A BRIDGE IN BALTIMORE, PART TWO: A SPECULATIVE ANALYSIS
On Monday last I attempted to gather together some significant and representative articles about the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore harbor after one of its load-bearing pylons was struck by the container ship Dali as it was attempting to leave the harbor. I indicated then that I would offer, in Part Two of the blog, a speculative analysis of what I think might have happened, and, by implication, who might have been behind the incident.
I say "incident" because I do not, as of this writing, believe for a moment that this was a simple and sad accident as the goobernment and the F.I.B. (Federal Investigation Bureau) would have us believe. The government and its spokesmen are inveterate liars, and judging by the articles so many of you gathered and sent and which composed our article "round-up" in Part One, there are many out there who had the same initial reaction to the F.I.B.'s announcement as I: we simply don't believe the "it-wasn't-terrorism" narridigm.
But such events require more than just skepticism of government "obfuscations" in order to argue for the incident having been deliberately planned.
In Monday's blog, I briefly mentioned that in order to understand the event, one might have to seek to situate it in a much wider context than even current geopolitical events such as the Moscow terrorist attacks. I did not, however, specify what that wider context might be, other than to include in the "round-up" of articles an article noting that global positioning systems in the Baltic region of Europe appeared to have been subject to massive jamming and spoofing over a 63 hour period, interfering with aircraft and ship positions during that period. Most assessments agree that this is the result of Russian electronic warfare measures, and on that score, I would concur.
But it is the capability itself that I wished to highlight by including that article, because that capability alludes to three other episodes in recent years that have also exercised my attention, and long-time regular readers here might recognize what they are: the USS Donald Cook Incident, the USS Fitzgerald Incident, and the USS John McCain Incident. In each of these incidents, a US Navy warship was involved. In the last two incidents, merchant ships collided with the warships under circumstances that I regard as peculiar and unusual, and while time and space do not permit me to review all those details here, the explanations of the Navy and the press at the time of the latter two incidents explained them as accidents and the result of poor decisions and training on the part of the officers and crews of the warships, in addition to the poor training on the part of the merchant vessels' crews that collided with them. Aiding in these explanations are the fact that they occurred in some of the busiest shipping lanes in the world: the Malacca straits near Singapore (in the case of the McCain) and the busy waterways near Tokyo and Yokohama, Japan (in the case of the Fitzgerald). At the time of both incidents, I argued the behavior of the merchant ships that actually did the colliding with the US navy warships was suggestive of those ship's steerage having been technologically (and perhaps remotely) accessed and controlled, and that the collisions may have been deliberate. At the time, some friends who had spent time in the Navy assured me that my speculations were nonsense, and that the accidents were, indeed, accidents. However, I remained then, and remain now, unpersuaded, and continue to believe that my speculations in this regard may be viable explanations. The relevance of those speculations to the Francis Scott Key Bridge Incident will be immediately apparent to the reader. We'll return to that point in a moment.
What convinced me that such speculations were a possibility were the two USS Donald Cook Incidents. The first Incident, if the reader does not recall, occurred while the Aegis-class frigate was in the Black Sea in the tense weeks' and months' aftermath of the Maiden coup. An "obsolescent" Russian Sukhoi-22 fighter jet approached the ship on a very low altitude attack trajectory, and then apparently engaged some sort of electronic warfare technology that completely shut down the Donald Cook's sophisticated electronics, leaving the vessel essentially a helpless bit of floating metal in the Black Sea.
Message received: the Donald Cook managed to restore enough of its electronics to limp to the Romanian port of Constanza (for "rest of the crew" as we were told at the time). A few months later, in the Baltic, the Incident was repeated, again with the Donald Cook and, once again, a Russian Sukhoi-22 fighter jet which approached at very low altitude on a mock attack run, and again, interfered with the warship's electronics. Apparently the "crew rest" in Constanza, Romania had not fixed the problem. Message not received. (And sorry, no, I am not buying the idea that the US navy deliberately provoked the incidents to learn about Russian electronic capabilities, and that the US Navy is perfectly capable of countering them.)
