DREADFUL DREADDS?

DREADFUL DREADDS?

Yesterday I blogged about the story of the Soviet irradiation of the American embassy in Moscow from the 1950's  to the 1970's, drawing some disturbing connections not only to the ability of low intensity microwave radiation to manipulate the mind and cause disease, but also the converse, to inculcate health is diseased tissue. Furthermore, I explored a speculation I have entertained often during the Fauci-Baal Gates-Wuhan planscamdemic narrative, that being we might be witnessing the "beta-test" of a bio-electrically activated phenomenon, i.e., of a virus activated only by or in an electro-magnetic template of some sort. In the past, I've connected this idea to the arrest of Harvard chemistry professor Dr. Charles Lieber for allegedly not disclosing to federal authorities his financial relationship to the Chinese virology laboratory in Wuhan, site of the original covid outbreak. Lieber's specialty was nanotechnology. Additionally I have also connected that speculation to Baal Gates' stated goal of a vaccine that would also contain a tracking system, and which would automatically "update" itself with "downloads" much like the annoying "business model" of Microsoft windows updates.

And as I indicated yesterday, there's more to my speculations, this time provided by a gem of a find spotted by a regular reader here, P.T., and passed along. This one is worthy of your very close attention:

DREADDs: The Power of the Lock, the Weakness of the Key. Favoring the Pursuit of Specific Conditions Rather than Specific Ligands

As the article notes, DREADDS stands for "designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs," that is, specifically designed or modified cellular receptors - genetically modified cells - to make them active in the presence of drugs designed to activate them.

While the article is intensively technical, it is worth noting that the focus of this research is concerned with breaching the blood-brain barrier, and that in the process, behavioral modifications have been noticed. And it's a short step from noticing to manipulating:

Third, and the most critical point, conventional pharmacological controls must be used. The same philosophy as in pharmacology should be applied, and, as for neurobiological experiments, groups of transgenic animals without expressing DREADDs (e.g., DREADDs empty viral vectors) must be integrated to verify the selective effects of the ligand and chosen dose (Smith et al., 2016, Campbell and Marchant, 2018; Mahler and Aston-Jones, 2018; for an example of experimental studies following this design, see also Xia et al., 2017; Cope et al., 2019). This statement may appear trivial, but the pursuit of an absolute selective ligand and the attractiveness of this approach have already led to some overconfident behavioral studies, sometimes conducted in the complete absence of this control.

In conclusion, DREADDs provide a precise way of manipulating neural circuits and behavior, and afford a great alternative to optogenetics to tonically manipulate a specific cellular subpopulation, thus opening exciting new avenues of research.

So, let's incorporate what we have here, with what I blogged about yesterday, and the whole idea of an electromagnetically-activated virus or disease. And yes, this is once again some really high octane speculation. We have already heard reports, for example, of nuerological effects associated with covid-19, not only with the virus itself but, in the UK, with "vaccines" being tested there. I've suggested that Dr. Charles Lieber, the Harvard chemistry professor arrested by the federal government for allegedly not disclosing his financial ties to the Chinese virology laboratory in Wuhan, whose expertise in nanotechnology could conceivably be a factor in rendering any pathogen more efficient, could also be a vehicle for rendering any counter-agent more efficient, especially in terms of vectors of delivery. Similarly, I've suggested that particulate metals would render any electromagnetic component of either a pathogen or a counter-agent more efficient.

Now, we can add a third component: DREADDS, a pharmacological-genetic component, plus designer drugs designed to activate them. Mix and stir some microwave interferometry in the form of 5G towers, and voila, one can create all sorts biologically targeted mischief...

See you on the flip side...

 

26 thoughts on “DREADFUL DREADDS?”

  1. That’s it in a nut shell. They don’t want us… they want our bodies for some reason, the highly crafted avatars that they are, annoyingly come with an operating system already installed…

  2. Well he is Baal Gates, Judges 2:13-14, Ashtaroth pick your favorite spelling is a sex party goddess, think “True Blood” when the Maynad had them going buck wild in the courtyard. Remember how Halloween III didn’t have anything to do with Michael Meyers, rather a mask activates and viola–:snakes outside ya head, snakes outside ya head. I have Gehlen’s radioactive Soviet Water from way back in the day: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp82-00047r000200620007-2

  3. DREADDS says it all if you’re not afraid of what our elites are doing you are already doomed. These mad scientists or more correctly stupid arrogant fools have finally jump over the cliff.

