RECENT CERN FINDINGS COULD CHALLENGE THE STANDARD MODEL

This was one of those stories that was on everyone's - well, almost everyone's - radar this past week, for there is news coming out of the world's Cosmology Cartel, CERN, that may be opening the door to alternative physics models other than the standard model.

New Large Hadron Collider study may overturn Standard Model of physics

Now, what interests me (for our high octane speculation purposes) are these curious statements.

"The Standard Model says the world interacts with all leptons in the same way. There is a democracy there. But there is no guarantee that this will hold true if we discover new particles or new forces," said Maryland professor Hassan Jawahery, ahead of the publication of his study in Physical Review Letters. "Lepton universality is truly enshrined in the Standard Model. If this universality is broken, we can say that we've found evidence for non-standard physics."

The research is particularly important, as it indirectly builds on another experiment, the Stanford University-based BaBar study, which has been in progress since the 1990s, and also appears to contradict the Standard Model.

When we seach for the recent explanations from Stanford's Babar experiment (which, incidentally, is called BaBar because B mesons are written with a big capital B, and their anti-particle "equivalent" is written with a big B with a bar over it, hence, "BaBar"), we find this intriguing reference:

BaBar Experiment Confirms Time Asymmetry Time's quantum arrow has a preferred direction, new analysis shows

And in this, we find these statements:

Time marches relentlessly forward for you and me; watch a movie in reverse, and you’ll quickly see something is amiss. But from the point of view of a single, isolated particle, the passage of time looks the same in either direction. For instance, a movie of two particles scattering off of each other would look just as sensible in reverse – a concept known as time reversal symmetry.

Now the BaBar experiment at the Department of Energy's (DOE) SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory has made the first direct observation of a long-theorized exception to this rule.

Digging through nearly 10 years of data from billions of particle collisions, researchers found that certain particle types change into one another much more often in one way than they do in the other, a violation of time reversal symmetry and confirmation that some subatomic processes have a preferred direction of time.

Reported this week in the journal Physical Review Letters, the results are impressively robust, with a 1 in 10 tredecillion (1043) or 14-sigma level of certainty – far more than needed to declare a discovery.

Now, for those of you who know the name of Dr. Nikolai Kozyrev, the famous Russian astrophysicist, this will be sounding awfully familiar, for Kozyrev, as a result of a rather different chain of reasoning concerning the fusion process in stars, came to a very similar conclusion, namely, that time was, in effect, its own form of energy and that it had a preferred spin orientation. One of the chief differences (as far as this hack from South Dakota can tell), is that the Stanford experiments are obviously concerned with things on the quantum (very small) scale, and Kozyrev was talking about things on the macro(very large) scale. Not surprisingly, Kozyrev related his thoughts to the phonemonenon of torsion.

Reading a little further into the Stanford article, we find this arrestings series of statements:

“This is a fresh way to understand data we had already used to measure CP violation,” said BaBar physics coordinator Abner Soffer, associate professor at Tel Aviv University. “By looking at it slightly differently we were able to undeniably see time violation as well. What’s nice is that the effect was there the whole time, but nobody had thought about it the right way before.”

Time violation had previously been seen in particles called neutral kaons by the CPLEAR experiment at CERN, but that measurement was not direct because of the inability to distinguish T violation from CP violation, and the interpretation of those results drew some criticism. It’s hard to set up laboratory conditions that can see time reversal violation, Martínez-Vidal explained. But BaBar provided just the right conditions for a clear, direct measurement.

In other words, CERN appeared to have very loosely confirmed similar results, and while it is certainly stretching things a great deal, it can be said that perhaps CERN, like Stanford, was looking for such events, above and beyond Higgs bosons and quark-gluon stangelets and all the other weird deities in the quantum mechanical pantheon.

