Daily News

PLAYING DARPA AGAIN: DRONING ON ABOUT DRONES…

Like many of you, I've been following the emergent transhumanist technologies of "emulation" and "anamnesis", the technologies designed to emulate and invoke or "recollect" the gods of old. These technologies are transhumanist in my opinion because they fulfill the extension of human consciousness throughout the universe so openly called for by some transhumanists like Ray Kurzweil, and because their intent in the hands of some is to allow the robotic extension of an individual's perception and "presence" outside of the body. In short, what we are talking about is the robotic extension and intrusion of the venal surveillance snitch state that Western culture and society has become. In this, the robotic remote control drone plays a pivotal role.

I want you to consider two articles in this respect:

New Drones Rape Your Mind

Now before we go on to ponder the second article, stop and consider this on its own for a moment: the technology will soon exist for a remote-controlled drone or robot to map an individual mind, and thus the potential exists for it to signal to a controlled in a bunker far away whether someone is thinking thoughts "too indpendent for the matrix consensus." Add to this what we said yesterday about the papacy's calls for a kind of global council on morality guidance, and you get the picture: we could have Albigensian crusades, with drones...

But why bother with crusades? Consider this version:

Next-gen US drone: Now equipped with ‘death ray’ laser

Now, with luck, an upgrade to this laser will be powerful enough to simply zap the malefactor into molecular disruption, and with corresponding advances in computerized database management, all references to such an individual could, if necessary, be completed zapped from the public record as well... the footprint of an individual could not just disappear physically, but historically.

Now let's play DARPA and do what DARPA does best, and imagine all sorts of creative Kammleresque ways in which technologies can be combined: a robotic drone capable of reading one's mind, equipped with a death ray laser, and pre-programmed to make on-the-spot decisions on whether to zap, or not to zap, the malefactor, and, taking a cue from old Cold War ICBM days, the human in the remote control bunker could have an "inhibit" switch to override the drone's "decision" while we await the decision from the Pope...er...from the global moral counseling guidance center...

... face it... you already know they're not only thinking about it...

...See you on the flip side...

17 thoughts on “PLAYING DARPA AGAIN: DRONING ON ABOUT DRONES…”

  1. It really dawned on me the magnitude of these soul searching drones. Not only have our prayers been answered and the Lord will be delivering us from evil, but this could trigger a leap in human evolution on par with harnessing fire. Imagine if humankind was forced to purge himself of all destructive and negative thoughts on fear of death? We would unlock our true potential in no time. And who can’t fantasize about 9/11 conspirators or Sandy Hook child murderers being hounded out and quickly meted out with justice? Imagine your neighbor, the cut throat kid killing federal assassin or the local newspaper editor who consistently obfuscated the truth about 9/11 and drank fresh blood every friday night with his fellow satanists running in terror down the street pursued by one of these Gabriel class divine justice drones as the rest of the neighborhood looks on?

    This drones would be nothing short of Angelic. They would in fact be Angel Drones.

    Now how is that for a dystopia? Or is it?

  2. Look at the bright side– As Jesus was the Great Exorcist and Roman Catholicism is his demon fighting legacy, what if these drones will be demon hunting drones? The latest technology in exorcism. Paint them black, anoint them and send them on their blessed mission to search and destroy those demonically possessed. I like it. I like it a lot.

  3. It struck me the other day, much as Joseph illuminates, that “the venal surveillance snitch state that Western culture and society has become” fosters a social climate quite analogous to the one constructed by the Church during the Inquisition.

    Knowing how deep this river runs, is it any wonder that the Vatican is posturing in various adogmatic manners (i.e. statements and releases on ET life, fraternity with Islam, the errant dating of the Gregorian Calendar [in 2012, no less], etc.) to reassert itself just as the NWO’s global security state hits critical mass with its Cyber Panopticon and Robotic Inquisition?

    The essential question: Is the Vatican the mastermind of this NWO geopolitical maneuvering, is it but a single cog in a machine, or is it simply kowtowing to an even more powerful entity?

    1. Hi John Q.

      “The essential question: Is the Vatican the mastermind of this NWO geopolitical maneuvering, is it but a single cog in a machine, or is it simply kowtowing to an even more powerful entity?”

      this seems to be the mega-baffling unanswered question de luxe that I constantly ask myself- in any case I hardly think the Vatican is completely innocent entity-

      hope you are well-

      Larry

    2. Soul searching drones as part of a high tech inquisition? How efficient. Changing your identity and religion won’t hide you from these guys. What will the breakaway Nazis and the Defenders of Christendom think of next?

