Babylon's Bankers

US TREASURY AND CRYPTO-“CURRENCIES”

This is a story to pay attention to, and our thanks to W.G. for spotting it and sending it along. In a nutshell, the US Treasury Department is launching an effort to gain control over crypto-"currency" exchanges. But the real question is why? Here's the story:

US Treasury Wants Complete Cryptocurrency Control

Note the following:

The Treasury Department mentioned that crypto exchanges currently operating in the US are required to verify the identity of owners if the transaction exceeds $3,000. The Treasury also asked exchanges to submit the information of the owner of a crypto wallet directly to the Department if a transaction exceeds $10,000.

...

Finance Magnates asked the crypto community to share views about the recent action by the US regulatory authorities against cryptocurrency exchanges and its potential impact. Johnny McCamley, Founder of CryptoClear told Finance Magnates that the recent action is a serious intrusion into privacy, but the crypto community must get ready for such intrusions.

...

“We all must get used to it, whether we like it or not. Taking a ‘big picture’ outlook, this is the future of your level of privacy, having little to no privacy, that is. Especially with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC’s) such as the Digital Dollar coming into play sooner than most realize. Although the initial goal of these CBDC’s is not to replace cash but to compliment cash, I have no doubt the long term goal of CBDC’s is to replace cash. My point being, your money and more importantly where it flows and goes, to family, investing in stocks or crypto assets or wherever your money happens to go, will be tracked and traced down to the cent ($0.01). So, although this is a ‘proposed’ regulation focused on cryptocurrency assets transaction data (being the names and addresses for anyone that you send crypto to or receive crypto from, for any transaction worth over $3,000), not CBDC’s, get used to the government drastically increasing the amount of personal information they hold about you and your money. It is the future,” he added.

So what this about? Why is Treasury doing this? There are three possible answers, and I suspect all of them are in play. The first answer is the obvious one: taxes. The government wants its cut, and to get its cut, it needs the regulatory infrastructure to do it. But I suspect that infrastructure is leading directly to the second and third reasons, which are not so obvious, but to which the article alludes: the move toward a completely "cashless" system. That system, perforce, will have to be ultimately space-based for transaction clearing, and hence be global in nature. Note that this carries an implication that few are seeing clearly. In the past, when contemplating the moves of Mr. Globaloney to establish a "one world government" many have focused on the implication that this would perforce have to imply a "one world currency."

Not so. There are already a multitude of crypto-"currencies", and the moves of Treasury indicate that it is perfectly willing to live with a multitude of such "currencies." What matters more is the transaction and clearing systems themselves, or rather, the transaction and clearing system itself. Presuming for a moment that Treasury is acting as the front for the interests of Mr. Globaloney, we may reduce this approach to a convenient axiom and with it, our second reason): One system, many "currencies". The essence of a digital transaction system is the ability to transact quickly, and "currency" exchange rates can easily be built into such a system to make it appear that there are a multitude of "currencies" in circulation. What matters is not the   "currencies" but the system itself. It seems apparent that Mr. Globaloney would prefer the simplicity of "one 'currency'" to that of a multitude, but that can easily be accomplished by putting into place an interim step of "one system, many 'currencies.'" In effect, it's a move to digitize the current system, which is indeed a "one system, many currencies" system. We'll get back to this point in today's high octane speculation.

The third reason is the most obscure, but again revealed in Treasury's regulatory structure: it wants the names and addresses of those involved in crypt-"currency" transactions, and this is the profound clue to what's going on, because in effect, it is the final move in making individual humans, both individually and collectively, the collateral backing the whole system. It is, in effect, a "beast" system, and a slavery system, because what is transparent to some, you and me, is opaque to others: the system, and those controlling it, will be behind a one way mirror, able to see what everyone else is doing, while being able to manipulate that system for their own covert transactions. Treasury is more concerned about who is transacting, than about the transactions themselves.

