OF PFIZER AND JFK….
Sometimes one is just simply left breathless with brazenness of the "narrative" we've all been living under. In this respect, consider the FDA's recent request for 55 years to fully release the data on Pfizer's "vaccine". This article was shared by someone wishing to remain completely anonymous, but you have to read it to believe it - and, of course, to catch your breath:
The article begins with a question in the form of a subtitle to the article itself:
The fed gov’t shields Pfizer from liability. Gives it billions of dollars. Makes Americans take its product. But won’t let you see the data supporting its safety/efficacy. Who does the gov't work for?
The answer is plain enough: it isn't you or me. The "request" makes a mockery of claims to "transparency":
The FDA has asked a federal judge to make the public wait until the year 2076 to disclose all of the data and information it relied upon to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. That is not a typo. It wants 55 years to produce this information to the public.
As explained in a prior article, the FDA repeatedly promised “full transparency” with regard to Covid-19 vaccines, including reaffirming “the FDA’s commitment to transparency” when licensing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
With that promise in mind, in August and immediately following approval of the vaccine, more than 30 academics, professors, and scientists from this country’s most prestigious universities requested the data and information submitted to the FDA by Pfizer to license its COVID-19 vaccine.
The FDA’s response? It produced nothing. So, in September, my firm filed a lawsuit against the FDA on behalf of this group to demand this information. To date, almost three months after it licensed Pfizer’s vaccine, the FDA still has not released a single page. Not one.
Instead, two days ago, the FDA asked a federal judge to give it until 2076 to fully produce this information. The FDA asked the judge to let it produce the 329,000+ pages of documents Pfizer provided to the FDA to license its vaccine at the rate of 500 pages per month, which means its production would not be completed earlier than 2076. The FDA’s promise of transparency is, to put it mildly, a pile of illusions.
My only quibble here is that the last statement is a bit too euphemistic for my liking. I'd prefer to say that the FDA's promise of transparency is, to put it mildly, a big steaming pile of male bovine puckey. But there's more:
Taking the FDA at its word, it conducted an intense, robust, thorough, and complete review and analysis of those documents in order to assure that the Pfizer vaccine was safe and effective for licensure. While it can conduct that intense review of Pfizer’s documents in 108 days, it now asks for over 20,000 days to make these documents available to the public.
So, let’s get this straight. The federal government shields Pfizer from liability. Gives it billions of dollars. Makes Americans take its product. But won’t let you see the data supporting its product’s safety and efficacy. Who does the government work for?
Now, if the supposed documents release of Kennedy assassination documents be any guide, they're still covering that up, so what will our children and grandchildren get to see long after we're gone (and assuming of course, that our children and grandchildren will not be victims down the line of "unforeseen" consequences to these potions, and assuming of course that there still is a functioning US government to release any documents, a proposition which looks to be increasingly dubious)? If the JFK documents release is any guide, they'll get to see next to nothing. Of course, there will be plenty of excuses, a few heavily-redacted "releases", accompanied by invocations of "national security" and all the other typical bobbing and weaving, but in essence we will continue to see nothing.
If there's nothing wrong, then why hide it?
Of course, in 2076, they could release those JFK documents. They'd be a nice distraction to preoccupy everyone and keep them from noticing that the Pfizer documents haven't been released.
See you on the flip side...
1 Comment
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
Asked whether she supported the Greek government in imposing a €100 (£85) monthly fine on those aged 60 and over who failed to get a Covid jab, Von der Leyen argued that the spread of the disease and lack of vaccine take-up in parts of the EU meant mandatory vaccination had to be on the table as a policy response. Von der Leyen echoes previous remarks made by the WHO.
24 Nov 2021. The World Health Organization has suggested countries should look at introducing mandatory vaccines saying “it’s a healthy debate to have”.
Robb Butler, Executive Director for WHO Europe said that it was a “very delicate” topic but that conversations needed to be had. “There are lessons of history here where mandates have come at the expense of trust and social inclusion so it’s very delicate,” Mr Butler told Sky News.
“We think it’s time to have that conversation both from an individual and a population-based perspective.”
He’s right about one thing…. lessons from history. Lest We Forget.
