OF THE QULT AND THAT STRANGENESS IN THAT WIKILEAKS DUMP

So many people sent some version of this story last week that it made it almost immediately into my "finals folder" of stories to blog about. So thank you to all of you, once again, who brought it to my attention, and another "generic thank you" to all of you who take the time to send articles. Anyway, this story is about that little bit of strangeness that made it into the Wikileaks dump which occurred around the time frame of the arrest of Julian Assange. But before we get to that, first a little caveat lector; most regular readers here already know, that during my years of writing, talking, and blogging about "strange stuff" that  I've not commented much - if at all - about Wikileaks or Julian Assange. When Assange and Wikileaks first appeared, it was not a subject that was very much on my radar, and hence, to this day, I do not know much about Assange nor his operation. At the time he first appeared, I expressed some skepticism as to how it all worked, including who his sources were. I still have that skepticism. That said, I am even more skeptical and cynical about the nasty precedent and implications that his arrest portends. In some respects, I suppose, what bothered me about Assange was what bothers me about the Q-cult, or Qult as my colleague Bernard Grover calls it: it struck me as contributing to that malaise of our age, the desire to be "
on the inside" and "in the know," not that that was Mr. Assange's goal, but that seems to be one implication. Granted, Assange and Wikileaks did not concoct a labyrinth of bread crumbs for the faithful acolytes to decode and follow nor did Assange assert cryptic claims to a kind of infallibility ex cathedra et ex consensu ecclesiae Qque. That is to say, Assange at least did not, so far as we know, construct a psyop nor was he part of one. That makes his arrest - at least to me personally - very troubling.

What I find even more troubling is the possibility that the Qult has been carefully nurtured for the past couple of years, almost as if some sort of "replacement" was being prepared for the day that Mr. Assange was taken down.

Which makes the strange little document in the last Wikileaks dump, and that has been making the rounds on the Internet, even more intriguing:

Wikileaks Document Exposes a “Secret US Base on the Moon

Taking this document (and the accompanying article) as authentic for the sake of argument, we're presented with a bit of a conundrum. On the one hand, if one views the document itself, and then reads the above-linked accompanying article, one is struck by the fact that the original document states that the report that the Soviet Union destroyed a secret US moonbase was unclassified. Quite frankly, when I read the accompanying article and saw the document itself, it struck me that the headline read like one would expect to find on The National Enquirer, accompanying yet another article headlined Two-Headed Elvis Seen in Hotel Bar in Mindinao. So my first difficulty here is not only the Enquirerlike headline, but the fact that the whole thing is unclassified ab initio. Without the benefit of the whole document and possessing only its summary, we're left with not much other than the possibility that we might be looking at a summary of a newspaper article that might have appeared in some foreign media.

A second possibility here is that we might be looking at a bit of deliberate and intentional "meme-planting." After all, it would be a relatively easy thing to plant false documents for someone (like Assange) to "find" and disseminate.

But strangely enough, it took a junior Senator from Wisconsin to point out the possibility that perhaps one way to keep a "super secret" super secret is to downgrade the classification from "Super Secret" to "Kinda Secret but Not So Much," that way, one doesn't have to track the "Super Secret" document on the "Super Secret Documents Ledger". By the same token, some times the best way to hide something is just to pull it from the public awareness, but not to classify it Super Secret, nor even Kinda Secret but Not So Much, but just to leave it unclassified and on the shelf. No one else knows about it, who doesn't know the location on the shelf, and since it's So So Secret, it's above Super Secret and its ledgers; it's So So Secret it's not even classified.

But with all the strange photos of stuff on the Moon, including some strange things in the Chinese and more recently the Israeli pictures, the idea that the US may have had a So So Secret (i.e., unclassified) base on the moon is not so strange, and raises new questions: what kind of base - manned or unmanned - was it? Where was it? What was its mission? When did it become operational? When was it constructed? And who constructed it? Did this base have something to do with NASA's strange L-CROSS mission in 2009, which was designed to crash into the South Pole of the Moon? Remember that one? We were all told that the impact would be visible on Earth, so spectacular would the collision be.

When it happened, it was  - at least after all the hype - a big nothing burger. Except to a handful, who were far more excited about the fact that the impact was not visible to the naked eye. What the telescopic images revealed was rather stunning, for the impact signature was not that of impacting on a solid surface, but of impacting on, and penetrating, a roof and exploding into an empty space beneath it.