So back to some high octane speculation, and the central question of "Will this actually work?" I suspect not, and for a variety of reasons. But let's look at just one. Recall for a moment those stories concerning the enormous electrical power consumption that is required to "mine" crypto-currencies. In a certain sense, one might say that the "value" of a crypto-"currency" is in part determined by access to such power (not to mention access to the extraordinary amount of data-processing power also required to run such a system, even with quantum computing and so on). In an interim system of "one system, many 'currencies'" it is conceivable that there is a threshold or inflection point beyond which the system is so choked with data and transactions that it can no longer function efficiently or smoothly. Think, for example, of those frustrating times when your internet goes down, or is incredibly slow due to high internet traffic volume. Magnify that globally and you have... a mess(I'd call it something different, but this is a "polite site"). And that's not even dealing with the possibilities of some disaster - electromanetic pulse or particularly strong solar flare events - taking the entire system down. In that circumstance, I rather suspect sacks of flour, loaves of bread, or cans of soup will be much more valuable than crypto-blips. But in any case, the sheer volume of transaction in such a system will drive up electrical and data-processing loads immensely, and the question is, is there enough of both to make such a system work?

That may seem like a fairly obvious question to ask, but so far, reading all the vast literature and articles on the subject, I haven't seen anyone asking it. The short answer is, no one knows, because no one is asking.

And it's that question that brings us to yet another really high octane speculation. Suppose Mr. Globaloney, in the secret councils of his power, has asked and already learned the answer, and knows more or less where that threshold or inflection point is? One might go so far as to speculate that the whole social engineering scheme of "lockdowns" and so on associated with the planscamdemic might have been to gain some impression of that threshold or inflection point. In case, assuming they do know that threshold, it would be a secret well worth keeping to themselves, and using in conjunction with some of their other favorite memes, like "climate change" and so on. "We have to shut down transactions in such and such a region, or among such and such a group of people" because it's driving up the "carbon footprint" due to increased electrical demands. In other words, keeping the actual threshold secret allows the threshold idea to be used to further promote "the agenda."

See you on the flip side...

 

 

49 thoughts on “US TREASURY AND CRYPTO-“CURRENCIES””

  1. All this “religion” babble confuses a person!! Each person reflects the structure he or she grew up in.

    Until something happens to break one out of the bubble one as been living in….one stays inside that bubble, quite content in NOT knowing anything else exists!!

    Look at the Psychological Warfare that has been perpetuated upon masses, who still prefer to believe all the lies of the past centuries!!

    How can one have logical religious discussions if one doesn’t even really KNOW who or what “God” IS??!!! Each person would have his or her own idea about that, so there is no Logical Base for a true discussion!!

  2. YouTube exterminated the CAFitts interview link Pierre provided. Here’s the same interview at a new link: To understand how the crypto takeover fits into the new globalist picture, jump to about 15 minutes and roll for 3 minutes. There are multiple global events happening in silo. I highly recommend the entire interview: https://youtu.be/LCiIc6i81uM

  3. Again, the currency battle surfaces into discussions made out of bits and bytes zipping through the networks. There may not be much control over the mechanism the electrons flow out onto and into, like the wires and wireless frequencies, but there is certainly a drive to control access and the extra baggage (rules, regulations, users, exploiters, influencers, and the list of synonyms goes on) that flood onto them. Anyone who expects to own a chunk of it has to have a handle on several requisites, the hardware, the seven layers of the network, and a means of securing it or they’re just chasing loose change without the means to support their goal(s). One of the bigger mysteries in all this are “Who are “they” that do now?”

  4. May I recommend a science fiction short story from 1903 “The Machine Stops”. There is even a Viemo video adaption of that story. As always there is the old saying beware what you wish for you may not like what you get. But then these power freaks never really think out what they’re doing ever they’re too stupid, to begin with.

  5. It depends on how deep the ‘trap’ is… CAFitts recently ..
    if we are looking at nanodust, quantum communicated everything, the even the vegatables coming out of my new plandemic garden will not be immune from interference and being brought into the grid. Still the whole darn thing, if mere humans are doing it, is like the tar baby. Toffler’s Future Shock meets Rocky Horror Picture Show’s Future Schklocks. CIF’s latest 48 min ‘the trap is set, but the door is still open’… though that was a week or two ago.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsGW6emvXhA
    (with Hebrew subtitles)

    1. Robert Barricklow

      I worried a little over this concept; of trying the interfere in some manner w/the universe’s way of making something out of nothing quantum physics.
      Michael Crichton’s grey goo comes to mind in thinking of unintended consequences.
      Thus, other advanced intelligence would definitely be in the mix; if such doomsday scenarios were in play. Would it be in both the digitals’ and analogues; interest to forestall such an event.
      Now, another dimension intelligence w/a start stop grey goo button? In fact would any, w/that capability – do a IHOP and/or MIHOP?

