GeoEngineering

MORE CALIFORNIA WILD FIRES, AND ANTARCTIC STRANGENESS…

California is once again suffering severe wild fires. We have already witnessed the fires that raged through Napa and the northern bay area, and have even commented that some aspects of those fires appear to be highly anomalous. It would indeed be difficult to deny, for most of us have seen the pictures of (1) burned and flattened buildings, and right next to them, trees or shrubbery that remains unburned and untouched, or (2) pictures of trees and schrubbery bent over and twisted into strange shapes, an effect of microwaves, and a phenomenon correlated with the bending of plants in crop circles under similar intense microwave conditions. (One thing that might be investigated is whether the California plants show signs of the nodules found in crop circle plants... however, it might be too late to do so now).

Now southern California is facing a similar fire apocalypse, and those who've been following the geoengineering story are blaming at least part of the magnitude of the disaster on the chemtrail-spraying phenomenon. Consider this article (found again by Mr. V.T.):

California Firestorms: Geoengineered Catastrophe

While I hate to speculate in the midst of a disaster, when people are losing their homes and having their lives turned upside down, I have to do so, because I suspect that most of us, as we watch these disasters afflicting California, have the same sense or intuition that this is horribly wrong, and that something is wrong, that it isn't entirely natural, or just the El Nino winds, or draught, and so on. In this case, I've been receiving a few emails this week about the fires, and most people emailing are expressing some version of this idea that something is wrong, and they've looking for answers, from deliberate acts of arson/terrorism, to geoengineering, or plots involving the UN and so on. Frankly, I'm open to all of them, but lean toward the geoengineering explanations for a very simple reason: I would never have entertained it nor paid much attention to such an explanation had I not seen with my own eyes the "spraying" and "chemtrail" phenomenon while on a recent trip from southern California to the bay area a couple of years ago with two friends.

There was, however, something in this article that not only caught my attention, but really threw me for a loop. In fact, it's so loopy that one might be inclined to think that I've not only walked off the end of the twig but have walked straight into a lush padded room... do not pass kookery, go directly to padded room. The first statement that caught my attention was this:

Geoengineering operations are not only cutting off precipitation from the US West and destroying the ozone layer globally, the desiccant particulates from the fallout create an incendiary dust that coats foliage and structures.

Ok... if there is incendiary dust sticking to foliage, why in the pictures are some things burning, but some palm trees appear untouched... or am I missing something?

But the thing that really caught my attention was this:

While California continues to go up in flames, regions of the Canadian Arctic and Greenland have recently been basking in record warm temperatures nearly 60 degrees above normal.  At the same time that record heat is occurring in the polar regions and elsewhere, snow is forecasted (scheduled) to fall as far south as Chihuahua, Mexico (2017 also saw record low ice at BOTH poles). The climate engineers will continue to use patented chemical ice nucleation processes to fuel ever more extreme weather whiplash scenarios. The climate engineers are manufacturing the illusion of winter in some regions while overall global temperatures continue to soar toward a runaway scenario.

Now, it is true that regions of the world that we normally associate with "cold" are experiencing record "balminess," and like Mr. Wiggington, author of the article and "geoengineering watcher", I suspect that much of the global warming/climate change hype is on shaky ground, but for a very different reason than the "concerned scientists" maintain. It has become something of a mantra in certain quarters that this "global warming"/"climate change" is due to human activity and that as such we need to limit that. Of course, this agenda is being driven by those who, while lecturing us on our greed and consumption, continue to live in mansions, run up gigantic electric bills, and fly in their private jets. I'm not talking about that kind of global warming/climate change-humans-are-responsible stuff. Frankly, I've never bought it, and don't now.

But what I do buy into is that geoengineering itself - the "solution" - might very well be the problem.

And that brings me to today's high octane speculation on my walk from the twig to the padded room. Imagine, for a moment, that you've decided to engage in a massive planetary geoengineering project, spraying all manner of junk into the atmosphere for whatever reason. The reasons many advance are themselves an indicator of a multi-leveled agenda: increasing the electrical conductivity of the atmosphere for nefarious purposes ranging from missile defense to mind control, induction of genetic modified (and modifying) materials into the human population, and so on. So while you're doing this, you then cynically exploit another agenda as you watch the temperatures rise, and watch California burn: you say it's all due to too much cattle flatulence, carbon emissions, and other activity of the general populace.

