Well every now and then one makes a prediction that is "true" and it's looking increasingly likely that scientists at CERN have gathered enough evidence that the Higgs boson has been "discovered," with caveats, as the following article states:

APNewsBreak: Proof of 'God particle' found

If true, this would be a stunning confirmation of the standard model.

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. lee on July 6, 2012 at 10:24 am

    “creating” particles? how and why? I dont understand that.

  2. Robert Barricklow on July 4, 2012 at 5:59 pm

    Reading the tea leaves. There is something to it.

    Our conscious minds often have no idea
    what we are learning unconsciouly.

  3. HeartStreams on July 4, 2012 at 12:39 pm

    Mike Adams eloquent call for adding consciousness to the plate of puzzles picked at on the physics plate. Nothing new for super fans of jpf, but nevertheless elegant and worth reading.

  4. Ancient Wanderer on July 4, 2012 at 11:39 am

    In the UK’s ITN News article, the video describes how they have discovered a new field rather than a particle. They say it explains gravity et al.

    if they have discovered a Field it is in all likelihood related to the Fields that Nassim Haremein talks about that is the fundamental underlying structure of the universe.

    An isotropic vector matrix and the ‘flower-of-life’ pattern.

    it’s all fractal in nature and is probably the ‘pattern’ to which both all (sub-atomic)particles, atoms, cells, planets, stars and black/white holes are built in this universe.

  5. lee on July 4, 2012 at 8:11 am

    Just how and why would you ‘create’ a particle?

    • HAL838 on July 4, 2012 at 1:15 pm

      How and why do you ‘create’ a Bigfoot or
      a Loch Ness monster. both of which are not
      a dying breed, but rather, at this point, found
      EVERYWHERE by so many
      as the saying goes [but not the fact]
      with “no one left behind,”
      even picking up their dead (?)

      I think Tom Bearden has a word for it,
      as I read a few years ago in his book,

  6. Otter on July 4, 2012 at 6:22 am

    Since we create our own reality, then what we seek is what we find. In the long run, Cern’s findings won’t be as significant as Kron’s findings.

    • HAL838 on July 4, 2012 at 1:19 pm

      Very good, but who’s Kron?

      Although the “reality” that counts is the shared one.

  7. Jon Norris on July 3, 2012 at 10:51 pm

    And let’s see, who funds CERN again….? Oh, yes, the mainstream people with a vested interest in the standard model.

    No surprise here.

    Maybe they had a bad cable, too……..

  8. forrest on July 3, 2012 at 1:53 pm

    Great timing, CERN.

    • HAL838 on July 3, 2012 at 6:41 pm

      Isn’t it, though ?

      [wink wink, nod nod]

      Just add it to the previous 300
      they have created, no kidding.
      If you look long enough and hard
      enough [oh yes] it will turn up
      in some form or other.

  9. Patricia on July 3, 2012 at 12:58 pm

    One wonders if the funding season is upon CERN. This has all the earmarks of a story that is “to be continued” during the next budgetary season … a kind of scientific cliffhanger.

  10. Jonathan on July 3, 2012 at 11:21 am

    How would this fit into the model of physics you and others like you have been proposing for years (if at all..)?

    • Joseph P. Farrell on July 3, 2012 at 11:56 am

      Basically, I think they’re CREATING particles, not so much DISCOVERING them.

      • LSM on July 3, 2012 at 2:54 pm

        I hope your posting is meant as a slightly sarcastic response as opposed to a belief that CERN is actually capable of creating new particles- if the latter is true, we’re f****d

        • HAL838 on July 3, 2012 at 6:47 pm

          I’m definately with you this one, Joseph.

          why is that?

          THEY’ve been doing it for years….
          breaking things apart and making new pieces.
          Predicting it doesn’t make any difference.
          It hardly ever fully fits anyway.

          Serious science has become a fool’s pursuit in this country.

      • MattB on July 4, 2012 at 4:51 am

        That is an interesting idea Joseph. What leads you to that ‘hunch’?

        I find it difficult to believe that 96% of the Universe’s mass is so difficult to find.

        I wonder how many years this ‘standard model’ will go on for now? How many discoveries to the contrary will be shouted down or locked away after this episode?