    2. Robert Barricklow

      The movie Planet Shutdown is being scrubbed left & right: from url’s; youtube, and search engines, even https://duckduckgo.com/
      and its website: https://planetshutdown.com/
      Censorship all across the USSA’s
      lockdown surveillance landscape.

      Tyranny’s is loose
      but loosing it’s ability to mask.
      Soon ALL will begin to see behind the mask …

    3. YouTube killed Pierre’s link. (Surprised?) Here’s a fresh one: https://youtu.be/LCiIc6i81uM As I commented above, jump to about 15 minutes and play for 3 to see the overall plan. The entire 48 minute video is worth watching if you have time.

  6. By reconfiguring the economy to become cloud centric, and by shunting all IT infrastructure into a few corporation’s hands (Microsoft, Amazon and others) the globalists can better leverage the technology behind the one way mirror and see the whole economic system using a few complex, but very revealing, path flow diagrams. From these they can decide how to harvest revenues through transaction taxes and fees rather than sales taxes. Oh, yes, I see the possibility of a graduated flat-tax system coming based on some metric of size, and they need the concentration of infrastructure into a few well chosen hands in order to identify the best algorithms of taxation strategies possible.

    As we all know, this system’s Achilles heel is its centralization. When it fails it will fail spectacularly. The sooner it fails, the better. If it fails too late, the entrepreneurship and creativity of the human spirit might be too severely crippled to recover–and that might end the species without some type of intervention. The trans-humanists will not like the heaven of their creation because the gravitational pull of their collective greed coalesces into a singularity they cannot control. In the end it consumes them and everything in its orbit. It’s failed every time it’s been tried–because the universe is governed by a set of galactic laws they do not understand. They have forgotten who they are–and that will be their ruin.

    1. Robert Barricklow

      First off cloud centric.
      Yet, there are at least three major clouds
      getting the centric ink; all under the umbrella of
      [Centric Inc./Amazon, Google, Microsoft]
      Ah, but whose is managing the Fed’s coupons?
      [As w/ Doctor Farrell; I’m posting as I read, & were on the same wavelength, as your now at Amazon too/3rd line on my computer screen.]
      Yes! It’s in sync w/a rentier type of economy. The CCP/Ernst Stavro Blofeld Re-Set.
      Oh! That stinking rat Steve Forbes’/flat tax.
      Yes the algorithms will become a major structure of ANY infrastructure. A truly hidden system of unimaginable structural violence. A baked in the cake poison pill continually by innocent victims; imposed by Borg bureaucrats .
      OrigensChild,
      Absolutely loved your last paragraph!
      Two magnificent writings[Doctor Farrell’s & Yours] on the upcoming marriage of the U.S. Treasury and crypto currencies.

      [Now onto other comments]

    2. Having had many spiritual experiences in the latter half of my life, I am curious how the trans-humanists will ‘cope’ with those aspects of Being. Telepathy is quite real for higher-level Beings, so they know exactly what trans-humanist plans are for humanity. I guess it comes down to how ‘passive’ the Other Side is, regarding trans-humanist goals…

  7. Robert Barricklow

    Before I even read this blog…
    I’m getting so tired of the Ministry of Truth’s narrative maintenance crews that its pathetic.

    So, the Ministry of Truth is connected to the Ministry of Treasury in the cents/sense of binary control. Analogue won’t do[cash/crowds in bars and churches doing the human exchange of information].
    It’s ALL about CONTROL.
    Mind Control is the mission objective.

    Now the real problem between these two juxtapositions is information. Both are information sources and when combined they may tell a tale they don’t want to be known.
    You see I used to be a fortune teller of sorts; and the real problems in that profession begin when your right. Because, “they” absolutely have to know who leaked the information.
    So the digital currency is, as we know here, not a currency. Even worse; it’s got back doors galore. Now, when crowds get together, some parts of the conversation will start adding up to more than the gestalt whole.

    As far as it’s the future?
    Well, it’s the future “they” want.
    NOT the future mankind wants.
    Taxes on the little people[99%ers];
    for the less than 1%.
    U’d have to be a literal no brainer to fall for it.

    Absolutely loved it!
    One system. Many currencies.
    The CCP tie-in is mag wifi/cent$ itself!
    To digitize everything; including You!
    [We control the horizontal.
    We control the vertical.
    We can roll the currencies, make it flutter.]

    1. Robert Barricklow

      Do the split as insurance[gambling term].