And finally, to round out today's high octane speculation, there is a bit of an odd thing in the assertion that the Soviet Union destroyed this alleged American Moonbase. On the document itself there is a space labeled TAGS< and under this heading, one reads "ARBOGAST, CEYD QUENTIN, OGEN - Operations-General, UR - Soviet Union (USSR)." Now, the way I'm reading that strange list, ARBOGAST, CEYD QUENTIN, and  OGEN" would seem to be codewords, with "ARBOGAST" perhaps being the codename for a specific project area, and CEYD QUENTIN and OGEN perhaps being specific projects within that project area. OGEN could be simply a sigil for what follows it:  "operations-General". Then we get something very suggestive: "UR - Soviet Union (USSR)." Is UR explained by what follows it, as OGEN appears to be by "operations-general", in which case UR becomes some sort of sub-project heading for the Soviet Union in whatever ARBOGAST represents? Perhaps. Or, even better, is UR intended - as one individual who sent this story to me speculated - to represent an ancient UR, Ur of the Chaldeas in Mesopotamia? And is the reference to the Soviet Union indicating that it has some sort of "project ARBOGAST" (whatever that may be) interest in Ur?

Who knows, but I find that whole chain and line of reasoning to be intriguing to entertain.

So, for the moment, color me skeptical, but willing to be open to the high octane speculations here if indeed we could find out more information and details about this document.

See you on the flip side...

29 thoughts on “OF THE QULT AND THAT STRANGENESS IN THAT WIKILEAKS DUMP”

  1. According to Q Legend and the Qult Qoncensus, WikiLeaks was infiltrated and taken over by the Clowns (CIA) and Assange has had little or no control over it for the past year or so.

    This story line has two major implications:
    1) Q is an effort to de-emphasize and discredit WikiLeaks, and take over the role that WikiLeaks has played in the current political climate; and
    2) This story is a deliberate meme implantation to achieve some goal as yet unapparent (by the CIA).

    I have found it quite useful to simply distrust any and all specific information in the Net-o-sphere, and rather analyze the trends to see what agendas are being served.

    It seems fairly clear to me that there is a huge “gangland war” going on behind the scenes, and that nearly all the data spewing into the public consciousness is tainted by one or more players in this turf war. Trends seem to be a way to ascertain drifts in goals and objectives, even if we can’t trust the content.

    Perhaps this line of thinking might shed some light on this topic?

    1. It’s certainly a wicked witches brew; when it comes to tasting which brew is authentically true, and which is purposed to misconstrue.
      I find great sources, and then they’ll throw a curve ball. They state something I find misleading. Yet, I still find myself, looking at the pitch and wondering if it is a fast & true pitch. I then reexamine my perspective.
      I try to look at who has power over whom
      and how is that power being used?
      Still, it’s wicked witches brew of…
      which is which?

  2. Columbus-discovering-America-moment is a designed solution, awaiting the designed problem of Luther-nailing-church-door-moment to arise, that would cause a reaction: the Reformation crisis.

    Thus human cattle transport could begin to the New World. Freemasons (Jesuits 2.0) would have free reign to mold the American mind by papal design, creating the juggernaut golem, that would be decisive, in two world wars.

    Europeans do question the American narrative, because Europeans know better. Therefore WikiLeaks is European criticism against USA. Julian “Gandalf” Assange is an honour Icelander, and no harm shall come him.

    “Skáldskapur skýrir heiminn, kveður niður drauga, og vekur upp framliðna anda.” Translated: “That, which is Bardic, clarifies the world, speaks down spooks, and awakens bygone spirits.”

    Americans exist because of a half millennium papal plan. Americans act according to their papal programming, being slaves to papacy, lost in their labyrinth, without a clue. Therefore WikiLeaks exists.

    Personally, I would love to stick it to the man in kangaroo court, but I am not allowed to. Latest WikiLeaks: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/bpyrlzspm7wmnx8/martian-grapes.pdf

  3. I am so skeptical about the moon base, but heck what do I know… I do know this kind of travel is extremely hard on the human body … even teleportation can do a real number. Out bodies are just too dense. Edgar Mitchell was correct about the ET’s not allowing space to be weaponized. I have said it once & I will say it again, until we understand how to implement plasma, shape shift space craft in a blink of an eye, to use holograms to the extent the ET’s use them & all the other high strangeness that goes along with this, I will remain skeptical to the end.

