...OK, I freely admit that I've never been able to wrap my mind around the policies of Europe's two largest powers - France and Germany - and their refugee policy in particular, or, for that matter, their sanctions policy against Russia for the latter's "aggression" in the Ukraine. By any objective standard, the USSA is as much to blame for the mess in the Ukraine as Russia, and it's debatable that Russia is much to blame at all. What has not made sense to me is, quite bluntly, the willingness of Paris and Berlin to go along with Washington's kooky agenda in the Ukraine with the sanctions regime. Plain economic reality, it seemed to me back then, would dictate that sooner or later, those two countries would break with Washington, and I strongly suspected that it would be France that would crack the egg and make the omelet first.

This article from Russia's RT was shared by Mr. P.K., and it seems that, true to form, the French have (once again) had it with Washington:

French Assembly adopts resolution calling to end anti-Russian sanctions imposed by EU

There's a potentially very subtle game being played in Paris, and perhaps these passages from the RT reportage hint at what it may be:

The debate on canceling sanctions was held at the National Assembly for the first time, the politician said. Mariani stressed that anti-Russian sanctions should be lifted because they only cause harm.

"We are demanding that the sanctions be lifted because they are totally ineffective and they are dangerous for our economy," he told the Assembly.

"I have seen our minister of agriculture standing in front of our farmers and say 'We have to lift the sanctions.' I've seen the minister of finance reiterate the same thing. And all they do is say 'We can't do anything, Europe is to blame'," the MP told RT, saying that while he is "part of the opposition," regarding this matter he wants "to help the government."

"France is constantly saying that it's the birthplace of human rights, that the people's will should always be respected. So now I'm waiting for France to accept the will of the parliament and demand the lifting of the sanctions during the next talks," Mariani said in an interview with RT France after the vote.

The MP said that he does not know of any resolutions that haven't been considered by the government, and said that Francois Hollande "must take the responsibility" and make a move towards a restrictions-free policy in relations with Russia.

If the parliament's position on the issue is not accepted, "it will be the strongest slap in the face of democracy," Mariani said.

Earlier this year, France’s Minister of Economy, Industry and Digital Affairs Emmanuel Macron said that by this summer France will assist in lifting Western-imposed sanctions on Russia.

France's agriculture has suffered significantly from the EU's political decision. As a result of embargoes imposed by Moscow on European food products in response to the sanctions, French farmers have found themselves in increasingly difficult conditions. With reported losses of millions of euros in a number of France's agricultural industries, the farmers' unions have organized nationwide strikes designed to highlight their difficulties. Since 2014, French farmers have been setting their produce on fire and blocked roads with tractors in protest at their government's policy against Russia.

In December last year, the European Union prolonged its sanctions against Russia – originally initiated in August of 2014 – for another six months. Italy initially delayed the decision to prolong anti-Russian measures, demanding the issue be discussed rather than merely rubber-stamped.

What's the nature of the subtle game? I suggest that it is twofold: (1) with respect to the actual structure of the European union as currently constituted as a non-democratic, non-representative regulatory body in Brussels, versus the member states that comprise it, and (2) a game between the French legislative and executive branches. As the article notes, the EU's sanctions regime are hurting the economies of two of the EU's largest and most powerful members, France, and Italy, and one must conclude from this they are not helping the German economy, Europe's largest by far, exceeding even that of Russia. The EU, in other words, is acting as the obedient sockpuppet for Washington, whereas the political and economic realities in Paris and Rome are very different. The message? Either the EU adopts a policy representative of the interests of its member nations, or one can kiss the EU goodbye, and that will leave Germany in the catbird seat, and no one wants that (not even, it seems at times, the Germans, with, maybe, the exception of Herr Steinmeir).

The game that interests me the most, however, is that which seems to be currently played between M. Hollande and the Assembly. In the wake of the recent sad attacks in Paris and Brussels, the French securities services have quietly raided and cracked down on a number of mosques in France. While not belaboring the point, the French found what one only expected they would find: caches of arms and "literature" extolling the virtues of Islam and excoriating the very laws, culture, and institutions of France. So much for the policy of tolerance and multi-culturalism. Much more importantly, this resolution comes at a time that Saudi Arabia is under increasing scrutiny for its well-known role in terrorism sponsorship, and at a time when Washington's policies are increasingly under scrutiny in Europe, and being found greatly wanting.

M. Hollande, you'll recall, sent the French aircraft carrier, the Charles de Gaulle to Syria to drop a few bombs on ISIS, coordinating this effort with the then-ongoing Russian effort, and gaining some logistical support from Frau Merkel, which included German space assets of an unspecified nature, but we can guess what those were.

So what's the game, the high octance speculation? Time will tell, of course, but the action of the French assembly now hands M. Hollande some maneuvering room he didn't have before, up to, and including, the possibility of a French withdrawal from the sanctions regime imposed by Brussels in response to "domestic political and economic pressures" that he probably isn't - at least privately - in that much disagreement with.So how will this reading be corroborated?

The article itself suggests the nature of the game: watch Italy, and, by extension, Germany. In the latter case, local German Laender (states) are already passing similar resolutions, and Merkel's government is weak because of her assinine refugee policy. The backlash is going to spread, in other words, from France. It has already spread to Rome. It's only a matter of time until it spreads to the Bundestag.

Can you say "vote of no confidence"?

See you on the flip side...

Posted in

Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and "strange stuff". His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into "alternative history and science".


  1. Dan on May 11, 2016 at 1:34 am

    De Gaulle may have started it when he got involved with latin america.
    Coming from good Jesuit stock, a bloodline of interest and in all the right clubs, its not an insurmountable leap to guess these current sentiments where set in stone awhile back.
    He also had a hand in the creation of CERN and the EU.
    “What’s the point of Europe? It must serve to prevent domination either by the Americans or the Russians.”

