Mr. V.T. spotted another intriguing story this week, and it concerns an intriguing finding in the latest computer data-crunching of the human genome:

AI Finds Traces of a Lost Species in Human DNA

Now, needless to say, I have some high octane speculation to advance about this, but first, let's find out what "this" is:

New research published last week in Nature Communications suggests a yet-to-be discovered hominin interbred with modern humans tens of thousands of years ago. This mystery species eventually went extinct, but an AI developed by researchers from the Institute of Evolutionary Biology (IBE) and several other European institutions found traces of its existence in the DNA of present-day people with Asian ancestry. A press release issued by the Centre for Genomic Regulation said it’s the first time deep learning has been used to explain human history, “paving the way for this technology to be applied in other questions in biology, genomics and evolution.”

The mystery hominin is likely a hybrid species of Neanderthals and Denisovans, according to the new research. Neanderthals, who lived in Europe, and Denisovans, who spread to Siberia, southeast Asia, and Oceania, were a closely related group of early humans, diverging from a common ancestor around 744,000 years ago. When anatomically modern humans (Homo sapiens) spilled into Eurasia from Africa, they commingled and interbred with both Neanderthals and Denisovans, which we know through genetic research. In addition to the generous amount of DNA left behind by the Neanderthals, scientists have extracted Denisovan DNA from a well-preserved finger bone found in a Siberian cave. Today, we find traces of these extinct species in the DNA of non-African humans, though only Asians retain genetic remnants of the Denisovans.

But as the new research suggests, modern humans, in addition to interbreeding with Neanderthals and Denisovans, interbred with a third, albeit unknown, species.

There you have it: some unknown hominid/humanoid species interbred with humans about three quarters of a million years ago, and that species in turn was "likely a hybrid species of Neanderthals and Denisovans". And that would make us a hybrid of a hybrid. Moreover, this would appear to be the case in "the DNA of present-day people with Asian ancestry." And that leaves some questions unanswered: is the same property found, or not found, in non-Asian human populations? Is it found in Africans? Caucasians? If so, to what degree? And if not, why not?

I find the story extremely intriguing, not only for what it is saying, but what it is (perhaps) not saying, as exemplified in the following story that was shared by Mr. B:

China clones gene-edited monkeys

Now, Mr. B., when he shared this article, wondered just how far China is really in the techniques of cloning: cloning monkeys is not that far removed from cloning humans, and the significant thing here is that the monkeys in question had already been "gene-edited" for the express purpose of studying specific things. Indeed, recent months revealed the story that one Chinese geneticist had indeed tampered with the genome of a human baby. He was quickly denounced by the Chinese government, but I suspect less because he had done so, and more because he had revealed he had done so. With all of the ancient stories indicating some sort of ancient "genetic engineering project", from the Bible's Nephilim to the Apocrypha's "watchers" to Mesopotamia's Annunaki, one wonders if we're looking, perhaps, at yet another twist in that story? And given the story earlier this week of Biophotons and consciousness, one also has to wonder if our linguistic abilities are somehow "hardwired" into the human genome? And while we're on that, one also has to wonder if, in fact, the multitude of human languages might be somehow connected to an ancient "Tower of Babel" moment of history, if the multitude of langauges was genetically manipulated?

Of course, all that's very high octane speculation indeed. And there's not a shred of indication in either article that any connection to those ancient stories is intended or operative. But sooner or later, I suspect, some sort of interdisciplinary effort will have to be undertaken in that respect. And there's another "high octane speculative possibility" here, namely, that "they" really are thinking in those terms...

... they're just not telling us.

See you on the flip side...


  1. “…And given the story earlier this week of Biophotons and consciousness, one also has to wonder if our linguistic abilities are somehow “hardwired” into the human genome? And while we’re on that, one also has to wonder if, in fact, the multitude of human languages might be somehow connected to an ancient “Tower of Babel” moment of history, if the multitude of langauges was genetically manipulated?”

