Joseph continues his commentary on the article by Valentin Katasonov, and the Russian economist's thoughts on a hidden system of finance:

Parallel World of Finances (I)

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. HAL838 on March 19, 2013 at 11:59 am

    Elections have been fraudulent since electronic voting !
    [just corrupted before that]

    Obama’s birth certificate has been proven a fraud, a fake !
    [cbs broke it with little fanfare]

    The 2nd amendment has been really the only one left !
    [gun buyers are saying, ‘just try it’]

    TJ wants to know how much you will take (?)
    [we are about to find out]

    Gear up, children. War’s on !

  2. LSM on March 18, 2013 at 6:02 am

    go, go, GO (emphasis added to quote a well-known Farrell footnote quote :-)) Dr. Farrell with your analyses and viewpoints- I think you’re right on the money (so to speak- or am I being redundant? :-))-

    am half-way through “Covert Wars”- and you think this book is not “exiting”?- Dr. Farrell, I never thought it was possible for you to out-trump yourself but you managed to do it with this one- thank you so much for breaking down all of these financial concepts to a layman’s (start with me) level of understanding; i.e., you’ve exposed the cancer of hidden finances to us so we are able to see that we don’t need the usuary-based chemotherapy but just the natural remedy of getting rid of these financial vipers-

    many regards,

    Larry in Germany

  3. Robert Barricklow on March 15, 2013 at 8:13 am

    Information warfare is breaking to the surface.
    Maybe even some truth?

  4. incognito on March 14, 2013 at 7:00 pm

    That was a pretty good selection, that article. Your intelligence is obvious but there’s one small point:
    Do you mind not interjecting yourself all the time as you comment? It distracts from following your train of thought. The fact that you are commenting incisively (the majority of the time) is what makes you relevant.


    • paul de gagne on March 16, 2013 at 5:27 am

      Quote, “Do you mind not interjecting yourself all the time as you comment?”

      Firstly, I am not picking on you specifically but just pointing out a trend or certain method of operating. So don’t get into a Huff about it, ok?

      I find this sentence very interesting and telling? I am making a wild guess here but I am going to post this anyway and critics be dammed, ha, ha!

      All through School years “scientific papers’ had to written with as little use of the subjective word “I” as much as possible. (for the life of me I cant see any real purpose for this other than to follow a certain dogma in so-called science (might makes right kind of science) but I call it the “One Way Only Method.”.

      It’s as if “We all pretend the experimenter has no direct effect on the object or what is being experimented on.” This has got to be one of the worst fallacies ever put out by the fraudulent establishments! All this ‘quantum physics and we’re still in the ‘dark ages’ never mind questioning the existence of Dark Matter?

      Speaking of Dark Ages, I read some of the posts about dark matter concerning scientists and how they “REALLY WENT/GO ABOUT” discovering inventions that DO MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

      I suggest some of these commenters on this site also read the educator “Paul Feyerabend. It would add to or increase their sometimes wonderful, enlightening posts? Also, do a little more reading in the Art of Epistemology or maybe even a little Ontological fabrications now and then to spice out a point. (there’s my little example of a little bit of ‘personality injection, ha, ha!)

      Annoying sometimes isn’t it?

      I have to laugh at that sentence. If you ever want to dig deeper with all these sic – conspiracy theories then one has to deconstruct them and show how some of the basics or foundational elements of these ‘conspiracy theories of the moment/fashion” aren’t initially too well put or together along with everything else going on in this dam confusing field of study called Alternate History!(I would like to say revisionism but I find that word also got took over and abused!)

      Yes, play them (theories, hunches, guesses, etc.) out and see how many of them fall apart. (like the conspiracy theory that is poking in the funding for all these black projects?????). I don’t believe there is such a thing as a ‘Free Lunch” but not always because I get food stamps along with a couple of other things, but usually there isn’t?

      Here I go again, wandering completely off the subject matter.

      I ran a little ahead of myself in that next to last paragraph — I meant to say Satirize a point in a convincing conspiracy theory and you might piss off the conspirator to where sic —the conspirator unexpectedly INJECTS her/his own feelings into the debate and you sometimes may find out where they really stand on the issue and also how reliable their broadcast are.?)

      So you don’t like Farrell’s BODY LANGUAGE? ( if I had a nickel as they say I would be a rich man). Be grateful for if Farrell never revealed any, what quirks (?) then I would have been long gone. Farrell is a pro, don’t get me wrong, but not the kind of pro everybody listens too? If they did I probably would vamboose. Being a dogmatic Agonistic I am might still stick around to see what the enemy is up too?)

      I can hear another form of all “NEUTRALITY THEORY OF METHODOLOGY or “when losing an argument DON’T get emotional (OR INJECT!!!!)!” That’s another good one that shuts down debates! (as if the only true or proper form of arguing is the ‘Passionless Form.” (BULLSHIT ON THAT!)

      I like these ‘little injections’ or interuptions on Farrrell’s part for it shows me he hasn’t lost his human touch/traits unlike like some of these transhumanist wantabees whose monotone voices reveal how magnificent DULLness can be.

      I better quit this and go back to reading and finishing the CWBC book before I open my big mouth any further and convince you of what?

      • paul de gagne on March 16, 2013 at 5:45 am

        It just came to my mind Incognito might think I am picking on him. I’m not for I like some of his posts.

        I heard somewhere that “Trail Lawyers” are some of the best paid people around. Also, that 95% of lawyers don’t have the verbal skills necessary to do the job or as they say, “They are really able to Think on Their Feet” and don’t need to sit still to Cognate! Like so many of us do. (that’s a big weakness of mine for I find myself going over and over a ‘point’ in my head til it becomes clear instead of being like some of these eagles who are like Lightening itself as if they have no obsessions!)

        I guess people like me can only watch and learn. An Instructor in College once told us ‘That a certain Professor over at Columbia University’s Law School use to send his students down to Union Park/Square (?) to watch and listen to all the SOAPBOX oratories I imagine going on there.

        Something about this really makes good sense. (I wish I had more of those skills to where I too could tell Farrell not to inject himself into his expounding, ha, ha!)

        Have a good day today. I’m off to Eygpt to see if I can Rent a Pyramid for a few nano-seconds (all I can afford!)

        P.S. —- After all we’re getting close to St. Paddy’s day and boy do those Irish spin Yarns, ha, ha! (Almost makes Life Worth Living?)

  5. DownunderET on March 14, 2013 at 2:43 pm

    If the Russians “know it”, then so does China and every other nation that the Anglo-American elite have been pissing off.

    I wonder if down the track, that one if these nations will provide “actual proof” of the hidden system of finance, exposing to the whole world wha’ts been going on since WW 2.

    As Dr. Farrell has said on the Byte Show many times, Germany is the key to all of this, in other words, the “loss” of Germany from the west to the brics is basically the death nell for the Anglo-American elites.

    • incognito on March 14, 2013 at 7:12 pm

      I think Germany is the heart of Evil in the west. Paul Warburg and his cronies were coming from Germany during the years they spent implementing the fake fed. Yeah, London and the British empire are and were key manifestations of these centuries old elites, but Skull and Bones is an offshoot of a German secret society.

      • incognito on March 14, 2013 at 7:16 pm

        Don’t forget: the “windsors” are really the Saxe Coburg Gotha.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events