HURRICANE DORIAN: THE BLOGOSPHERE IS BUZZING
Regular readers of this site know that I am one of those who thinks - for various reasons - that there has been full scale geoengineering and weather warfare going on for some time. Indeed, as I've made it very clear, I have a rule: I will not discuss climate change with anyone who does not admit the technologies exist (and have existed for some time), and admit the possibility that they might be being used. To pretend to discuss a phenomenon without addressing one of its major potential causes is to commit a material omission. As Elana Freeland aptly put it in an interview with me, the presence of such technologies and their potential use means, in effect, that there is no such thing as purely "natural" weather. And while it's purely anecdotal, I've seen the strangeness myself, watching storms and tornadoes track one way, then make sudden and jarring turns. Just a few days ago one such storm was tracking "northeast", and as I was listening to my local weather radio, even they sounded mystified when the storm suddenly turned due south, after remaining stalled over one area for about thirty minutes.
Something seems to have changed with Hurricane Dorian, however, because I've noticed that more and more articles are appearing that at least entertain the idea that storms can be created, if not steered. There are all sorts of speculations out there about the storm, and its track. Perhaps President Trump's tweet about nuking the storm fueled the sudden interest. But as I previously pointed out, he's not new to the "nuking hurricanes" game:
America's Decades-Old Obsession With Nuking Hurricanes (and More)
Count me in four-square agreement with Wired's assessment of President Trump's idea that nuking hurricanes is "a terrible idea," if for no other reason than that we don't know what would happen. The storm might dissipate, but do so by scattering all that nuclear fallout to the four winds. Terrible idea. Then again, it might actually feed more energy into the storm. An even worse terrible idea. And besides, any way one slices it, under current treaty obligations, no one is allowed to detonate nuclear weapons in the atmosphere.
Which brings us back to weather modification. Consider the following article: https://globalintelhub.com/artificial-hurricanes-manufactured-deep-state-enterprise/
In this article, the following image is reproduced:
What's interesting here is the language being used for the 2009 U.S. House Committee on Science and Technology: "Geoengineering: Assessing the Implications of Large-Scale Climate Intervention." Notably, what's absent is any qualifier that would indicate future difficulties; rather, the language conveys the idea that "Large-Scale Climate Intervention" is already underway; most regular readers of this site or others dedicated to the topic would probably say it is. If the committee were to be strictly accurate and follow the public narrative that such modification might be possible, but that it isn't currently in operation, the title of the hearing would have more accurately stated "Geoengineering: Assessing the Potential Implications of Large-Scale Climate Intervention."
A year earlier, the Reichsicherheithauptamt... Er... uhm... I mean, the Department of Homeland Security, did this:
Department of Homeland Security Hurricane Modification Workshop
Look at those bullet points, and ponder the implications:
- identify viable hurricane modification hypothesis that warrant further study
- Understand hurricane physical processes including their initial development, mechanics, life cycle, instabilities and responses to outside dynamics and forces
- Understand DHS specific concerns regarding hurricane threats to life and property caused by wind, rain and storm surge
- Define potential DHS-specific hurricane modification factors, requirements and risks (i.e. pre-development modification, track changes, intensity change)
- Address projected effort/cost/viability/time-lines for hurricane modification implementation
- Recommend a path forward
- Limited scale field tests:
- Salt Seeding Tests
- Carbon Black Aerosol (CBA)
- Upper Ocean Cooling
- Ion Generators
Monolayer Films (Italicized emphasis added, boldface emphasis in the original
What's even more intriguing to ponder is the mission statement:
In view of these realities, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) with the organizational assistance of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)/Global Systems Division of the Earth Systems Research Laboratory sponsored a workshop on hurricane modification at the David Skaggs Research Center in Boulder, Colorado February 6-7, 2008. This action is consistent with the Homeland Security Act of 2002, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) mission to respond to threats and hazards to the nation and the Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) goal to accelerate delivery of enhanced technological capabilities to meet requirements and fill capability gaps to support DHS agencies in accomplishing their mission. (Boldface emphasis in the original)
The language again is uncomfortably ambiguous, for on the one hand, purely natural weather can be understood as a "threat and hazard to the nation," but so can deliberately engineered weather, and the fact that it is the Reichsicherhe... er... Department of Homeland Security doing the study that suggests to my mind that a hidden goal of the conference may have been how to recognize and distinguish between purely "natural" weather and weather that may be a weaponized use of weather modification technologies, since that would obviously fall under DHS's "mission brief." Two such signatures might be sudden, inexplicable, and dramatic changes of course (think Hurricane Katrina), or intensification, or de-intensification of a storm. Another might be the track falls over areas (targets) that have connections to recent political news. Consider, for example, the track of Dorian through - and the devastation caused to the unfortunate victims in - the Bahamas. The Bahamas are a British Crown Colony, and we know Who was ultimately behind the recent prorogation of Parliament concerning Brexit.