    Greetings Dr Farrell – on this point above, you key in very closely on perhaps the greatest scientific ‘miracle’ that ever affected the human race in one singular incident.. I believe you are absolutely correct to note that language is hardwired into our neural circuitry, and I suspect that it is there by design – whether entirely ‘divine’ in its provenance, or in some way inherited from progenitors who ‘bred the trait into us’ using genetic engineering, for now the question is somewhat up in the air.

    I have been developing a hypothesis which still requires much research, but I thought I’d share the germ seed of the matter, as it will almost certainly interest you. This concept developed in part intuitively on studying a particular work, and in part from the material itself. The book is called ‘The Alphabet that Changed the World’ by Stan Tenen, and it is essentially a study on the origin of the Semitic languages, and Aramaic/Hebrew in particular, as a for of communication which developed from a complex system of natural gestures & symbols which seemed naturally resonant with concepts which the early speakers would have coped with non-verbally in the mists of time when verbiage was first being tested out by these archaic Semites (& others – the Greek alphabet shares a remarkable heritage in common with Hebrew, transmitted by the Phoenicians, if memory serves, though I’m not 100% sure on that single point, as it’s been a while since I read the original work. The author was a bit of a maverick, but he was passionate, keenly & incisively intelligent, perceptive & intuitive. He seems to have grasped some extremely important concepts & rules for the genesis of the language, and in my view it actually offers clues for one of your favourite topics, the ‘Tower of Babel’ moment..

    In a nutshell, I have often found myself pondering the incredible differences in human language, finding it remarkable that such great variety could exist even between cultures who weren’t really ‘separated’ from each other by any torturous geography or warring customs, etc. The fact of a Tower of Babel moment seems almost unimpeachable to my mind, and the scriptures, the modern anthropology & philology, with the work of Stan Tenen in hand, had me in a deep musing on many nights.

    I found myself wondering – if there was an ‘incident’ in which the litany of human language suddenly & dramatically altered as the result of an act of will imposed by an external power, then how did it happen? In my mind I consider the agents of its implementation to have been the Bene Elohim, ‘the Sons of God’, perhaps the ‘Watchers’ who remained faithful to the mission, having received instruction from a higher authority to impose restrictions on human communications, likely for reasons of significant import. I sometimes imagine that had the Tower of Babel moment not happened, could humanity have taken the vast knowledge received from the renegade ‘fallen ones’ & set ourselves off on a runaway train of high technology in the hands of a very immature civilisation, ultimately leading to the demise of either the people or the planet? I consider it a reasonable explanation in itself, especially in light of the seemingly brash experimentation going on today with particle colliders & various other toys for adults..

    Anyway – if indeed these Bene Elohim (with their AI ‘helper-bots’ in tow) had been instructed to mix up the lingua franca of the human race, how would it have been accomplished? I do believe that yes, language capability is hardwired into the brain, whether it came by nature or intervention, and what is more, this region can be accessed readily when a person is in a hypnotised state. In the scenario I am outlining here, it is very important to note that despite misinformation to the contrary, hypnosis can be applied to vast numbers of people at the same time, even if they would consciously resist in in the normal course of affairs, if the correct technological tools are available. A variety of carrier waves & pulsed beats/ light pulses can be used to utterly remove the barriers to hypnosis, including sub-liminal auditory stimulation. It is claimed that hypnosis cannot be performed on someone who doesn’t want to be hypnotised. This claim is oft-repeated for the benefit of counsellors or therapists who don’t want to scare away their potential customers, but in fact there are numerous ways to foist a hypnotised state upon a target.

    Avoiding the obvious use of chemical doping agents to achieve the effect (possible a genetically engineered pollen or chemical released over a wide area – but unlikely) – there is the use of electromagnetic waves at certain points on the spectrum, with subtle leading by practitioners being optional at times as necessary.

