwanese), South Africa, and so on. Additionally, it is to be noted that the inclusion of intelligence analysts, cryptographers, and mathematicians, would appear to give Wikileaks its own in-house encryption, decryption, and analysis capability, backed by unknown persons with "millions." Clearly, at one level, one has all the presence of "Mr Globaloney" that could be interpreted to mean Wikileaks has an inside track to that group and, to that extent, represents their interests and agendas. The citations Professor Chossudovsky has provided in his article are alone a gold mine of information and he deserves credit for exposing it.

It's that pattern of involvement with South Africa, Taiwan, and "Chinese dissidents", however, that attracted my attention, for in it, one detects another pattern, one associated with the former World Anti-Communist League, which was, not surprisingly, based from much of the period of its operation in Taiwan. That organization has since changed its name, with the collapse of the Soviet Union, to the World League for Freedom and Democracy. Same organization, new name.  If one searches for the organization under its new name, one comes here:

World League for Freedom and Democracy

And scrolling down, one reads this:

In 1978, Roger Pearson became the World Chairman of the WACL. Pearson was described in a Washington Post article as having neo-Nazi associations[1][2][3][4][5][6] and sources report that as a result of an article in the Washington Post in 1978 critical of WACL and alleging extreme right wing politics of Pearson that either he was expelled from WACL or at least was pressured into resigning from his position as World Chairman.[7][8][9]

The U.S. chapter of WACL, the United States Council for World Freedom (USCWF) was founded in 1981 by Major General John K. Singlaub. Singlaub was the former US Chief of Staff of both United Nations and American forces in South Korea, but was relieved in 1977 by U.S. PresidentJimmy Carter after publicly criticizing Carter's decision to reduce the number of troops on the peninsula. Singlaub became a member of the WACL in 1980, and founded and became president of its U.S. chapter, the United States Council for World Freedom. This branch generated controversy when it supported Nicaraguan guerrillas in the Iran–Contra affair[10] and, in 1981, the USCWF was placed under watch by the Anti-Defamation League, which said that the organization had increasingly become "a point of contact for extremists, racists, and anti-Semites".[11][12] During the 1980s, the USCWF and WACL conducted a purge of these elements, and invited ADL observers to monitor its conferences;[13] by 1985, the Anti-Defamation League declared itself "satisfied that substantial progress has been made since 1981 in ridding the organization of racists and anti-Semites."[14]

It is alleged that in the mid-1980s WACL had become a supplier of arms to anti-communist rebel movements in southern Africa, Central America, Afghanistan and the Far East.[15] During the 1980s, the WACL was particularly active in Latin America, notably by aiding the Contra forces in Nicaragua.[16] During this period, WACL was criticized for the presence in the organization of neo-Nazis, war criminals, and people linked to death squads and assassinations.[11] Other allegations have included reports claim that the World League for Freedom and Democracy is responsible for producing what its opponents call "troops of killers", while ostensibly organizing to provide support for Corazon Aquino from the right-wing in the Philippines[17] and for supporting the Mozambican National Resistance (RENAMO) movement in Mozambique.[18]

The World Anti-Communist League held annual conferences at various locations throughout the world. Numerous groups participated, including the Unification Church of the Rev. Sun Myung Moon. WACL also enjoyed support from many U.S. Congressmen, most notably 2008 presidential nominee Senator John McCain (R-AZ),[10][19] who sat on the United States Council for World Freedom (USCWF) Board of Directors in the early 1980s.[20][21] McCain has said previously he resigned from the council in 1984 and asked in 1986 to have his name removed from the group's letterhead.[22]

In other words, the organization is not only well-connected to the upper echelons of the American political and intelligence establishment, but also connected to the post-war network of Neo-Nazis and their influence over Latin American death squads.