All of this is, of course, speculation in aid of trying to develop an eventual template for discernment. The fact is, Dorian seems to have sprouted a great deal of such speculation in amounts not seen since Katrina, but the context, especially with DHS's study, lends a credence to such speculations that they previously did not have. As the weather gets increasingly strange, such speculations will only increase.
See you on the flip side...
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
Bomb the village to save it/[nuke the hurricane]
Add that to;
Ignorance is strength; slavery is freedom; and war is peace.
The Gestapo, aka Homeland Security, is there to control the narrative and/or plug any truth holes
Like their normal mission; to quell any threats to the status quo; especially representative governance. This would quality as a threat or hazard to the owners of the U.S..
The Gestapo needs to make sure the Hurricane is following the agreed upon destruction parameters as an on-site agent of the U.S. owners.[although most are absentee owners].
The winds of an obvious in-your-face lying media,
are beginning to blow globally w/hurricane force.
Uncontainable, even by the fearless unelected and unaccountable
Oh dear, today’s (6 Sept 19) news Belgium will give storm names as the Anglo-Americans do. Why? We hardly have storms of note unless they are going to manufacture them above Europe as in today’s USA.
Ramura…..High Five!!!! More people should be made aware of our “Hillbilly” from MO who has figured out the “tools” used to control the weather!! There is a huge one right in Puerto Rico! Mike Morales of Above Ground World News!! 😉
I think we are intelligent enough to know that there are probably various “groups” who have the weather controlling “toys”! Mike puts right up there the various companies that sell their “weather wares”….but we “normies” have no clue just how many groups of power hungry cabals exist on this planet….OR….how many groups of “others” might be involved as well.
As C. A. Fitts knowingly points out, each of us must get involved at the Local Level if we want to start changing things!! The U.S. Populace was numbingly brainwashed during the two World Wars & after, which has led us to this Great Awakening of today!!
Personally, I think it is wonderful that this centuries old Pedo Empire is slowly being unraveled…..most of us “normies” had no clue about how things REALLY operated in this world!! Now we KNOW…….unless we choose to be blind!!
And…if we really took out a Chinese sub base with Dorian….I say Hip! Hip! Hooray! That reminds me of the person who was recently crossing from Guatemala into Mexico who wandered off into the brush to take a leak & Lo & Behold…..there were tanks sitting there with a Star painted on them!!! We are naïve if we think there has not been a plan in place to take the U. S. down from the INSIDE!!! If one has enough money & enough people with NO integrity…anything can be accomplished!! 😉
Seems like Carol Rosen was correct after all except there was obviously a narrative change in ‘climate change’.
Chelyabinsk, blue beam, blue chicken cult etc. seem to be a smokescreen while the real game is afoot.
Just read that the United Nations made a donation of 1 mln USD. Such amount for a “natural disaster” where 20 people died and 70,000 are in need? Maybe someone can once male a telly what amounts are donated by the UN for which natural disasters. Maybe there is a pattern by which we can get a more realistic picture who the enemy is???
Interesting idea Marco – there is always a “paper trail” somewhere – if you know where to look.
Wonder what they are finding washed up on the beach or uncovered from the sands after theses storms that we are not hearing about.
They always find something good after the storms along the Gulf Coast.
Can’t post the links from my portable microwave communication device but there are a bunch of mainstream venues calling trump a quack for insisting that Alabama was in the path of the hurricane while meteorologists insist it never was. He even held up a poster of the path with parts of Alabama circled by hand. Sorry, this isn’t dementia or a case of misspeaking. He got that info from somebody, and when the storm was moved, it left him open to msm fake news and of course he can’t announce that it is roque elements or foreign players messing with the weather otherwise he’ll look coo coo like the rest of us. That hand drawn circle wasn’t an accident
Makes one wonder what the motives were. For Trump as well as all players involved. It does seem the media is compliant in their non-compliance to Trump. Wonder what happens to the Hegelian dialectic the instant the media falls in love with Trump as most did Obama.
It must be really fun messing with billions of minds full of ideas and thoughts….I wish I could be a technocrat ?
I thought that Dorian was going to finish off what hurricanes Irma and Maria did to Puerto Rico drive more people off the island. Opening it up for new settlers or maybe the next potential hurricane will do the job stay tuned.
Jim Stone has been watching Dorian from its build-up (chosen words) from a low-force tropical storm.
