User Answers

RESHORING, RETRENCHING, BREXIT, AND THE COMMONWEALTH

Both before and after the BREXIT vote took place, I was offering the hypothesis that Great Britain had little to lose and everything to gain by getting out of the European Union. The latter entity is what results when one follows the goofy 1942 plans of the Reichsbank and I.G. Farben for a Grossraum in which the Grossraumkartel can operate. (For that story, one may take a look at my book The Third Way.) Fundamentally, the view of the technocrats and other sprouts in Brussels is an inhuman one, for they care little about culture or cultures, and everything about regulation and bureaucracy. I've always thought it both ironic and highly apt that the leader of the E.U., Jean Claude Juncker, carries a surname synonymous with the worst features of Prussian bureaucracy and and its worship of the all-powerful state.  All that the E.U. lacks is a Hohenzollern to lead it.

In Britain's case, I was - and remain - of the opinion that with the "soft power" card being played so much on the world stage these days (think only of Vladimir Putin in this respect), one of its crucial advantages is the British Commonwealth. With the BREXIT vote, I thought, Britain would have a golden opportunity  perhaps to lead and mold the Commonwealth into a more cohesive bloc, and I predicted that it would even extend some sort of "Associate Member" status to the former colonies now calling themselves "The United States of America." This hypothesis was based upon what for me was the signal event which occurred prior to the BREXIT referendum: the Queen's "little dinner" with the Vice Premier. Normally when the monarch invites one around for tea and dinner at the palace, the conversations remain private and only the most glittering generalities are shared with the public. In this case however, "somehow" the subject of the conversation became public, and the subject of the conversation appeared to have been the Queen asking the Vice Premier if he could name three good things about the E.U.

My suspicion is that Angela Merkel and Jean-Claude Juncker were not at the top of the palatial list.

Then came the visit of the now newly-anointed Emperor of China, Mr. Xi Jinping which was, let us be quick to recall, a state visit (for those of you in Sacramento, Nuttyfornia, that means a visit with the Queen).

Something was afoot, I thought, and my suspicions were all but confirmed when, after the BREXIT vote, voila the British Commonwealth extended an invitation to President Trump to forget about all that 1776 and 1812 stuff, and become some sort of associate member. Mr. Trump, in an unusual display of abnormal decorum, indicated that he'd think about it.

What does all this mean? With the American tax cuts, the drain of dollars from Europe as they "reshore", the move of the Bundesbank now to include Chinese reminbi as a reserve currency, it would appear that Mr. Globaloney (which to my mind is always associated with the "Anglo-Sphere", the City of London, Wall Street &c.), has decided to reconfigure and revitalize its power base: North America, and the Commonwealth.

Why am I bothering you with all this review, however? Because Ms. K.M. noticed the following article by M. Thierry Meyssan, which, while differing in some particulars of analysis, is basically saying the same thing:

Theresa May’s Foreign Policy

The May Government's timing is impeccable, for the recent German elections have so weakened Mad Madam Merkel's government, and the Italian elections have thrown such a huge monkey wrench into that 1942 plan for a "European federation" (led by guess who), the stage is right and ripe for such a "rethink". Notably, notes Meyssan, this rethink includes the following (and note Meyssan's usage of Russian political philosopher Alexander Dugin's use of the term "thalassocratic" to designate that bloc opposed to the Eurasian land powers, i.e., Russia and China):

In any case, Global Britain today may be defined as follows :
- the promotion of international free exchange, but exclusively in the thalassocratic context, in other words with the United States against the Chinese communication routes;
- and the attempt to exclude Russia from the Security Council and cut the world in two, which implies the on-going manipulation with chemical weapons in Syria, and the Skripal affair.

The price of excluding Russia from the UN Security Council might come too high however, i.e., at the admission of Germany and Japan as permanent members, but that's another story. But in any case, the bottom line here is that the turn-of-the-century insights of British geopolitician, Halford Mackinder, about the struggle between the sea-powers and the land powers are still operative. The difference now, of course, is that it is not sea power, but space power, which will be the ultimate arbiter.

What's the goal of all of this? What's my high octane speculation?

This is where it becomes difficult to tell, for under certain circumstances these developments could be very good things. But under other circumstances, this could indicate that the plutocrats running the western world have decided to limit their pillaging of the globe to a less ambitious project: the rape of North America in the guise of "privitaization" and "limited government" by selling off public assets for pennies on the dollar: the post-Soviet "rape of Russia" scenario, but applied to North America.