After the announcement that Austrian vaccines will be compulsory after February 2022, Medical Ethicist Harald Schmidt said – ‘that the decision is ethical as any choices on vaccines are individual choices, but individual choices with a social consequences’. There are safe and effective means to protect others we should take them. It’s not as if this is the first time we are talking about mandates, the principle is the same’ He talks about the vaccines school children have before entering school. https://www.dw.com/en/austria-announces-general-vaccine-mandate/av-59886153
HOWEVER, these are experimental vaccines on trial, with no long term data, and emerging data of severe adverse reactions, a fact that is being ignored in discussions on mandating.
We as a company simply cannot take the risk if in … four years the vaccine is showing side effects,” Ruud Dobber, a member of Astrazeneca’s senior executive team, told the MSM in July 2020. All manufacturers have been absolved of public liability.
19 Dec 2020
Harald Schmidt the gentleman in the video above, – an expert in ethics and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania, said that it is reasonable to put essential workers ahead of older adults, given their risks, and that they are disproportionately minorities.
“Older populations are whiter, ” Dr. Schmidt said. “Society is structured in a way that enables them to live longer. Instead of giving additional health benefits to those who already had more of them, we can start to level the playing field a bit.”….
Anyone who has studied history may find similarities in Schmidt’s comments above with another famous period in history.
And that’s how they plan to sell the mandate of these experimental unlicensed procedures, while manufacturers have been given absolution of public liability, and while trials still continue.
We need to fight this mandate, it will lead to others. We are witnessing the rise of the fourth r31ch.
First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me.
If there’s anyone who might understand the tactic of delay within legalisms and legal protocols it would be other attorneys, especially, a non-affiliated team of lawyers not subject to costly legal ploys that deliberately extend conditions of rulings. Proprietary rights of the owners of an operation or production seems apparent, especially, with intellectual property rights infringements considered.
With many of the special developments that have been taking place with these items associated health and wellness as well as treatment modalities there’s a lot of [behind the scenes] work and procedure that goes into an end product like a vaccine, for instance. They’re rarely, if at all, isolated events and laboratory procedures but a compilation of many steps throughout the process. A lot of smaller operatives and people involved at each definable step.
Curiosity is an important characteristic of the psyche, but it also comes with a liability of exposure to thievery that wreaks havoc on intellectual property rights and lawful procedures. The less defined the more problematic where language gets involved in how rulings hold up in courts. It seems as if undiscovered territory where law and property rights are concerned. Something a totalitarian regime doesn’t bother with – they just take – and the rest pay, often with their lives. In any case, there isn’t much in the form of facts to be known just yet about this seemingly awkward tactical delay of legalisms. It’d be nice to have an encyclopædic recall of many a legal reference about now.
In my experience, lawyers in courtrooms, are a trembling fear, behind a smirky grin.
That is the reason, why I indiscriminately push their freemasonic apron down their throat.
There is no shape, that a bent worm can’t wriggle itself into, by legal technicalities.
As a remedy, the Runes – besides being the plan of man – are also the first law structure of precedence, in natural state.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/pnz9jpb73u1gfla/druidry-for-dummies.pdf
Precedence is the favorite legal term. It always comes down to that, in case law.
To move precedence back, to the foggy origin of the first law, is the legal nightmare.
No apron lawyer can stand up to the Runes, without being beaten to the ground, by logic.
That is John 1:1.
If anyone wants a reason not to be vax this article is a good reason to avoid this manmade plague. They must be really desperate to offer up children to Moloch is there a deadline they must meet is Dr. Fauci really Shoul Tucker.
Looks like all the countries with Royalty are experiencing the worst tyranny. An Austrian royal is actually in charge of Austria. I suspect the royal families have a lot more power than most people realize. I don’t believe in coincidences.
European royals are Malthusians who’ve never cared much about human life unless that life was born into the nobility. Just look at Charles “Climate Change” of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, or Philip “I Want to Be Reincarnated As a Deadly Virus to Combat Overpopulation” Mountbatten. This is in perfect accord with the philosophy of the antihuman Davos wannabe nobility and their schemes for the planet. Coincidence? I don’t think so.
Sure. They are Assyrian Moloch. That is why, the wolves locate their teeth marks, around their throats.
In Scythian asymmetrical warfare, women and children are easy targets, because they don’t run so fast.
Limitless consciousness can go anywhere, because there are no limits, when honor is off the table.
