Cosmic Warfare

MORE CONFIRMATION OF THE ROSIN AFFIDAVIT: ASTEROIDS, NUKES AND A NEW ...

So many of you saw this and sent it to me that I cannot thank you all individually.

The reason for this week's "synchronicity" will, however, be evident from the moment you read the headline on this one:

Russia and the U.S. unite: Former enemies sign agreement to work on nuclear weapons to tackle the danger of ASTEROIDS

Before we can move on to why I think this article is both significant, and a bit of theater, it's worthwhile to recall what the Rosin Affidavit is, for those readers who may be unfamiliar with it. When Dr. Wernher von Braun was retired from NASA (and I'm one of those who think he "was restired" rather than "retired" from NASA), he moved into a consultancy as a vice president of Fairchild industries. There, he disclosed to another Fairchild Industries engineer, Dr. Carol Rosin, what he alleges to have been the "strategic game plan" he heard from "insiders". According to Dr. Rosin, von Braun told her that the "game plan" for weaponizing space was to concentrate on a series of "targets of opportunity." First, he said, the "Communists" would be the threat used to justify weaponizing space (remember the whole anti-ballistic missile defense that began in the Eisenhower Administration and culminated in Reagan's "Strategic Defense Initiative.") Then, according to Rosin, it would be "terrorists'. Well, in that respect, remember the subtle pushes for regional missile defenses in Europe after 9-11 by the Bush II administration. And we all recall Iraq's Scud missiles being aimed at Israel and Saudi Arabia during the Gulf War, which Israeli calls for the US Patriot missile system as a defense. Then according to Rosin, Von Braun indicated that the concern would move from "terrorists" to "nations of concern." These, it might be argued, were President Bush's "axis of evil" nations, and they became a "selling point" for pushing the European missile defense system. Of course, Russia was a primary unstated reason for the extension of a missile defense shield to Europe, but that's another story.

According to Rosin, however, the penultimate and ultimate threats to be used to justify the weaponization of space were "asteroids" and then, finally, "extra-terrestrials." Rosin relates that when von Braun got to "extra-terrestrials," he chuckled, as if not regarding that possibility as genuine, or, perhaps, he had some sort of unspoken inside knowledge that he was laughing off, possibly nervously.

In any case, I would suggest that we're looking at a partial confirmation, even if it is also a bit of theater, of Rosin's Affidavit. But before we get to the theater part, let's recall that one month prior to the Cheyabinsk meteor event, Russian prime minister Dmitri Medvedev gave indications that Russia would press forward, on its own if need be, with a defense against near Earth asteroids. Subsequent statements from Russia indicated that the method to destroy them would use thermonuclear weapons "or other means."

It's that phrase "or other means" that has me thinking that, perhaps, this concentration on nuclear weapons as the means for asteroid destruction might be a bit of theater, to accustom us to the idea and "necessity" of having hydrogen bombs in orbit above us. This idea was the nightmare of 1950s and 1960s "nuclear planners."

But why would it be theater? Well, apparently, there's been another near Earth asteroid (according to some), or Russian missile test (according to most), in Russia. And like the Chelyabinsk meteor, this one appears to have been destroyed by means that are clearly not nuclear, and that clearly do not resemble that of a standard kinetic impact or collision with another object either. Note in the following the clear indications that the "meteor" is a rocket, that simply dissolves or disappears:

Bizarre Jellyfish UFO Photographed By Two Astronauts And From Ground In Russia

Strange Clouds Photographed from ISS Tied to Secret Russian Missile Launch

Other photos of the same event show a clear contrail, and Russia announced a test of its new TOPOL strategic missile more or less within the time frame of the incident.(See Topol launch from Kapustin Yar tests new combat payload) So...

....what are we looking at? Missile test? A UFO? Well, definitely a missile test according to the Russians, but in either case, we're looking at a very strange disappearance of the object in, and that's the point. Not an impact, not an ABM, but clearly something in the destruction of the "meteor"  or missile.

I suggest what we're looking at is (1) deliberate obfuscation of the sources concerning what happened and (2) that the reason for the obfuscation is to disguise the existence of a human "anti meteor" system that is not based on nuclear weapons or kinetic impacts with the objects.  Those who've read my books will recall the existence of a document detailing the testimony of a German prisoner of war from World War Two, who testified seeing an Allied bomber simply "disintegrate" when hitting some sort of "invisible barrier." What we have here looks almost similar.

And Chleyabinsk? that strange event over a major Russian city, and also a premier site in the development of Russia's nuclear energy and defense systems? Well, they've now recovered chunks of that meteor:

Giant Chunk of the Chelyabinsk Meteor Raised from Lake

Why the effort to recover that meteor? Well, from the scientific perspective alone, it is a literal godsend to scientists. But I also suggest that those chunks are going to show why the meteor exploded, and if something impacted with it. And that's the real reason for the interest.

Bottom line? I suspect, once again, we're looking at messages being sent, clearly by Russia, but to whom? The USA would be one obvious target, given Russian-American geopolitical clashes down on Earth; but in space, clearly the two world powers are concerned about "asteroids," and they're conveniently showing up at the precise time that they need to in order to justify a new kind of "international space cooperation" against the threat.

And that's all preparation for the ultimate raison d'etre for space defense as Von Braun told Dr. Rosin four decades ago...

See you on the flip side...

