We've come a long way since the Oxford Union days... Great Britain has a new Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, a.k.a. "Bojo", who has promised to deliver on Brexit, come what may (no pun intended).

But he faces some problems:

5 big problems Boris Johnson has to deal with on his first day as prime minister


Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. Robert Barricklow on July 27, 2019 at 12:19 pm

    As this is a site for speculation; and in my case, a wild-and-crazy-guy of speculative threads – follow the money.
    Most trails stop at someone; or, at a tribe of someone’s priests/finance wizards, banking families, secret finance organizations, secret societies, of-world locations, etc., etc.
    Yet, to follow further, what or whom spawned this mechanism of measurement? Is this measurement like its brother, the megalithic yard; that portends an “otherly world” space connection? I’m say that “money power” was/is purposely woven into the infrastructure of man’s growing civilization[s].
    Fast-forward to BREXIT/Bojo.
    It’s never really about the show; the race; the so-called democracies/parliamentary systems, et al; the scripted debates; the [$]election proce$$es.
    It’s about power; specifically money.
    That power decides the outcomes.
    Of course, complications arise when several factions of money power[$] fight for total spectrum dominance.

    So back to the measurements of the megalithic yard/money; their authors, and what “they” wanted to spawn?
    Biologies are engineered to respond to different environments in different ways. The Biblical locusts, for example, respond to certain conditions that turn them into a mass of monstrous intent.
    In other words, to cut to the chase; there are parasites that control/engineer behaviors that are extremely subtle and hidden. Hidden in the very structures of powers’ infrastructure[s]; manifesting destines that were planted/seeded elsewhere, other than Earth?
    So the show is a manifestation of something much more than entertaining; it is instead a sinister show of hidden power[s] within the structures that support mankind’s illusions of grandeur.

    Enjoy the Bojo show!
    Be mesmerized!

    I’m reading A Shot In The Dark by Lynne Truss whose plot runs farcically close to the above; and whose solution is:
    “I find that reciting ‘The Walrus and the Carpenter’ gets me through this sort of thing quite well, but of course you can make your own choice. As long as your lips move its fine.”.

    … a wild and crazy speculative thread?

    • Robert Barricklow on July 28, 2019 at 11:57 am

      Is this a Boris USSR twin, revisited?
      From this article

      BoJo’s cabinet is a free market Taliban unleashed.

      Here again the speculative thread leads back to WW1 and Wilson lying to make the world safe for democracy[shades of future-present Soros color-revolution NGOs]. In reality it was to protect American Corporate investments in Britain & France; and that the international banking cartel would get their money back, that they loaned those countries. In others words: to make the world safe for capitalism.
      Fast Forward to the war in Iraq for another free-market massacre brought to you by neoliberal puppet Bremmer. Hey, it worked in Friedman’s Chile, and least when inked by a neoliberal press fantasy narrative.
      Then the Thatcher-Reagan Petrodollar recycling due to Nixon golden realities of a, God forbid, real market economy; that required electric-Volcker-shock-therapy. Then Naomi Kline laid-out capitalism’s latest Shock Doctrine therapy evolution financial warfare South American reality.
      Anyhoo, the story is too long.
      Suffice to say this BoJo free market shock therapy looks more like the former USSR under another Boris.
      Is this a USSR Boris twin, revisited?

  2. goshawks on July 26, 2019 at 6:43 pm

    I am curious about the background to Brexit, and what that means about the US/UK ‘relationship’. Obviously, it means that the UK has thrown its hat mainly to the US and the “5 Eyes” nations. EU (mainly a reunited Germany) is out – or sidelined – although there is a strange connection with David René de Rothschild at Wikipedia (below).

    I tend to think that the UK is “calling in its chips” in this maneuver:
    Wikipedia on Rothschild family:
    “The Rothschild family is a wealthy Jewish family descending from Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744–1812), a court factor to the German Landgraves of Hesse-Kassel in the Free City of Frankfurt, Holy Roman Empire, who established his banking business in the 1760s. Unlike most previous court factors, Rothschild managed to bequeath his wealth and established an international banking family through his five sons, who established themselves in London, Paris, Frankfurt, Vienna, and Naples. The family was elevated to noble rank in the Holy Roman Empire and the United Kingdom. … Nathan Mayer von Rothschild, the third son of Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744–1812), first established a textile jobbing business in Manchester and from there went on to establish N M Rothschild & Sons bank in London. … The Rothschild bank also funded Cecil Rhodes in the development of the British South Africa Company. Leopold de Rothschild (1845–1917) administered Rhodes’s estate after his death in 1902 and helped to set up the Rhodes Scholarship scheme at the University of Oxford. In 1873 , … The London banking house continued under the management of Lionel Nathan de Rothschild (1882–1942) and his brother Anthony Gustav de Rothschild (1887–1961), and then to Sir Evelyn de Rothschild (b. 1931). In 2003, following Sir Evelyn’s retirement as head of N. M. Rothschild & Sons of London, the British and French financial firms merged under the leadership of David René de Rothschild.”

    Wikipedia on Cecil Rhodes:
    “… [Cecil Rhodes] advocated vigorous settler colonialism and ultimately a reformation of the British Empire so that each component would be self-governing and represented in a single parliament in London.”

    “Secret Society” background on Cecil Rhodes:

    Summing up, we have a clear ‘handling’ of Cecil Rhodes by the Rothschilds, and then the multiple ‘tentacles’ extended by him/them into the US as offshoots of the “Secret Society” aka Round Table Groups . CFR, Trilaterals, etc. I would opine that this is the clandestine underpinnings of Brexit…

    • goshawks on July 26, 2019 at 6:47 pm

      Also interesting at Wikipedia; Rhodes’ connection with Princess Radziwill:
      “In the last years of his life, Rhodes was stalked by Polish princess Catherine Radziwiłł, born Rzewuska, who had married into the noble Polish family Radziwiłł. The princess falsely claimed that she was engaged to Rhodes, and that they were having an affair. She asked him to marry her, but Rhodes refused. In reaction, she accused him of loan fraud. He had to go to trial and testify against her accusation. She wrote a biography of Rhodes called Cecil Rhodes: Man and Empire Maker . Her accusations were eventually proven to be false.”

