October 6, 2017 By Joseph P. Farrell

The articles on the Las Vegas shooting continue to pour in, and I am grateful to all of you sharing them. This one comes from Mr. V.T., and if true, raises more questions:

Mr. Brian Hodge, a citizen of Australia, was apparently in the room next door to Paddock's, and had this to say:

An Australian man who was staying in the room next to the shooter in the Mandalay Bay has confirmed he witnessed multiple gunmen involved in the Las Vegas attack.

There were multiple people dead and multiple shooters. I was just hiding waiting for police to come get us. I got outside safely and was hiding in bushes,” Brian Hodge told Australia’s Courier-Mail.

Mr. Hodge, who was staying in room 32134, next door to Stephen Paddock in room 32135, also provided important information when he revealed that a security guard was killed by police.

My floor is a crime scene. They killed a security guard on my floor.

Who was the “security guard” who was killed by police?(Emphasis in the original)

The article continues by referencing yet another witness, who saw suspicious activity concerning a security officer:

Wendy Miller from Cooroy, on the Sunshine Coast – another Australian caught up in the Las Vegas shooting – may have provided a missing piece of the puzzle. Also speaking to the Courier-Mail, Ms Miller said she was at a bar in the nearby Luxor Hotel with her husband when she saw what she described as a “man of interest” run by.

Ms Miller said the man sprinted through her hotel after coming off an escalator from the Mandalay Bay.

The man that they [security] were chasing was wearing a security jacket like them,” she said.

Mr Hodge’s eyewitness report of multiple gunmen and a dead security guard, and with Ms Miller’s report of a security guard being chased by authorities, suggest that the mainstream media narrative of the “lone wolf” gunman is not the truth.

There you have it: two Australians are providing a version of events that is certainly not condign to the narrative being cobbled together by the corporate controlled Mighty Wurlitzer Media. In this case, however, the allegations are disturbing, for if true, it would indicate that at least one "security guard" was not a legitimate security guard. Accepting that for the sake of argument, this would imply the possibility of other plants within casino security that day.

Bear with me, because this is where my high octane speculation begins. First, a personal note. Many, but not all, regular readers here will know that many years ago I was a casino floor manager. In fact, at one point, I was the ranking floor manager on the overnight shift in the casino I worked for. I went through the usual hiring process: I had to  fill out an application that seemed longer than the Old Testament, and wait for several weeks while it was vetted. Once accepted, I went through the usual training, and once working, I had to work with security, which in casinos, as everyone knows, is quite intense. The bottom line: all floor personnel and security personnel know each other. In a large concern like the Mandalay, this probably isn't the case, at least on a personal level, but nonetheless, even if one doesn't know or interact with particular staff members, one will at least recognize certain faces over time.

This brings me to a disturbing set of conclusions and implications: if there was a "fake" security officer who in turn implies the possibility of other fake security officers, then the implications are that they were planted some time in advance of the event. Even if they were planted only a few days prior to the event, they would have to have been given key codes, security cards, and to have been familiarized with that particular casino's operating procedures. This implies, once again, "people on the inside" able to procure any false documentation to allow such moles access to the secure areas of the casino and hotel. So if these Australians' allegations should be born out by other developed details, then the bottom line is that that casino, and quite possibly many others, could be similarly infiltrated. And that means in turn the casinos will now liaise with the government and begin a thorough, though very quiet, security review and vetting of their personnel. Given the nature of this and of the business itself, we're unlikely to hear of the results in any other but the blandest and most general of terms.

Now with that in mind consider this version of the same story shared by Mr. H.B.:

Here the arms dealer narrative is one again referred to:

Why would an accountant, with no criminal history, who according to his own family, didn’t even like guns, suddenly decide to commit the worst mass-casualty shooting in United States history? Even Republican Congressman Trey Gowdy is scoffing at the narrative that this was carried out by a lone shooter.

An unproven theory currently being circulated by someone claiming to be an FBI agent is downright chilling, and supports the theory that there was in fact more than one shooter. In an email that was supposedly sent by an FBI agent seeking to remain anonymous, the text reveals a conspiracy of Benghazi-level proportions. The shooter was actually a FBI agent who was involved in a gun running scheme similar to what happened in Libya. But things unfortunately didn’t go as planned. A screenshot of the email is below, whose text reads:

“The LVMPD knows the motive behind the attack, but the FBI will not allow us to release the motive because it implicates the FBI in illegal arms deals and supplying arms to ISIS terrorists within U.S. borders.”

“Stephen Paddock was an undercover FBI agent who participated in multiple illegal arms deals in the Las Vegas area in a gun running entrapment scheme similar to Fast and Furious. Paddock thought he was engaging in another routine arms transfer, but ISIS operatives who were going to meet him learned about the entrapment scheme and Paddock’s true identity. They killed him and carried out the massacre, and then fled the scene.”

Whether those allegations are true or not remains to be seen, and as the article points out, the email in question cannot be verified.

But in any case, the bottom line is, of course, that if these Australians' reports are true then the whole event was planned and orchestrated.

See you on the flip side...