Why should the Taiwanese and therefore, the possible World Anti-Communist League/World League for Freedom and Democracy connection concern us? In his crucial study The Beast Reawakens: Fascism's Resurgance from Hitler's Spymasters to Today's Neo-Nazi Groups and Right-Wing Extremists (Routledge, 2000), Martin A. Lee notes, in an extended footnote on pp. 226-227 the following disturbing series of connections:

On rare occasions, the (Institute for Holocaust Revision) managed to entice mainstream historians, such as Pulitzer Price-winner John Toland, to present papers at its conferences. Ex-CIA agent Victor Marchetti also lecture at an IHR gathering.... Another favorite IHR speaker and collaborator was Issah Nakleh of the World Muslim Congress(WMC). Basied in Pakistan, the WMC was initially headed by the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who, like his friend H. Keith Thompson, stood by the Third Reich until his death in 1974. A few years later, the WMC, then headed by Pakistani Dr. Inamullah Kahn, mailed Holocaust-denial literature to every member of the U.S. Congress and the British Parliament.... Dr. Kahn also served as an advisor to the Saudi Arabian royal family, which lavished funds on the WMC. In addition, the Saudi Arabian government retained the services of American neo-Nazi William Grimstead as a Washington lobbyist. Like many European neofascist groups, the WMC adopted a third-position stance toward the superpowers, as demonstrated by this headline from Muslim World: U.S. AND USSR - BOTH SERVE ZIONIST INTERESTS. But Khan tempered his anti-American tirades when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979. Soon the World Muslim Congress began working closely with U.S. intelligence and Pakistani military officials, who were covertly supporting the Afghan mujahideen in their fight against the Soviet-installed regime in Kabul. This effort was strongly endorsed by Dr. Khan, who served for many years as the Pakistani representative of the Nazi-infested World Anti-Communist League, which played an important role in the Reagan administrations "secret war" in the Golden Crescent.(Emphasis added0

Global Crescents and secret wars and Afghanistan imply a covert war for control of drug money coming from that region.

In other words, one is looking at a mouthpiece not just for globalism, but one which could conceivable have deep connections to other global networks: radical Islam and its dubious connection to the Saudis (and again, note that Saudi-Nazi connection), global terrorist networks, and, of course, global fascist networks.

And that should give everyone pause.

See you on the flip side...

 

34 thoughts on “THAT WIKILEAKS THING…”

  1. This is a quite interesting book about Wikileaks, written by ex-Wikileaks insider.

    WikiLeaks: My Time with Julian Assange at the World’s Most Dangerous Website (2011).

  2. iZeta, I tried to respond to your comment below – but, once again, “Your comment is awaiting moderation.”
    goshawks – March 21, 2017 at 11:10 pm.

  3. Doc, left out tidbits of clinton history like his forced quick exit from school while on cecil rhodes’ dime? Or ron brown’s ridiculously tomely demise? Or those at least 19 trips to kennebunkport while gov of arkansas? Or all those arkansas state trooper protected flights by bobby seal n probbly w in n out of arkansas with heavily loaded planes?….

    Ok enuf. U were right. That list is 2 long.

    So meanbwhile that brings us back to snowdens backer/journalist/leaker-when-we want-to, glenn greenwald and his backer omidyar who spent 300+mill on greenwalds network shortly after backing vicky nulands neo nazi ukraine boys to poke the putin bear…. and oh yeh he gave those neo nazis how much? Um 300+mill as well.

    So why wouldn’t we trust snowden n assange? Btw, reading bios on assange n his parents is a wild ride. Assange was raised in spy soup more than w n more than barry sortero.

    Vomito, can u werk up some sort of mini series plotline we can sell on a utube channel like master ken’s?

  4. Julian Assange has certainly been on an interesting journey, from early associations with The Family in Victoria here in Oz, alleged hacking exploits as Mendax, founding Wikileaks and winding up “prisoner” in Ecuador’s embassy, possibly due to being “honey-trapped”. Possibly. Where to next?

