CONCERN ABOUT CERN: THE STRANGELETS RUMOR REMERGES

CONCERN ABOUT CERN: THE STRANGELETS RUMOR REMERGES

Remember when CERN's Large Hadron Collider was scheduled to be turned on for the first time? THere were efforts in the courts, both in this country, and in Europe, to block the process, with the plaintiffs seeking injunctions to prevent it, until the possibility that the collider might create "strangelets", or "quark-gluon condensates" or plasmas, that might gobble up the planet. At the time, these were referred to as "mini-black holes" though they're not quite the same thing. Strangelets are what physicists believe was an exotic state of matter that existed within a few seconds after the big bang. The fear was that they acted in a manner analogous to the "gray goo" scenario of nano-technology speculations, where a nano-technology is designed to gobble everything up and turn it into "gray goo", an apocalyptic scenario if there ever nwas one. Similarly, strangelets would convert all matter into the strangelet, eventually swallowing up the planet and converting all its mass into a superdense "goo". Well, that, anyway, is the Cliff Notes version, though I'm quite certain it would set most physicists' teeth on edge. Indeed, at the time, all these rumors and lawsuits did set physicists' teeth on edge, for they responded, quite correctly, that the dangers of CERN's monster machine doing this were vanishingly small. Not zero, but still, vanishly small.  But adding fuel to the quiet controversy was the factt that these suits were thrown out of court. Why? Well, for one thing, the courts had no jurisdiction over CERN, for CERN is a quasi-sovereign entity, a kind of "cosmology cartel." And that meant, in turn, that the plaintiffs had no standing.

Well, the "strangelet" story is back in the alternative news community once again, in this article shared by Mr. V.T.:

http://kevbakershow.com/cern-strangelets-causing-increased-earth-changes/#sthash.tI13T3gg.FtuKOTDp.dpbs

Now note what is really going on here:

During our previous shows covering CERN we have spoken about something called “Strangelets”. Strangelets are produced that the LHC at energies over 10TeV. For long periods in 2016 10TeV+ was achieved and towards the end of the year the energy rose to over 1PeV – 1 Quadrillion Electron Volts which would’ve seen Strangelet production go through the roof – or perhaps it would be more apt to say fall through the floor!

Strangelet’s were first produced at CERN in 2010 and at that time they referred to them as plasma. The strangelet’s are composed of a Quark-Gluon condensate and are stable in nature. It’s this stability that makes them so utterly explosive due to everything else being of an unstable make up!

The Gluons  normally act as intermediaries between the individual quarks, allowing exchanges of energy. It’s all in the name… Gluons – they literally glue the quarks in place. When the beams of particles collide they literally rip the Quarks & gluons apart and they form in a dense stable state.

Strangelet’s are highly dense and hard to contain once produced, and we had spoken about the potential for them to make their way towards the core of the planet and cause major disruption that would come in the form of earth changes, e.g. earthquakes and volcanic activity.

Now, I find this interesting, because in my own wild and very high octane speculations, I have entertained similar ideas, namely, that CERN's toy is really a planetary-scaled machine, capable, perhaps, of producing planetary effects, though I have concentrated not on the idea of strangelets, but rather upon the strong magnetic fields it produces, being embedded in a mollasse of rock, i.e., non-linear material, and that perhaps when "turned on" it could have effects on the planet, even, perhaps, on the earth's magnetic field, which in turn might affect human and animal behavior patterns in some way. As a result of these speculations, I've also entertained the idea that there may be two layers to CERN's computerized data selection filters, one picking out anomalous collision events for scientists to analyze and ponder, and a deeper, more secret one, picking out data that might have nothing to do with particle collisions. Inclusive in this second-filter layer, I have proposed that "data correlation" experiments might also be a secret and hidden component of the CERN experiments, measuring correlations of environmental(and sociological) effects when the collider is on.

What the article implies is that these correlations are, in fact, being run on an ad hoc basis by amateurs watching the CERN machine, and watching concurrent earth-events. Indeed, there are websites claiming there are variations in the Earth's northern magnetic feild concurrent with the collider being on, though it should also be noted that scientists dispute these, maintining that such changes are normal and, to a certain extent, cyclical, and can be accounted for by other processes. Color me skeptical here, but I suspect that there may be a further high octane speculation that could be entertained, namely, that these "data correlation" studies might not only be conducted by some deeper seecretive layer of the project, but also that these amateur websites might themselves, unwittingly, be a part of it, as it would be an easy matter for an institution like CERN, with its vast computing power, to monitor them. One thing I remain convinced of, is that CERN's toy is not an isolated, closed system. It is bound to have some sort of planetary effect, whether via strangelets or some other mechanism(think strong counter-rotating magnetic fields, embedded in non-linear media, and torsion here).
I've also raised the problem of the verifiability of CERN's findings, for it raises certain philosophical problems: science is about repeatability and verification. The problem is, none of us has the means of building our own gigantic particle accelerator, to "check the results" of the cosmology cartel that is CERN. Perhaps this is why the Chinese want to build their own, bigger version, and more recently, the Russians have announced similar plans. And perhaps, too, they realize that a planetary machine that could produce such effects has potentially entirely different purposes...
See you on the flip side...