      Exactly, it’s Whoseville writ large!

      Thought experiment.
      Is the poor man’s weapon in the future
      a rocket payload of exploding sand into space.
      Space would the become a beach[polite site]

      With all those electrical blackouts,
      brownouts, and don’t forget that…
      Sun “they’re” experimenting with.
      Now there’s a real corona[l] problem
      of mass ejection.
      Long story short>
      Solution to energy/data problem?
      More CONTROL!

      1. RB: I wrote my speculation with respect to the centralization problem in my comments above. Feel free to shred them.

  8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvsp9vAZc-A

    This should be watched by everyone here. That’s why I have a very serious problem with the abrahmaic way of thinking, everything in Abrahamic is binary. Everything must be evil OR good, there is no concept that a person can be good and evil at the same time. If you following the way of Lucifer, by default you are evil, no one asks why we considering Lucifer as evil. Where are the proofs he is evil? We consider him evil because he was a rebel? I know even for an atheist such things are blasphemous because the Abrahamic mindset is so much embedded into the west.

    That’s why the intrinsic hatred of dharmic religions is rampant in the west.

    1. Funny my other half and I just had similar conversation today. We threw Communism and Socialism also into the Abrahamic mindset because this is the system that bore them.

      My personal theory is no matter what the system, those ruling in the west of India will fall into that mindset as those whom become ensnarled into it. Due to the lack of understanding Karma. Tis a pity the western mindset, for the most part, confuses Karma with the afterlife. If they consider it at all.

      Peace.

    2. AK: There is no question that practitioners of these faiths have had a huge impact on other cultures, but I sometimes wonder if blaming the Abrahamic tradition for these excesses is yet another canard. Colonialism wasn’t practiced by Abrahamic faiths exclusively, and all colonizing peoples were guilty of many of the behaviors often blamed on Christians–usually to a worse degree. Rome was far more destructive than some nations in the West, and they were hardly practitioners of any Abrahamic faith. Of the western empires it’s tough to say who was worse–the Spanish or the English. Both might have embraced Christianity, but they hardly practiced it completely when economic and political circumstances were defined according to monarchical or oligarchical designs. I don’t think its entirely fruitful to blame Christianity for all of these faults. Indeed, the attitude is defining the problem too narrowly. Religion may have been often used as a tool to justify the activities, but in the end, everyone knows systems of belief can be twisted to achieve resolute ends producing atrocities that are alien to the faith system’s original provenance. Pagan empires were just as guilty–and generally more wreck less. Indeed, many of those were designed to engender conflict–not prevent it.

      Anecdotally, I have worked with quite a few people from your culture and we got along fine. I have a deep sense of appreciation for your culture, though I hardly know much about it, and I thoroughly enjoy your cuisine. None of my Hindi friends ever thought my Christian beliefs were binary in the way you describe–and many were pleasantly surprised at how open minded and congenial I could be when given the chance to interact on a day to day basis. Most, when the topic of Christianity was discussed, were curious as to why I didn’t fit the stereo-type–and that was always a very fun conversation. I doubt seriously any of my comments will change your mind, and I can appreciate how these attitudes are now weights many of us have to bear. But I hardly think Judaism or Christianity is nearly as dialectical as you envision–though I am certain Marxism, Communism and Socialism are. As far as binary dialectics go, those are the harden examples. They have no sense of civil liberties or human rights whatsoever! They insist on one shared synthesis of a singular model or design–and this is a thing to which most Christians and Jews would find frightening. What is missing in your opinion of Christianity is one fundamental plank in the system of our faith: we are all imagers of God. We share a subset of his features by His design–and with that comes some commitments, responsibilities and obligations. That we fail means we are not yet perfect–but aspire to be so. All humans are His offspring–His Children. Even Lucifer remains His child, but it was Lucifer who wanted, and was granted, a divorce. Even your own avatars of Vishnu would not tolerate a coup by a child without consequence. Lucifer remains unrepentent because of habit of will prevents him from doing so. That’s how our theology works. It’s hardly binary–because relationships are not binary. When power-brokers use religion as a means to an end is when the binary thinking comes into play–and of this the West is guilty of much!

      1. Robert Barricklow

        Then there is that tinkering w/the genetic code long ago; that splitting of an androgynous man? Either way, or some other means; the code of – the man in His image – may have been purposely changed? If so, I wonder how many times.
        The re-set is another change; but this is one being done inhouse, by inbreds.