        At least now more people will be awake enough to look for T.T Brown’s and Ronald Richters now.

        • HAL838 on July 4, 2012 at 1:23 pm

          It’s strange how that ‘unseen’ and unknown mass
          percentage keeps growing………….very strange that

        • Joseph P. Farrell on July 5, 2012 at 7:59 am

          Matt, this is precisely my feeling too… in some respects, the standard model strikes me as having been DESIGNED to dead end…

          • MattB on July 5, 2012 at 5:34 pm

            What we have is a ‘false unified theory’ of everything that is constructed by, what appears at first glance, disparate disciplines.

            Certainly the forced indoctrinations of ‘the standard model’ we find in Physics, biology, geology, history, palaeontology, linguistics and even theology really don’t help things.

      • bdw on July 4, 2012 at 4:37 pm

        Also, if “science” is partly defined as what others can replicate, then much of what is done at CERN is not science: they are the only ones who can do it. They could make up any old story, for any reason, and no one would be able to prove them wrong.

        Same situation holds for much of what NASA does.

        Also, it is very unlikely that there will be any practical benefits from this research (higgs boson): the energy levels are too high for practical use (you have to spend billions of dollars in equipment and energy to do this stuff . .. )

  11. HeartStreams on July 3, 2012 at 9:10 am

    The experiment is interesting in the sense that the Higgs they found seems to be very elusive and not very “particle-like.” It makes me wonder if the Higgs is less a particle and more a grating of standing waves in the medium that then gives birth to measurable effects in the medium. In that case, they might have really. ome up with a way of measuring or detecting the some aspects of the medium itself… Food for thought.

  12. Hal Hichler on July 3, 2012 at 8:31 am

    JPF, are you familiar with Nassim Haramein and his unified field theory?

    There are plenty of youtube videos where he presents his ideas. He would laugh at the idea of a God particle and believes they will have to continue building super colliders into infinity if they want to find the smallest particle. I’m no rocket scientist, sometimes it takes me an entire evening just to get through a few pages of one of your books, but it sounds convincing to me. Didn’t Einstein himself say that the unified field theory would ultimately be simple to grasp and not complex?

    I recently just watched his four DVD “Crossing the Event Horizon.” ALong with his unified field theory, he gets into a lot of other subjects up your alley in this dvd like Giza and the other great pyramids, Freemasons, the Arc of the Covenant and crop circles. This is a gentleman with an absolutely unassailable thinking mind. His logic is flawless. I’ve had to watch these dvds several times.

    If you are unfamiliar with him, I would be compelled to send you these DVDs as I feel your education is not complete without it.

    And please, if you are responding to this post, I am not interested any talmudic nonsense from trolls about how is three chalk board long math formulas are flawed.

    • HAL838 on July 3, 2012 at 6:54 pm

      It’s like my big TOE
      [Unified Field Theories]
      Everybody has one!

      • Jedi on July 4, 2012 at 4:32 am

        Sparky, they found it…with a +- of .6 in a frequency range of >9 .11
        and on July 4th…RT has a video of it, freeze at 1.33 for the pertinent data.

        The final swan call before stormy weather.

        • HAL838 on July 4, 2012 at 7:11 pm

          Is that like four thirds ?

      • HAL838 on July 8, 2012 at 1:07 pm

        And that was probably the smartiest thing Einstein ever said

  13. Jedi on July 3, 2012 at 7:30 am

    so finally the enigma of which came first the chicken or the egg.

    however, as perusual, no one was thinking of sentence structure, the question should of been which came first the rooster or the hen….a hermaphrodite? M dna and child?

    hidden in plain site right in the good book.

    • Jedi on July 3, 2012 at 4:40 pm

      Interestingly there mascot is a great big huge white elephant, on a white background…how appropriate.

    • HAL838 on July 4, 2012 at 1:26 pm


      Think chicken
      I’m hungry

    • Robert Barricklow on July 4, 2012 at 6:01 pm

      This is my kind of thinking.

      • HAL838 on July 4, 2012 at 7:23 pm

        You mean all that bloodshed in/of “good book” thinking?

        • Robert Barricklow on July 5, 2012 at 10:11 am

          A twist of lime

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events