This technological ability implies the possibility that a ship's systems might be remotely accessed, interfered with, and possibly even commandeered to the extent that a crew no longer has control of the ship. And this in turn implies the possibility that such an event may have occurred with the Dali's collision with the pylon of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore. That something was happening on the Dali's bridge and engine rooms is apparent from the video that, by now, we have all seen: the ship makes its way down the channel, loses power, regains it, loses it again, regains it, smoke begins to pour out of a funnel toward the stern, the ship then appears to turn out of the main channel and to starboard and thus toward the southern pylon of the bridge, power goes out and on again, the ship hits the pylon, and the bridge collapses, taking the lives of some pot hole repair crews with it. Notably, as all of this is occurring, road traffic on the bridge continues until it suddenly stops in time for the bridge to be vacant of road traffic just before the collision. This is also a crucial point, for it means that there was communication between the ship and the shore, and that authorities were alerted to a problem on the ship, and to stop traffic from entering the bridge. This in turn means that the crew knew there was a problem, and that a collision was possible. This implies, in its turn, that the crew recognized either that they had lost control of the ship or were about to.
So what do we have? We have (1) power losses, (2) smoke indicating that the ship's big diesel engines might be being restarted, or some other possibility, (3) a probable notification of shore personnel that controlled access to the bridge by someone in the ship's crew, or possibly by the harbor pilot, to shut the bridge down, and finally(4) a starboard turn of the ship directly toward the southern pylon. We must not assume that the communication from the ship to the shore to alert the bridge controllers to shut down traffic occurred on the ship's communications systems. If there was interference with the ship's electronics (suggested by the power outages), other systems - cell phones, radios, &c - in the possession of the crew might not have been effected and hence might have been used. You'll note that, in the articles gathered thus far, we have heard little to nothing about the composition of the crew other than that the ship's master was, suggestively, Ukrainian. We do not know who the harbor pilot(s) was or were, and we know nothing about the crew nor what they might have observed on the ship as all this was transpiring. I find this point to be extremely suspicious, for it might indicate that the crew has been sequestered and deliberately kept from public view in order to insure "they are able to read their lines correctly." I suggest that these peculiar facts align with the idea of a commandeering of at least some of the ship's systems by technology, and a crew seeking to regain control of the ship (hence the power outages and warning of shore personnel). Technology is indicated for a very different reason, namely, the requirements of Lloyd's of London and other major insurers that such ships have redundant systems for steerage and so on. For a ship to collide with a bridge pylon after a perfectly executed starboard turn might indicate not only the failure of redundant systems to work to avoid collision; it might also mean that the steerage was operating, but the warnings from the ship to shore to shut the bridge down might further indicate that the crew lost control of it.
This type of argumentation makes the other indications of a well-planned and executed infrastructure attack even more compelling: (1) the fact that, by collapsing the bridge, US military sealift capability is affected by stranding two sealift ships in the Baltimore harbor, (2) the possible collapse of the bridge onto a major underwater energy pipeline, (3) the closure of the harbor itself, (4) the symbolic nature of collapsing a bridge named for the composer of the lyrics to the USA's national anthem, and finally, and not least (5) the timing of the attack for a time when the least possible collateral loss of life would occur. Imagine if the attack had occurred at 5PM, or 7AM, at the height of the evening or morning rush hours, and you get the idea: the loss of life would have been much much higher. If one argues, as I am, that the Incident was a deliberate attack and not an "accident", then this factor of timing indicates the type of player or agency involved: one (1) capable of planning and executing such an event, (2) in possession of the technology to do it (if indeed a technology was involved), and (3) someone deliberately trying to inflict serious damage while minimizing loss of life.
In this respect the speculations of Tom Luongo, whose article I included in Monday's blog, are well worth pondering. Was it Russia? Are we looking at a potential retaliation by that country for the Moscow terrorist attack? Possibly. Certainly the attempt to minimize collateral loss of life might indicate this. The one key factor that would argue against this being a Russian operation is the timing: there would not appear to be enough time between the Moscow attacks and the Francis Scott Key Bridge Incident to organize such a complex operation, and to position the personnel and (if I am correct) the technology to do it. On the other hand, arguing in favor of a Russian operation is the simple fact that only Russia has demonstrated a technological electronic capability that might include the ability to commandeer a ship's control systems. (Here, I must make mention of those UFO incidents over Malmstrom Air Force Base, and in Wyoming, where UFOs allegedly remotely and electronically interfered with the electronics of a flight of Minutemen ICBMs, changing their targeting data entirely remotely. As has been noted by Richard Hastings in his book UFOs and Nukes, the Air Force contracted with Boeing to find out what had happened, and Boeing was able to reproduce the incident remotely, implying both that such technology is not ipso facto "extraterrestrial", and that remote electronic commandeering of such systems is possible). So if it was Russian, what about the timing? We must not rule out the possibility that if this is a Russian response or "horizontal escalation" for the West's activities in the Ukraine since 2014, that this might be a response to older incidents than the Moscow terrorist attacks, such as the West's attacks on the Kerch Strait bridge. Viewing it in this fashion removes the problem posed by the timing of it as a retaliation for the Moscow Terror attacks. It might be retaliation for some other, older attack on Russia.