Scythian martial art is – historically – Isaacs unbound, as the four horsemen, the battle-ax of Yahweh:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/7zqjhdvk7d21yl0/scythian-for-dummies.jpg
Just see the governments as a layer introduced between those royals with all the power and the population. It is an illusion of choice and power for the people. Just think to whom those puppets in the governments swear their oath and whom pays their salaries. these actors are their to function as a valve for letting steam off from the population. Its worldwide the same with those few exceptions.
it’s over for this wicked system.
Maybe we should be asking about what we can do now that we understand what we are dealing with.
Yes.
Go local.
Extract yourself from the system.
Where your attention goes, energy flows.
[Press releases are Fairy Tales come true? Or, wannabe true?]
And, even the 55 years is a lie; they won’t release it …
until the JFK files are released. And, even those files will probably be lies.
In conclusion, the USSA leadership is not only, not agreement capable;
they’re not even capable of telling one truth, just like Fraudi Fauci.
“It” is not even a government.
“It’s” one of many criminal syndicate’s media outlets, pretending to be a legitimate government. I defy one to find a real government; one that represents the will of her people – and that’s despite the 24/7 continuous media blitzkrieg of lie after lie after damn lies. the people are supposed to swallow.
The only thing “transparent” about these so-called governments; are their illegality, their absolute pretense.
Trying to decipher whose in charge, is like watching new reality shows of ongoing governmental coups. And, as is often the case; the results are numerous ruling factions claiming to be the legitimate government
[just not on the 24/7 controlled globalized criminal media outlets].
And, that’s just the way the media controlled New World Order likes it:
Propaganda Galore – Worldwide!
The FDA, is just another captured inst1tution; just like the Federal government. It’s, again; boils down to just a matter of whose on first
[the latest coup “winner”].
So, the FDA is a subsidiary of USSA Big Pharma.
The 329,000 pages are for the numerous quackcines in the pipeline; followed by the numerous narrative “variants”; narratives substituting for the very real numerous quackcine fatalities, and/or life-threatening quackcine side-effects.
With all the above incorporated into one’s perspective frame;
the worldwide ongoing lies are deadly humorous – a gallows’ humor, if you will – 24/7/365.
At any rate, when the Pfizer & JFK documents are finally released; they both will suspiciously have, the same first phrase:
“Once upon a time… “
Used the wrong button first, so no comment to be reported from my side.
Then the first step we should take is stop voting. By means of your vote you do give legitimacy to th corrupt system as you described it. When the whole population refrains from voting then there will be no means to install such a corrupt institution.
Right now, the WHO is dictating your child’s healthcare decisions and mandating mass genocide of children. In 2014 the UN published “Considerations regarding concent in vaccinating children and adolescents between 6 and 17 years old”. (my note: is this one of those situations where the intentional misspelling of “concent” is signaling true intent???)
Article 3 says that attendance in school implies informed consent for vaccination. This new policy mandates that children who attend school have waived for themselves and their parents their informed consent rights as it relates to the vaccinations. By treaty obligation “All signatories to the 2005 International Health Regulation will have to implement this mandate.”
https://www.who.int/immunization/programmes_systems/policies_strategies/consent_note_en.pdf
3. An implied consent process by which parents are informed of imminent vaccination through social mobilization and communication, sometimes including letters directly addressed to the parents. Subsequently, THE PHYSICAL PRESENCE OF THE CHILD OR ADOLESCENT, WITH OR WITHOUT AN ACCOMPANYING PARENT AT THE VACCINATION SESSION, IS CONSIDERED TO IMPLY CONSENT (my emphasis). This practice is based on the opt-out principle and parents who do not consent to vaccination are expected implicitly to take steps to ensure that their child or adolescent does not participate in the vaccination session. THIS MAY INCLUDE NOT LETTING THE CHILD OR ADOLESCENT ATTEND SCHOOL ON A VACCINATION DAY, IF VACCINE DELIVERY OCCURS THROUGH SCHOOLS (my emphasis). Implied consent procedures are common practice in many countries. However, when children present for vaccination unaccompanied by their parents, it is challenging to determine whether parents indeed provided consent. Therefore, countries are encouraged to adopt procedures that ensure that parents have been informed and agreed to the vaccination. Comprehensive data on whether the approach countries use to deal with consent has changed or evolved over the last decades is not available.”
Also on p.4:
“When mandatory vaccination is established in relevant provisions in law, CONSENT MAY NOT BE REQUIRED (my emphasis).