That model and its explanatory power makes sense of quite a few dots, but you'll have to wait for the latest Solari quarterly review with former Housing and Urban Development Assistant Secretary Catherine Austin Fitts to post in the members' area to see how and why. But I think it's well worth your consideration.

See you on the flip side...

 

 

22 thoughts on “RESHORING, RETRENCHING, BREXIT, AND THE COMMONWEALTH”

    1. RB, that would really fit-in with our times. Dysfunctionality in government, an alienated population, debt overload, decaying infrastructure, etc. Just like the Soviet Union around 1989. Yeltsin was the ‘patsy’ for the rape of Russia by Western moneyed interests under the theme of “Embracing Capitalism.” Trump may be just the ‘American face’ of another Yeltsin. Certainly jibs with the privatization scenarios being pushed…

      1. Robert Barricklow

        Goshawks.
        I hope I’m wrong; but all “his” moves aren’t boding well.

  1. Robert Barricklow

    …other sprouts in Brussels [Loved It!]

    When asked to name three good things about the EU
    I’m surprised the reply wasn’t a quick’ snap of a salute
    Heil Hitler!
    Nazis! Nazis! Nazis!.

    Thalassocratic now = maritime/space[sea]

    In the past I posted this scenario/that there was a meeting of the minds of Russian/American intelligence to plunder both countries. The only question was whose on first. In my scenario they flipped a coin and the Russian wins, We’re on first.
    Now it’s “our” turn… ?

    But, there’s China, and perhaps a little shuffling of the deck, since that first base hit?

    1. Robert Barricklow

      Yet, the neocon’s puppet masters want to strike while the irons hot. Perhaps Harvard is out of the question to assume the past role of laundering all those billions[or is it trillions?]

  2. Okay. WAY over my head. Will reread and “mull.”
    But, in a private exchange with me, you indicated that had discussed the “Senior Executive Service” concept (vis a vis a broader conversation about the “Q” debunking of same by American Intelligence Media, and, if I got YOU right, you said Catherine said “this is not portrayed exactly.”

    I am still planning on working out my wording for next vidchat question, but I cannot fathom, in ANY reality, where SES would be a “nothing burger.”

    Looking forward to me getting my question worded propertly and you responding about what you know, do not know, and what Catherine said (that you might or might not disclose) about this topic.

    1. Ramura coincidentally the other day I posted a question about SES to Catherine on her website.

  3. The UK is a failed state; it simply doesn’t know it yet. The same can be said of the USS of A, and for that matter the entire AngloZio empire. The whole sordid lot is inexorably contracting, reduced to turning inward and looting and pillaging itself, and has served up nothing but synthetic lies and propaganda since they offed JFK in ’63 to get the ball rolling on global fascism, aka the NWO.

    May is a puppet, one of a long line of puppets, and she s one of the clumsiest and most transparent. Honestly, who cares about her fate at this point? Britain is toast, they simply don’t know it yet.

    The whole Russia demonization is transparent and over-the-top hysteria orchestrated by the same puppet masters who direct the psychopathic jabbering class of which May and Johnson belong, as do so many others, and it is the most embarrassing parcel of lies the West has produced since it started drug-dealing in the 18th century — the profits of which fueled the English Empire via the Opium Wars and enriched Elihu Yale so much (along with slave trading) that he then decided to found a university with all that illicit dope money, a place called Yale which funnily enough spits out equally criminal presidents.

    Who’da thunk?

    1. Well, actually they began drug dealing in the 17th but the rest still stands. In GOD we trust: Guns, Oil and Drugs.

  4. marcos toledo

    I say the USA became a vassal of the Norman Empire about sometime before the Spanish-American War. The Great War sealed the USA reintegration into the empire in everything but name. In the shadows is the Greek vs Persia Wars that the Roman Empire inherited to its determinant. A so-called thalassocracy is by its nature unstable against a land empire its all command and control a lesson the Norman Empire never learned.

  5. We need to step up a level or six, out of the day-to-day details. Charles Fort stated, “The Earth is a farm. We are someone else’s property.” Going down the Gizar route for now: Ancient war. Remnant ‘people’ and technologies. Continuity of purpose.