All of which leads us to our high octane speculation of the day. You'll note that the RT article about CERN finding things that could either significantly modify, or perhaps even overturn, the Standard Model of particle physics appeared on August 30, just a few days ago. Then, a day later, this article appeared at RT, also about CERN, but with a completely different focus:

10 mind-blowing facts about the CERN Large Collider you need to know

Now, there are the usual pro forma disclaimers at the bottom of the article about the contents not representing the official views of RT (or the Russian government), which raises all sorts of thorny questions. Why would one of the mouthpieces of the Russian government choose to run such an article about CERN(a day after the previous one, remember), under the heading that these are things you need to know about the Large Hadron Collider? The question to my mind is intensified when one considers the contents of the article itself, which, by picturing Shiva and the so-called "666" corporate logo (which, in my opinion, could equally be just a stylization of the five accelerators that comprise the machine, or just as easily be a "999" reference for Hermetica-Egypt fans), seems to be raising en passant all the conspiracy theories out there concerning the machine.But more important than pictures of CERN's logo or Shiva, there is this extremely odd set of paragraphs that follow an even odder section header:

9. Massive gravitational pull

The CERN collider is composed of some 9,600 super magnets – which are 100,000 times more powerful than the gravitational pull of Earth - that fire protons around a circular track at mindboggling speeds. A beam might rotate for up to 10 hours, travelling a distance of more than 10 billion kilometers, enough to make it to the far reaches of our Solar System and back again. Travelling just below light-speed, a proton in the LHC will make 11,245 circuits every second.

No less amazing are the magnet’s coils, which are made up of 36 twisted 15mm strands, each strand comprised in turn of 6000-9000 single filaments, each filament possessing a diameter as small as 7 micrometers. The 27km length of the LHC demands some 7,600 km (4,100 miles) of cable, which amounts to about 270,000 km (145,000 miles) of strand — more than enough to circle the Earth six times at the Equator. According to the CERN website, if the filaments were unraveled, they would “stretch to the Sun and back five times with enough left over for a few trips to the Moon.”

This is followed by a review of the warnings from Hawking, and a review of the court case attempt in Germany to prevent the collider from being fired up at all. It's that little mention of "massive gravitational pull" as a section header along with details about the magnetic strength of the LHC itself that suggests to this layman hack from South Dakota that someone, somewhere in Russia, has made a connection between magnetism and gravity, and, moreover, to possible magneto-gravitational effects that might be induced by the collider, altogether apart from any public references to quantum mechanical experiments. In short, what RT seems to be suggesting is that the machine is about much more than quantum mechanics; that it is, in fact and reality, a machine able to manipulate effects in the large and even planetary scales, and that the particle physics is the "cover story" for a much grander, and very different type of physics experiment. We don't find many scientists talking about such possibilities - or even willing to admit them - but nonetheless they would seem to this layman to follow inevitably from the structure of the machine itself: a strong local magnetic field, sheathed in a (potentially piezo-electric?) molasse of rock, all within the greater context of the Earth's magnetic field, which in turn forms a much larger macro-system coupled with that of the Sun... I even suggested that the stacked character of the Proton Sychrotron in relation to the Collider plus the counter-rotation in the Collider itself, might under certain circumstances induce a kind of magnetic field precessional wobble... well, you get the idea. The bottom line, at least for this hack, is that it still appears that CERN may be about far more than just slamming packets of mathematical information together, and the RT article may thus be a little reminder that the incomplete theories of yesteryear - I'm thinking Kron, Kaluza-Klein, and so on - may be incomplete, but that does not make them un-engineerable...

See you on the (hyper-dimensional) flip side...

34 thoughts on “RECENT CERN FINDINGS COULD CHALLENGE THE STANDARD MODEL”

  1. Hmm seems like a nice way to roll out the new physics paradigm. Get everyone paying attention and thinking they are going to blow up the world on Sept 23, Then with all eyes on them, they “discover” unified field physics, roll out the 50 year old tech meanwhile they continue to play with the current more advanced stuff.

