JOHN ROBERTS: ANOTHER EPSTEIN CONNECTION?

JOHN ROBERTS: ANOTHER EPSTEIN CONNECTION?

I've tried to refrain from commenting much about American politics because it is, well, both laughable and wearisome. And hence, today's blog is not really about politics, but rather about another one of those strange connections of people to Jeffrey Epstein. As I blogged earlier this week, there's even a tenuous Epstein connection to the corona virus outbreak story via Epstein's connections to Harvard chemistry professors.

If you've been following the impeachment circus you might recall Chief Justice John Roberts' censoring of a question by Kentucky's junior U.S. Senator Rand Paul. It's that strange episode that drew my attention in this story shared by D.M.:

The Epstein Effect? Rand Paul’s Relevant Impeachment Question Disallowed by Chief Justice John Roberts. Has The Chief Justice Been Compromised?

Here's the question which Senator Paul submitted, and which Chief Justice Roberts would not permit - twice - to be read:

On Thursday Chief Justice John Roberts disallowed this question from Senator Rand Paul at the Senate Impeachment hearings:

To the Manager Schiff and counsel for the President:

Manager Schiff and Counsel for the President, are you aware that House Intelligence Committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with ... when at the National Security Council together, and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that ... and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the President before there were formal House impeachment proceedings?”

Why is that question NOT relevant to the proceedings?

I don't know about you, but personally, I don't see how that question is irrelevant, and presumably both sides would want to clear up the matter, which as of this writing, does not appear that it will be.

But as the article continues, it points out that Justice Roberts, like many on "the Supremes," has turned out to be for many people a bit of an abysmal disappointment, flip-flopping on key issues such as Obamacare, leaving some mystified as to his legal reasoning, if any:

Roberts’ moves behind the scenes were as extraordinary as his ruling. He changed course multiple times. He was part of the majority of justices who initially voted in a private conference to strike down the individual insurance mandate — the heart of the law — but he also voted to uphold an expansion of Medicaid for people near the poverty line.

Two months later, Roberts had shifted on both.

Like many, I myself wondered just why Roberts had suddenly  reversed himself, and like many, I entertained the suspicion that Justice Roberts had somehow been coerced into the decision. But now, in the light of Senator Paul's question, a piece of information has emerged - in 2019 - that might corroborate that suspicion:

Since that time a very interesting document surfaced and Chief Justice Roberts was quick to deny it was, in fact, him listed on that document.

There is no question that there are many men named John Roberts in this world, so there is no way to prove it was our Chief Justice.

He, of course, denied that he flew on The Lolita Express.

What you're looking at in the image is the flight logs for Jeffrey Epstein's infamous Lolita express flights to his "island." Justice Roberts has, of course, denied that it's him, but as the article also notes,

There is zero proof that Chief Justice John Roberts did, in fact, fly on The Lolita Express.

But keeping in mind that Epstein allegedly catered to VIP types (like Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Joe Biden, John McCain, Prince Andrew and Jeff Bezos) would anyone be able to say WITH 100% CERTAINTY that it was not our Chief Justice on that flight?

No, says the Chief Justice: it's some other John Roberts, and granted, there's probably a lot of John Robertses around, just as there are a lot of Supreme Court justices lying around, for sale, cheap.  Humor aside, however, I cannot help but think of those documents from the JFK assassination mentioning a "George Bush" that was contacting the government to warn about attempts on President Kennedy's life. When asked about that curiosity, President G.H.W. Bush responded that it must be referring to some other George Bush than he, and granted, there's regrettably probably a lot of George Bushes lying around (emphasis added).  But matters weren't helped that in some of those references, it was "George Bush of the CIA." Well then, it must be some other George Bush of the CIA, after all, there's probably a lot of George Bushes lying around, not to mention a lot of CIAs lying around, and self-evidently, a lot of Georges Bushes of a lot of CIAs. Alas, circumstances didn't help the president's attempts to distance himself from the matter, such as his Nixon-like inability to remember exactly where he was and what he was doing when President Kennedy was murdered, nor were they helped much when researchers uncovered some damning circumstantial evidence about operation Zapata, and Bush's background role in the Bay of Pigs fiasco. But that must have been some other George Bush of some other Bay of Pigs fiasco of some other CIA in some other universe.