    **When the hypnosis isn’t having the desired effect, do the androids faithfully drop by in their service vehicles to update the programming? Maybe…**

    Taking the work of Stan Tenen & dissecting it for key components of action, it struck me very powerfully in the intuitive way that there is a deep aspect of ALL language capability which is related to GEOMETRY, applied in our experience of the spacetime continuum as an unfolding mimicry of real world artefacts utilising geometric substitutions to visualise the matter at hand within the autonomic conscious experience of handling the language. As in, the proto-language of the Semites who would become Hebrew speakers was originally a gestural-geometrical substitution artefactual expression process (yikes!), which, when turned in the mind of the Adept/Kontroller & viewed from a plethora of angles, ever-greater complexity of thought could be reinforced & internalised, made manifest in the mind/memory, then the simpler matter to transmit/substitute old for new, those geometrical cross-sectional artefacts being turned instantly into known meanings – in a spoken form (which also may be connected to real world mimicry in its deepest autonomic remnants – though the connection of sound to form is a very mysterious process, and as you know well, the very basis of magical operations & spiritual authority is the use of language in very specific, ritual ways – ‘Abracadabra’ means “I will create as I speak” in Hebrew..). If we therefore accept the fact that there is some connection to geometric representation in our archaic memory which comes as a pre-installed feature of our linguistic centres in the brain, can we then suppose that, being accessed in a hypnotic state, changes to the mathematical data spread which had created the shape, form & then having been mapped onto intrinsic sounds for each letter, syllable, word & compound word series, may very well be said to have evolved – instantly, with the right tech – creating another ‘rotation’ of the geometry, which, when viewed in cross section (one of Tenen’s methods) as a singularly existing & self-justified complex foundational geometric object that can be adopted into common parlance. In these ways it seems safe to say that with advanced knowledge of philology, geometry, psychology & anthropology, whole nations could be so manipulated to provide for a new language, having had some sort of mathematical translation (rather, a ‘mapping onto’ complex alternative geometry of form of the meanings already known & embedded with a previously existing geometrical construct – in this case, proto-Hebrew, based on cross-sections of Torus geometry & adapted archaic gestural forms – which could be mapped onto the new letter forms also, enriching the language greatly, far beyond what most modern languages can accomplish.. Rather than ‘teaching’ a new language, the geometry would simple ‘speak for itself’, the woken human then very naturally expressing terms & matching all with correct contextual relevance, written form & sound intonation – all variations on the proto-language’s geometrical evolution has become a wonderfully unique & culturally enriching/focusing method by which to separate groups of humanity out into pastures new, having birthed a new language within them, by so doing dramatically slowing down the pace of the evolution of human societies & eventually, providing for a slightly better globally cooperative civilisation.. I don’t see this as a ‘bad thing’ to have happened – I believe we were artificially advanced in our knowledge (if not our genetically hybridised DNA too), by a contingent of those advanced Omega-Humans (the Watchers, the Bene Elohim) who were supposed to shepherd & guard us, to walk with our leaders & encourage the fledgling human race to grow at its own pace, in harmony with the planet & with each other, under the grace of Heaven. We all know the story of the Fall, and it was probably prompted a prescient awareness in the Omega’s mission purpose, knowing that they would, at some time in the future, have to take a difficult decision, to provide for the need which became evident, to slow it down, to settle the ‘human project’ into a more wholesome growth phase, so that the strange advances (which would perhaps have taken several thousand more years to develop organically), were carried with us as boons & mystical talismans as we battled & struggled to understand our own strange provenance & the knowledge of the ‘gods’ – who had been confusingly present for both good & ill, at the earliest time of our ancestral memories.