  2. This is a recent ‘channeling’ (not by me), but I’ll put it here for the interesting ‘take’ on CERN:

    “CERN has three purposes:

    1) Physics experiments in 3D.
    2) 4D holographic weapon.
    3) Trying to open a portal/wormhole to a dimension that was sealed long ago.”

  3. Possibly the Large Hadron Collider is being used to stabilize our fickle Sun. Or, maybe the CERN scientists intend to dramatically shift the poles making the Mediterranean the new North Pole and putting the yahweh bastions under a mile of ice. Thank you IG Farben East.

  4. I wrote a very long reply to you, Robert, but it was taken by my friends at the CIA here at Little Langley.
    I know I was taking a big chance because they do that a lot.
    Crying doesn’t help and I’m expecting some ‘other’ company.
    I remember what I said at the end and maybe I’ll try again later.

    Thank you Robert. Intelligence is always a breath of fresh air.

    1. I can often win the computer, in the fight over my own,
      but not always.
      Perhaps it goes back to 1994 and a strange ‘conversation.’

      THEY gave us the mouse, not for the ease of use, but to limit
      use.
      Robert, Do you remember when you could type in your instructions?

  5. Mmmmmmm,counter rotating magnetic fields potentially producing a shearing torsional effect on local space, could this collider actually be die Glocke II. Could we see some mad scientist planning to place earth into a better/different orbit,maybe one where germany has a tropical climate and hamburg hula hula girls on the baltic beaches. Boy it just gets better and better don’t it?

  6. “The CERN collider is composed of some 9,600 super magnets – which are 100,000 times more powerful than the gravitational pull of Earth ”

    “a machine able to manipulate effects in the large and even planetary scales”

    Considering the feedback loop systems (Submicro to supermacro), and that the earth’s magneto-gravitational system integrates our local virtuality.. what are they attempting to do? Or is it being done as we speak?

    On wiki: Shiva is also a transformer.. limitless, transcendent, unchanging and formless. I think we have an idea what that actually is…

  7. apologies for jumping around here. please consider this interruption in the regular programming to take a look at dr f’s article on yet another explosion in china.

    i put this link up in a comment there a moment ago.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smM6p4GinLY

    the source is one of the first folk to get me onto electric universe theory. he runs a bit long but his logic is unusually sound.

    dr f. can we get another article on this subject?

    thank you,
    zdb

      1. I doubled checked this story on what looked like an official CERN news site. Now, that site is not to be found.

        This appears to be another phony science news story, similar to the fake Dr. Amit Goswami interview a short while back.

        Thanks, Margaret, for pointing it out!

  8. Many times we see what we want to see. A sort of “seek and ye shall find”.
    In the early 70s I began searching out information on time-travel as part of a possible novel; incorporating physics with bio-engineering, and then using a bio-engineered black widow[red hour-glass] as a symbol/vehicle to drive the storyline. In researching the physics, I envisioned time as being a form of energy-foam that when manipulated, within an immense magnet-toroid[doughnut-hole], spining certain “time particle/waves” to speeds approaching light, time could become o tool.
    And low and behold, I found huge magnets being shipped to Stanford and other research facilities around the globe. I began seeing time machine research going on all over the place.
    Fast forward to today, & I see CERN in that context. It fits my mindset. [The timing mechanism’s would be linked to biology; like the rings of a tree.] Of course; the driver this technology is it’s weaponization[this revelation came later with my readings of Dr. Farrell’s work].

    Unclejed’s “Project Chronos” analogy is spot-on.

    1. Time is a multie infinity grid that goes ALL ways

      (why backward?,) but back in time and forward in time

      and crosses (time) lines that can end, or begin, as it changes

      every time (frame) quanta, about 10 to the minus 43rd power.

      Most of the ‘time’ the connections will by far out number the

      disparities, so that WE perceive it to flow very nicely,

      MOST OF THE ‘time.’

      But ‘quirks’ can be big enough to be seen & felt occasionally,

      as those strange tales oft heard about.