He actually parses-out two layers: (1) the manipulation of the storm into weak-hurricane status and (2) the absolute, over-the-top MSM screaming that it is a Cat-5 super-storm (while it actually is a Cat-1 or Cat-2).
We all know here that (1) is happening, so (2) is more interesting. Stone speculates that the baddies are aiming at placing ‘precedents’ into the historical storm record, for “anthropological human warming” (AHW) propaganda purposes. In other words, a long-range plan to ‘create evidence’ of AHW, even when Mother Nature is not cooperating in providing such.
(Stone notes that there has even been a recent change in sampling of hurricane wind data. The traditional spot has been at sea level, which is spot-on [hah!] as that is the elevation of the sea-shores which are hardest hit. Now, they are sampling at multi-hundred feet up, to get the highest possible wind speeds for the record books. We are seeing cooking of the books, right in front of our eyes…)
The guy from Renaissance Horizon has a pretty funny attitude to it all. He lives there and is completely unmoved by media BS. This is his second vid. on the the (partial) subject since the warnings went out.
In truth by Grace goes over the wind speed discrepancies of the surrounding areas, that should show much higher readings.
I suspect it may not have been a cat 5 myself. Should have been more damage if it was.
(Interesting: My WiFi stopped working when I tried to Reply. I had to shut the whole computer down, pull the plug, and then restart it…)
More from Jim Stone:
“The hardest hit island was supposed to be Grand Bahama, which is where Dorian got parked during it’s peak winds. But there are significant problems with proving it, because the only pictures available are shoreline pics where the waves did the damage, damaged roof pics, and flooding pics from storm surge. There’s nothing that indicates winds got over 110 mph anywhere, and pictures that are supposed to be from the 220 mph wind zones often show no damage at all, only flooding. The situation is so bad that, to get ‘damage pics’, some MSM outlets are posting pictures of other weather disasters. The Bahamas were hit so little that there’s not even a large number of uprooted trees away from the shoreline; it looks like tropical storm damage, not hurricane damage, even on Grand Bahama.”
“Look through the photos of the Bahamas – there are a few areas with damaged trees but none with piles and piles of them down, and no forests got wiped out. The wind was so damn mild in a lot of places where it was supposed to be 200+ that even the tomato plants survived in good condition.”
“And as I predicted, there’s no damage at all of the sort; instead, damage indicates wind gusts up to 120 mph and NO MORE, with sustained winds below that. The YouTube videos have houses with shingles missing, no broken windows, with the houses totally intact. There is a flipped over car in one, but a 120 mph wind will do that. No Category 5 hit the Bahamas; the damage is Category 1, as I stated it would be.”
“If the storm is as stated, Cat 4+, there won’t be any leaves or branches left on any trees, . If there are no pictures of MILES AND MILES of completely destroyed trees where all that’s left is 10 feet of the trunk with no branches, it was not Cat4+.
If there are no pictures of entire cities without a single house standing – if it does not look like a giant trash pile the way hurricane Andrew did it – it was not Cat 4+.
What you’ll see with a Cat 1 :
Entire trees uprooted in mostly one piece, blocking roads. Strong hurricanes shred trees after tipping them over; there won’t be any green left at all. Knocked over trees (in abundance) begins at 70 MPH.
Houses standing but missing shingles and having a few broken windows. If that’s all there is, there was not a Cat 4.
Billboards shredded and destroyed, and gas stations knocked over. That’s Cat 1 stuff. Cat 4+ will rip the billboard frames out and won’t just wreck the print. Cat 4+ is not likely to leave a tipped over gas station roof where it is, it will instead be scattered for blocks in pieces.”
What if they gave a (war) Cat5 hurricane and nobody came?
How to make (friends) disasters and (influence) profit from people.
Everybody complains about the weather but nobody (but them) does anything about it.
What goes around, goes around.
We reap their whirlwinds.
The steering committee will not be televised.
The picture of Dorian greyed out?\
Angels don’t play this haarp, this badly.
global warming or wobal glorming?
Weird how it seemed to pop up out of Puerto Rico huh? Wonder what kind of radar equipment there is down there.
The Russians did it !!!!!!!!!!!!
I’m with you @Origen. This is the first time I think we might actually be observing competing factions in “who is zooming who” here. The storm starts from nowhere. It quickly accelerates beyond all reason and starts heading for (1) Little St. James Island and, it looks like to me, (2) Mar a Lago. Then (Mike Morales youtube) finds microwave pattern coming from Gulf across Florida, hitting storm on south side. The storm actually starts to go south for a silly minute. I missed a few zigs and zags but then it stalls completely “Dead Center” over the Chinese/Danish joint deep-sea port that almost certainly is a submarine base as well (Chinese? Danish? Collaborating? And Greenland has the only remaining large stock of necessary minerals that China doesn’t control and will be critical to cyber-growth in the future?). And I think there was actually a second such base also right under the “scrubbing tip” of this storm.