    1. Tim, I went to a doctor I loved in Ferntree Gully soon after I went to Melbourne. She was a lovely lady. Then she hit the news, along with her father (whose book I have) because they were members of The Family. I had also been to one of their meditation afternoons at Ferny Creek. My sister, a devout Christian, left her when she heard the news but I stayed on.
      She died of breast cancer, and the woman who led the movement, who lived in the UK, cared for her while she was ill.
      So The Family has always been an enigma for me. The people at the meditation afternoon were also lovely, gentle people. Weird, I know.

      1. My sister, a doctor, worked with the children after they were brought out of The Family.
        Assange’s association with that group, however tenuous, implies a connection with intelligence services. At the very least, the way Anne Hamilton Byrne mistreated her followers is very similar to covert intelligence programs like MKUltra. Hamilton Byrne is apparently in a nursing home in Melbourne, and has recently been the subject of media reports like this one: http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/bigideas/2017-03-20/8360682
        Here’s one about the use of drugs on the children: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4248718/Children-given-LSD-Australia-s-cult-Family.html

        And then there’s this: http://spitfirelist.com/for-the-record/ftr-724-wiki-of-the-damned/

  5. In case anyone hasn’t heard David Rockefeller died at the age of 101 either today or yesterday, not sure.

  6. May I suggest a new image for the USA. Lets replace good old Uncle Sam with one Batman villains either The Joker or Harry Two Face. I think either would be a truer representative of the USA than kindly Uncle Sam.

  7. The one good thing about all these ‘layers upon layers upon layers’ of deception is that it is forcing humans back into Intuition. By intuition, I mean all the connections to higher realms and latent human powers. ‘Intuition’ usually comes in the first micro-second of observing someone or some situation, before the conditioned-mind has a chance to edit it out. (This is why the PTB so-stress the Rational Mind.)

    So, in once sense, I welcome all the deception. It is forcing us to bring-out (actually step-back-into) our dormant capabilities. This is how we will Know who is at the bottom of the rabbit hole – directly…

    1. Agreed as long as we maintain our thinking faculties healthy. I firmly believe this is a major reason why our food, water, and air supply is continuously intoxicated with substances that prevent rational thinking. Not to mention wi-fi and all the other exotic technologies that are turned on and off intermittently.

      1. In my mind (grin), the proper use of the Rational Mind is to ‘fill-out’ the details provided in a flash-moment by the Intuition. This is needed to convey that ‘truth’ to those still stuck in Rational Mind, as well as to guard against ‘inputs’ that are not Intuition.

        The key, though, is that Intuition should be the primary Knowing. If the fact-trail peters out or is intentionally obfuscated, one should stick with that Knowing, come h@ll or high water. This is the hard part, in the face of shunning and paid skeptics.

        The good news is that everyone feels the same Intuition. It is like the JFK assassination (or 9/11): There has been enough tampering – destruction of evidence (JFK’s brain is missing!), intimidation or suiciding of primary witnesses, and the deployment of controlled-media to lay partial or false trails – that no-one will ever be able to utterly Prove that JFK was assassinated by a well-oiled ‘machine’. However, ask anyone to search their feelings on the matter, and 99.99% will Know something is wrong…

        (And yes, the PTB are deploying many methods to subjugate the Rational Mind. It is still dangerous to the PTB if someone connects the dots…)

        1. Unfortunately the word intuition has been consistently attacked as if it were a debased form intelligence. Richard Dawkins is a classic example of someone who thinks like this, and believes that instinct is the only valid form of intuition, and that it must remain only for the animals or (supposedly) our ape-like ancestors. He can’t possibly grasp the idea that our intuition is a higher form of intellect. How else did our past high, transcendence culture come about? As for the JFK/911 scenarios you’ve put forward, I also think that premonition, intuition, telepathy, telekinesis, and all the other forms of non-localised mental activity, is still prevalent in our species, though severely blanketed by such things as those I’ve mentioned above, together with all the genetic tinkering that our species experienced long ago, to purposely keep us captive and with one-dimensional thought processes. I personally don’t have a problem equating the ‘rational mind’ with the ‘intuitive mind’, as long as I don’t use THEIR meaning of ‘intuition’.