      The above info is what makes time navigable, both ridiculously

      expensive and flawed technology.

      But this Universe is mind (god) stuff and so is the favored

      (I think) method of time travel.

      1. Last night in between sleep & consciousness I was thinking about time travel & the “living universe”; “quantum fluctuations”; “the observation effects on reality”; “mind/matter”; and time as a living entity trapped in a bottled/captured universe. As I played out the combination/scenarios the possibility of time travel narrowed down to an individual’s grasp of all the above & more; that he or she, “in theory” could do it.
        And therein the culture conundrum: Besides abolishing history, TV ‘news’ also vanquishes time, since it eliminates all critical perspective on what is happening/the broadcasts occur at the same time as the events they are supposedly reporting on, and these events last no longer than the fleeting instant in which they are enunciated, the disappear, swept away by others, which in turn are annihilated by new ones. The inconsistent/dizziness denaturalization of the actual world has resulted, purely and simply, in its evaporation and replacement by the truth of media-created fiction, the only true reality of our age: the age of image/simulacra. Thus, what is scandalous in our day, is not the attacks on our moral values, but consistent attacks on reality itself…
        The communication revolution has abolished the human ability to tell the difference between truth and lies and/or between history & fiction.
        Time, like ourselves, has become trapped in a manufactured reality; the difference only is in the technology, and/or the observer.

        1. I like your analogy…because it’s true. Unfortunately, perception means more than reality, thereby becoming reality and everyone (seems) to get their own (reality.)

          As for time ‘travel,’ I seem to skip around it all the ‘time.’ Unconsciously, of course, never consciously or by will, tripping through ‘time frames’ that somehow don’t quite belong to its back & forth connections. BUT, that’s not the only way to travel time as it often skips sideways. That’s the nature of its multie-dimensional INFINITY and key to its conquest and travel. TIME is key to the Universe.

          I’ve lived with the impossible all my life.
          THAT you can get use to.

          BUT the torture THEY constantly put me through because THEY found out how different I am, is NOT something you get use to. I certainly have never gotten use to such physical pain and mental anguish.
          In the beginning, there were multiple attempts on my life. The failures drew THEM to torture instead.
          Electro/magnetics are the two ‘sub’ keys to the Universe.

          THEY have the ‘flawed’ use of both through their technology, which is flawed by its very nature.

          Is it possible to believe any of this about me?
          For all his wonderful research and sense about ‘things,’ Joseph doesn’t.

          1. As you say, Perception is reality.
            T.S. Eliot calls it the preservation of the quality of culture of a minority[1]. This Higher culture is basically a culture made up of three ‘senses’ of the term: the individual, the group or class, and the whole society Each maintains a certain autonomy and develops in a state of constant tension with others, within an order that allows the whole of society to prosper and maintain cohesiveness.
            But that doesn’t exist.
            It’s, unfortunately, a culture of image/entertainment maintained & maintenance by the less than 1%; at the expense of us all, including the clueless less than 1%.

          2. Clueless THEY are NOT, but ‘insane’ is a good word.
            It is not a medical term or mental illness. It is a legal term of total incompetence, a condition usually permanent and almost always evil.
            AND as Friedrich Nietzsche once said, “Insanity is more often found collectively rather than individually.”
            [Himself of the elite of the times, he would have known.]

            AND as medical science knows, it is often caused by inbreeding, which the ‘elite’ have been doing for perhaps millennia.

            ALSO, all religions acknowledge control of the Earth by [the] (d)evil.

            On the other hand, I combined two brief college thesis and rewrote them into one entitled, “Modern Democracy: Experiment in Progress.” One of very few writings I kept in my own name for publication. I was still a bit naïve then about how the world and the USA really works from the top down.

            Anyway, never having heard of me, one editor ‘stole’ it and I was quoted in most of the ‘talk’ shows, but in no position, at that time, to go after it legally. No big deal for the actual purpose.