      2. Interesting commentary, OC… and I’m not even a theist. I wonder if what Arpit is describing is more Zoroastrian/Manichaean than Abrahamic. While the Abrahamic traditions see things in terms of good and evil, I’m not sure Christianity is strictly binary. Could a purgatory or sevens circles of Hell fit into a strictly binary system? Or could the notion of gradations of good, as seen in the idea that there are common people, saints, angels, archangels, and so on?

        1. Zorostrians are not like that. One can visit India at anytime to feel the religion of Zorostrians.

      3. Wait a minute, I wasn’t going into it. But as you pushing me into it.

        No one blaming Abrahamic or as your more focused toward Christianity, for colonialism. Or pagans were holier than thou. No, I never said this.

        Even once I wrote here the mistakes/faults or evilness of Krishna. But he is still a god. If you want I go into the details.

        And as for talking with Indians (Hindi is a language, not ethnicity), two types of talks happen, one in front of white people, which is all hunky-dory. And the real talks between brown people when white leave. So, no they are not telling you the full story. And there is a second kind of Indian, who don’t even know anything about the homeland or any dharmic traditions. So, they won’t be any use to you.

        And here, if you thinking only communism, marxism is only binary, then it be pretty hard to describe it further. And it was not focused toward that PoV, more toward Dr. Farrell where he was describing the influence of Lucifer.

        Also, who said Vishnu never faced a power struggle? Shiv and Vishnu fought a battle over it. But again how Lucifer’s rebel make him evil? or incarnation of evilness?

        You are exactly describing what I was saying, and when Christianity starts to describe him as evil, you are choosing the path of binary. What if he had won? Then god be evil? I don’t want to go there, I know several people don’t like it.

        1. I apologize for equating Hindus and Indians in the same breath. You are correct in pointing out that this is a bias against which we should all guard ourselves. For this, and for making you think I was pushing an argument, I do apologize.

          With respect to your sharing the reality of interactions between Indians and Indians as opposed to Indians with foreigners, of this I am very much aware. That was my point. It’s been ages since I spent time with people from your land but there was a time when these interactions were very common–and very welcomed. Casual relationships and close friendships are two very distinct things–and the latter can put many sons or daughters in conflict with their parents, as you well know.

          I will defer any further conversation regarding the Lucifer equivalency to evil discussion for the same reasons you are trying to avoid one. I wish to be both respectful and approachable. With respect to the claim of Christianity and Judaism as binary systems, I will agree to disagree in part. I will admit there are forms of Christianity and Christianity that are two dimensional–and those fit your definition four-square. Yet there are those forms that are far more subtle and operate in more than 2 dimensions. They share opinions of absolutes with respect to good and evil, but these absolutes operate in a subspace of possibilities that are, by nature, neither good nor evil–benign, present, but active. In these forms good and evil are defined by the consequence of activity within that subspace, and these consequences become the boundaries for how good and evil are defined. If you still wish to maintain the results are binary, well, it’s your prerogative. Some of use would say love is good no matter who is loving, whereas hatred is evil no matter who is hating. Then again, some of us would hesitate to make a decision with respect to sharing with others until the consequence of the sharing is known within the person’s life and thinking, and the consequences of what is shared is manifest through their actions.

          Peace and good will. And, by the way, I, too, dislike what we in the west have done to a noble people and country. I wish I could erase these stains. It is better if we all step outside of political, social and economic circumstance and commune with one another as equals.

        2. Christianity as taught and practiced by the Romans and their vassel kingdoms was a horror story and could be viewed as quite evil and used for evil intent. Same as a lot of other religions. I see three main conscious states that themselves can be broken down into many overlapping spectrums. There’s the indifferent, divine, and demonic. All spectrums flow through everything and different entities are born resonating more strongly in one catagory or another. But they are not stuck in what they are born more strongly into and can change if they want to bad enough or because of their experiences and reactions to those experiences. But many don’t. But most have all spectrums in them and can display any of those spectrums. They just gravitate naturally towards one spectrum or another. In the conflict between the two polar opposite extremes which ever one exerts the most influence on the indifferent generally is manifested to a greater degree. Some see indifference as the greatest state and the end of all conflict. Some see the divine consciousness as the way to the greatest experiences and existence possible. The demonic resonances just want dominion over everything and to consume and destroy everything.