Might this be someone else's attack? Luongo makes an intriguing case that it may have been, up to and including the sclerotic powers of Europe like the U.K. or France, whose "leaders" like Boris Johnson or President Macron have given ample public testimony to their desire to see the Ukrainian war linger on and on, with the US's continuing financial support, a support which has obviously wavered in recent months. Could it even be a third party, a non-state actor, intent on sewing enough chaos and confusion - and ill-will - into Russo-American relations? Again, possibly.
In the final analysis, a reasonable case can be made for all these possibilities, but in my opinion, not enough information is yet known to indicate which of these possibilities might be the most likely.
But one thing seems to emerge clearly from the collapsed wreckage, the bent and twisted girders, of the namesake bridge of the author of the USA's national anthem lyrics: this was no accident. If you believe the F.I.B., then I have a bridge in Baltimore to sell you. So let's call it what it is: it isn't the Francis Scott Key Bridge Incident. It's the Francis Scott Key Bridge Attack. So why the fib of the F.I.B.? Think geopolitics... and insurance... and independent insurance investigators ...
See you on the flip side...
No Comments
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Help the Community Grow
Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.
A Ukrainian captain seems too much like a red herring for it to have been Russia or Ukraine, but would be perfect deflection for deep state actors in Israel or within the U.S.
I recall the speculation regarding the cause of the Ever Given veering to shore in 2021 – that being remote access
I’ve just read “The Last President,” by Ingersoll Lockwood. It’s the final chapter in the book, “The Baron Trump Collection.” I bought the book a number of years ago, when it was rumored that Donald Trump had been sent through time to take the world through, yada, yada. Of course, as we here know, DJT’s uncle was John Trump, the dude that seized Nikola Tesla’s papers.
The story ends with the destruction of the Capitol dome and the inevitable division of the country. There it is again, the break up of the USA. Born and raised here in California, I’m cool. On the other hand, I wouldn’t lay to rest a hungry eagle whose time may not be through, no matter the plotting laid to make that happen.
And whilst we are all dangling on that last pore of the leaf dangling on that proverbial extremity of that “branch”……instead of looking at Russia and China per se,, what about Taiwan? There is an intense internecine political battle on that benighted island pro and anti China factions. as noted from their recent elections and mandates proposed. So as a whacky ” out there” thought experiment…what if one side pro-China, perhaps wanted to degrade US capability for a period of time or issue a warning or indeed both? I just note that the attached article regarding a joint venture announced in January 2024 between Synergy and Wisdom. Synergy the outsourced ship management services provider for the Dali and Taipei based Wisdom Marine Group (bulk carrier ships owner). By the way Synergy have and offer remote management systems as part of their portfolio of service offerings. https://shippingtelegraph.com/dry-bulk-shipping-news/wisdom-marine-and-synergy-partner-on-bulk-carrier-jv/#:~:text=Taipei-based%20dry%20bulk%20shipowner%20Wisdom%20Marine%20Group%20and,under%20the%20name%20Wisdom%20Synergy%20Ship%20Management%20%28WSSM%29.
Lets not forget the tensions bubbling away for some years now between The Philippines and China. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/philippines-china-trade-accusations-over-south-china-sea-encounter-2024-04-06/?taid=661128dbab64640001766790&utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter
And this last year ….https://www.globalconstructionreview.com/us-renews-attack-on-chinese-contractor-targeting-manila-bay-reclamation-projects/
7.5 Scale earthquake in Taiwan…. hmmm !! https://www.bitchute.com/video/Q2GLPhZEPV0E/
1. The collapse of the Soviet Union (1991), and the Twin Towers (2001), occurs within a decade, while the hardened positions of the Cold War come to an end, which then discloses the true nature of the underlying conflict.
2. The Vatican is waging proxy wars against heathens, which is the Roman Empire waging war on barbarians, which is the Assyrian empire waging war on Scythians, which is the “divine right of kings” doctrine against the runes.
3. Fundamentally, it is Caiaphas waging war on infrastructure, which is backwater against aqueduct engineering, attempting to prevent an intercontinental land bridge, in the Bering Strait, which is a heathen hole in the fence.