  4. Gotta agree on ur takes on the leak ops doc. I wanna say both assanges parents were intel. Have read plausible similar assessments on sy hersch. Leadership compelled milai to come out. Used hersch. Did same with deepthroat n watergate. Had hersch waiting anytime ben bradley backed woodwerd n bernstein off.

    1. More notewerthy bout assange: as he stated, their retraction rate is zero. Compare that to rhe gray lady or any other source. Ironic that arguably the most controlled opposition propaganda source is not only the most accurate. Its been arguably 100% spot on.

    2. the qult cannot brag about such accuracy given the arcane codified and inane nature of q. can any of these psy ops brag about full disclosure? ironic as all get out that greenwald closed out publishing more of snowden. stated that if a publisher with enough resources comes along he may reopen a file. after he published like 10% of snowden’s leaks? guess omidyar’s $300mil for the intercept was insufficient. how much did assange withhold of what wikileaks got? can anyone know? and yeh, like q even considers full disclosure.

      speaking of omidyar, did anyone see a comedian (tv personality) beat poroshenko today? comparisons are being made to leaders in iceland and—— wait for it —- ussa. it seemed to work for cleaning up iceland’s neoconlibzio’s. wonder how it’s going to go for ussa. wonder what omidyar thinks of his $400 mil poured down poroshenko’s throat now. did they get that much out of the fracking and gmo crops forced down the ukraine’s throat? think he’s returning any of victoria nuland’s calls?

    3. Please provide a reference for the Sy Hersh comments about Assange. I have tried googling and the only thing that comes up is Seth Rich….

      1. seymour hersch probably broke more intel related stories than any other author. whistleblowers have trusted hersch to protect his source with secrecy and with publication. whistleblowers are endangered both by being made public and by their story not being published. hersch is famous for being trustworthy so whistleblowers have sought him out. at the same time, hersch has been accused of psy opping. whatever the case, hersch has been a source for comprehensive as one can get info on any major topic. pick one of his books. the reference was not to his involvement with assange. it was a comparison. i imagine assange is a psy-op. he’s still a better source for info than the vast majority of what else is out there.

  5. Well Sheryl P. Walter does in fact exist. you can find her contact info on page two. that FOIA report was published in 2011 so it would “line up” with the date of December 2012, but it would take that much to obtain and place that info in it either. Just a quick search is all it took

    https://foia.state.gov/Learn/Reports/Annual/2011.pdf

    In fact Mz. Walter has had some interesting requests……like responding to FOIA requests for the Clinton emails. like this one-

    http://www.thompsontimeline.com/tag/sheryl-walter/

    this one was fascinating to read from 1979 and declassified by Mrs. Walter in 2014. I think Dr. Farrell would enjoy it. Oh, and then go look up Johnston Island for grins.

    https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/145110.pdf?v=6fdc639fc05556d56e92bea85d245f4e

    and from November 2012

    https://diplopundit.net/tag/sheryl-l-walter/

    Could UR mean “United Russia”? There is a political party in Russia by that name since 2001.
    By the way, in 2008 UR nominated one Dmitry Medvedev for president. yeah, that guy who has said some interesting things over the last few years.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Russia

    All this doesn’t give the report any more credence but there is some interesting data points in it.

  6. An interesting story in light of the SpaceX Dragon capsule accident read Apollo1 without dead astronauts. What is the real space program for the past fifty years how advanced is it really we who have been paying for it would like to know?

  7. I remember the X-Files spin-off, The Lone Gunmen . In it, Morris Fletcher (portrayed by Michael McKean) was a government SoB who enjoyed ‘playing’ with the Lone Gunmen. He would put-out extravagant disinformation, just to watch the Lone Gunmen spin their wheels. And he liked doing it…

    This article’s kind of stuff reminds me all too much of the above…

  8. More items added to the moon’s strangeness column..
    1)A U.S. Moon base
    2) U.S. Moon base Destroyed
    3) The Russians did it.

    As far as Julian goes; I place him as a tool being used by various factions to send messages. Now “they” want to get some kind of precedent set to legally let loose global censorship on psychotropic steroids.

    This moon press shot goes beyond even enquiring minds; more of the tabloid World News genre, where the headlines are for laughs.