  4. For me, this column brings up a SF series by David Brin, The Uplift Universe. In this universe of eons-long sentience, there has been a ‘consensus’ by several senior species that it is good to ‘uplift’ pre-sentient species into consciousness. Both to ‘replace the stock’ of species which die out and for less-noble political/industrial purposes. There is an agree-upon ‘price’ among the senior species that the uplifted species must serve the uplifter species for a time. The catch in the above is that there are benevolent, benign uplifter species and there are real SOB uplifter species (think evolved Harkonnens).

    Where the above segues into this column is from the uplift point-of-view. We already have evidence of the Anunnaki/Watcher meddling-with (uplift?) of humanity. Michael Tellinger has unearthed further evidence in southern Africa that there may have been an almost-cattle-ized version of humanity used for gold hunting/digging. And all those mysterious ‘plagues’ down through the millennia. DNA-insertion through viruses?

    And now, we have ‘vaccines’ which are designed to introduce foreign DNA (worm DNA, in one case) into our very genome. Stuff that will proceed down the generations. Plus, we have every possible ‘social pressure’ from Above for the population to take those vaccines.

    Putting the above together and shaking, has humanity been getting uplifted under a less-than-noble senior species? That would explain a lot of things.

    There is also the little ‘tidbit’ that the uplifted species is only expected to serve for a finite amount of time. After that, we ‘graduate’ into a free, unmessed-with species. Is humanity approaching that time, with our ‘Harkonnen’ senior species not-at-all happy with relinquishing their hold? And are other benevolent, benign uplifter senior species going “Ahem…”? That would explain other things…

    1. Considering that consciousness is continuous, “we” are “they” ( it goes both ways obviously).
      Such vision can lead to unity.
      There are of course other possible paths, leading to dissociation. They’re however short lived experiments, thus powerful during their expression.
      AFAIK, dissociation never succeeded in a sustainable way.
      But any species and being has the freedom to choose, and the consequences are part of its learning process.
      Hopefully we’ll go through this as smoothly as possible :))

    2. Anyone remember Babylon 5, the Shadows and Vorlons vying with each other to shepherd humanity? I’ve often thought that might be a decent metaphor for human history.

      (That and a double episode from Star Trek: The Next Generation where a not-strictly-corporeal species, which can pop in and out of our field of vision, uses the life force and fear of dying humans as food. The latter has always struck me as metaphor for TPTB.)

      1. I had the strangest ‘gut reaction’ to the Babylon 5 Shadows and Vorlons, when I first saw the series as it was produced. Part of me was jumping up and down and saying, “Look here! Look here!” Very strange…

        On the other hand, I may have been influenced by what I consider the best SF book series to date, the famous Lensman Series by E.E. “Doc” Smith. Some have noted that Babylon 5 may have ‘lifted’ some concepts from Lensman. In that book series, there are two diametrically-opposed elder species of great abilities (Arisians and Eddorians) who are influencing or enslaving more-junior species in our galaxy. The Arisians are building-up the psychic capabilities of various species (including humans) in order to combat the really-psychic Eddorians. The Eddorians, on the other hand, are into Power and just want submissive species. Sound familiar?

        The other interesting thing is the ‘reception’ of these two series. Despite being one of the most famous SF book series, Lensman has never been made into a serious movie (small attempts here and there). Babylon 5 made it onto TV, but was kept from syndication (unlike Star Trek) for a couple of decades. One could almost think that the subject matter was too close to home…

  5. Connoisseurs of fiction and fiction writing, especially, the Isaac Asimov variety and likeminded, have had a tendency to mutate as much if not more than wild strains of bacteria and viruses. Almost as if they feed and challenge each other to propagate and prosper. Even of the IDIC type (Infinite Diversity / Infinite Combinations) from Star Trek’s Vulcan. Fortunately, such activities and imaginings go back much further, at least, that’s what remnants of the Ancients highly suggest. It would seem that humankind is also what they eat, maybe ingests is the term for recent times as it would also include drinks, eats, breathes, and absorbs. The good, the bad, and the accidental or perhaps tricked into morsel that havoc did wrought into the present, especially, the additives that are slipped into the next prepared drink, grain, or protein. It’s quite possible that some of humankind are still not listening to that which Is or their body’s disagreement with what it was just exposed.

    Corporeal lifeforms seem part of the greater electromagnetic spectrum (as science suggests it is) as well as interacts with it and its many combinations as distinguished from its apparent diversities. Makes one wonder how often an equilibrium is reached but not recognized. It seems that adversity is more the norm that makes front pages and is incorporated into volumes of print. Fortunately, that which is, is more than the sum of its parts and seems to diverge from the babel that seems confused or distorted.