      It may or may not be the end of the world as we know it, but it will surely be the end of the world for someone.

  4. It struck me the other day, much as Joseph illuminates, that “the venal surveillance snitch state that Western culture and society has become” fosters a social climate quite analogous to the one constructed by the Church during the Inquisition.

    Knowing how deep this river runs, is it any wonder that the Vatican is posturing in various adogmatic manners (i.e. statements and releases on ET life, fraternity with Islam, an errant Gregorian Calendar, etc.) to reassert itself just as the NWO’s global security state hits critical mass with its Cyber Panopticon and Robotic Inquisition?

    The essential question: Is the Vatican the mastermind of this NWO geopolitical maneuvering, is it but one cog in the machine, or is it simply kowtowing to an even more powerful entity?

  5. As I’am reading up on yinyang:

    …the bases of any yinyang distinctiomn is difference, opposition, and contradiction.
    Any two sides are connected and related, but they are also opposed in some way. It is this difference that enables yinyang as a strategy
    -to act successfully, we must sometimes be more yin and sometimes more yang, depending on the context.
    This aspect is often described as moodum
    /”shield-spear”
    and originated from a story/
    …A person who sells shields and spears promotes his shields by saying they are so strong that nothing can penetrate them, whereas he promotes his spears by saying they are so sharp they can penetrate anything.
    Someone then asks him – what happens if one tries to use your spear to penetrate your shield?

    assassination is; afterall,
    the business of business.

    1. it has been said to hate your enemies and love your neighbors but JC said to love your enemies .

      Sun Tzu said get your enemies too fight your enemies…something about a wise leader never fights any battles and wins all wars.

      even the godfather got in on it, keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

      its a philosophy written in stone

  6. Help! I’m drowning in drones dude, debilitated even disabled into a dystopian paradigm (hey, who let that p into this d party?). In other words Joseph, your dystopia is raining on my utopia. A utopia where an emerging critical mass of people utilizing the power of the internet by their collective visualization and activism will create a more human world and send the technocratic juggernaut packing its bags. Focused intent and passive resistance for a better outcome is the best “weapon” we have against the oppressors. We need to remember that the dark side of technology is not necessarily our fate and that we, in sufficient numbers, can control the outcome.

    1. I am no expert.

      But “passive resistance” hasn’t really succeeded much in this world, despite the propaganda. If you think Ghandi defeated the British with ‘passive’ resistance, read up on the ACTUAL history, not just the propaganda.

      For sure, using ‘passive resistance’ as if it were some kind of magical formula isn’t going to accomplish much.

      Do you think the Jews could have beaten Nazi Germany with passive resistance?? Do you really think that would have accomplished anything at all in that context????

      I agree that the “new age” sorts of ideas in your post can make a difference, but your “in sufficient numbers” comment pretty much concedes (in my opinion, of course) that it just isn’t going to accomplish much. Too high a percentage of the population is just propagandized out of any ability to help effect any positive change.

      My opinion of course.

      1. They excel at creating double blinds.
        A double blind is a situation where if you choose one you lose, if you chose option two you lose, and you cannot win with a draw.
        The only way out is to …SMASH IT!!!

        It’s The ONLY Way.

      2. I agee with you that passive resistance alone is inadequate, perhaps even futile. I’m counting on a change in the public awareness and a public outcry by a vocal minority. In terms of percentage these numbers can in some cases be surprisingly low.

        When there were plans to reform the internet a couple of years ago congress heeded the displeasure of the few million emails and phone calls that cried foul. When a gag order was removed from biotech scientists in Europe regarding details pertaining to GMO research strong measures were taken in short order to push back the GMO surge. The recent failure of Propostion 37 in California, I believe, is but a temporary setback as more people here are getting wise to the damaging effects of frankenfoods. I’ve heard numbers as low as 5% rejection might be a sufficient market force to pass legislation that favors the health of the consumer over the agenda of the biotech companies.

        Admittedly if the criminals in Washington put a chokehold on the internet then we the people will would most likely be neutered by our loss of access to real news in lieu of the propaganda perpetrated in mainstream bread and circuses. The deck does indeed seem to be stacked against a citizenry that had yet to awaken from its slumber. I guess ultimately my position is to visualize a positive outcome simply because failure is not a option.

Comments are closed.