          1. Interesting; I had never even thought to equate intuition with instinct. Another way the PTB are trying to pre-condition the meaning of a word, to draw it into the gutter…

            The bottom-line ‘intent’ is to cut-off OUR access to higher states/powers, while retaining THEIR own access. No competition. One can see this in all the slaughters of ’empowered’ cultures down through the ages, with the Tibetan culture probably being the latest to be shattered.

            In Tolkien’s “Silmarillion” book (spoiler alert!), the good-guys got absolutely whacked down to a nugget of survivors before the ‘cavalry’ came-in from the netherworlds of the West. I sure hope that is not how it plays-out here in OUR Middle Earth…

          2. iZeta, I tried to respond to you but, once again, “Your comment is awaiting moderation.”
            goshawks – March 21, 2017 at 11:10 pm.

    2. I’m all for rationale and intuition, and have been watching all the usual sites for updated info., feeling a sense of a puzzle coming together. There is so much ‘Look here!’, and minutes later, ‘Now look over there, quick!’ Always the sense that I should look with my eyes but not with all senses because I’ll miss the crucial piece. The feeling is the PTB/Usual Suspects are holding a baton of power, which has been recently greased (by the www?), and it’s getting too slippery, so more hands are employed so they don’t drop it altogether. A big piece is on you tube about nik research and kreationz buried cities.

  8. http://www.revisionisthistory.org/crypto1.html
    Revelation of the Method
    “Michael A Hoffman II in Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare, on what he calls the “revelation of method” by the “cryptocracy”:
    “This is what simplistic researchers miss: the function of macabre arrogance thumbing its nose at us while we do nothing except spread the tale of their immunity and invincibility further. That is the game plan operant here.”

  9. Robert Barricklow

    WikiLeaks is a personification of the whole information as currency symbolism; in this information/economic warfare landscape of betrayal[I e surveillance state/world]/Those who control the present[WikiLeaks, et al] control the past and those who control the past control the future.

    1. Robert Barricklow

      Numerous people who’ve had experience with WikiLeaks know that any corrections to the record, to express the truth, are quickly changed to reflect the present oligarchy’s just-in-time history of record.

      1. Wikileaks is mild compared to the obfuscation of records on all of the genealogical sites. Try to research the family lines of some of these people and you will soon discover most of it has either been scrubbed or altered to support “the current narrative” of “history” as well as cover the tracks of crypto “Jews” or in most cases the Khazar-an people who pass themselves off as “Jews”. These would be the Jews, who are not Jews, spoken of in the Bible. These people are similar to Gypsies, they hold a grudge for centuries and plot and scheme in the background as a hidden force.

  10. Why people yearn for “disclosure” seems a bit hard to understand in my mind. If you take ancient texts literally, “disclosure” occurred in high antiquity, indeed, it occurred “in the beginning”. God, gods, angels, demons, and “aliens” are, by definition, all ET’s; so we have never been alone and we have always known it; though few will admit it. There is also that “strong delusion” thing promised right before the end of it all to consider. This is just my opinion on the “disclosure” subject.
    Kahlypso is correct, what better way to lend “credence” to your propaganda than to “jail” the “credible” source behind it. You can apply this logic to pretty much all the “leakers” lately who find themselves “trapped” in embassies around the globe. All of them will have ties to “intelligence” agencies, whether governmental or private. It’s all “controlled opposition” and a favorite tool of the globalist’s; and so obvious that it’s overlooked.

    1. Dangit wd. I had previously pictured snowden n assange with flowing manes lookin way mel gibson bellowing freedom to their last. Oh wait. That was as he was being disembowelled. Nevermind. Thanku instead 4 popping that thought bubble. Even i don’t expect more truth to come out ovf giving so many liars their apparently just desserts

  11. Not seeing the fascist-Nazi connection.

    “Chinese dissident” can include but does not automatically include members of the “World Anti-Communist League”.

    And nowhere does Chossudovsky make some attempt to identify the “Chinese dissidents”.

    So more like a “could be”.