But there might be yet another stupendous colossal agenda, and herewith the "padded room" part of today's high octane speculation. And yes, you're fully permitted to laugh and tell me I've completely lost it, that I've gone round the bend and that I am just a few flies short of a Happy Meal. Suppose you suspected that there was "gobs of stuff" down there in Antarctica underneath all that ice. How to get to it. Well, you could drill and mine, but that would be relatively expensive, and it wouldn't give you access to all of it.

So...

... you would have to melt the ice.

And you could blame all that resultant flooding on the cattle rancher dairy farmer and John and Jane Q Public, tax them for their carbon emissions, accomplish a few other objectives along the way, and make the public pay for your project.

Yea, I know. It's insane. It's goofy. It's just as goofy as that nutcase member of the Rothschild family who proposed, some years ago, buying massive amounts of dry ice and cooling the world down that way. That's the sort of planet-sized insanity and kookery too much inbreeding results in.

In the case of my own kookery today, I cannot plead inbreeding as my excuse.

I can, however, point to that planet-sized kookery of a powerful famdamnly  as an example of such planet-sized agendas and the willingness to indulge them. The trouble, in other words, is not that I'm that crazy, but that the so-called "elites" are.

See you on the flip side...

 

 

28 thoughts on “MORE CALIFORNIA WILD FIRES, AND ANTARCTIC STRANGENESS…”

  1. not sold on the melting antacrtic ice to get at whatever it is they want to get at. given current tech levels that we don’t know about, don’t have access to and are now obviously being sujbected to, i’m guessing antarctica is a much easier nut to crack for rottenchildren than we imagine.

    melting off a few bergs to make fake geoengineered news drive their livestock into loving the agenda 21 chains does make more than enough sense. didn’t jesuits do something similar in uruguay and/or paraguay a few hundred years ago? they called it reductions? in fact they reduced entire countries to dried out husks after extracting all resources (including humans) using all the resources (including human) to reduce those countries.

    1. so what’s a wise coyote/roadrunner to do when smart enough to avoid running off consecutive cliffs.

      how does one avoid losing resources to central banks, bit coin bubbles and subdivisions that are laser cleaned like so much rust off a metal tool? what and where can one invest to preserve one’s ability to keep on another day?

      1. I wonder what those directed laser beams are doing to the human body? Trees and humans are still standing.

  2. keep an eye out for limited hangout angles on dane wiggington. some of the tripe he’s written and said in reply to and about weatherwars101 makes a person wonder. and for all i know ww101 is a limited hangout too – at least much less so that dane.

  3. Ironically, Antarctice ice is expanding while Arctic ice is shrinking. The Antarctic circumpolar vortex prevents warm ocean waters from reaching the Southern polar regions, while the increased humidity of the atmosphere results in increased snowfall.

    1. sorry but the Antarctic ice is shrinking not expanding
      https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/sea-ice-extent-sinks-to-record-lows-at-both-poles
      https://neptune.gsfc.nasa.gov/csb/index.php?section=234
      But the extent is irrelevant. As land ice melts ice will probably increase temporaily over and on the ocean at the edges of Antarctica as glacier move ever faster to the ocean and then suddenly decrease as glaciers break off as one did recently https://www.cbsnews.com/news/iceberg-broke-off-antarctica-pine-island-glacier-four-times-size-of-manhattan/ When this happens the glaciers begin to move faster to the ocean.

      What is important for Dr. Farrell’s point is what is happening as land and coasts become accessible – extent plays a part and so does ice thickness/volume. If ancient technology is there it might be underwater on the coasts just as ancient structures are being found on other coasts . Already things are being revealed and perhaps the scientific inquiry related below will be looking for other stuff…… https://www.livescience.com/60600-antarctica-ice-shelf-hidden-ecosystem.html ” A giant iceberg that broke away from an ice shelf in the Antarctic Peninsula in July is slowly revealing a vast undersea ecosystem that has been hidden for thousands of years, researchers say.
      As the iceberg, known as A-68, moves away from the Larsen C ice shelf and into the Weddell Sea, it will eventually expose 2,240 square miles (5,800 square kilometers) of seafloor that has been buried under the ice for up to 120,000 years, without light and linked to the open ocean only by minimal currents, according to scientists with the British Antarctic Survey (BAS).”

  4. Given that it has been seriously proposed to use nuclear bombs to melt the ice caps, I don’t think your speculation is all that speculative.