4. The Vatican Catholics want to plug the Darial Gorge, like the Macedonian tyrant did, in an attempt to quell grassroots democracies, that were spurred, by Jacob’s twelve-membered senate, and Elijah’s philosophy (the runes).
5. Seen through that lense, the twelve-appointed disciples were an symbolic reboot of Jacob’s proto-republic, explaining the rightful dictator, as a mere servant to the senate, washing the feet of senators, which opposes tyranny.
Today, what threatens the Vatican’s crusade the most, is Yahweh-Elohim understood, as “yearly truce & free will”, which undermines the imperial brainwash of the ”Lord thy God” false gospel translation.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/s7tnc0ze5af0u3k/uncle-traveling-matt.jpg
BTW, my issue, with the Scriptures, has always been an apparent lack of humour, and I have no patience with boredom. Nevertheless, the humour is present, understated though.
A rightful dictator, washing the feet of twelve senators, is a pie in the face of the “pomp and circumstance” of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, which sets the tone of the underlying theme.
Today, the DEI gospel of the Hollywood movie moguls would fall apart, were the American president to wash the feet of his senators, as a mere shoeshiner on leather footwear.
That is a sophisticated joke…
I have listened and read several interviews, talks, articles, analasis…on the subject, and I am very grateful for dr. Farrell`s thorough sum-up in 2 parts. Good to have them all in one place, in a logical and sensible order.
My first reaction and thoughts about the incident were similar: the government was way too rush to announce what this “accident” was not – that is always a tell tale what it actually is (= the opposite of the official narrative). The FBI showing up on the scene before the last ripples of the waves caused by the demolition…sorry, “collapse” settled, is just…comeon!
Things are heating up on those very points of the globe, that were in a similar picke in 2014-2015 (the Ukraine, Gaza, Izrael, Taiwan…). Seems to me that Mr. Global sent a new message to his lackeys to make this 3rd world war “finally” happen (“dammit”), who desperately try to be “inventive” thinking why not crack up and divide the USA somewhere in the middle (north from south) and blame it on Putin`s Russia. Their means are pretty much the same ols, same old, not much new under the sun since 10 years ago…their use of symbols ditto.
No way this was an accident, anybody with common sense and some very basic insight in sea-faring vessels`protocol understands this much.
I cannot help but be reminded of a very recent movie “Leave the world behind”, which I watched 2 times aleady. While watching it I could not shake off the feeling that this movie is more than a fantasy, more than even a threat – it is a prep-up. The tanker that hit the shore in the movie is called “White Lion”…which again, opens up for much symbolism.
But then again, it is not the Nazis in Kiev that we (the world) should be worried about, but the Nazis in Washington.
Related to the symbolism in point (4) the symbolic nature of collapsing a bridge named for the composer of the lyrics to the USA’s national anthem, see also that Ship named after Salvador Dali rams bridge as in Dali’s painting ‘the broken bridge’
The Nazi scientists went to both to the USSA & the USSR.
The Nazi spy apparatus was handed over Reinhard Gehlen.
That was a foundation upon which today’s conundrums turn.
So it is hard to pin the donkey’s tail, on any tale that covers the whole truth.
Suffice to say, they’re are players behind the scenes that move events in specific manners; that benefit themselves, more than those that make the actual maves.
CUI BONO who behind all these sabotages what is their end game purpose and who profits
Potentially good video interview with former Baltimore Port director.
23 hours old as of this posting…
Maybe more factual than ” whodunnit”, but possibly good info:
William Doyle on Baltimore | CEO Dredging Contractors of America & Former (Baltimore) Port Director
YT channel : What is Going on With Shipping?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l-DAZqTZCb8
Thanks for the link.
With limited resources one is still out tallying the good, the bad, and mediocre data bits available to an outsider of the accessible details waiting to be revealed (if they ever are). There’s certainly a lot of coincidence involved. For instance, the flashing of ship’s onboard lighting system(s), as if a receiver of electromagnetic pulse (EMP) phenomena; the failure of the ship’s steering to correct that overdone starboard turn (like the wheel house got stuck at the most opportunistic timing of a saboteur) after first veering to far right of the channel approaching the bridge; and those black plumbs of smoke from the ships stacks, as if those diesel engines were affected with bad fuel injection run afoul. One has seen the effects of an experimental industrial sized diesel engine malfunction when its electronics were taken over by a software virus within the engines fuel control mechanisms that operate propulsion and electricity generation. Not unlike those programmable logic controllers (PLC’s) that were affected during that STUXNET business you know where a while back.