    Yet, the times have gotten so Alice-In-Wonderland strange; that even intelligent skeptics laugh out loud,
    & then look a bit deeper. Who planted the story? For what purpose? The questions generated are ad infinitum.

    For now, I’ll put it in the:
    their brand of dark moon humor column.

    1. Just a side note.
      Finished reading THE Municipalists by Seth Fried.
      Another outstanding Don Quixote/Sancho Panza duo has just been to literature. An by-the-book bureaucrat and a super computer hard-drinking AI

  9. I have always viewed Wikileaks and JA as, suspect. JA and his platform are “unverifiable truths” at best, and a mouthpiece for any number of three letter agencies. JA could easily be knowingly or unknowingly operating as a controlled opposition tool for TPTB. For those reasons alone, I’ve always loosely followed their “leaks” with a cautious eye. If “Big Brother,” wanted JA and his platform to be gone, social media profiles linked to JA or WL would be scorched earth with a simple algorithm tweak. Look at how quickly someone like Alex Jones was de-platformed, and his shows were NOTHING compared to the “iron clad” Wikileaks drops. If the Intel community, or those that control these agencies wanted Wikileaks silenced, it would have happened years ago.

    With that all being said, I have read many compelling articles indicating that these ruling elite operate under a belief system governed by Karmic Laws. Meaning, so long as they telegraph what they are doing or planning on doing, they are not effected by the Karmic outcome. In other words, as long as the plans are disclosed directly or in many cases indirectly (Ex: symbology, numerology, etc.), your consent is then implied and/or waived. This falls under the spiritual warfare aspect of things.

    So, is/was JA and his Wikileaks a means for these elites to air their laundry, indirectly?

  10. With respect to the intellectual color spectrum my base coat on this one would be skeptical. I’m not saying I cannot be convinced. I would need more than a story as these are so easy to manufacture these days. Indeed, this is precisely the type of story I could see an intelligence community plant as justification for funding a huge militarized space agenda to “catch up with the Russia”. We’ve had the Soviet card played once as justification for our initial space race. When it comes to speculation you fall back into probability based arguments using assumptions with little to ground them into reality. Granted we do a lot of that here in this forum. When we do speculate, we usually have good questions and data. One cannot make an omelet without eggs as the primary ingredient. I do not see any eggs.

    1. This is a great catch. It’s nor surprising to see this there at this time. In fact it casts part of the the Monmouth transcripts into a new historical framework. This snippet from the Congressional record does imply Congress was actively dealing with budgetary issues related to a visible and public space program with an agenda–an agenda that definitely went underground sometimes in the 70’s and 80’s. Congress is spending trillions on something, but we’re not seeing any benefit from it.

  11. Wouldn’t surprise me in the least to discover that JA and Wikileaks along with Snowden were controlled opposition put in play to control the narrative; and he hasn’t been “imprisoned” all this time, but partying in Miami. Just another “intel” op meant to mess with our minds.
    We will have to wait and see what testimony he gives to congress, should he be allowed to do so. There are those who are hoping he will provide information to take down the deep state, the Clinton’s, etc. How long has that carrot been dangling in front of the apple cart. A long hoped for event of no consequence along with all those “sealed indictments”.

    1. yeh it does seem a quandry to place where the warring oligarch’s dialectic lines get drawn. the trump clan sometimes seems tightly aligned with the kennedy’s and taking down the bush/clinton cabal. then other times trump puts the scmuck who plea-dealed epstein not only into sealed settlements but immunity from further prosecution as the labor secretary? and somehow the only judge with cajones enough to call the plea-deal illegal is 94 and dies?

      and now that the mueller report is out and everyone acknowledges and accepts that trump colluded with israel while podestas colluded with ukraine and putin is just waiting for the ussa to fall apart poisoned with vaccines and glyphosate, we can stop anticipating and start watching perp walks for pedovores and other such monsters who offed seth rich for leaking aaron schwartz for making a good ai.

      did anyone else notice that congressman schiff is both trumps most shrill opponent and merck’s most shrill vaccine proponent? when does bobby kennedy jr get to call out schiff the way mccarthy got called out by joe welch?

      1. btw, did anyone else notice that ussa warship stuck quarantined in the middle east with mumps or measles or rubella? hm. wonder who made that batch. or is merck going to blame those 27 lads in sick bay on the unvaccinated? think they got up to 54 cases at one point. does anyone know what the completed vaccination schedule and rate is onboard american warships?

Comments are closed.