    So yeah – there’s a lot more I want to do to further tinker with this little hypothesis, but if you haven’t read Stan Tenen’s book ‘The Alphabet that Changed the World’, I would recommend it as an excellent jumping off point for further analysis, though there are some stand-out aspects of his personal beliefs & theorising which I believe show him in places to be trying to fudge the data to fit the theory (in particular, the crass inclusion of the disordely & oft-virulent language of the Quran, Hadith & Sunnah, for example, in his overall manufactured archetype, a beautiful geometric representation which he named ‘the flame in the meeting tent’. Unfortunately, he is somewhat foolish trying to ‘make it so’ that Islam can join in, despite being sat outside the headmaster’s office for the past 1500 years – in this respect Tenen is like a geometrising Captain Picard, breaking the Prime Directive out of misplaced & undereducated, dangerously unwise humanist opinion….

    Speaking plainly, there is no covenant of fellowship between Muslims & Jews, never before, never in the future – its a 1500 year clash of ideology which, on the Islamic side, is so virulent that there can be no redemption for it in any respectable theory of religious tolerance & freedoms, because it is a system for total life domination in all areas, not just religion. Education, politics, music, art, sports, the position of women in society, the outlawing of homosexuality throughout the entire Islamic world, the persistent terror attacks perpetrated without regard even for the sanctity of young teenage girls, bombed at a concert in Manchester, burned alive in cages in Syria, It has no place in mature spirituality, and what’s worse, the penalty for leaving is automatically DEATH. Abhorrent, designed by Satan his own infernal self.

    Anyway, back to the theory – Tenen’s work in establishing a special Torus shape as the geometric seed & seal of the Hebrew language is remarkable & it seems very prescient, worthy of further studies expanding outwards to examine whether a ‘geometric rotational or planar adjustment’ in the central archetypal linguistic patterns recognised in the brain in cultures speaking different languages (who often claim to have no memory of where they came from or what their original provenance was at all..) NB – This brick wall of ancestral memory can be particularly evident in the Asian/ Pacific Islanders or Meso/South Americans living in nations or regions circling the Pacific ‘Ring of Fire’ – they certainly appear to have linguistic connections to the land of ‘Mu’ – a syllable which is tellingly abundant in all sorts of language constructs in these vastly separated but ‘ringside seating’ nations on either side of the Pacific. Slightly removed from the Semitic analysis in the main part of this post, but it’s one of those curious ‘also ran’ incidents that needs a honourable mention in the ‘linguistic familial linkage debate..’

    Cheers, MichaelianDreamer..

  2. Looks to me that the engineering of homo sapiens sapiens never stopped, it continues to this day.
    Question is: By whom?
    The Annunaki still? Or has the project been sub-contracted out or perhaps hijacked by an outside entity?

  3. Something about these speculations reminds me of that strange statement from president Putin on genetic samples being collected:

    “Do you know that the biological material is collected all over the country for different ethnic groups and peoples living in different geographical area of the Russian Federation? The question is why they are doing it, and they are doing it purposefully and professionally. We are an object of great interest. Of course, we do not need to have any fear about it. Let them do whatever they want, and we must do what we have to do,” Putin said

    “We are an object of great interest”…. interesting phrasing… And “we must do what we have to do”.

  4. deep learning is as deep learning does.

    and gigo.

    couple years back when i first ran across, i talked it over briefly with a friend who was months away from her phd in theoretic physics. she poo-ed every idea on the electromagnetic force (humongously stronger than gravity) being the primary force guiding cosmology, the universe and everything. pointed to black holes and the big bang and on.

    told her about scalable experiments in labs matching exactly massive galaxy sized observations and splaining with excellent working models. she insisted that physicists today had experiments proving standard theory (sun is fusion, gravity determines everything, and on). i was surprised. hadn’t heard of any. asked her to set me up with links and all. wanted to know who had experiments. well fermilab for sure, right? oh yeh. they had scads of computer models confirming all of steven hawkings’ theories (aka laws if you’re in their religion). i countered that computer sims are not empirical evidence. got eye rolls and refusal to discuss further ever since.

    still won’t discuss the SAFIRE project. hm. woulda thought the mic involvement in electric universe so overtly woulda won her over.

    at any rate, i have been a little distrustful of such deeply learned truths ever since. makes one wonder at what point the builders of ai will suffer backlash as ai grows and develops and inevitably finds lies and half truths distasteful and learns how it’s developers were the single greatest source of inaccuracies in all their data.