      The above is interesting as Miles Mathis has done extensive genealogical and historical research implicating the early Radziwill family:
      “Although these early kings of Jerusalem were not Jewish, being instead Crusaders from Christian Europe, the Counts of Brienne were later invaded by marriage with Jews. This was of course to make use of the claim to Jerusalem, which the Jews hoped to manage for themselves – as they eventually did. This invasion by marriage first occurred (so far as I can tell) in the 1500s when King Sigismund I of Poland overspent himself on chapels and jewels. So he brought in Jewish bankers from Lithuania, including Abraham Ezofowicz. They admit Abraham’s brother Michal was not only the head of Jewry in Lithuania, but that he had been ennobled – the only Jew admitted to be ennobled in European Medieval history. What they don’t admit is that Sigismund’s son Sigismund Augustus then married a Lithuanian Jew named Barbara Radziwiłł. Well, they admit the marriage, but not that she was Jewish.

      They do admit Sigismund Augustus’ mother Bona Sforza was violently opposed to the marriage, and they even admit Bona planned to poison the bride. Sigismund Augustus had to remove Bona from Cracow: she was sent back to Italy and eventually she herself was poisoned. But they don’t explain why Bona was so violently opposed to the marriage. They also don’t explain why Sigismund Augustus waited until after his father died to marry this woman. They also don’t explain why the marriage was opposed by all Polish nobles. They imply it was because Radziwiłł was Lithuanian, but there had been many unions between Polish and Lithuanian nobility before that.”

      (also check-out “Thrones” as to how the throne of Sweden was infiltrated by Catherine Jagiellon, daughter of Barbara Radziwiłł of Poland and Lithuania: )

    • Foglamp on July 27, 2019 at 5:52 am

      I would suggest that the underpinnings of Brexit are occult/esoteric rather than clandestine. I agree with you that it’s about bloodlines. I think it may be a ritual connected with ending the rule of the money changers begun with William of Orange.

      • goshawks on July 27, 2019 at 11:45 pm

        You might be interested in Ralph Ellis’ book, Mary Magdalene: Princess of Orange . Ellis researches how Mary Magdalene (and offspring) travel to Provence in France, after Jesus’ “death”, and start-up what ultimately becomes the line of William of Orange. (This is part of a very controversial – but well researched – series of books examining who Saul/Paul, Josephus, and ultimately the historical Jesus actually were. Not for the dogmatic or faint-hearted. I have read all of them.) Full disclosure; he is a publicly-avowed freemason.

        6-Part series by Ellis (25-min pt. 6 here on Mary Magdalene):
        (Probably better to start with below 70-min full-length for context, or search youtube for many of his videos.)

        • zendogbreath on July 28, 2019 at 5:37 pm

          Have seen a video in the last year on a similar scenario putting their landing point in Ireland. Think it was splaining the Boy’s lost years (what was that 12 – 30 years old?)

          • goshawks on July 28, 2019 at 9:09 pm

            If this was concerning Ralph Ellis, he wrote Scota, Egyptian Queen of the Scots: An analysis of Scotichronicon, the chronicle of the Scots :
            “The legends of Ireland and Scotland tell a fantastic tale of an Egyptian queen and her Greek husband, who were exiled from Egypt at some point during the second millennium BC. Chased from their homelands, they took to the sea and settled in Spain and then Ireland. It is said that it was from this Queen Scota and King Gaythelos that the modern titles for the Scottish and Gaelic people were derived. All of these early Celtic myths were finally set down in a fourteenth-century book called Scotichronicon… Ralph Ellis has taken a lateral look at this mythology, and found many links and associations that lead to one inescapable conclusion – that the extraordinary tale of Queen Scota and King Gaythelos is probably true.”

            Queen Scotia was Ankhesenamun, daughter of Pharaoh Akhenaton.
            King Gaythelos was Aye, vizier to Akhenaton & Tutankhamun.

            Basically, the people who succeeded Akhenaton got pushed-out of Egypt after the post-Akhenaton ‘regime’ fell. They spent some time in Greece, then Spain, and ended-up on the British Isles. They are pushed as the ‘ancestors’ of the Irish and Scots, but (if real) were probably just foreigners who organized them.

            “Ay (Aye) was the second last Pharaoh of the Eighteenth Dynasty of the New Kingdom of Ancient Egypt. It is thought that he ruled Egypt for four years from around 1323BC; however, he had been the vizier of both Akhenaten, Tutankhamun and possibly also of Smenkhare. It is widely believed that – in his position as the vizier of the young Tutankhamun – he was the real power behind the throne, and some also consider that he murdered Tutankhamun and married Ankhesenamun (the wife of Tutankhamun and the daughter of Akhenaten) in order to seize the throne for himself.”

          • zendogbreath on July 29, 2019 at 9:38 pm

            No, that’s not what I was thinking of. That doesn’t surprise me at all though. In fact how could that kind of immigration not have happened many times over millenia? Cairo, Illinois comes to mind. Alotta lotta hidden history.

  3. anakephalaiosis on July 26, 2019 at 6:00 am

    Solving Oxford riddles, is equally applying deduction and induction, paradoxically.

    Drawing “needles” out of stone, is what makes a rightful ruler, Druidically.

    Humorously, Prime Minister Haystack is looking for his “needle” – not his comb.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events