    1. I took it that Joseph was referring to the middle east when he said that. We do know that they had quite a profound effect on many of their leaders.

  12. A very interesting post with a lot of meat on the bone and very much appreciated.

    Wikileaks and who is really behind it is a font of speculation and a spook’s fun-house mirror. Some left-leaning US intel honcho in a huff over the Podesta leaks probably gave away a bit too much when claimed it was a Russian op and that to organize it all required a very large staff (he claimed several hundred) and full state intel resources.

    But then Chossudovsky and Global Research are very much in step with Russian intel interests, so ball back in the other court. Now Chossudovsky espies Rothschilds behind the curtain, along with the gardeners of radical Islam (Mr. Global’s weapon of choice), and the old Iran-Contra nutjob network hustling arms, drugs and lord knows what else while destabilizing Central America for fun and profit (and running it all through Israel and over to Iran, and let’s not forget birthday cakes and BCCI… in a word, the Ur swamp).

    But then, if so, why whack Hillary, the ultimate globalist swamp thing? Granted, in the primaries, the Economisthaufen bemoaned HRC and Jeb! as tired dynastic retreads, but at that point were they already primed for MAGA? I have my doubts, as support for Trump was then seen by Machiavellian DNC strategists as a sure-fire way of making HRC look electable in comparison.

    So now Wiki is trying to take down the CIA. You have some “retired” Deep Staters out there on YouTube claiming this is the US intel “white hats” draining the swamp, but it could also be a move by the Russians, the Chinese, Rothschildistan or even an incensed NSA turf war to expose CIA surveillance and reclaim their exclusive right to blackmail, err, I meant “surveillance.” So I still can’t decide who is really running the Wiki show.

    1. I’m reminded the why of President Kennedy’s assassination; that he wanted to get the CIA under gov’t control again and who assassinated him.

    2. Basta, i am more n more reminded of ussa collapse similarities to ussr collapse. Both carefully engineered n executed. Does anyone see nsa getting pr beating like the cia is? Nsa is just the overreached big brother by msm and now by alt media standards. No one openly associates nsa with mockingbird, paperclip, lsd, mkultra, irancontra, heroin, cartels, phoenix, sadist army assymetric warfare manuals,….

      And who do all parties who talk about such subjectz rant? Cia, right. Almost like we’re being led to think that nsa r the white hats n cia r nasty loose canon outta control sadists. Anyone got similar associations between fsb n kgb? Anyone remember putin’s own occupied apartment complexes gettin blowed up by terrists justifying putins rise to totalitarian power n then years of war with those moslem chechn rebels who btw traded generals with russia every 2 or so years?

      How does one remember all that? Who came up with all that? How do even aliens keep their puppets on task thru all that? And y?

      1. Robert Barricklow

        I remember writing that here long ago. That the plan was cooked up to implode Russia first; followed later by the USA. A gentleman’s agreement was struck for global hegemony under the deceptive umbrella of self governance.

        In short, they would own it all – including you.

    3. After a fair amount of reading on Assange’s childhood and background inspired by the comments from Australians above and a review of his activities, I think we can definitely rule out any serious Rothschild connection with Assange and Wikileaks; that was one prize, early on, among a slew of such prizes by all and sundry. Very tenuous at best.

      What you come away with from his biography is that Assange is the “brilliant, geeky” (as one schoolmate characterized him in a hometown article when he first rose to prominence with Manning) child of a pair of shiftless, peripatetic (he attended nearly forty schools) and rather pathetic New Agers who ran a puppet theatre and divorced when he was nine.

      So the child was raised with the typical New Age idealism but turned to computers to escape his situation; he was a sort of wunderkind at programming and had created programs, internet protocols, encryption methods, had hacked into a huge number of sensitive websites, and had even founded one of Australia’s first ISPs while still a teenager.

      Despite the introversion, he also clearly has a quiet narcissism about him, a strong belief in his own exceptionalism, which combined with the New Age idealism led him to think he could take on the world as a cyberpunk warrior and right its wrongs. Hackers are anonymous, but Assange wanted to be hacker rock star; he wanted the attention and adulation and cultivated it whenever he could.