    And I don’t think you need a padded room, unless it is well stocked with years of food and water, and deep enough under ground to survive a nuclear war (or zombie apocalypse).

  5. When the people are cut out of the decision making process on such important subjects as the alien agenda and what the govt. knows, and spraying God knows what over our heads and we don’t know if it’s protecting us from harmful rays of the sun or causing wild fires to rage uncontrollably, the people have a right to know, to be informed in on the decision making process.

    I don’t remember voting for aerial spraying and now once again our secret government has taken the decision making process away from the people.

    Do the people know best? Maybe not now that they have dumbed down the population to the point where they don’t know their ass from a hole in the ground.

  6. Melting the Antarctic makes massive sense. Considering the beast is multi-tentacled, also:
    -Making obscene money on weather derivates (control the weather, control the Market) and Green businesses
    -Changing the atmospheric pH, vibration, frequency or related in order to let something nefarious in
    -DNA something…

  7. JPF: “Suppose you suspected that there was ‘gobs of stuff’ down there in Antarctica underneath all that ice. … you would have to melt the ice.”

    The Antarctic circumpolar current ‘seals off’ Antarctica from the great ocean belt-currents. Antarctica will be the last to warm from general planetary warming.

    So, something ‘local’ to Antarctica would have to be invoked for the melting. There is one h@ll of a thickness of ice, so to do it in less than lifetimes would require a mas sive heat input. Chemtrail-like haze would not do it. Even one-off nukes probably wouldn’t do much.

    Now, if you could use (successors to) HAARP to engineer massive ‘short-circuiting’ between the ionosphere and the ice, that would do it! (Might fry any ancient electronics still functioning, though.) JS gives the science-details on that, and why short-circuiting is a limit for ordinary ‘unobserved’ HAARP usage. (Limited short-circuiting might tie-into CA fire ‘oddities’…)

    1. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/stable-antarctic-ice-is-suddenly-melting-fast/
      Think about defrosting your freezer. When I defrost mine nothing seems to happen and then huge chunks come free because unseen melting is going on underneath. The ice doesn’t have to all melt in order to go away. Glaciers are already moving to the ocean and are moving ever faster.
      “The surface of some of the glaciers is dropping by as much as four meters each year, as measured by remote-sensing instruments on the CryoSat 2 satellite. The ice loss is so great it is also causing changes in Earth’s gravitational field, which have been detected by GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) satellites….Overall, the ice shelves along the southern Antarctic Peninsula have lost almost one fifth of their thickness since the early 1990s. ”
      Whether or not CO2 or geoengineering started this, there are factors that take it out of the hands of man. Increasing numbers of forest fires are sending soot to places like Greenland where the dark soot melts the ice faster. More and more of the Arctic being ice free means more sun energy is absorbed by the Arctic ocean instead of being reflected making the Arctic ever more vulnerable to melting. These are positive feedbacks, some are related to greenhouse gases, but some are based on other things like the reflectivity of different colors. As the polar ice melts the weight on the poles changes and may make earthquakes and volcanoes more likely. Volcanoes could work as a negative feedback by dimming the sun and cooling the planet, but dimming the sun also means less light for plants. If the powers that be started this they are either insane, stupid or have a plan to get off planet or underground before the chaos makes the surface unlivable.

  8. The geo-eng is not to warm the planet up. The particles are reflective. It is to cool it down. Let’s play connect the dots.

    1) A bunch of elitists want to get rid of 90% of humans. They’ve said so in a lot of “scientific” research like Club of Rome and in Stonehenge like rock, Georgia Guidestones.
    2) During the last glaciation, about 40,000 – 30,000 years ago we got to within 15% of an extinction event due to low CO2. At 150 PPM most plants don’t do well if not out right die. We were at 170-180 PPM.
    3) The same elitists are trying to limit CO2 to 270 PPM. They have even devised ways to pull CO2 from the air in massive quantities. I include this one here because while it is geo-eng it doesn’t fit into #5. Those are ways to cool the planet. The effect of CO2 is too small to be temperature geo-eng.
    4) Major long term storage repos for plants and animal DNA have been setup and are collecting massive varieties.
    5) They are involved in geo-eng to cool the planet. All the “studies” are talking about how to cool the planet. None are talking about how to warm it when our inter-glacial ends.
    6) A lot of the cyclical climate folks are saying we are about done for our inter-glacial. David Dilley even put a date on it, 2116 (missed my fav Rush album by 4).