So, yes, it must be some other John Roberts, perhaps known to some other George Bush ... nothing to see here, move along...

...(hysterical laughter)...

...Ok... I'm better now...

...Bridge in Brooklyn for sale, cheap. Have your people contact my people... cash and carry only...

Now, an interesting question that has not been asked with respect to this entry, is was it before, or after, Roberts' nomination to the Court?

See you on the flip side...

 

 

25 thoughts on “JOHN ROBERTS: ANOTHER EPSTEIN CONNECTION?”

  1. About my rant last night, a delegation confronted Pope Benedict in 2008 and he took action to resolve the global fraud concerning more than just our country. The Papacy owns it all more than a century with the British Monarchs managing it for them. No need to elaborate what happened to Pope Benedict and this is why you hear other countries saying: “If America goes down, so do we”. Q Anon got it right with WWG1WGA

    The Roman Catholic Church was bifurcated long ago in secrecy and millions of good Catholics and clergy having no knowledge of this whatsoever rejecting what has taken place under their nose during the Age of Pisces. Almost 1/3 of the new Congress are Catholic; an extreme change 60 years ago when President John F. Kennedy was elected. I think people like Pelosi, Roberts, etc., are not stupid, know the score and work for the globalists.

    Before the swamp was Officially named Washington, DC; it was called Rome. Franciscus wrote July 11, 2013 Moto Proprio, effective September 1, 2013 changing International Law giving the banks, corrupt corporations and courts 3 years to clean up their criminal acts. The Roman Curia holds all global corporate/trust charters and the Pontiff has the power to liquidate any/all corporations that have committed fraud and criminal acts. There is no Statute of Limitations on Fraud. Fraud vitiates everything it touches from inception.

    With the Office of the Pontiff now abolished, it appears efforts being made to toss their criminal fraud into the lap of UN-elected bureaucrats at the UN Corp that was created by Nazi sympathizers in Vichy France during WWII. There are many separate corporations under the so called United Nations umbrella…just like the IRS and the Internal Revenue Service are 2 separate corporations — with one holding debits and the other credits you never hear about getting transferred via Canada to the City of London “Westminster” ending in Rome. Paying income tax is voluntary and there is a lawful procedure to follow revoking your election to pay that you can learn about at the website. The IRS is absolutely “toothless” deriving its power from the BATF.

    The window is closing with all the current shenanigans. We need “land owners” from the 50 states to boot up remaining Assemblies and help restore our government. Educate yourself, and reclaim your stolen land and property http://www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net then consider donating $20.00 a week as Grand Moms and Pops have done to defray our humongous expenses so we can move quicker with Registered Mailings to all parties concerned averaging $10,000 a week sometimes.

  2. Of course, Roberts is compromised. He was sent to Florida on the voter “chad” issue when Dubya and Gore were in the whirlwind. Later Dubya nominates him for Retiring Sandra Day O’Conners slot. When Rehnquist dies, Dubya withdraws nomination and punches him in the vacant CJ slot.

    Ah, but there’s more. Much more. The Municipal Government is owned by the Holy See; dba: “the” United States, Plenary Oligarchy. Part of Global Air (Commerce) Jurisdiction. Their contract – The Constitution of the United States – “the” STATE OF _______(insert any of 50) – Legal PERSONS – “citizens of the United States” – Federal Civil Service and Dependents.

    [There are no mistakes the way above is typed. Things in quotes are to draw your attention to such as “t” in lower case. When something is in All Caps such as PERSONS, the meaning/definition is entirely different from persons in lower case.]

    This is the part of government that attempted to impeached President Trump, and also created the “pretty papers” for the Nazi Rat Lines that went to different countries as well as other evils conjured by the Vatican.

    There are 3 Constitutions so don’t let the Wicked Witch of the West babble on when she says Constitution without asking: “which one”.

