GERMAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT STRIKES DOWN EU PATENT COURT

GERMAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT STRIKES DOWN EU PATENT COURT

Here's a one of those potentially big stories that does not make the lamestream controlled media radar, but it could be one of those stories that we're looking at that is more potential fallout from the ripple-effects on society of the corona virus madness. It was spotted by K.M., to whom a big thank you for bringing it to our attention:

BREAKING: German constitutional court upholds complaint against UPC Agreement and implementing act

The language of the court's decision is - for a legal decision - oddly not filled with the usual flannel-mouthed obfuscations, but cuts straight to the point:

This morning, the German constitutional court issued a 86-page decision in which it upholds the constitutional complaint against the German ratification of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court [decision here]. According to the Court, the German act by which it was to accede to the UPC Agreement, violates the German populace's democratic rights under Article 38 Basic Law, because it was not passed with the parliamentary majority required by Article 23 Basic Law.

Article 1 of the UPC Agreement provides that "A Unified Patent Court for the settlement of disputes relating to European patents and European patents with unitary effect is hereby established." According to the German constitutional court, this constitutes a transfer of adjudication authorities, which implicates the constitutional rights of the German populace.

Such a transfer of authority requires, by German law, a two-thirds majority in the Bundestag [the German federal parliament]. German constitutional law only recognises international obligations to the extent they are compatible with the national constitution [even in the context of the EU: see the infamous decisions Solange Iand Solange II]. This means that the recognition of international adjudicatory authority requires strict constitutional safeguards, which were not met in this case. Thus, the complainant's rights under Article 23 Basic Law were not observed.

Putting all that into plain English, the regulatory powers of the Unified Patent Court of the EU are, as far as the German constitution is concerned, unconstitutional. And that translates into a major blow against the European Union, whose open borders policies are a bit tattered in the wake of the corona virus story. One of the things I find odd and ironically refreshing, is that when one looks at the EU patent arrangements, they appear - at least to me - to be an updated version of the sort of patent regulation that Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy put into place as a (little known) component of the Rome-Berlin pact, and that was subsequently expanded in the thinking of wartime  Nazi jurist and lawyer Walther Hallstein, and then subsequently incorporated into the 1942 Reichsbank-I.G. Farben study sponsored by Nazi economics minister Walther Funk. That study, as I reviewed it in my book The Third Way, planned to create a European federation via regulatory authority bypassing national parliaments, and that authority included patents. Indeed, patents were a special and principal concern of these studies. It is therefore ironic that while the structure of the EU so closely resembles these wartime studies, that one primary concern of the study - patents - should be struck down as being in opposition to fundamental law of post-war Germany!

Time will tell, of course, whether this is a signal of the potential unraveling of the EU or not, but for the moment, this cannot be good news to the unelected regulators in Brussels, especially in the wake of Brexit.

Let me know what you think...

See you on the flip side...

29 thoughts on “GERMAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT STRIKES DOWN EU PATENT COURT”

  1. There is a phenomenon known as virus interference.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-019-0123-7

    Discussion
    Epidemiological data suggest that humans who receive influenza vaccinations in two or more consecutive seasons may be less well protected than those who receive vaccination in the current season only.

    Here, we demonstrate that a similar effect holds true using well-defined viral challenges in the ferret model, which is considered to be the most useful small-animal model for human influenza infection.

    Read the above in conjunction with this :

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31607599

    Examining virus interference by specific respiratory viruses showed mixed results. Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus

  2. Quite a brain twister of legalese. One can understand why there was such a drawn-out Brexit. As with any sovereign nation with guiding laws for commerce to safeguard, Commerce must have laws or you’re left with pillage and plunder of not only the little guy, but also the people of that nation. They need protection from outside threats as well as a means to act under law(s). For any would be takeover of those designing worldly types it’s the fly in the essential ointment at the spa. Likely, for all 27 of those member nations.

  3. Joseph, does this mean Germexit? Also what does this do to Bayerfarbensanto’s iron grip on all toxins forced into all peoples everywhere?

    BTW, has anyone noticed that while China and Italy have already passed legislation mandating covid1984 vaccine (once it comes out) in all humans, that the US is already working on the same legislation? And that Trump will most likely jump on that bandwagon too? Even as he’s selling chloroquine hard? Not that Bayer makes chlorquine too with a horrendous nasty list of effects they like to call side effects.

    1. Robert Barricklow

      ZDB
      Already they’re floating that mandatory vaccines will be somewhere in the near future; some countries are looking to do it ASAP.
      Jim Marrs would no doubt, not at all be surprised.