      He clearly had the brains, the idealism, the egotist’s disdain for laws made for the little people, the entrepreneurial spirit and the geeky charisma to take his hacking to the next level and founded Wikileaks and became its front man.

      I’m sure various groups and wealthy donors with various agendas have donated to him and supported him, and I’m also sure that he’s being fed a lot of intel gathered by various state actors. But one thing you cannot deny is that he is not controlled by any USG organizations, as he has consistently acted against the DoD, State Dept., HRC/DNC and now CIA. the only other big US honcho not on the list is the NSA, but the NSA was whacked by Snowden, who Assange actively assisted during his flight, and anyway that would also mean if he was an NSA puppet that the NSA has gone totally rogue and is carrying out, through Assange, an assault on just about the entirety of the rest of the US deep state. Hard to buy into that one, sorry.

      All of Assange’s most vocal supporters are classic, old school leftists, from Latin American anti-gringo socialists to Yoko Ono, passing through Le Monde and some UN committees. Accordingly, any number of US politicians want him murdered. Assange said that he’d hacked HRC so long and had read all her cables and so he knew that she was an incompetent and unfit for the presidency, and that he had a personal enmity with her, which fits perfectly with his view of himself as a player on the world stage.

      So, tl,dr: I think he’s ultimately a free radical and that any number of intel groups would both like to kill him at one moment while feeding him leaks to take down rivals the next. I think he’s the hacker reincarnation of Philippe Petite, the world’s greatest tightrope walker.

  13. Yeh.. taking this in consideration with recent stories coming out over ‘alternative media’ outlets about Partial Disclosure and maybe big news coming from somewhere..
    I had a thought yesterday..If all the PTB’s wanted to start a partial disclosure program.. (check youtube, swamped with UFO sightings since December 2016) and you’ve spent the last 60-70 years denying “the existence of” through your corporate trumpets (MSM..). Then I think you’re going to have a problem explaining WHY were we lied to for so long.
    If they did have an agenda for disclosure, I think that the best way to bring it about, is by discrediting the old trumpets and letting the info come through the ‘alternate media’ sources… (seeing as the information was always there to begin with… -_- )
    However.. How can you make those outlets ‘respectable’ or ‘viable’, seeing as you’ve spent so long making them out to be tinfoil hat brigades…
    Destroy the credibility of the MSM and push people to the alt meds in order to pass the pill..
    If you have information to disclose and its damaging to the governement, I think that somewhere you have to have an anti-establishment trumpet in order for people to believe what’s being said, seeing as no one believes the propoganda spewing forth anymore..

    Does that mean that Wikileaks is Whatever-I-decide-to-Leaks..
    I find it hard to follow their modus operandii.. Why destroy Hillary – she was all up for partial disclosure controlled through the Rockefellers.. (we’ve all seen that photo of Hill next to Rock with that UFO book in her hands..) Even That Blink guy is still following Pedo-sta, straining at his leash to have his name associated with Disclosure..

    Having said that, I’m still grateful to them for bringing Podesta and his vile kind out into the open.

    I

    1. Having said that.. Pedogate has certainly destroyed Mainstream’s credibility. People dont seem to mind seeing about UFO’s more and more in the papers.. Taking England’s ‘The Daily Mail’ for exemple.. Growing up in UK, I didnt think of the Mail as a rag.. Its a respectable-ish journal.. Since decemeber they’ve gone full out alien..

    2. Why? HRC said, during her tenure as Sec. of State, “can’t we just kill him?” After nervous laughter her staff realized she was deadly serious.

  14. Yeah, Cause for pause indeed…
    The question then is : Why is Assange “jailed” @ the Ecuadorian embassy ?

    1. Serving as devil’s Avocat..
      Because it gives credence to the idea that the organisation is anti establishment. And Wikileaks is against anti spying laws somewhere.. But coming from America, that’s the biggest pile of hypocrisy I’ve ever seen.

Comments are closed.