And then, what evidence will be publicized remains to be noted. Bridge builders have mentioned their observations of a lack of bridge pylon-bumpers to safeguard against accidental collisions reducing ship induced impacts of the bridge.
One does wonder about those buoys for global positioning system (GPS) and how they might have had an impact on ships steering. Peanuts for pulsed weaponry.
Symbolism alone is striking. Lara Logan does have a point to consider.
I agree with Joseph.
I woud also add that Dali created a painting called “The Bridge and The Broken Dream,” which shows a partial (damaged?) bridge and strange people nearby (it is Dali, after all). The painting could also point to some message relating to the currnet state of the U.S. I have not looked into the meaning or purpose Dali had in creating the painting.
That particular bridge also lacked proper protection from just such collisions, required on most modern bridges, and visible on other bridges in that area. It was the perfect target out of all bridges in that waterway to create maximum damage from a collision. This alone argues strongly against a “simple accident.”
The blockage of the port and the highway running over the bridge will also cause a significant economic impact and logistical juggling, some of which might not be public knowledge. It is a critical route for moving hazardous waste, which might result in opportunities for future “incidents” involving that disrupted movement of materials.
The Dali (ship) had a previous incident involving striking a bridge in Europe – dress rehearsal or plausible deniability (or both)?
It is not uncommon for organizations who could carry out such attacks to position various assets well ahead of any actual operations which might require them, and the policies of the current inmates runing the Swampington asylum have provided a huge hole for just such assets to pour through in gigantic numbers for some time. It would be blisteringly stupid for our enemies to refuse such a red carpet invitation. However, I am certain that most players capable of running such an op would have had people and assets in place to do this kind of damage for a very long time, as we do in “other places” in the world. This situation could have been a planned contingency for years, just waiting for the need and circumstances to be put to use.
The involvement of a bridge and a gas pipeline together would definitely make me think of Russians as the message senders, but so obvious a clue could also be a red herring . . . .(pun intended)
It is highly likely that a harbor pilot would carry a radio tuned to frequencies easily monitored by police stationed near the bridge, or that his office could quickly relay a warning by radio.
I would be very surprised if the harbor’s safety planning had not included collisions in their contingencies, but a known lack of that kind of planning could also contribute to such an op, or be compensated for, depending on the result desired.
Everything about this incident screams precise, deliberate planning and execution. There is no such thing as “just coincidence” in these matters. Only an idiot would accept “just an accident” as the cause.
“Cyberism, is the real domain of power!” I’ve heard that all computer chips manufactured in a certain Middle Eastern country are full of extra back doors that makes them less reliable than their competitor’s chips that have only the centrally approved back doors. I’ve always found AMD computers to be more reliable and they seem to last longer than Intel in my experience of computer ownership. So much so that AMD and NIVIDEA chipped computers are the only ones I buy. And it seem everything has at least a few of these chips in them making everything very vulnerable to those with the codes to them.
It seems the bridge came down at 1:29 AM.
https://www.npr.org/2024/03/29/1241660667/-we-got-workers-in-the-water-audio-reveals-details-about-baltimore-bridge-rescue
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/03/26/us/baltimore-key-bridge-collapse-maps.html
1:29… 1:29… That time rings a bell… In that bell is engraved “Where We Go One We Go All”
https://qalerts.app/?n=3685
In other words, we just don’t know… Good analysis Dr. Farrell. Thanks.
The bridge looked pretty rickety. A replacement should have constructed years ago. Demolition is an art, and construction of a new one would involve many parties and plans. “Hey let’s utilize current events…”
𝖁𝖔𝖎𝖈𝖊𝖘 𝖔𝖋 𝕽𝖊𝖛𝖊𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖔𝖓 🕊
🧐There are coincidences when this 👃nose has had the right nose again before an object 💥collapses and has taken out an 📜insurance policy worth billions, as was the case on 🗽9.11 with the WTC
💰Larry ‘Money’ Silverstein profits from the 1 billion 💵dollar insurance policy for the 🌉Baltimore Bridge.
@VoicesofRevelation1🕊
1.8K views
02:30
https://t.me/voicesofrevelation1/6822
The description of the path taken by the vessel Dali reminds me of the “carefully executed, last-second bank turn” executed by the plane that hit the second of the Twin Towers. The only logical explanation is intentionality.