9 thoughts on “ MORE CONFIRMATION OF THE ROSIN AFFIDAVIT: ASTEROIDS, NUKES AND A NEW ...”

  1. Robert Barricklow

    Appears this has been scripted for sometime.
    Probably had/has access to ancient text, and then translated to “fit” their plans. Don’t actually believe a live alien “physical” presence is in communication.
    It’s scripted theater.

  2. This fits in nicely with the idea that one reason for this kind of “theater” is to let the “others” ( to use Dolan’s term) out in space know that we have such a capability – to disintegrate objects coiming in to the atmosphere – including craft they might send.

    The progression from “nations of concern” to asteroids to ETs may indeed be a game plan, and Von Braun’s “leaking” of information to Rosin might have just been part of the the psyop. The question is, how much of that psyop is for our benefit, and how much is a smokescreen or even direct message for the “others?”

    There is also the layer(s?) of factional infighting, which might also be a ploy and/or part of the psyop, or at least being leveraged as such on some level. The black ops community is capable of an insane degree of convolution in their op planning and execution. And, we certainly know that the Russians are incredible chess players as well.

    The Clint Eastwood/Richard Burton movie, “Where Eagles Dare,” is a nice portrayal of a convoluted black op during WW2, full of double and seeimng triple agents, although still a cakewalk compared to situations today.

    The Gene Hackman movie, “The Package,” is also an interesting study of a rogue black op within military intelligence, although having more to say about the JFK assasination than space stuff.

    Whether Hollyweird is telling us bits of truth or just stories, I think it can be instructive to see the situations and behaviors modeled and displayed for us to think about.

    Which reminds me of a statement attributed to Crowley when criticized for publishing “secrets” of the Golden Dawn , etc.; that one could shout the truth from the rooftops, and only a very few would actually listen or understand, so secrecy was not really as important as some would like to think.

    The best place to hide is in plain sight?

    Food for thought.

  3. Space co-operation huh, well that idea of putting up some sort of space cannon takes a hell of a lot of money, so if the US wants to buy in, they have to find the money.

    Now, who said there was a hidden system of finance to fund black projects and secret research?

  4. it has been reported, that during the apollo missions small lockers were found on the movie moon set, and containing a shoe shine box, carrying the name, larrold silverstien and inside, besides black shoe polish, was a Lincoln green insurance policy manual of “how fraud can benefit a liar that is willing to murder”, also besides the black shoe polish, and a pack of (wanna be a ) player smokes, , a large quantity of ky petroleum was found…..and a script about a future movie, ghost busters. Might explain the strange behavior of aliens and the claims of anal examinations.

    I aunt afraid of knew ghost….ghost busters….

    1. the black shoe shine polish aka, the black box, the one that is never found on mysterious plane crashes.

      now there is a script, with, a….I got a bad feeling and a happy ending.

      Woody nickels for all at the bar known as cheers.

  5. Hitting an asteroid with a nuke is a bad idea anyway. Instead of being hit by one big object you be hit by grapeshot instead and radioactive to boot. Anyway our masters are itching to do Star Wars always looking for a new killing ground to open up.

  6. awesome research, and with ayrans being genocided in there former homelands after of course being taken over by the emperors chosen people, or the self proclaimed chosen ones, they have distractions going on in outer space (high atmosphere but still submerged) and carried by the story tellers aka the lame stream media which ignores the massive destruction of any semblance of a renewable economic model system, while the exportation of 3rd world desert creators and other highly exploilted life slave forms goes on into 1st world, all right under the massive noses of the moses makers ………..It is wonderful to be alive to witness this….I sometimes imagine err, remote view,, that earth is a living lesson of the mistakes that non intelligent life forms make when given access too technology, and how quickly things get out of control when the patients take over a eco system, …..
    calling nurse ratchet to the cafeteria….calling nurse ratchet

  7. Re today’s post, related or not, coincidences get my attention: I came across these yesterday:

    Russia to test new missile
    The RS-26 is expected to be deployed with multiple supersonic, maneuvering warheads designed to defeat U.S. missile defenses in Europe. It will be equipped with a high-performance fuel that boosts acceleration shortly after launch for avoiding anti-missile interceptors.
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/oct/16/inside-the-ring-russia-to-test-new-missile/
    … which has me thinking of reasons for so much anti-ballistic weaponry being assembled in the Middle East, around the ancient lands, with the appearance of national defense when it may well be for planetary defense …

    Jellyfish go to space, say it was “meh, kinda sucky”
    A moon jelly pictured … NASA sent jellyfish into space to test if being born weightless affects the ability to adjust to gravity. The jelly forms crystals at the margin of its bell which it uses to sense up from down; without gravity the sense doesn’t develop. (a jellyfish w/ vertigo?)
    http://deepseanews.com/2013/10/jellyfish-go-to-space-say-it-was-meh-kinda-sucky/

  8. Oh, I read “space jellyfish” and thought Trevor James Constable’s critters, or Norman Bergrun’s IFOs.

    Now speculation: A shockwave in the shape of a bell (inverted from the camera’s view), but not a local shock in the earth’s chemical atmosphere, but a contained shock in the aether–one that shows up visually and would likely dustify solid matter within it. Perhaps the targeting point, or method of generation high in the earth’s atmosphere is delivered by rocket, but very unlikely this was a rocket warhead exploding in any conventional sense.

Comments are closed.