TIDBIT: AND THEN THERE’S THE NUCLEAR ANTARCTIC ...
May 1, 2017 / /
And, in case you missed this sizzling tabloid headline:
SHOCK CLAIM: Antarctica is a big nuclear launchpad from which scientists control weather
Posted in Tidbits
19 Comments
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
Why is Antarctica so cold versus the Arctic? Why can’t we go there? Why can’t we fly across it and conduct independent science? Would our cosmology be different if WWII ended differently?
How many of us have primary evidence of this mysterious netherworld? Why do the military – air and navy — use different maps than the rest of us?
Maybe the secret is in plane site.
solfeggio, was that an intentional reference to scott onstott? if so, what do lay lines look like on poles? gosh, any help?
isn’t there a very masonically designed building used for the government at a ley line intersection in calgary? any reality to ley line theory? is that what edward leedskalnin used in florida? electric universe theory fit in with this and the electric nature of giza? what kinda ley lines intersect at arctic and antarctic?
ZDB, ley lines definitely exist. I have walked several, and even noted where different folks have ‘tapped’ them for various purposes. I had not thought about what ley lines might look like/be like at the poles. I will give it some thought. Thanks!
The discussed topic of controlling the weather from Antarctica is actually pretty dumb. Antarctica is known for its circumpolar current, which effectively keeps Antarctica in a deep freeze. No warming ocean-water gets to it. This same current would resist any climate changes spawned from human Antarctic meddling. So, Antarctica would be the least effective place on Earth to INITIATE weather changes… (The Arctic, on the other hand…)
The most curious, by far, of all the images in the embedded article is the first one…labelled as from the ARCTIC (NOT the Antarctic!) and has a form similar to what is often described as how Atlantean cities were built.
Perhaps we should be looking in the ARCTIC, and not the Antarctic, for Atlantis!
Nazis put bases up n the Artic.. Might have been looking for Hyperboria. . . Im of the opinion rhat we have to stop second guessing and trust what plato sais. Id Say atlantis was to the west of gibralter and the canary islands are whats left. The dogs being the only survivors.. They must have eaten the atlanteans who didnt escape..joke apart.. Check out underwater surveys and compare it to geological valley formations. There are river news under the ocean That shouldnt be There. I think That antartica used to be part of another continent.. I cant remember the name.. Will come back
Pretty good tidbit.
Speaking of nuclear issues and Antarctica there are the Yoichi Shimatsu stories which claim Japan is dumping material taken from Fukushima into the Antarctic Ocean below the southern-most tip of New Zealand. If the story is true, why there?
As a side note during one of Dr. Farrells’ many discussions with Whitley Strieber, Mr. Strieber mentioned an incident he witnessed when in NZ where US aircraft were leaving an airbase in continuous fashion heading to Antarctica.
If both stories are related, then in the immortal words of Bugs Bunny, “What’s up doc?”
Of course, Dr. Farrell, I didn’t mean you directly…. It’s just a general quote…
Lets face it Antarctica would be the perfect place for would be mad scientist to play out their whack out fantasies. Shoul Tucker wet dream playground what could go wrong.
Whether or not the narrative presented is literally true, there are some interesting Antarctic associations with weather control, nuclear blasts and “black ops”
Good morning Dana, and thank you for the cymatics info. The “endless hall of mirrors” analogy used in describing the harmonic overtones of a 432 Hertz “A” scale makes very good sense. I came across a video of a man playing an acoustic-guitar version of “Whiter Shade Of Pale”, in both 432 Hz tuning and 440 Hz. The difference between the two was subtle, but I am convinced the 432 Hz version sounded brighter, fuller and had more emotional “feel”. I am actually making my own, 432 Hz-tuned, wind chimes. Peeps who hear ’em, dig ’em.
(Sorry, Doc; I don’t mean to post an off-topic comment; I just wanted to thank one of your members for some graciously shared info.)
Phil .. You are indeed correct .. the change is ever so subtle .. You don’t necessarily hear it .. you FEEL it .. Here is one of my old favorites converted from 440 to 432Hz .. Pink Floyd’s “The Division Bell” .. (imagine the implications of this switch .. it makes you FEEL whatever is required .. scary stuff indeed)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bsu0KWPYX3s&list=RDBsu0KWPYX3s#t=6 … Enjoy!!
thank you freefall and phil. doc, i remember you killed that discussion a few posts back. this topic always seems to come back up. curious question comes to mind.
if everything is frequency and all frequencies share consistent rules, then a frequency shift, however subtle would be discernable and noteworthy in visual range, why wouldn’t it be discernable and noteworthy in audio range? just like when disney retouched the colors at the basilica(?) a few years back?
Yeehh 432hz my new favourite toy.. Ive been listening to theta waves for the last 2 weeks. Its unexplainable.. Ive been sleeping for 3-5 hrs a night and ive Never felt better… Méditation is also easier. You get a feeling That can only ne described as a wall of water falling to the ground. Then i usually fall back.. Because i dont know what im doing..and its not something You should play with… To answer your question. Its all about resonance. Dont know why.. But im convinced its all to do with resonance. Come on to community phil. We can discuss it more over There without polluting the forum
..lol.
As far as im starting to understand it.. The 432 will resonaye with you. Sounds more natiral.. You fell ir. You interprete with the right side.of the brainAnd 440 will send it to the left part of your brain.
Sorry for spelling.. Im on phone..
no worry on spell/phone. will take a look at community. doc, you too please. between physics background, patristics insights, music and all gotta think you’re gonna surprise all of us. again. as usual.
meanwhile, i will continue to believe this subject is pertinent to doc’s post here. weatherwar101 on yt might be a limited hangout. if so they’re much less limited than any other geoengineering source i’ve seen. their theory is simple. when combined with knowledge of water production by plasma (electric universe theory) it gets easier and easier to exploit (weapons and tools) and employ. it goes to charge, resonance, heterodyning,… i imagine somewhere in there a little play in scalar work becomes a force multiplier or exponentialer.
and more meanwhile, if you don’t think this drip drip into mainstreaming an idea everyone currently, or until recently did, believe is conspiracy theory –
http://www.cege.umn.edu/index.html
anyone named leit kynes at the head of any of these academic think tanks?
I want to be an alumni weather wizard geo-mancer as well. at last my dreams can come true. Is this real?