          1. In retrospect, I appear to be a little bit of everything. But my demonic aspect generally just shows itself when confronted by the demonic, one too many times.

    3. Robert Barricklow

      A global problem: media.
      A media that has similarities w/one of the theme’s in Doctor Farrell’s blog today. Rephrasing that theme:
      ‘One’ media narrative control ‘system’;
      ‘many’ distributors.
      Only a few of the alternative media generators actually go off script and ‘shred’ them
      [using OrigensChild’s term]

    4. Arpit – It’s true the Western mind tends to be more binary, but I don’t believe there’s an intrinsic hatred of dharmic religions in the West. Hindu and Buddhist ideas have been embraced by many in the West since the 19th century. Within Christianity itself, Calvinism (with its doctrine of predestination) is basically dharmic. I think what modern Westerners instinctively dislike is when the concept of dharma or karma is used to justify an oppressive social or political system. I personally believe that kind of justification is a perversion of the doctrine of dharma and karma–but any religion can be used to keep people from rebelling against a political system.

  9. Interesting article.
    The Bitcoin maximalists have always been of the “down with the banks” idea(Which I am ok with). The retort to that is.”Sure, you can have your Bitcoin but if we close the on ramps and off ramps your Bitcoin will become difficult to use”. With the Treasury Department insisting on KYC for all transactions over a certain amount, they will have control of the on ramps and off ramps.
    Fortunately, this is like a crazy science fiction movie.
    Within the world of crypto currencies there are some that are private which again can be banned from exchanges. But there are decentralized exchanges in which people can exchange their crypto currencies between the different types with no central authority in charge.
    Also, when people have their currencies in their private wallets they can use different private currencies to trade amongst themselves.
    With technology, the government will always be one step behind. It’s like cutting off a starfish leg and two of them grow back.
    That still won’t stop them from trying to seek control over the whole situation.
    Should be interesting.

    1. Joseph, maybe you know something I do not see. This scamdemic is designed to ultimately centralize every corporate data center into a series of clouds controlled by a few corporations who own all of the infrastructure. If all of the data centers disappear and are consolidated in the hands of corporations like Microsoft, et. al., this freezes into place the ability to monitor transactions, to tax and to interdict as needed. If everything in the cloud passes through a few corporations how do you achieve this independence you tout so loudly? Regulation does not have to be overt. You regulate from within the infrastructure itself.

      I think you are working on a distributed network model that is itself being dismantled at the banking layer. I don’t think the goal is to permit network model transactions outside of their system once the system is set up and prototyped. The last thing they want is an open system for general use. The history of banking tells us that every open banking system we’ve had was destroyed–or collapsed into a closed one. The internet of things becomes two networks–one for the global public economy and one for the private system of control with its hypostomes pulling equity from the public system and injecting debits back in the system in the form of debits for taxes and fees. All it takes is a new Global Federal Reserve Act of 2025 to end all of these private exchanges–and the feasting begins immediately. Am I missing something? Please. Enlighten me.

      1. Yes, the powers that shouldn’t be do not like open systems.
        But maybe we have a chance with the encrypted digital networks.
        In fact they are so worried about them that the IRS put a several hundred thousand dollar bounty out for anyone who could crack the private crypto currency network, Monero.
        There are all sorts of distributed networks coming online for distributed storage of videos, data, transactions. While they do use the general Internet, they are encrypted and not visible. And I do believe that the encryption will advance even as quantum computing comes online.
        There are over 7000 crypto currencies now. A large number of them are completely private coins. No personal data is transmitted with the transaction.
        I’m hoping that as the government may try to crack down, that it becomes a game of wack-a-mole for them to deal with this vast number of networks.
        Also, crypto currency networks are worldwide. They are global and soon they will be probably in the satellites that Elon Musk is launching. While the US has a large amount of the global economy, I do see that slipping away and with that, its influence.
        I remain optimistic.

    2. Robert Barricklow

      From the beginnings of bitcoin; “they” knew the control would be through distribution chokeholds. In other words, centralization by design. Which why China is building out a separate internet of their own. Yet it too; will have chokepoints, by design.
      Sometime, in the near future, an internet of sorts will be – by design from the grassroots up. The things will change. Iot be damned.

    3. Whoever controls the infrastructure of the internet controls the internet. Whoever controls the internet can monitor or control anything that uses the internet. So unless cryptocurrencies are going to exist on some other infrastructure, I don’t see how they’re going to successfully elude government or bank control.

