A RIDDLE SOLVED? A HYPOTHESIS IMPLIED BY KELLOGG’S PHASING OUT ...
If you've been following the GMO story as we have here at Giza, you'll be interested in this story shared by S.D. In a nutshell, cereals producer Kellogg's will begin to phase out all grains from its cereals that incorporate glyphosate getting rid of these GMOs in its cereal products by 2024:
As the article notes, this is a direct blow in particular to Mon(ster)santo's version of GMO grains, designed as they are to operate in conjunction with that company's Round-up pesticide, which incorporates glyphosate:
Kellogg’s has pledged to stop using wheat and oat products that contain glyphosate by the year 2025 in a move that it says is a part of an ongoing commitment to reducing pesticide use and “sustainable agriculture.” The company, which is behind popular cereals such as Raisin Bran, Froot Loops and Frosted Flakes, garnered widespread applause for the move.
Glyphosate is the active ingredient in the country’s most popular herbicide, Bayer-Monsanto’s roundup. It is often used by farmers to control unwanted plants and dry out crops to facilitate harvesting.
The company claims that the chemical’s use is already somewhat limited in the production of its food, being reserved for occasions when crops need to be harvested quickly due to weather challenges. However, the company said they are aware that some consumers have concerns about its use.
In a statement, Kellogg’s said: “Although this practice is not widespread in our wheat and oat supply chains, we are working with our suppliers to phase out using glyphosate as a pre-harvest drying agent in our wheat and oat supply chain in our major markets, including the US, by the end of 2025.”
The company is working with farmers on phasing out the use of glyphosate for drying out crops in countries including the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, France, Australia and Mexico.
The World Health Organization has called the chemical a probable carcinogen to humans, while California lists it as a chemical that is known to the state to cause cancer.
This is, of course, good news.
Except... I wonder about the utility of citing any statement by the World Health Organization during the planscamdemic, when its role in promoting what may turn out to be an even deadlier wave of "science gone wrong" get your jab it's absolutely safe narrative than glyphosate and Mon(ster)santo's Round-up ever dreamed of being.
And, I wonder even more if the move was really due to concern for "sustainable agriculture", or if it was really due to fears of being held liable in courts of law for damages accruing from the use of glyphosate products? After all, Mon(ster)santo, and its German parent company, Bayer (a former component of what we like to call I.G. Farbensanto on this website) have faced multi-million dollar lawsuits over Mon(ster)santo's supposedly "perfectly safe" products. Indeed, one comment to this article points out the potential connection between the planscamdemic and GMO narratives (beyond the usual government-corporate assurances from - Surprise surprise! - the Food and Drug Administration that the products were entirely safe):
We're only going to poison you for 4 more years, at which time we expect most of you will be dead from the Bio-weapon shots you have all been scared into taking...
So, there should be no cereal necessary at that point in time!
But in case you're missing the connection: imagine the damage that could be done by these corporations if only Big Agribusiness could get the same immunities from prosecution for "products gone wrong" that Big Pharma has managed to extort from Big Government for its quackcines.
If you think that I'm joking, or perhaps going "a bit too far" with my daily dose of high octane speculation here, consider this: before there was ever a planscamdemic, "scientists" floated the idea of combining GMOs and "vaccines" (and continue, now, during the planscamdemic to do so). Such a strategy would conceivably enable the "exemptions" Big Pharma won for itself to be extended to Big Agra as well. One can even envision an extension to the nutty and wearying propaganda surrounding the injections to GMOs: if you don't eat GMOs (with the engineered-in "vaccines" of course) you're just "unpatriotic" or "a danger to your fellow eaters". Why? Because it's no longer simply "food" with "substantial equivalence" to the natural version, it's also a medicine, and therefore, any laws applying to the latter could be extended via careful litigation and a bribed or blackmailed judge or two to GMOs.
When the acquisition of Mon(ster)santo by Bayer first occurred, I and others watching it happen were wondering "why"?!? Why on earth would a pharmaceutical giant expose itself to such litigation grief by buying a company like Mon(ster)santo, already at the time of its purchase the subject of numberous lawsuits. Perhaps, with the GMO-quackcine combination, we're looking at the answer: the extension of Big Pharma immunity to Big Agra, and the enhancement of bottomless profits from unproven potions lacking, like the GMO, intergenerational testing.
See you on the flip side...
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.