    General De Gaulle to Alain Peyrefitte, 1962 (Source: Online Dictionary of the EU)

  2. goshawks on May 5, 2016 at 7:52 pm

    I find this situation interesting because of Icke’s ‘Totalitarian Two-step’ phrase. This is where steps toward totalitarianism take place so slowly that the public is not aroused to respond. (Kind of like the frog in the pot model.) The EU is unelected bureaucrats – most likely hand-picked by TPTB – ever-so-slowly nibbling away at national sovereignty. They have gotten away with it to this point by staying below the public’s radar.

    The French Assembly ‘resolution’ has come about because the EU (TPTB) moved too quickly with the anti-Russia sanctions. The EU is now visible on the radar. As the people awake to the near-boiling pot they are in, the reaction will probably spread far beyond the sanctions issue.

    With luck, the whole EU structure will get a reboot…

  3. basta on May 5, 2016 at 4:47 pm

    Pfft! Wrecking balls, away! NWO FTW!

  4. DownunderET on May 5, 2016 at 4:03 pm

    Only one word is applicable here….BLOWBACK. I didn’t think the those Frencheees would be the first to “blink”, but they did. You can imagine the White(out)House isn’t impressed. But in essence those Russian sanctions were a joke, who did Washington think they were kidding. The sanctions didn’t affect the US at all, and the European farmers paid the price, so now who will be next?
    Germany or Italy maybe, but I suspect some of the smaller European countries may follow France, and if that happens, it will be a avalanche.

  5. LSM on May 5, 2016 at 2:29 pm

    the TTIP plan as exposed by Greenpeace (somebody had to do it) is being forced down European throats by the US (if my read sources are correct the US will simply block many European exports/imports unless the EU will accept this nefarious agenda); the ramifications of this are horrendous: among other things this will allow “Monstersanto” access to European agriculture which will be, thanks to Monsanto, death in slow-motion as it already is in the States-

    the Merkel administration here in Germany continues to deteriorate; 1st of all “Angela Baby” is obviously like most politicians a sock-puppet; if this twit really believes she will be helping Germany/Germans with her (her administration) sanctioning of this she is out of touch with reality-

    both economic powers of Europe (Germany and France among some less important others) have been hi-jacked by a third force- let’s see now if the Hollande administration will be able to accomplish what is stated in this article-

    let me guess: NOT; Germany and France continue to be over-run by Islamic immigrants and it seems all of these people have smart phones! (gosh)-

    nothing whatsoever occurs without monetary backing- so who is financing all of this?- read between the lines-

    please be well Dr. Farrell and all readers-

    Larry in Germany

  6. DAVID GOLDMAN on May 5, 2016 at 11:53 am

    Look for more ¨terrorist¨ events in France or Italy if this movement to end sanctions gains any traction.

  7. marcos toledo on May 5, 2016 at 10:49 am

    You are assuming Joseph that the elites that rule the Americas are the masters at the helm of their states. Who really rules this World is the question that is matter of everyone life or death. And we are at the whim and mercy which they by their actions have clearly shown neither compassion or mercy.

  8. Robert Barricklow on May 5, 2016 at 10:43 am

    Apparently some still are using the workings the democracies against the wishes of the feudalistic technocratic dictates.

  9. charlesfrith on May 5, 2016 at 7:39 am

    “…OK, I freely admit that I’ve never been able to wrap my mind around the policies of Europe’s two largest powers – France and Germany”

    Perhaps a Google of the Couldenhove Kalergi plan will help but like George Anne Hughes always hinted to you, in quite a few interviews; There are some subjects you seem unable to research. Watch any Christopher Bollyn presentation on Youtube. Join up the dots.

    • LSM on May 5, 2016 at 2:35 pm

      Hi Charles,

      am glad to see you’ve finally posted something/somewhere except on your own website- you’re a brave man-

      I truly wish you would contribute more to the website (if I recall you are a member- still?)- I think at least some would be receptive to your ideas…

      be well-

      Larry in Germany

      • Centauri on May 6, 2016 at 2:01 am

        Hehheh I’m sure the good doctor loves to have a forum like Project Avalon appear in his comments section. That area is 1% cross-referenced, solid fact and 99% a parade of vanity where people of varying degrees of mental illness declare everything as fact. Lots of talkin’ and very little listenin’!

        The reason I appreciate Giza Death Star is because the topics discussed come from a solid source and speculation on those topics are labeled as exactly that; speculation.

        I doubt that a lack of lip service here regarding any of the many unverifiable claims could be blamed on an inability to research haHah

        • LSM on May 6, 2016 at 2:32 pm

          ” Project Avalon…That area is Project Avalon appear in his comments section. That area is 1% cross-referenced, solid fact and 99% a parade of vanity where people of varying degrees of mental illness declare everything as fact.

          ok, Sir/Madame, state your DOCUMENTED sources that prove absolutely everything stated on is:

          “1% cross-referenced, solid fact and 99% a parade of vanity where people of varying degrees of mental illness declare everything as fact”-

          I think I’ll be waiting for Godot…


          • Centauri on May 6, 2016 at 3:00 pm

            Well, ok!

            Sift through this entire website


            and confirm my exact percentages that I asserted.

            So we don’t have this silly conversation in the comments section of a website I appreciate, you can defend Project Avalon by emailing me at [email protected].

  10. DanaThomas on May 5, 2016 at 6:31 am

    Despite being hit by 2 Gladio-style operations in a short space of time, the French political class still seems to have a minimum regard for national interest.
    By the way there is a youtube channel called Panamza wholly devoted to those highly suspicious events.

Help the Community Grow

Please understand a donation is a gift and does not confer membership or license to audiobooks. To become a paid member, visit member registration.

Upcoming Events