      1. Also, the overt government may always be one step behind, but the covert military-intelligence-banking complex (the people actually in control) will always be two steps ahead.

  10. While granting with C.A. Fitts that “cryptos” are not currencies but credits with the company store, a key point is that R-schild controlled clearing systems are cut out of the transaction and they are not amused. If anybody has non-standard (zero-point etc.) power generating tech, of the ancient or modern variety, “they” will have it, so it’s not a matter of paying electricity bills. So it could be something involving the physics of loads on a worldwide system. But there is the consciousness factor. With increasing awareness of the implications of the fact that money power, which formerly fed off kinetic energy, is now “on the grid”, that very same grid is getting “hacked” and is racing towards the same fate as the various parasitical pecuniary potentates of past millennia….

    1. I cant help but feel they are going to claim some spurious grounds to squeeze out anything they cannot control or harvest. Any kind of independence is anathema to them.

  11. anakephalaiosis

    Theatrical story plot:

    Pontius Pilate was building aqueduct, from Bethlehem to Jerusalem, while Roman empire was preparing conquest of Britain.

    The former meant free water for all, and the latter is predator capitalism, of spoils and slaves. But Caiaphas refused to pay for the free water.

    The rainwater cisterns in Jerusalem had been a former power tool, that controlled scarcity. One either submitted to the high money priest, or died from thirst.

    Both Pilate and Christ had a common enemy in Caiaphas, who was big boss moneylender, who provided fake holiness, to predator capitalism in imperial conquest.

    So Britons secretly delivered a perfumed Pendragon (007), who got a Mickey Finn on the cross, and smelling salts for resurrection, in operation Monty Python.

    Then gospel writers became spin doctors, who spun tales, to support the miraculous downfall of Babylon’s Banksters, in rejoice of hallelujah.

    The enemy of my enemy, is my friend. Qui bono. Quo vadis.

    1. Plus being in Siberia would cut costs on the cooling systems needed to run such a large crypto harvesting system. I might set up a small mining operation of my own someday but I will never buy into crypto.

  12. I am presuming that the Treasury Dept has been ‘captured’ long ago by the Fed. I am also presuming that the Fed is just a public front for the the Cabal/TPTB/SPMotU/Phoenician Navy ‘families’. So…

    Joseph: “…the system, and those controlling it, will be behind a one way mirror, able to see what everyone else is doing, while being able to manipulate that system for their own covert transactions.”

    A book which I read long ago by James Bamford, “The Puzzle Palace,” mentioned that there was a code-breaker in the US military after WWI named Herbert Yardley. When the sleuthing was shut-down from above, he formed a semi-clandestine outfit to keep reading foreign traffic of embassies and consulates in Washington and New York.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Yardley
    en . wikipedia . org/wiki/Black_Chamber
    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/12/82-years-before-edward-snowden-there-was-herbert-o-yardley/282019/
    Eventually, his efforts were discovered by higher circles. Secretary of State Stimson declared, “Gentlemen do not read each other’s mail,” and basically fired Yardley. This forced-shutdown occurred in the early 30s, before the manipulation of Hitler into power and the run-up into WWII.

    One wonders whether the elimination of Yardley’s “Black Chamber” oversight was NECESSARY for the plans being hatched – i.e., the elites talking back-and-forth across the Atlantic in perfect secrecy.

    Now, we have the reverse: The elites want access to ALL transactional information, while employing the MSM to carefully ‘massage’ what is released to the public…

    1. Stealing from others, whether literally, figuratively or symbolically show, in its self, whose teaching (fatherhood) they follow. Aggrandizement / worshiping the creature / creation while willfully, repeatedly, purposefully ignoring, denying, & abominating the God of all creation is an ancient Foundation of the Kaos Korps / those without Peace or its Prince .. and a huge gaping gate (way of Cain – Jude 11) to Abaddon and the pathway of Nimrod gang theology that will steal, if you legally allow them access, your material, intellectual & True spiritual inheritance.

      1. Prior to WW1, the basis for ‘Royal German Saxe-Coburg’ dominated ‘5eyes’ secret surveillance & manipulation through the media & communications networks had already been agreed on both sides of the Atlantic by the occult narco banksters.
        “Accuse others openly of doing wrong while doing exactly the same in deception & benefiting from .. ” rules for thee but not for me – star chamber – privy council – senior executive service legal system.

Comments are closed.