TIDBIT: WORMHOLES, WORMHOLES, AND MORE WORMHOLES…
In today's tidbit we're going to have a bit of physics fun.
K.M. spotted these two things, and I thought long and hard about whether or not to blog about them. But it was suggested a more fun way to talk about them would not be in a full blog, but just to tickle the subject. So here we go. The first thing K.M. sent was a "batch" of papers, over 1600 in fact, archived at Cornell, all on the topic of wormholes, and in many cases, traversable wormholes. There there's a couple of odd things about these papers: see if you can can tell what it is:
Showing 1–50 of 1,695 results for all: Wormhole
Now, K.M.'s second offering was this:
Formation of Wormholes by Dark Matter in the Galaxy Dragonfly44
Again, there's a lot to notice, but see if you can spot what caught my eyes in the abstract:
I. INTRODUCTION: Today, one of the challenging questions in a theoretical physics is the question of the existence of traversable wormholes [1–21]. Other mysteries in physics is dark matter (DM) [22–24]. Like black holes there is another miraculous objects of our universe which are wormholes.After the prediction of Einstein-Rosen bridge in 1935 [1],with a lot of theoretical evidence researchers have pro-posed the existence of wormholes in space-time which acts like a shortcut path to travel between any two widely separated or infinite region of the universe or between an-other universes in multi universe model. Structurally it looks like a tunnel (called its throat) with two mouths(most likely spheroidal). Here most interesting thing is exotic matter needed to open its throat (violates null energy conditions [2–4]. The curiosity about wormholes physics has vigorously been increased since publication of Morris and Thorne’s research article where they pro-posed the prospect of the existence of traversable worm-holes, as a solution of Einstein’s field equations, that does not contain event horizon and traveler can easily move in both the regions in space-time through its straight stretch throat [2, 3]. By the existence of these hypothetical objects one can realize time machines or shortcut among faraway places of space. Maximum mass of the universe is made up by the most mysterious substance which do not interact with the electromagnetic force, i.e. can’t absorb, reflect or emit light are dark matter whose nature and composition remain an overall question mark [22, 23]. Researchers hypothesize the existence of dark matter only from the gravitational effect. Observation of the spiral galaxy rotation curves is an enthralling experimental evidence for the existence of dark matter. The dark matter candidate particles are generally classified into cold, warm and hot categories. Interaction of a scalar field whose energy density is dark energy may be caused of the dark matter particle mass. Over several decades it is openly accepted that almost every galaxy contain a large amount of non- luminous matter forming massive dark matter halos around the galaxy based on different lines of evidence like flat rotation curves of spiral galaxies [24] and strong lensing system [25]
12 Comments
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
They seem to be talking or referring to scalar fields a lot. oh, and rotation curves.
Two things Dr P that I suspect caught your eye:
1. The language. Numerous grammatical errors that hint at a Google translation of another language….Russian or German would be my guess.
2. This paragraph: “Observation of the spiral galaxy rotation curves is an enthralling experimental evidence for the existence of dark matter. The dark matter candidate particles are generally classified into cold, warm and hot categories. Interaction of a scalar field whose energy density is dark energy may be caused of the dark matter particle mass.”
Am I correct?
alright, you knew i’m gonna do this. so call me a nit picky conspiracy theorist (is that a thing? did cia set that up in the 60’s over jfk skeptics? the really picky skeptics? back and to the left?). i’d criticize this gravity centric perspective as sci-fi but it doesn’t meet my meager definition of sci. therefore i gotta lump it in to psy-op. at least partially.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2t1q0NdZsA
Plasma vs Gravity | Space News
as one commenter on this vlog stated, it’s all about keeping the masses ignorant of the knowledge available only to the wealthiest guys on earth.
my argument against the label of science applied to theoretical physics is that science requires scientists to attempt to disprove theories using observable phenomena. it’d be nice if they were measurable, verifiable, repeatable and possible too. it’d be even nicer if there were any scientists not being censored off alphabet platforms for disproving theories of just about anything corporate media forcibly sells us (opiates, ssri’s, statins, vaccines, low fat or fat substituted foods, sugar, tobacco, viagra, beta blockers, stomach acid blockers, antibiotic overuse, gmo’s, vioxx, annual mammograms that cause cancer, prostate treatment that provides no improvement in longevity or quality of life, asbestos free baby powder, surgical implants that don’t ruin patients, soon to be non-cancer causing versions of glyphosate?????????) is anyone seeing a pattern here? a pattern applicable to all science? all knowledge in fact?
this is not to say gravity doesn’t exist and isn’t seriously interesting. it is to say that gravity centric theory excludes plasma science. plasma theory explains vast gaps in gravity centric cosmology. no need for such poorly defined terms and incomplete theories as dark matter, black holes, big bang, dirty snowball comets, fusion based sun/stars, biologically formed petroleum, lightning formed from static charges in clouds, winds caused by coriolis effect, and on.
wow. given the credibility of the spectator and the directions the algorithms are censoring um er ah i mean steering me to, it’s practically synchronicity that got me on to this link.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/10/how-many-scientific-papers-just-arent-true/
How many scientific papers just aren’t true?
Enough that basing government policy on ‘peer-reviewed studies’ isn’t all it’s cracked up to be
Donna Laframboise
To travel to any other point of potential in space time you can get there by several means. One you can build a space ship and travel there expending energy and time. Two you can wait trillions of trillions of years exactly where you are and eventually every potential possible including the one you want to experience will eventually manifest right where you are if you can live that long. Three you can travel through the veil (no space time bubble in both dark and light matter mediums) by creating the conditions to artificially form them or by accidently stepping through one and into one of the faerie, jinn, heavenly, hell or any infinite other potential realm dimension, world or position in our Universe.
Probably uncountable more ways especially when you realize time and space are part of the same illusion and are interchangeable values in equation positions seeking a sum particular potential manifestation.
If one cannot “see”/measure dark matter through various tools; except through gravitational tell-tale signatures; perhaps, this “matter”[in every sense of the word] is within other dimensions – that can’t be measured, except through their gravity tell-tales[at least in “our” public versions]?
When to going gets tough;
there’s always an easy-out:
multiple universes.
Multiple universes do exist; but not in the “normal” sense.
They exist w/each individual’s
interface[quantum]
w/in living universe[es].
Language; as Bohr said/We are suspended in language in such as way that we cannot say what is up and what is down.
This is why I enjoy Dr. Farrell’s vid-chats,
because the questions/answers format – gets damn close.
I should have added – live format;
in the sense there is spontaneity.
While traversable wormholes are intriguing, I am more curious about White Holes. These are where the in-falling matter which created the Black Hole did not just crush into a singularity and stay there. Part or all ‘tunneled through’ via an unknown process and exited the Black Hole, producing a hypothetical White Hole: Some form of matter appearing out of nowhere. This could even be speculated to be the origination of Dark Matter or Dark Energy. (The White Hole need not even be originating in our Universe.)
White Holes were popular for a time, but fell out of scientific favor. I am not sure whether this was due to proof that they could not exist, or the uneasiness that a White Hole could pop-out anywhere…
What if black holes are regions where gravitational forces convert matter and energy(light/white holes) back into dark energy and the nucleus of matter is where light/white holes(energy and matter) pop back into existence.
What if black holes’ gravity wells fuel the opposite phenomenon inertia which manifests as matter and energy popping out like bubbles from the abyss of dark matter its opposite. What if the total mass of both dark and light matter in the multiverses is equal when viewed infinitely but oscillates from slight dominance from one to the other when viewed at any scale of a potential finite view?