So my thesis is that the storm was heated and steered by the Deep State, but the Trump came back from G7 and learned of this attack. He sent Pence “out of the room” while he retreated to Camp David to “discuss how to deal with Dorian.” Then comes out with the “Dead Center” statement. Did “our side” shoot back and bring THEIR attack under OUR control? I think my theory is as good as any as clearly none of us will really know.
But if I am right, I am expecting that somehow, despite all the hype, that the storm will stay further out to sea and do less overall damage as it comes up the coast than is being forecast. They have already declared my area (Portsmouth, VA, in southeast VA) to be in a “local state of emergency.” And the storm is probably at LEAST a day and a half or two away. I’ll be watching to see where it goes from here.
Ramura , you mean that Freeport deep sea port is owned by Chinese-Danish company?
like button. Good points Ramura. Mike Morales caught a couple good shots of how they juiced it.
People within my own circle–family, friends, etc.–have noticed the odd behavior of this hurricane. Some know my opinions are speculative and arcane, and to those who have been brave enough to ask me my thoughts, I have said: “I agree. This weather pattern does not appear to have any known historical precedence with respect to the known atmospheric phenomenon for which we have data, and the stall of this hurricane makes us wonder whether the normal atmospheric patterns were frozen in place directly or indirectly. We need more data.”
With respect to my first impression, it appears this event was either “directly” engineered or was a natural event that was “tampered with”. As Dr. Farrell implies there is potentially more than one group of people at table with technologies who could actually do this. But I am not yet willing to jettison the idea that this one may have a third layer–an actor who “seized control of the operation” in order to draw attention to the operation, to bring the technologies responsible into public view and to send messages to those possessing the technologies who are responsible for the initial use of it. Perhaps it’s a replay of one of Dr. Farrell’s theory regarding the events in NYC on a late summer morning in 2001. This one may be a “gotcha” moment.
That’s an interesting idea OC. Been wondering along that line awhile on a number of different issues. If the globalonyists had the leverage and power that they’re supposed to have (and are as coordinated as they appear to be), then how is it they have so many problems getting done what they are clearly trying to get done? Why do we have the pleasure of hearing so much tripe about this op or that op? Is our knowledge of Epstein’s network and operation our knowledge just so Bibi an the Donald could take down Barak and Epstein and Clinton? What about war crimes of all sorts? Why let this stuff be published? We all are getting a clarified picture of how easily and completely censorship can and has been done. No matter how red pilled or blue pilled any of us are, we all seem black pilled enough to recognize that whatever either side is telling us about the other, that reality of what both sides have done is many times worse.
Should you desire a little humor in your life, you should try to discuss this with people who have no clue the technology actually exists and that it possibly may be currently in use for nefarious purposes and profit.
This storm has been consistently over rated by the media; which is obvious once you start tracking it via the Earth Wind map. The wind speeds reported in the news appear to have been taken at a height of 850 hPa rather than at the surface where the damage from the wind would actually occur. As far as I know, no one on the coast lives at 5000 feet above sea level.
I live near the coast of Georgia and have a need to know what to expect from it, as it concerns my families safety. Apparently I can not rely on my local news station to give me the correct information. I find this to be rather disconcerting and have to ask just why that may be.
ZeroHedge posted an article comparing it to the F5 tornado which hit Joplin in 2011 with wind speeds of 185+ with gusts of 220+ and a mile wide track on the ground. You can find pictures of the absolute devastation online. If Dorian was a cat 5 storm with reported wind speeds of 185+ stalled over the Bahamas for 12-16 hours, there would be nothing left standing and 30,000 to 80,000 dead as there would be nowhere left to hide from the storms fury. Everything would have been razed to the ground.
Just why is it we can’t even trust the weather reports in today’s world?
WD, Evelyn Rottenchild has a big stake in the weather business and has had for sometime.
There seems to be an interesting pattern of “failed investments” in the BVIs, USVIs, Caribbean in general and a similar pattern in “destruction by natural causes”.
I’m waiting for “mainstream” meteorologists etc. to explain how a hurricane can just “hover” over one place for days. If they can’t, well, they could always find a job supervising robots at WWalmart’s.
LOL. I was amazed that on Fox News, Sean Hannity engaged in a rather interesting line of questioning to a “professional weather service spokesperson” regarding how a hurricane can stall for this period of time over a region with these performance characteristics. From my point of view these questions were managed–but not answered.