            I believe that ‘things’ will be changing soon, making it possible for your [and my]
            more ideal “culture” states to become possible.
            As I said, (I am) ever the eternal optimist.

            Thank you Robert. Intelligence is always a breath of fresh air.

          3. I totally enjoyed reading both of your explanation’s and happy to say I GET it.
            Only 3 short years ago, after reading “Covert Wars” by our Dr. Farrell, I set out for the higher path, yeah.
            It’s unfortunate though,I could have been 35 years ahead by now but one night going to bed, I asked for any type of proof if, “they” were out there and I did get a very negative response. I quit cold turkey that night.
            And then I read/learn that the “They” are us. Thanks Dr. Farrell and all of you here. Just trying to follow the path and avoid the many detours out there.

  9. This CERN thingamabob is murky at best, so I thought I’d give it a new explanation of of it’s purpose, here goes.

    CIRCULAR EXOTIC ROTATING NAZI’, there isn’t that a better explanation !!!

  10. While we’re on the subject of bogus physics, one of the most compelling recent conspiracy theories is that Stephen Hawking died in 1995 (when his wife divorced him) and has been replaced by a doppleganger who is simply another ALS sufferer who hasn’t the slightest clue about physics, and his “pronouncements” have been programmed ever since.

    Hawking has had ALS, a disease that no one survives more than 15-20 years tops, for over 50 years! He is now supposedly 73 years old and still as sharp as ever!

    Utter nonsense! As for CERN, is there a measurable gravity well that is created when they turn that thing on? Do they have a no-fly zone around it? If so, then I’d start to get worried.

    1. A Miles Mathis is the fellow who has presented this conspiracy theory. It’s fairly well thought out with photographic evidence. As for Hawking’s ALS, according to Wikipedia, he has rare form of ALS that is early onset and slow progressing.

      I take no position on this, but for those interested, here’s Mr. Mathis’s pdf on Hawking:

      http://milesmathis.com/hawk3.pdf

  11. How to create a new branch of Physics;:

    1) Invent a vision of The Universe different from the one currently in vogue.
    (2) Call it Quantum Physics to clearly distinguish it from its rival, Newtonian Macro-Physics, so that everyone will think you are onto something.
    (3) Paper it over with an endless number of unexamined fixed ideas, so that you always get the result you are looking for.
    (4) Root these fixed ideas in the false assumption that The Universe is finite, i.e., that it emerged out of an “ultimate” particle.
    (5) Never investigate the relationship between your Micro and Macro visions, so the public won’t discover there isn’t one.
    (6) Lobby Congress annually for billions of tax payer dollars.
    (7) Announce a momentous new “discovery” every time your budget comes due.
    (8) Nominate one of your discoveries each year for a Nobel Prize even though its only speculation.
    (9) Do not point out that your speculations always lead to a dead-end because they soon become economically infeasible to prove.

    And, most of all,

    (9) Never question the fixed ideas behind your Theory, so that no one will begin to doubt it.

    Oh yes, I almost forgot the two most important rules:

    (10) Pretend to endorse the vision of The Universe proposed by the Hindu God of Destruction, Lord Shiva, by erecting a monument to him in front of the campus of your Collider. That way everyone will think you are dealing with ultimate reality,

    (11) Then simply ignore the core message of his vision of The Universe:

    “He who does not begin at The Beginning, will not end up at The End.”

    ‘Nuff said…

  12. A coupling to the earth and to the sun in a massive amount of rock reminds me of the Pyramid of Giza, but minus the rotation and the magnetic field precessional wobble. And that just raises all sorts of questions concerning what their ultimate goal is especially if the Pyramid was used for warfare in the past. Are we seeing a replay?

  13. Will the Big Bang and String Theory end up in the dust bind of scientific ideas who’s time came and went. And what purpose did these theories serve to keep the rest of ignorant so our oligarchs could control us as usual.

Comments are closed.