User Answers

SOMETIMES OLD NEWS IS NEW NEWS: MIND MANIPULATION OVER A DECADE AGO

I was reading a book by the late Jim Keith called Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness for some research I'm doing, and I was struck by this passage, written in 1999, concerning the research of neurophysiologist Dr. Michael Persinger:

"Among Persinger's accomplishments is the ability to cause subjects to think that they have been abducted by aliens, or have had an encounter sith angels of God through the use of a modified motorcyle helmet equipped with solenoids to send electromagnetic pulses through the frontal lobes of their brains. 'Ultimately,' Persinger says, 'human experience is determined by what is happening in the brain. And the experience of God can be generated by a process that has nothing to do with whether God exists or not.'"(p. 205).

Keith went on to explain that Persinger's ground-breaking research was published in the June 1995 issue of Perceptiual and Motor Skills, in a paper entitled "On the Possibility of Accessing Every Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorithms." While the title says it all, its contents are even more darkly revealing: "One logical ectrapolation to a neuophysical basis of conscious" he says, is that "random variations of 'noise' within the matrices could potentially differentiate between individual brains." Keith's comment is worth nothing as well: "In other words, individuals could be indentified by the specific characteristics of their brain output." (p, 206). As if that were not enough, Keith then goes on to quote yet another provocative thought of Dr. Persinger: "Identification of these sequences could also allow direct access to the most complex neurocognitive processes associated with the sense of self, human consciousness and the aggregate of experiential represetations... that define the individual within the brain." (p, 206)

Heady stuff, if you'll pardon the pun, but the implications are clear: neuroscience is pushing the borders and possibilities of the technologies of mind manipulation to frontiers scarcely dreamed of only a short while before, inclusive of technologies that can engineer the deepest mystical experiences a human being can have. That possibility, plus the fact that Keith's and Persinger's words were written more than a decade ago, should be sobering enough.

6 thoughts on “SOMETIMES OLD NEWS IS NEW NEWS: MIND MANIPULATION OVER A DECADE AGO”

  1. There is only one sure way to fight any kind of manipulation.
    You have to NOT be willing to just do your own thing, and
    follow whatever idea pops into your head, but first check
    if it is right, if it makes sense.

    And people who want to have total anarchy fearing any
    control simply open the door to more of this, because
    without structure and rules to contain behavior, and hint
    that some ideas leading to such behaviors are perhaps
    wrong also, there is no freedom possible except to the
    most powerful. The stronger will rule the weaker in a way
    that can’t be vetoed, and the mind controllers will find
    that their targets have no structure to try to relate to in
    order to keep the messages or disorientations under
    control.

    The Illuminati wanted an eventual condition, in which
    there was no government, no religion, so social structure,
    no laws, each man would be the ruler and priest of his
    household like Abraham was, so they argued to the still
    slightly Bible respecting initiates. And they warped the
    picture some in doing it, also.

    Meanwhile they trained their members to observe, collect
    information calculate various individuals’ reactions and
    behavior. They worked to be secret rulers who would
    decide how the supposedly free masses would be led by
    demagogues.

    Precisely this tyranny of the mob rabble that was let loose
    in the French Revolutions (there were a series), was what
    the Founding Fathers saw government as essential for.

    We need to judge our thoughts and feelings before we
    act on them. We need humility and self control. We need
    to be willing to listen and where it is going in a good direction,
    accept direction, but not when it goes in a bad direction.

    We need some controls, but they have to be loose
    enough to allow for the individual situation, and the people
    doing it have to be affectable by a vote.

    Too much control is stifling. Too little is stifling. And the fact
    is, that fascism and tyrannical monarchies and so forth, at
    the time of their establishment, almost never are done so
    without a lot of active cooperation, even DEMAND by the
    people. People want some control and direction. This is
    easily exploited for evil.

    Instead of govt. of the people by the people and for the
    people, we need to think govt. of the people by the people
    and for God, because its purpose as an institution, is
    according to St. Paul, who spoke of a pagan imperial
    dictatorship barely controlled by the Senate at the time,
    something that, as a category or as perhaps some particular
    ones, was created by God for a purpose, TO RESTRAIN
    EVIL and secondarily to promote good.

    When it supports evil and punishes good, it must be opposed,
    when it moves into the zone of working against God.

    However, it is not evil in itself. Originally, the founding fathers
    envisioned a democracy ruled by people who were selected
    by the ruled, and were preriodically reselected or kicked out
    and replaced, and the people were themselves educated in
    public matters, economics and most of all VIRTUE.

    Benjamin Franklin was not virtuous in his private life, but he
    knew damn well the value of orderly society, that keeps
    things from being chaos. Though he was one of those that
    would fool around in private, the sort who view the elite as
    free from all restraints when in private dealing with people
    who didn’t matter because they had no credibility, or
    whatever, when asked “what form of government have you
    given us?” when the convention ajourned with the results,
    “a democracy, if you can keep it,.” and further said that
    we must be a religious (meaning bible focusses moral
    Christians) people, because that way lay virtue, and if we
    lose our virtue, we will lose our freedom.

    Why does virtue and freedom run together? Because as
    a body of people get more and more licentious, which
    usually also facilitates abuse at home, or can be part of
    a pincer move by the devil wherein falsely acting in God’s
    Name or some “principle” of authority in home and society
    there is abuse, the reaction is often to throw the baby out
    with the bathwater, and run about without morals or limits.

    License is actually practiced by such unvirtuous tyrants
    at home and elsewhere, even when supposedly practicing
    discipline, but it is control freaking, not discipline.

    License and liberty are opposite. If you police yourself,
    you won’t need that much policing imposed on you.

    It has been suggested, and I have thought myself, that
    there might be experimental total freedom zones established,
    and see what happens. That is all very well, as long as no
    one let in there is either a conniving rule by manipulation
    or personality cult creator on the one hand, or unvirtuous
    in other ways on the other.

    An experiment like this already was done, back when LSD
    was legal. The hippies in SF. what happened? First off,
    until the diggers got organized, everything went to hell
    in terms of physical situation. The Mafia moved in because
    of the lucrative drug scene. Rape started happening,
    because there was no concept that women were supposed
    to say no, or that love didn’t incl. and in fact have to incl.
    promiscuity on demand. (Unfortunately, the arrivers came
    out of an environment, where only women had been expected
    to be chaste, that men also must be chaste wasn’t even on
    the radar in supposedly Christian conservative America.)
    or there was a kind of coercion in some communes
    where, you visit you share incl your woman. Things got
    darker. Then Manson brought the negative situations into
    a focussed form, and brought it to its logical conclusion.

    Love is a nice concept, but ill defined. Love works no harm
    to its neighbor warns John or James.

  2. Or that could all be fake conspiracy theory or disinformation. I don’t know, but it is interesting. 🙂

  3. Reminds me of the alleged govt. project Blue Beam where they allegedly plan to project holograms or maybe even fly real manmade saucers in the sky to simulate an ET ‘threat’ and then probably use such mind control technology to make people think they are being abducted and we need to fight ‘back’
    The other possibility is for a fake Armageddon/rapture scenario for all those gullible christians.
    Gotta love morally bankrupt non-governments.

  4. Mass production of a “hive mind”. Utter control for the sake of… spiritual and material parasitical vampirism.
    Still, we are created in the Image of God, and there is a place in us which only God can access. Our mind is not within our skull: rather the reverse. These crass positivists and ‘materialists’ in the end fashion bars of their own prison — even as they push for total domination and hell on earth: in their own falsified image.

Comments are closed.