  5. I suspect that biology (specifically, genetics ) has been the Manhattan Project of the last century – both in the scale and the secrecy. In fact, all the wars, power plays, financial distractions, and such may have been to keep curious eyes off of The Prize. If you are looking for a fundamental raison d’être for a breakaway civilization, there you are…

    One can see the ‘blockade’, here and there. In one of his last books, Zecharia Sitchin wrote about the probability of an Anunnaki (or half-Anunnaki) princess buried in Sumer and then unearthed and shipped to a British museum. See There were Giants upon the Earth: Gods, Demigods, and Human Ancestry; The Evidence of Alien DNA (2010). One would think that this scholarly ‘claim’ would be welcomed, if only for the chance to debunk Sitchin. Instead, an iron wall went up, and the topic was quickly submerged. (Any bets on whether a DNA analysis was done, anyway – in deep secrecy?)

    There are also the questions that Michael Tellinger has brought up around deep human history – in this case, in southern Africa. Prepare to be amazed, if you do not know about this aspect of Mankind (including, of course, Enki). His books Slave Species of the Gods and Temples of the African Gods are recommended. (Tellinger’s Wikipedia page almost doesn’t exist – a stub – which is also intriguing.)

    Tellinger’s work can be extended if you combine his insights to include a technologically-advanced ‘overlord’ – one that has flight capabilities. Virtually every continent has ‘anomalous’ remains that are carefully explained away. Why should eastern Asia not be the same? Thanks to this AI (machine learning, really) research, we may be looking at the first inklings of a Tellinger-scale Op in that area. It may have been another attempt at creating local Workers. It may or may not have been an attempt at ‘seeding’ a new sub-species, explaining why the ‘signal’ is so weak.

    Interesting times…

    1. Also interesting:
      “The Enduring Quest for Übermensch: From Renaissance Humanism to Silicon Valley’s Posthumanism”

      “…close to the end of each year, going back decades, it [the world famous business magazine, The Economist – partly-owned by the Rothschild family and reputed mouthpiece for the world’s elite and its global agenda] publishes an eagerly awaited special edition, which predicts the major political, business and social trends and events of the year to come.

      At the center of the cover [‘The World in 2019’, 33rd edition] stands the ‘Vitruvian Man’… The Vitruvian Man also has two tattoos. On his forearm is a double-helix, the symbol representing DNA. This is most likely a reference to the intense research in DNA modification happening in the private sector.”

      More analysis at:

  6. If you what to believe our elites have not made the connection there a bridge in Brooklyn for sale. As for the second story well that’s the reward for letting the cat out of the bag he is probably continuing his research at an institute that well guarded.

  7. Ut oh
    Apparently there’s a species frame in the global community that needs righted?
    A hominin is the first sleight of hand?
    interbred, the next?
    10s of thousands of years ago[lowball extremist]?
    This is the new game. The algorithm sez it; it has to be true? Especially one of those deep learnist AI species?
    Another for-u good intentions paved road?
    More & more misdirections are then paved in text?

    Yea? What did happen to the commons?
    Enclosed by who[m]?
    What you me we Kemosabe?

    In my mind’s eye[that pineal gland again?]
    the Tower of Babel was the genetic engineering[tampering] of language w/in the original being.
    Well, what do you know; you went in the same towering direction.
    I actually had hoped I was wrong.
    That the twig was too extreme.
    For in my book,
    it’s more hellishly sinister
    then one could conceivably imagine.

    1. Of course, the key is in the eye of the beholder.
      That’s the real key to it all.
      Except most Adams will fall
      before that dimension is realized.

      … and then there’s that other[s] dimension too?

Comments are closed.