    Briefly, Territorial Government (British) dba: “the”United States of America – Democracy – Part of International Sea Jurisdiction

    Federal Government (American) dba: “the” States of America – Republic Part of International Land and Sea Jurisdictions [This portion of “Federal” Government has been missing since Lincoln elected 1860] It is being booted up with 14 states to go and help in needed. Go to
    http://www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net and learn how you can restore your government.

    Our courts are “private foreign courts”. They’re “for profit courts” that have been raping and pillaging the people 6 generations and will continue doing so until we, the people, step up and follow the lawful peaceful procedure designed to end the theft and corruption. Especially view of the fact on January 17, 1980 President Carter and the Senate confirmed another “Constitution”, namely, the “Constitution Of The United Nations Industrial Development Organization” and just recently, Pope Francis abolished the Office of the Pontiff.

    Rant over and now you decide if CJ Roberts is compromised.
    https://beverlytran.blogspot.com/2018/11/scotus-chief-justice-john-roberts-his.html

  3. Saw a msm article tonight enobling one of the Vindman twins. Wonder how much of their Op will come out in this. Or will this be like Epstein where just enough is exposed to villainize a few of the monster class.

      1. One of her videos was cancelled from YT because she mentioned the Vindman name in a certain context. Anyway, whatever op these gentlemen were playing at has probably gone down the drain….

  4. Sounds like more stuff from that intelligence dictatorship most skilled in disinformation tactics. The proverbial garbage into the salad bowl phenomenon. You know – Epstein was a US citizen so that makes the rest of the US citizenry suspect. . . . Ask yourself, “What part of history is now targeted?”

  5. There was an ancient lament (can’t find it in brief search) from the declining Egyptian years of the glories of Egypt not even being remembered. One of the main reasons for this was ‘usurpment’ from within. The legitimate heads of government, secret societies, etc., (Osiris types) were all being replaced – using accidents, poisoning, etc. – with types that would corrupt and bring-down society (Seth types). When enough of the latter took and held power-positions, the common people noted this and the society fell apart from within.

    Note that Egypt had three “Intermediate Periods” where everything literally fell apart…

    In today’s world, I could build a parallel. Once the ‘Seth-types’ gain a certain level in the government or corporations (including secret societies), the levels below them are corrupted, changed-out, or cleared-out. I would include the Supremes in this ‘op’. At the time “Chief” Justice Roberts was appointed, my intuition just went crazy. Something was very wrong in this appointment. I have no facts to back this up, but this intuition has not changed…

    In this regard, I have no doubt that anyone appointed to ‘power’ has to go through a compromising exercise. To gain the position, they are required to submit to this. Epstein was likely a prominent ‘compromiser’, but there are probably thousands of ways this is done. The appearance of a John Roberts on an Epstein flight is not at all surprising…

  6. The Gordian Knot of Jeffrey Epstein seems to be ever-growing entanglement of the rich and powerful. This black book should have insured his life just wondering why it failed. Who will next be caught in this never-ending spider web?

  7. well it makes sense, the more the poor parents have to ‘sell them all off for medical experiments’ (/monty python’s meaning of life movie, Catholic version) the better off the elite will all be.
    mCarthy was a stooge, sidekicked by Roy Cohn. It’s Roy Cohn’s ghost that is the Trump regime. “Communists” is a euphemism for the racist muck that cannot be named. MCarthy got his start in law with a mysterious financier, still unkown.
    I would go more for an Inquisition followed by ghettoisation, just like the good old days.
    “Are you or have you ever been what you already are? Please answer the question” I’d bet they would even obviscate on that one… 2 + 2 = ummm…… denial of holocaust mathematics gets you jail time in these oh so enlightened modern times.

  8. There are so many U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives who are Israel Dual Citizens, that it’s scary. If Epstein really was a Mossad agent, then the truth will never come out. Black Cube-Epstein-Weinstein-Mossad-Ehud Barak-Feinstein-Schiff… the list goes on and on.