    The above ‘global’ mindset produces two possibilities:

    First, all the action is just a ‘churn’ to keep the naked-apes occupied and not looking at the curtain. It is administered from the hidden ‘top’. Viewed from this angle, everything is under control – just not naked-ape control. Assuming the technology-buildup of the past few centuries to have been ‘directed’ from behind the curtain, there are two further sub-divisions of the plot: No major war will occur because it would upset the technology-buildup to date. Or, the Remnant ‘people’ have achieved their technology-goals – interstellar spaceflight capability – and plan to leave the naked-apes within a carefully-calculated, self-initiated thermonuclear war.

    Second, the ‘other side’ from the Ancient War has shown up. Perhaps scouts. Perhaps with an ultimatum. The ‘remnant’ is in a panic. The technology-buildup has been pushed hard because the weaponry-larder is near bare. Brexit and the British Commonwealth are being pushed because they are the most dependable of the ‘remnant’ hidden-Empire. (Note that the ‘Five Eyes’ provide all-hemisphere coverage of the globe.) Again, this breaks-down into two further sub-divisions of the plot: The ‘other side’ from the Ancient War has not landed (in any force) on this planet. So, all the nations on the globe – despite appearances – are to be used in defense of the ‘remnant’. Or, the ‘other side’ from the Ancient War has either landed or made protectionist treaties with some nations on Earth. Remember the internet ‘scuttlebutt’ around Putin being told by Pleiadians that they have his back?

    Interesting semi-SF possibilities occur when one looks beyond the day-to-day manufactured ‘churn’…

    1. Robert Barricklow

      Naked Apes is term I ascribe to ever since reading
      Desmond Morris, The Naked Ape. A great Book!

      1. Robert Barricklow

        Interesting analyses bringing in the players of the Cosmic War. I still think that the weapon that destroyed them was beyond their capacity to control. That “it” took over and the left over progeny prodigies diluted in mind and well…, certainly not spirit; unless that left over spirit was infected more through time, until it too decayed/succumbed to “the thing/it”.
        Not a happy Hollywood fantasy ending.

        1. RB, in my opinion, what went on was a lot more like “Star Wars” than any local, intra-System conflict. Joseph likes to keep it local, but I suspect the conflict was more pan-galactic. Just depends on whether ‘warp drives’ were real

          As such, our situation reminded me of the Pacific Islands Campaign of WWII. We (our Solar System) were more like the powerful Japanese bases of Truk or Rabaul. They were ‘neutralized’ from the air, and left-behind while bigger-fish were fried.

          Our ‘remnants’ have been relying on being behind-the-lines and not worth diverting-forces to dig-out. That assumption relies on whether or not the bigger-fish are now fried

          1. Robert Barricklow

            Perhaps, they just quarantine our system; in some fashion or other, to be down with it, on the Rockefeller cheep.

  6. The dialectical opposition, proposed by Meyssan, between Russia and Britain: while some parts of the British oligarchy may actually hold this view (as the distant descendants of 19th cent. liberal free-trader, mercantilist Russophobia cultivated then as now with the excuse of guaranteeing rights, freedom etc.) and may dream of a “Round Table” inspired Anglosphere (or as Marcos would have it, “Norman-sphere”), the current anti-Russian hype does not seem justified by a true Realpolitik.
    Yes, everybody is concerned about rising Chinese influence in the world.
    However, the current, almost comical military and media posturing against Russia has the “smell” of some hidden hand – perhaps the same hand that gave PM May the “wonderful” advice to hold a snap election and see her majority reduced. If she genuinely believed her majority would have been increased, and now genuinely believes that Moscow is the devil incarnate, one wonders how she could have become PM despite such lack of good sense. And if she has been compelled to hold early elections and to launch the anti-Russian crusade, against her own and the country’s better interests, who is behind this and why is she serving them? [Hint: never underestimate Germany, which has been very quiet during the Brexit dispute, with their front-man Juncker supposedly negotiating the EU pushback single-handedly…].

    1. Yes, Dana. It seems to me that Mrs May is being “pupeteered”. Either control files are being used or there is some larger game that we have not yet seen the outlines of yet. However it seems to me that she has been “branded” in some way by this whole Skripal affair.

      One interesting thing in Thierry Meyssan’s article is this:
      “Sir Nick Carter confirmed the necessity of … preparing for a war in which the images broadcast by the medias would be more important than victory on the ground.”

    2. Robert Barricklow

      Yes, they are certainly adept at adapting;
      if not downright playing w/loaded dice.

Comments are closed.