      1. This makes Bernard’s point about Q providing cover for the new all powerful emperor’s powers more pertinent.

        BTW, my read is that the mandatory vaccines will include chips to surveil and monitor compliance.

        1. Robert Barricklow

          Looks like a new meme is in the making…
          The devil is in the vaccines;
          the hell w/the details.

  4. anakephalaiosis

    Herd immunity, against panic-stricken chickens, has not been invented yet.

    Those, who use Borgia methods, try to avoid public eye, while posing as papacy.

    Those, who invent “isms”, like to think they are in control of the mob, with fake news.

    Grim Reaper has patent on the noose knot.

    1. Fear of death, use of our survival instinct (some refer to the reptilian part of our brain) and the unknown has been used on humans throughout our existence to control and exploit us. What is so unusual about now or our past?

      1. anakephalaiosis

        Jesuit training produces Roman soldiers, to serve Satanic papal empire.

        Animal instincts always come out, regardless of Stockholm syndrome.

        Purpose of culture is to cultivate instincts, not suppress them.

        A calm surface can reflect an image, in cool clear water:
        https://youtu.be/ZccIm5SDxJU

  5. Not related, but just too good to not post:

    http://82.221.129.208/.vp5.html
    “A Warning to Trump and the Rest of ‘Them’ screaming ‘China Virus’.

    I’d like to make something perfectly clear here: The Chinese know this virus came from the United States. THEY KNOW. They have indelible proof.

    So when those in American politics and media and morons … keep screaming ‘China Virus’, it is an insult so grave they deserve retaliation: It is the equivalent of a Klingon calling the Enterprise a “garbage scow”. Wake Up, People. We don’t need this. How the hell do you expect them to react in the future over this? How do you expect the world to react?”

    1. More to the point is how do the bureaucrats Trump/Clinton/Q et al expect the world to react? And who are they going to take it out on?

    2. G, just the considering the possibilities Stone brings up makes life better. The first time I clicked on that link, I got a page that kept expanding into his past posts. Now it only goes back to the vaping as cover for Ft Detrick leaks article. How do we read further back on Jim Stone?

      1. Ah. never mind. didn’t realize he keeps a page within a page to page down with. Boggled. Now somewhat less boggled.

  6. Great disclosure. Totally agree with comments also. I’ve been wondering who owns the Patents on the two versions of the Corona virus now attacking us?

  7. Robert Barricklow

    Now there’s a virus I can endorse; one that unravels unaccountable regulators and/or one also unravelling a huge Byzantium bureaucracy; geared to taking from the citizens[euphemism for political prisoners], to give to the few[privately run criminal syndicates].

    1. Robert Barricklow

      I’m not one who favors these patents that approach infinity[in terms of time]; w/mickey mouse golden handcuffs[euphemism for guillotining creativity & culture, aka patents on “freedom”, ect., etc.[Yul Brynner/The King & I]

    1. I refuse to get the annual flu shot for that very reason; seems every year I’ve gotten the flu shot, I get moderately ill with a flu-like illness. Every time. So I’d like to see those numbers too.
      A little off topic but perhaps you would like to see the CDC admit they make up the annual flu stats: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html

    2. multiply these effects by bad and insufficient nutrition in a population living under seige – locked down in place with limited access to food, water, work, wealth,…………… all resources.

  8. My German housemate told me two weeks ago that current patent law in Germany allows for a suspension of “patent rights” when it comes to medications and vaccinations during a pandemic or declared national emergency.

    South Africa had similar laws and used them to start manufacturing their own HIV drugs a few years ago when Big Pharma prices were so high they were effectively unobtainable.

    She told me that in Germany this did NOT currently apply to medical equipment or other patents but that could be changed by vote in certain circumstances.

    She told me this in the wake of the reports that Trump tried to either buy a German company or their entire vaccine output for US use only.

    She said the German Government could just declare the whole deal null and void under those laws and take over the productions of the vaccines or medication.

    I have no other information or sources on this –
    Melodi

  9. From their point of view the German Court is absolutely right. Anyway, over here in what some call the Old World, more perspicacious people have realized that the Franco-German BILATERAL treaty of Aix-La-Chapelle was the opening round in dismantling the Holy Brussels Empire.

    1. The Brussels ‘gang’ has been doing a slow-creep takeover of Europe for decades. It is good to finally see some pushback…

      1. goshawks your comment : The Brussels ‘gang’ has been doing a slow-creep takeover of Europe for decades. It is good to finally see some pushback…

        I couldn’t agree more.

      1. Europe never learns from the mistakes of the Holy Roman Empire yes Dana the Holy Brussels Empire-Third Reich resurrected. It’s back to the future they should have done a deep study of how the Romans managed their empire before creating the European Union.

Comments are closed.