User Answers

REALLY!?!? … RED MERCURY, AGAIN!? PART ONE

Last Thursday, for those of you who caught it, I talked about a short article that appeared on the Atlanta Journal-Constitution's website. The article had been shared by Mr. I.R., and when I saw the headline of the article, needless to say, I knew I'd at least be blogging about it if not talking about it. As it turned out and as I stated on last Thursday's News and Views from the Nefarium, Red Mercury is back in the news, albeit, in a small way, and as I said Thursday, I might and probably would blog about it for people who don't watch the News and Views. This is that blog, and there are a few updates. In any case, here's the article that caught my attention:

Downtown streets closed amid ‘red mercury’ investigation

There you have the story: a man walks into the regional office of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, who allegedly was carrying 'red mercury.'" As I pointed out in my News and Views, the diction is a bit ambiguous (especially considering the state of education today). Was it the man who was from Africa? or the red mercury? As I also pointed out in my News and Views, according to the 'red mercury legend,' the substance actually originated in Russia, being the product of their cold war black projects researches in thermonuclear weapons. Indeed, the legend of the substance has it that it was a psyops "substance" deliberately created as part of join international anti-terrorist operations being conducted by the CIA, the German BND, and the post-Soviet Russian security services in shutting down terrorist rings and Russian black markets sales of nuclear and thermonuclear weapons. The substance  itself was entirely fictional. Indeed, there were novels and a few non-fiction books that came out in the early 1990s about the substance. Red Mercury was the thermonuclear scare of the early 1990s. But again, the substance itself, according to conventional wisdom, orthodox narratives, &c., was entirely fiction. It didn't exist.

That, at least, is the conventional wisdom of the "red mercury legend."

So when the Atlantic Journal Constitution ran this article, my first reaction was, quite literally, "What!? Why revive the whole story now?" We'll get to that in a moment, but before we do - for it's today's high octane speculation - ask yourself this important question: "If the substance was fictional, why did they keep re-running the same scam, again and again, including (if my memory recalls) some sales involving African intermediaries in the mix? How did they sell the story to apparently credulous buyers?" Indeed, as one very astute listener to my Thursday News and Views pointed out while I was talking and recording (I didn't see his remarks until after I had finished the recording, and hence could not respond to him in real time), the "red mercury" story in Atlanta apparently ran concurrently with some sort of "drill" that was taking place, and that, of course, raises the suspicion meter into the red zone: are they preparing an operation, false flag or otherwise, involving nuclear weapons? Given that "red mercury" is supposed to originate in Russia, this is a rather harrowing thought to contemplate, given the current climate in the USSA of "Russiagate" and alleged hacking of US elections. This comes also at a time when chemical weapons were used in Syria, and hysteria is being ratcheted up, while the lamestream corporate media in the USSA seems to be ignoring the fact that Mr. Putin talked Mr. Assad to relinquish his chemical weapons, and that headed off the war-in-Syria hysteria that was being hyped during the Obama Administration. In short, there's been no real evidence presented thus far about who used those chemical weapons.

And now, red mercury resurfaces, in the context of a drill, and in the wider context of the anti-Russia hysteria in the West.

But for the rest of the story and my high octane speculation, we'll have to wait until tomorrow.

See you on the flip side...

 

13 thoughts on “REALLY!?!? … RED MERCURY, AGAIN!? PART ONE”

  1. Hi – new to this forum & JPF. Very intriguing RM incident – is this a stretch:
    “Is it possible that the term ‘Red Mercury’ is code for something else?”

    Code Red
    The CodeRED Mobile Alert safety app delivers real-time emergency, community, missing person and severe weather alerts to users within the exact area of impact. Alerts are initiated by public safety officials who use the CodeRED community notification system to effectively alert and inform residents to save lives.

    Code Red and Code Blue are both terms that are often used to refer to a cardiopulmonary arrest, but other types of emergencies (for example bomb threats, terrorist activity, child abductions, or mass casualties) may be given code designations, too.

    Hospital emergency codes have often varied widely by location, even between hospitals in the same community. Confusion over these codes has led to the proposal for and sometimes adoption of standardized codes. In many American, Canadian, and Australian hospitals, for example “code blue” indicates a patient has entered cardiac arrest, while “code red” indicates that a fire has broken out somewhere in the hospital facility.
    Note:
    CodeRED community notification system to effectively alert and inform residents to SAVE LIVES
    Code Red […] other types of emergencies > terrorist activity / mass casualties
    “code red” indicates that a FIRE has broken out

    911/emergency – the towers came down – we attacked Iraq.

    Code Red/emergency – the bridge came down – we attacked Syria.

    Code Red – message delivered & received? Also wondering about ‘burning bridges’ symbolic association. Oh, and were there any Israeli art students on scene to ‘document the event’?

  2. That’s interesting… about 15 minutes after the Atlanta PD post, a bridge over I85 (approximately 5 miles north of downtown area where streets were tweeted as closed) was engulfed in flames. News reports attribute fire to a homeless man who was arrested–one suspect saw another “place a chair on top of a shopping cart, reach under the shopping cart” and ignite it. Hard to figure out how a burning chair “ignited tons of the high-density polyethylene conduit, which then burned hot enough to collapse the bridge.” Reports say HD polyethylene conduit is not flammable.

  3. What did Alexis de Tocqueville write about the USSA in his Democracy In America. That he found material more suited for the theater than for real life the USSA has been a freak show from it’s birth the play-movie Marat Sade might give a better understanding of it.

  4. We also have “red matter” in one of the latest Star Trek movies. A nifty, red, liquid substance (similar to “red mercury”) held within a “containment vessel” of which only one drop will give you a singularity capable of swallowing an entire planet or a super nova.
    Anytime you see “drills” being played out at the same time such events occur, you can pretty much assume another false flag is in process. The script is so worn now, the assumption is automatic; and the occurrences are becoming an almost daily event world wide. They are like sitcom reruns.

    1. Yeah, I saw that “red matter” as the core of the movie (2009), and wondered at the time WHY it was being ‘injected’ into the mass consciousness. (I suspect J.J. Abrams is a ‘conduit’…)

      I had a similar reaction to the central plot-device usage of “Red Mercury” in the movie “RED 2” (2013). I do note now that RM ‘originated’ in the three-letter agencies in the movie.

      Dr. Farrell does make a good ‘association’ between the anti-Russian hysteria, the drill-in-progress/false flag meme, and RM. I could see a psychopathic set-up there…

      1. The thought just popped-in about the rumored “Samson Option” secreted-away nukes (not sure of what variety) in cities around the world. Combined with the above, an interesting ‘stew’…

  5. It certainly ties in with known (presumably) facts.
    According to Gordon Duff Trump was placed into power by non other than Israel with Wikileaks being run out of Haifa and the Podesta leaks being an inside job (remember Clinton’s statement to Lewinski that the Whitehouse lines were tapped by Israel).
    The Mattis statement calling Iran the ‘biggest sponsor of state terrorism’ certainly fits this narrative.

    All this was on the back of Hilary selling out the Post war fascists in Benghazi and Obama’s hesitancy in Syria.

    So we have two factions, the larger one being globalist internationalists versus the smaller faction, the post war fascists. These groups cross and intersect across all spheres with each group infiltrating all agencies, sometimes their objective align sometimes they don’t.

    Trump was a defacto post war fascist coup, Russia, Hezbollah and the Shiites gaining ascendancy in the Middle East was a line that couldn’t be crossed.

    So the Russia hysteria will be ramped up in days to come.

Comments are closed.