    It would seem that it’s fair to assert that Nature has its own mix and match taking place, too, right down to the sub-atomic as it is theorized. Not just the goings on in some for-profit laboratory setting. Heck, one is guilty of some experimental mixology onto thine own self. Albeit, risky but so is existentialism and ontology by any other name. At least with choice there’s only one to blame. Best to be well and accurately informed prior to that decision point. There lies the treachery that can wreak havoc in as many words. Who’s manipulating who is one question that needs vetting these days along with learning a new language of jargon.

    You know, those ears on that mouse are exceptionally long as if the mouse’s hearing ability spans well into the ultra / subsonic regions of the sound spectrum. Add some mammalian wings and it would probably resemble a fruit bat called “Queenie” by Willard, only in white.

    1. “Who’s manipulating who“ seems to me rather a state of mind.
      Entering the manipulation game might be a never ending story and battle, drove by feedback loops and self fulfilling prophecies.
      However, as a matter of fact, we’re in, I agree.
      Therefore the question could be: how do we get out? :))
      (actually “why would we get out” seems to be a better question, as it provides room for inspiration and beautiful thoughts).

    1. BTW, Amnesty International had direct connections in organizing protests and riots across Kudankulam in 2010, Russians had involvement in building reactors there, those were VVER-1000 reactors. Here is your Russian connection.

      Then PM Manmohan Singh secretly allowed Intelligence Bureau & R&AW to launch OPs against Amnesty, and they successfully destroyed Amnesty International. Obviously, these pieces of evidence collected by IB were illegal, and not admissible in court.

      But there is also a church angle into it. but that might be too much off topic.

      1. Nice to see you back Arpit. BTW, if you put more than two links in a comment the mod will doink you. That’s why I insert line returns into some of my links.

        Your comment gets me thinking Harry Potter. Miles Mathis wrote well on how we were hoaxed there. http://milesw
        mathis.com/potter.pdf

        Ironic that Rowling was credited with the whole of that literature and that she wrote much of it while in some lower level job at Amnesty Int recording torture survivors. More ironic that these are humongous ops overlapping and intersecting over and over and we are supposed to never notice.

        1. if one has read Scotsman historian John Hamer’s explosive book “The Falsification of History” J.K.Rowling has not written one sentence of “Harry Potter”; she is a Scientologist, a member of the Fabian Society (the logo is a wolf emerging out of sheep’s clothing) and her “literature” is being written by 6 ghostwriters- read the book-

          Larry in Germany

          1. Ordered. Thank you. Might want to consider neilsanders
            mindcontrol.com

            Be ready for some comprehensively nasty ad plausible well research ideas.
            milesw
            mathis.com
            is a bit more pleasant once one gets past the geneologies.

  6. To entertain the idea that these people fully understand what they are about is ludicrous. They are children playing with fire; they will burn the house down eventually. According to myth and legend, it has happened before in the distant past.
    Technological achievement with no consideration for the spiritual will eventually yield something monstrous. The parasitic elite have drank too deeply from their own Kool Aid.

  7. Ah. So the much touted singularity to which man becomes married to technology is now linked to the new Babel moment in human history. Its funny, but we’ve seen this script before. It didn’t end well. If SPMOTU couldn’t make it work then, I doubt seriously they can perfect it now. They will only make the problem worse. (Which may be their intent all along.) Why can they never achieve what they seek? goshawks knows the reason. They are approaching the problem from the wrong spiritual plateau. If they were higher spiritual beings, they would not be approaching the problem at all. The sin is in seeking the position–not landing in it through good deeds. The Church Fathers teach of Chrismation for good reasons.

  8. On a related note, the referenced article on DREADDs says they “afford a great alternative to optogenetics” and also calls them a “complementary approach to optogenetics.” The Wikipedia article on optogenetics raises some potentially interesting implications regarding recent events (emphases added):

    “Optogenetics is a neuromodulation method that uses a combination of techniques from optics and genetics to control the activities of individual neurons in living tissue—even within freely-moving animals.”

    “There is a challenge in introducing the microbial opsin, an optogenetic actuator, into a specific region of the organism in question. A rudimentary approach is to introduce an engineered viral vector that contains the optogenetic actuator gene.”

    “Optogenetics also necessarily includes the development of genetic targeting strategies such as cell-specific promoters or other customized conditionally-active viruses, to deliver the light-sensitive probes to specific populations of neurons in the brain of living animals.”

    Activating the affected neurons involves applying light to them. Seems a small step from light waves and 5G waves.

    1. *to 5G waves
      (The idea being: If neurons can be made sensitive to light waves, is it a big leap to think they could be made sensitive to waves from other parts of the electromagnetic spectrum?)

Comments are closed.