  9. January 10, 2011
    That is the date in the log. So, were there express rides prior? It does indicated a “John roberts” was a member of Eppie’s “club”.
    JR was nominated for SCOUS July 19, 2005

  10. Before even reading; “they’ get these potential young minds early on, and then manipulate their contacts/careers[That’s the frame from which to now read the post.]

    That “Bat Man CD Jokers” picture is interesting.
    [AI generated?]

    Apparently, an agreed-upon-fable impeachment script[by both side’s puppet masters?] was to be adhered to?

    But as article continues…
    White Rabbit

  11. Excuse my direct language, but “Epsteinian ecstasy” can defined, as the thrill of pumping fresh meat, at the butchery – royally stamped as “cattle in Rotherham”.

    These international underground networks advertise someone’s daughters for sale, as prostitutes, to exercise the claim of Rottenchild – the financial conqueror – in name of Satanic pope & pretenders.

    “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” -Matthew 18:6.

    A storm is coming!

  12. Is there a link between CJ John Roberts and Epstein? Someone, somewhere must know there is an answer to that question. But, if memory serves, there was evidence suggesting CJ Roberts and his wife had links to the pharmacological, uh, pharmaceutical community at the time this litigation was under review by the Supreme Court. If this is true, there may have been a genuine conflict of interest. If he, and any other member of that Court, had prior recent relationships with law-firms that worked with cases on behalf of healthcare organizations prior to ascending to this court, they should have recused themselves from the judgment process. Anyone who did not recuse themselves and ruled in favor, are now subject to bribery and extortion. I was watching this online as it unfolded that day–and was taken aback for the exact same reason. It looked, to me, as if CJ Roberts was forewarned to review each question from certain parties before asking to ensure that any question related to “whistle-blowers” was carefully screened before submitting them.

    All politics aside, this question, and the exposure of the Biden connection to Burisma, is a very curious thing. Both have huge political implications to many of the threads of conversations we have here. It looks as if these connections are going to be investigated now by the Senate–for what purpose we do not know. Without a doubt 2019 was an interesting year, and the war within the Deep State is now becoming visible in the main stream. With this off my chest, I’ll resume my silent watch. But it appears the ghost of Joseph McCarthy can be discerned hovering within the Senate Building, looking and speaking to various members present, and saying: “I tried to warn the nation, but everyone wanted me to shut up. Why didn’t anyone listen to me then?” With this question denied by CJ Roberts, I cannot help but wonder if McCarthy’s ghost did speak with Rand Paul at some point in the proceedings. With this question Rand certainly hit a very raw nerve! By now everyone knows I’m metaphorically speaking, but with the threat of multiple new investigations on the horizon emerging from the Senate, one has to wonder if McCarthy’s ghost is speaking to more than just one Senator. It feels like the 1950’s replayed with new players on a new stage. Fascism. Marxism. Space. Espionage. Conspiracy. It’s all there!

    1. Never left the stage.
      Still present and unaccounted for.

      The pot continues to boil. Is there a point where another McCarthy era is needed to let some steam escape, before an explosion of exposures/information is unabashedly released.

      To find those holes and plug them?

  13. Joseph and friends –

    “I’ve tried to refrain from commenting much about American politics because it is, well, both laughable and wearisome. ”

    Boy howdy.

    I would like to offer some links to Rudy Giuliani’s website, with several videos Ridy has presented.

    On the principle that(some?) in the political class make a living out of accusing their opponents of that which they themselves do(Alinsky?), the background on the Hunter Biden/Burisma/Poroschenko/Ukraine story is laid out with a certain coherence not previously available to me. The scale of the hypocrisy is not unremarkable.

    Not trying to sell it, because, no doubt ,there are readers here who aren’t Rudy fans.

    General link here:
    https://rudygiulianics.com/podcast/
    Podcast, Part 1 here:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fn4weTY-2zE&list=PLlMn0a7NgIUZXtIYdPUTas4FCw8Cux8oa&index=3&t=0s

    I’m part way through Episode 3.
    I was previously unaware the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma was poisoned.

Comments are closed.