21 thoughts on “CONCERN ABOUT CERN: THE STRANGELETS RUMOR REMERGES”

  1. Within the limitations of our human form and human senses, we have no way of knowing the full extent of what we are not able to see or measure with regard to what CERN destroys or creates.

    1. I’ve honestly never had one of my own potential comments return that message, and mine are usually no less controversial than your own. Maybe it’s something on your end that is warranting that result. I’ve seen others make similar claims as well. I know sometimes if a comment is too long there’s a hang up, but other than that I guess I’m not cool enough for the moderation club.

      1. It is a most unpleasant mystery. I had thought it may be due to my English not being strong enough, and the auto-censor took offence at my syntax or grammar. Whatever the real reason may be, I find it disheartening to see a comment go into moderation thereby removing me from the discussion. If there were some guide regarding the auto-censor, it would be helpful.

  2. “…the courts had no jurisdiction over CERN, for CERN is a quasi-sovereign entity, a kind of ‘cosmology cartel’. And that meant, in turn, that the plaintiffs had no standing.”

    And THAT situation is evidence of TPTB ‘ownership’. Nothing important is to be left to public control. Create a private entity, put your stooges in place, and proclaim that it (à la The Fed) is a public institution. It usually works on the sheeple.

    Also, no ‘government’ (or coalition of governments) is going to ante-up multi-billions just for abstract physics. TPTB are looking for something…

  3. Torsion Field … create a gravity well and power it up to gin a super worm hole to not just beam the Enterprise “That-a-way” but tear a hole in space time to the next verse over. Torsion Fields and Portals are in theory (and rumor) associated with each other.

  4. I actually worry more about CERN being a legitimate and benevolent entity. At least if they’re managed by a shadowy cosmology cartel, we know someone over there is accounting for the nested field effects in relation to chemtrails, weather warfare, woodpeckers, etc. Granted I do feel a tad dislodged from the time stream, but I haven’t got stuck in any walls lately.

  5. Shades of the Stargates the movie and the tv series or the portal from the movie Howard The Duck. Lab 05 from Fullmetal Alchemist list your worst nightmares unfortunately when listening to the radio show the people speaking on it were in their own bumble. And couldn’t see they were part of the problem. They bought into there was a division between believers and atheist when they two sides of the same coin you have to listen to the two and half hour program because they still buying into the Russia-China are servants of Satan against Israel Koolaid.

  6. I wonder if CERN had anything to do with that airplane going down over Egypt. I’ve heard that CERN creates portals. What if that plane hit one of those portals? Hummm…

    1. I think you’re onto something. Reports suggest the plane took an immediate 90 degree turn followed by a 365 maneuver. To me it suggests the plane was trying to avoid something…

    2. As much as that is an intriguing concept, I suspect simpler shenanigans. EgyptAir flight 804 was an Airbus A320. I am assuming Airbus aircraft have similar anti-hijacking ‘codes’ built-into their autopilot as published Boeing aircraft. It should be noted that this ‘capability’ is an active one, allowing remote controllers to redirect an aircraft to a suitable runway.

      While engineered to abort a terrorist’s flight-plans, this capability could be used for anything from over-‘G’-ing an aircraft to hijacking it to a ‘rendition’ spot for certain passengers or cargo. In that aspect, EgyptAir flight 804’s flight-behavior is eerily-similar to MH370’s…

  7. Perhaps their intelligence assets have gotten a picture of the objectives and methods being used and sought after. Or, perhaps they are protecting/attacking signatures themselves.
    Something afoot; and the cats out of the bag…
    running amok with hidden innuendoes and unseen truths.

  8. Of late, there has been record numbers of earthquakes an volcanism. Is CERN causing problems or reigning them in is the question? Or is it directing where and when those seismic events take place? My guess is CERN is a combo of Tesla and 2nd Order Civ Tech. Again I say, welcome to Antlantis part two..

  9. It would be interesting, perhaps, to correlate all the collidiers that have been or are proposed to be built, and how their locations relate to the geometry of the planetary grid.

    1. I was just wondering the same thing…what would their combined, relational effect be on the planet? What if they were all fired up at the same time, what kind of havoc would that cause on the magnetic field of the earth?

    2. I had the same thought, except I thought about it from a ‘coverage’ aspect. If the PTB are really behind ALL the so-called colliders, they would probably spread them out to form a ‘defensive shield’ for the whole planet. No gaps. It would be interesting to survey their sites from that point-of-view…

Comments are closed.