P. 7:
“Where parental consent is required, health workers should allow older children and adolescents to provide assent to the vaccination.”
BTW – definition of consent vs assent:
CONSENT
Consent is the principle wherein individuals must give their permission before receiving a medical intervention or procedure. According to the laws and regulations in place in most countries, consent is required for a range of medical interventions or procedures, from a simple blood test to organ donation, and including vaccinations. In only very few, well-described circumstances, such as life-threatening emergencies, may consent be waived. Consent derives from the principle of autonomy and forms an important part of medical and public-health ethics, as well as international law.2 For consent to be valid, it must be informed, understood and voluntary, and the person consenting must have the capacity to make the decision.
ASSENT
Assent refers to the process of children’s and adolescents’ participation in the decision-making on vaccination (or other medical interventions). Assent is not regulated in law like consent, and is sometimes referred to as a moral obligation closely linked to good practice in dealing with patients. International law provides strong support for children’s rights to participate in decisions about their health and health care, and also in the planning and provision of health services relevant to them and based on their evolving capacity.
sorry, I pushed the wrong button by mistake as well..
i wanted to simply replay that obviously, by sending your child to a public school, you are consenting to a lot of things.
Which would be one explanation for why so many people are choosing private schools or homeschooling for their kids these days.
Here is the FDA regulation which describes which information is releasable and which is withheld from public disclosure. see e and f. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=601.51 ( CFR Sec. 601.51 Confidentiality of data and information in applications for biologics licenses)
So the vaccine companies have the right to assert that information under (f) can not be released. here is the process for determining if the corporate submitted data qualifies under f: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2010-title21-vol1/pdf/CFR-2010-title21-vol1-sec20-61.pdf
When asking my ‘pro-vaccine’ friends about this issue not a single person agreed that the government should mandate the ingestion of a substance that has secret ingredients or non-disclosed test data.
A law that prohibits any mandate for a medical product or procedure without full public disclosure of all ingredients, production processes, and test data is needed.
This issue is just one part of the bigger issue: the privatization of knowledge.
I still think that consent is a big part of this somehow.
I believe Dr. Farrell is correct when he says that this is a spiritual war that has been ongoing for a long time. I’m not sure how it all fits in, but I believe that “they” require consent for these types of sacrifices. I do believe that these “jabs” may indeed be, at least in part, part of ritual sacrifice. In most of these practices, at least from what I’ve read, the participants (both those being sacrificed and those organizing and partaking in the ritual) have to do so willingly.
For this reason, I believe that they are doing everything they can to keep the volunteers lining up for their ritual and keeping the narrative in check.
I’m sure that they are stacking functions here, and running all sorts tests, trials, and of course making money simultaneously.
Tragic that this info. couldn’t make world headlines.Guess Mass Hypnosis has gotten hold of most.
My 9 year old told me this morning that two kids in his class have already received their second jab. 3rd graders! My wife was making plans with one of her long time (though not like minded) friends, she couldn’t do lunch because her twin girls (7 or 8 years old) had an appointment for their second shot. It is SO hard for me to not call these parents out to their faces, but I resist the urge. Should it ever come out that these so called vaccines they’re giving their children do indeed have dire consequences, they will have enough guilt to bare.
Indeed!
The year is 2076 … most of us reading this post in 2021 have gone to a better place … our remaining children and grandchildren ask “Who’s JFK?”
That was my thought too. By 2076 the globalists will have had plenty of time to scrub history of anything inconvenient. In the New History, Chairman FDR miraculously ruled for 100 years, starting from the Founding of this country on December 23, 1913.
I guess the “transparency” we have here is the revealing of just how crooked & untrustworthy our gov’t mechanisms have become!! They have gotten away with fooling The Public for SO many years….how to bring it all to a halt???
We of the older generation were trained to Trust The Authorities….now that attitude has gotten us into some Deep DooDoo!!
To bring it to a halt, It ALL has to come crashing down.
Good point Roxie. When I hear someone from government speak on about any issue, I ignore it and many times take the opposite view. Living in a red state….. about the same but a little milder approach.
FRESH CANTARELLA
Cantarella, fresh out of factory gate,
produced in Vatican state,
has short shelf life
of fifty five,
before expiration date.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/ccsirsai003ocg3/featherless-chicken.jpg