The dancing Israhellis got all jumping in joy, in excitement, which devilry usually does, as it normally hides in shadows, and lurks in darkness, terrorised, by the prospect of being found out, which is, why it has an ecstatic release of tension, by the narrative collapse, that could potentially expose the predator ways.
Try to remember
The eleventh of September,
And weep like a willow
On your wailing wall pillow.
Try to remember
The eleventh of September,
When living torches went
Kissing the pavement.
Try to remember
The eleventh of September,
When dancing Israhellis
Murdered your families.
The dancing Israhellis, a music video:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/scl/fi/afgeldl14fzsvnhhh2mxk/remember-september.mp4?rlkey=s8nbenwh4fsviiv0lurpduqvq
Greg Reese has info on how those damned souls dream of going further in destruction to create the chaos they believe would allow them to finally take global power from the ashes : peak psychopathy
Major Events Surrounding the April 8th Solar Eclipse
Greg Reese
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/major-events-surrounding-the-april-8th-solar-eclipse/
(…)
And Israel, who is in the midst of committing Genocide, is preparing to sacrifice a Red heifer. A ritual sacrifice TO PREPARE THEM FOR TAKING BACK THE TEMPLE MOUNT.
“Red heifers, to be precise. Some Jews and Christians believe they’re the key to rebuilding the historic Jewish temple in Jerusalem. And to beckoning the Messiah. To understand, you have to go back nearly 2000 years when the ancient Romans destroyed the last temple in the city to rebuild it. These believers point to the Bible’s Book of Numbers. It commands the Israelites to sacrifice a red heifer without defect or blemish, and that has never been under a yoke. Only then can the temple rise again. Those sacred cows were showcased in Washington at a recent prayer gathering. Many evangelicals believe these red heifers will usher Christ’s second coming.”
– Chris Livesay (CBS News)
“We need the Messiah to come, right? So for me, the red heifer, it’s red for the blood of Jesus Christ.”
– Evangelical leader
“A massive altar already awaits where the heifers are to be burned. According to some believers, the ceremony needs to be performed right here on the Mount of Olives looking directly into where the temple once stood. But something else now stands in its place.”
– Chris Livesay (CBS News)
Once they forcibly take the Temple Mount away from billions of Muslims worldwide, it will PREDICTABLY THRUST THE WORLD INTO THE PEAK OF CHAOS that these secret societies have been designing for centuries. And their plan is to bring order out of this chaos with their divine King to rule over the world.
(…)
Some minority radical sects believe Europeans are Amalek and must be destroyed for forcing them to convert to Christianity, the Holocaust and many other supposed crimes such as blasphemy and idolatry before the Temple can be rebuilt as well. One of their recent prophets said Europeans and Christianity would be destroyed by Islam. Who organized and lobbied for mass immigration into Europe? I read a paper years ago that the Redman would be backed to take back the Americas in another war and would not be destroyed because they were forced to convert at the point of the sword as well. I guess they might become Noahides. Stage seems to be being set for this. Hope it isn’t what is really going on and is just propaganda.
“US military sealift capability is affected by stranding two sealift ships in the Baltimore harbor,” so what? they are not critically needed and will be able to exit the harbor within a few days to weeks
” the timing of the attack for a time when the least possible collateral loss of life would occur”. As if saboteurs would care about something as insignificant as human lives. They don’t
and yeah, I think it was deliberate
and no, I am not “terrified,” and anybody who is needs to have their head examined
From what I have been learning lately about hacking of systems – it is surprisingly and terrifyingly simple and thus could be deployed quickly. Which only adds to the potential speculations. Definitely Not an accident.
yep, there’s that word again, “terrified.”
I am really losing patience with the whole concept of “terrorism.”
it is really disappointing that people have gotten used to to the idea of being “terrified.” What is WRONG with you people???
It is bad enough to be surrounded by propaganda on a daily basis, but to hear supposedly “educated” people nattering on all day about “terror this” and “terror that….” how lame.
it’s like listening to CNN and NBC all day… which is probably what you folks are doing, anyway.
May I suggest you start using the word “sabotage” (when appropriate) and drop the “terror,” you act like a bunch of high-school kids watching “Attack of the Killer Tomatoes.”
it’s really pathetic
Terror induces panic in response, which is, when the earthbound seeks to overwhelm.
Man overcomes the conundrum, by developing a thousand-yards stare, in the silent wood.
Cooler heads prevail, when fishing in empty ponds, by not being caught hook, line and sinker.
Generally, man walks through walls.