Sometimes ya just gotta love it. While browsing the internet this week for interesting news, I came across this item about scientists trying to make controlled fusion work as a source of electrical energy:

Overturned Scientific Explanation may be good news for nuclear fusion

What I really loved about this was that the original 1936 findings of British physicists was in part re-affirmed, but that boron played a role in the contemporary scientists' thinking about nuclear fusion.

Well, it played a role in the fusion thinking of none other than Dr. Ronald Richter, too. You remember him? The Nazi physicist in Argentina trying to produce nuclear fusion for Juan Peron in the early 1950s? Of course, Richter was roundly and publicly denounced by the scientific establishment for his claims, while secretly the USAF and Atomic Energy Commissions were investigating the man, and coming to a whole spectrum of conclusions about him, from "he's nuts and a complete fraud" to "he's a mad genius working in the 1970s".  One reason, no doubt, that Richter was so roundly and publicly denounced was his claim that his experiments were really designed to test mechanisms for tapping into the zero point energy.(See my Nazi International, chapters 9 & 10).

In his endless statements to the USAF, however, Richter emphasizes how adding boron to his plasma soups increased the energy of his reactions.  Well, so here we are, almost exactly sixty years later, and now we're being told more or less the same thing. It really sort of makes one wonder, not only what the good Dr. Richter was really up to down there, but also, what the American Black Projects "community" did with it....

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. Trevor Streeton on June 4, 2012 at 6:43 am

    According to the links to Richter I have found, he was a fraud.

    • Joseph P. Farrell on June 4, 2012 at 3:39 pm

      Of course the links say that. For a very DIFFERENT take on Richer, read my Nazi International and Grid of the Gods. If he was a fraud, why does the US Air Force interview him after his project was shut down by Peron. More importantly, why did some scientists in the USA call him a mad genius working in the 1970s?

  2. Nordman on April 17, 2011 at 10:52 pm

    Edward Michaud discovers German Type XIB U-Boat
    after ca. 17min…info booom…

  3. Peter on April 17, 2011 at 9:27 am

    Hi Dr. Farrell,

    After I read one of your books, I remembered seeing an old Disney show when I was younger that was about going to Mars. I got on Youtube and found it, its called “Mars and Beyond”. The video’s posted in 6 parts, and if you watch the 6th part, the narrator talks about chemical rockets being too inefficient for long term space flight and that “an electromagnetic drive that can neutralize gravity is the obvious answer, but such a device is still a thing for the future”. That statement was accompanied by an artist’s drawing of the classic flying saucer. What made my draw drop was the way it is discussed – no ET’s, no help from Aldebaran, just a simple statement as if this type of research was already being conducted. Interestingly, this segues to a shot of Ernst Stuhlinger and von Braun discussing a prototype Mars spaceship powered by an atomic engine and using an ionic drive – and this is the 1950’s.

    I believe there were 4 of these Tomorrowland episodes made, and all of them feature shots and dialogue with German scientists like Willy Ley, Heinz Haber, Ernst Stuhlinger, and Werner von Braun. One is called “Our Friend the Atom” and is completely narrated by Haber.

    I just wondered if you’d seen these. They’re pretty entertaining, and I remember watching them from when I was a kid.

    • Joseph P. Farrell on April 17, 2011 at 1:18 pm

      Haven’t seen it but I am familiar with the movie’s existence

  4. Christian de Coninck Lucas on April 14, 2011 at 1:25 am

    • Christine on April 14, 2011 at 6:49 am

      interesting. to get the other parts, put the cursor on the 1 in 01,
      highlight and delete 1 and type 2 so it reads 02, and hit enter,
      ditto to get the rest. I couldn’t find the link to the rest otherwise.
      I probably missed something, but if it isn’t there, and that would
      be interesting in itself if it isn’t, you can still get to it with this
      approach, which will also often get you lots of interesting places
      on other sites.

  5. James on April 13, 2011 at 4:41 am

    Forgive my fingers… Hoi polloi

  6. James on April 13, 2011 at 4:38 am

    It is not that the scientists are idiots….. Rather, that the dark deep and silent system as a collective believe the hoi palloi are idiots.

  7. Jon Norris on April 12, 2011 at 10:47 pm

    It never ceases to amaze me when things like this come out. 75 years and they still can’t get it right? Either the world’s scientists are all complete idiots, or something else is going on.

    While I can accept that all (okay, well most) of the world’s politicians and administrators are idiots, I have known too many scientists to believe that they are all this stupid. Something else is going on.

    Philo Farnsworth had a functional fusion device over 40 years ago, and who knows how many others did as well. To have spent 60 plus years and tens of billions of dollars and not come up with a single workable device on any scale at all is either one of the biggest con games in history, or the result of a collection of absolute idiots who are totally incompetent. Again, I know too many people involved in science to buy that this many of them are that stupid. No wonder they are so violent about cold fusion – the success of that “pseudo-science” makes the hot fusion crowd look like, well, complete idiots – and they can’t be complete idiots, because they have bilked us out of tens of billions of dollars for no results at all.

    Something else is going on. There is no question of that.

    • Joseph P. Farrell on April 12, 2011 at 11:00 pm

      I have to agree… consider how useful “fusion” research has been to syphon off billions of dollars… my intuition, and it’s nothing more than intuition, is that it has disappeared into the black budgets and black research projects. Farnsworth and Richter are two of the biggest clues that something is wrong…and wait till you read the first chapter of the book I’m working on right now to see just how wrong it is…

  8. chris on April 12, 2011 at 9:25 pm

    I am still taking boron to de-fluoridate my body and its working like a charm . it has awakened my pineal even more and i remember my dreams every night and my meditations are as vivid as real life. just a tip i mentioned it in members chat too. just supplemental boron pills about 7 to 10mg daily .

  9. ken sendo on April 12, 2011 at 7:39 pm

    …boron… memories of C2C interview come flashing back:

    Tom Blees — IFR (Integral Fast Reactors) using Boron as cheap sustainable recyclable fuel source, adapted to cars, trucks, etc.

    main site promotes the book w/o details; C2C interview says little in synopsis but interview rich in details; Amazon book review is also informative; YouTube has videos, too.

    wonder how far the practical application has reached.


  10. Christine on April 12, 2011 at 8:13 am

    Its. not really fusion. Its fission. Boron and I think Beryllium and Lithium
    are capable of fission, but unlike Uranium & Co will not chain fission.
    The fissions they do are incapable of supporting a chain reaction, and
    require impact not just getting piled up together feeding off emitted
    neutrons like the experimental piles before the bomb. Beryillium, a highly
    toxic element, is used to produce extra neutrons to lessen the amount
    of Uranium or Plutonium needed for a nuclear reaction in a bomb, which
    makes the so called suitcase nuke possible.

    • Mike M on April 13, 2011 at 1:41 am

      ???????? Is anyone else at a loss for words?

  11. Ted Torbich on April 12, 2011 at 5:13 am

    Joseph it is my firm belief that fusion is an actual existing technology but that it has gone black. The Tokamak model may be a red herring designed to waste the time of researchers. Have you also seen the cold fusion news?

    • Joseph P. Farrell on April 12, 2011 at 7:42 am

      Yes I’m aware of it and I suspect you’re correct

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events