    So time to take a flying leap off the twig.

    Keep CO2 low with legislative and technological means.
    Limit the amount of warming with spraying.
    Once the cold starts and CO2 is pulled into the oceans make it go below 150 PPM for a couple years.
    Let the food run out and the population is reduced 90%.
    Use the geo-eng to warm the planet and put CO2 back to 600 PPM.
    Restart all the plants and animals.

    1. This dovetails with my recent comment on this being the end of an Interglacial Period:
      https://gizadeathstar.com/2017/12/tamils-sumerians-antarctic-strangeness/#comment-78913

      A few years ago, “Scientific American” magazine published an article noting that ice core research hinted that we were already 1000-2000 years into the onset of the next Ice Age. So, we should have been seeing global temperatures beginning to sag.

      It was hypothesized that the combination of the agricultural effects of rising human populations and lately the industrialization of society was counteracting that temperature ‘slide’. In fact, the article’s authors noted that the near non-appearance of the forecast rise in global temperature as scientifically-calculated (without Milankovitch Cycle orbital variations) could be explained by two counteracting factors: human-caused temp-rising and MC-caused temp-falling.

      D@mn. Now, according to your scenario, they’ve weaponized an Ice Age

      1. wonder how sitting bull, geronimo, chief joseph et al felt the first time they saw guns, germs and steel. besides, dang, how do we get some o dem. thinking that’s how we’re gonna feel if we don’t already. now how to move on and do better than they did.

  9. Robert Barricklow

    We are the same wave length; they using chemtrails to accomplise multiple goals using CO2 as the patsy. One is economic warfare to accomplish geopolitical goals[domestic as well, for it’s all politics]; and they’ll profit handsomely from this while sympathizing. Two is to move ever forward to becoming the gods that were they’re fathers. Betwixt the two stretch even more skullduggery.
    So as cold hearted as the Antarctica solution is; that’s their signature default.

    1. What’s interesting is that there is land in Antarctica named Rothschild so can imagine they got their mitts on it somehow

      1. Robert Barricklow

        TianaB
        Yes, those Rothschild’s seem to get their hands on the booty before It’s “discovered”. This Antarctica “mystery” goes along w/Mr. Peabody’s Wayback Machine and their improbable history. Improbable that “they” had the maps of Earth before satellites; improbable that the biblical wars were cosmic in nature; improbable that a closed system of finance/science are slowing hanging mankind out to dry; and at the same time setting purposeful fires all along the watchtowers, while winning bets on all their inhumane antics.

  10. I believe the extreme weather is due to a weakening of our magnetosphere as explained by Ben Davidson from Suspicous Observers

    1. curt, ben’s all about avoiding talking about geoengineering – as discreetly as he can. ironic and progressively hard to do as his target audience gets progressively smarter about electric universe theory and the capabilities of electric weaponry and tools.

  11. This video is up in the Solari Top Pick’s / Wild Card section “https://youtu.be/T5wCm3PKeP4”.. It is in your face evidence that we are not in KS anymore. The Why’s and Wherefores of this need to be discerned. The B movie mad scientists appear to be large and in charge.

    1. Good video. Someone ought to calculate how much power is needed to produce a High Pressure area of that magnitude…

  12. Rottenchild can not make the Pyramid work, so he needs to dig for more artefacts. The other venue is to reconstruct the Pyramid from scratch, and that would unleash a suppressed mindset. Point is, that a carpenter knows how to build a house, whereas a banker can only speculate in its takeover by money scheme.

    As to the real function of a carpenter’s toolbox, the banker is at loss. Everything, needed to build a Pyramid, is in the human mind. The Runes show how to build a Death Star, and that concludes the unified theory solved. The source code of human mind is an analogue computer.

    To create a human is to create a Pyramid, not a golem mud hound. The golden image of Rottenchild Nebuchadnezzar is the monster of Babylon. Daniel wrote a bestseller about Rottenchild ages ago.

  13. You’re not ready for the straight jacket yet Dr. Farrell or if you are I will be in the next padded cell to you! This same thought has passed through my mind several times over the last few years. Of course ‘they’ would want to get at any loot under the ice but whilst they’re at it why not cause a rise in sea levels by melting the ice as ‘predicted’ by the so called climate scientists. I even imagined a giant microwave device in low earth orbit pinging microwaves at the ice and detaching icebergs an order of magnitude bigger than the Great Pyramid.

Comments are closed.